This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 24, 2023.
Should be a dismabiguation page as per WP:TWODABS. Great Britain men's Olympic football team has only competed a few times and not since 2012 (and no plans to compete again), whereas the women have competed at every Olympics since 2012. Thus, it's equally likely people will be looking for the men's team (for historic articles) or for the women's team (for recent articles). There are 64 mainspace links to this redirect which would need to be fixed. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 13:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
19:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete per reason 10 ("The redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject"). This redirect was created as a placeholder on the request of Rgdem999 who appears to be inactive. No other potential Royal Navy ships are redirected rather than being redlinked. Tevildo ( talk) 19:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Barbie also came out on this date, making this a bit ambiguous if it were to only refer to movies. I'm unsure if this should keep its current redirect as Oppenheimer's ad does seem to use 7.21.23 much more than Barbie's did, but also this doesn't necessarily unambiguous refer to movies either. I'm split between keep, retarget to Barbenheimer, retarget to 2023#July (although July 21 is not mentioned specifically) or delete. Tartar Torte 17:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 2#Combat jujitsu
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 2#Fanta Pineapple and Grapefruit
Apparent failed crystal balling (per creating edit summary) - not mentioned at target. If this is deleted then the entry at R800 can be removed and R800 (CPU) promoted to the undisambiguated title * Pppery * it has begun... 20:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
J947 †
edits
10:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Edward-Woodrow :) [
talk
14:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
After closing the move at Shoot, I went to update the redirects, and stumbled across a couple that didn't make sense to me. I don't think Shoot (botany) is the best target for any of these; not sure about Heteroblasty (botany) either, and they may fall under WP:R#D10 as broad topics that need their own articles (especially Anisophylly, which is not mentioned at either target). At the very least, Heterophylly and Heterophyllous should be synced. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 04:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards,
SONIC
678
05:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Edward-Woodrow :) [
talk
14:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
I believe that all these should redirect to the same page. I think it's better for all of them to redirect to Wikipedia:Universal Code of Conduct. Just as a note, I made the last 2 ( Wikipedia:CoC and Wikipedia:Coc) QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 09:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
J947 †
edits
11:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Edward-Woodrow :) [
talk
14:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
"Notable", as the name of a template, implies that it should be added to articles on topics editors have concluded are notable in the way {{ Sources exist}} is used rather than for a topic of questionable notability. I think this should, therefore, be retargeted to Template:Sources exist after the 128 existing mainspace transclusions are converted to {{ Notability}}. ~ UN6892 t c 14:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
05:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete - This is an oddly longstanding undiscussed redirect. I can't find any references of this sort of abbreviation for the show, and it has 0 hits from what I can find anyway. estar8806 ( talk) ★ 22:53, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
05:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete - It's been used 372 times since 2015, but did they find the 'feld they were looking for? Absent any evidence of use, it's not an appropriate redirect. signed, Rosguill talk 23:59, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete - Implausible and ambiguous search term. estar8806 ( talk) ★ 22:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
05:32, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 24, 2023.
Should be a dismabiguation page as per WP:TWODABS. Great Britain men's Olympic football team has only competed a few times and not since 2012 (and no plans to compete again), whereas the women have competed at every Olympics since 2012. Thus, it's equally likely people will be looking for the men's team (for historic articles) or for the women's team (for recent articles). There are 64 mainspace links to this redirect which would need to be fixed. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 13:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
19:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete per reason 10 ("The redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject"). This redirect was created as a placeholder on the request of Rgdem999 who appears to be inactive. No other potential Royal Navy ships are redirected rather than being redlinked. Tevildo ( talk) 19:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Barbie also came out on this date, making this a bit ambiguous if it were to only refer to movies. I'm unsure if this should keep its current redirect as Oppenheimer's ad does seem to use 7.21.23 much more than Barbie's did, but also this doesn't necessarily unambiguous refer to movies either. I'm split between keep, retarget to Barbenheimer, retarget to 2023#July (although July 21 is not mentioned specifically) or delete. Tartar Torte 17:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 2#Combat jujitsu
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 2#Fanta Pineapple and Grapefruit
Apparent failed crystal balling (per creating edit summary) - not mentioned at target. If this is deleted then the entry at R800 can be removed and R800 (CPU) promoted to the undisambiguated title * Pppery * it has begun... 20:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
J947 †
edits
10:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Edward-Woodrow :) [
talk
14:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
After closing the move at Shoot, I went to update the redirects, and stumbled across a couple that didn't make sense to me. I don't think Shoot (botany) is the best target for any of these; not sure about Heteroblasty (botany) either, and they may fall under WP:R#D10 as broad topics that need their own articles (especially Anisophylly, which is not mentioned at either target). At the very least, Heterophylly and Heterophyllous should be synced. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 04:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards,
SONIC
678
05:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Edward-Woodrow :) [
talk
14:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
I believe that all these should redirect to the same page. I think it's better for all of them to redirect to Wikipedia:Universal Code of Conduct. Just as a note, I made the last 2 ( Wikipedia:CoC and Wikipedia:Coc) QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 09:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
J947 †
edits
11:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Edward-Woodrow :) [
talk
14:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
"Notable", as the name of a template, implies that it should be added to articles on topics editors have concluded are notable in the way {{ Sources exist}} is used rather than for a topic of questionable notability. I think this should, therefore, be retargeted to Template:Sources exist after the 128 existing mainspace transclusions are converted to {{ Notability}}. ~ UN6892 t c 14:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
05:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete - This is an oddly longstanding undiscussed redirect. I can't find any references of this sort of abbreviation for the show, and it has 0 hits from what I can find anyway. estar8806 ( talk) ★ 22:53, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
05:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete - It's been used 372 times since 2015, but did they find the 'feld they were looking for? Absent any evidence of use, it's not an appropriate redirect. signed, Rosguill talk 23:59, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete - Implausible and ambiguous search term. estar8806 ( talk) ★ 22:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
05:32, 24 July 2023 (UTC)