This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 18, 2022.
Hackney North Star
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete.
✗plicit 23:56, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
There’s nothing called Hackney North Star it’s just called North Star it was accidentally put down as Hackney North Star.
BurudaKidd (
talk) 19:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Procedural, not properly tagged for deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 23:58, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:Mozambican -politician-stub
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Wikipedia:SANDBOX
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
✗plicit 23:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Marked as a "shortcut", but is the same length as the target.
Zuata (
talk) 21:59, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. Completley valid {{R from modification}}. This redirect has over 21,000 incoming links and receives over 200 page views a month. Since this is fully protected it also has the nice side effect of preventing people using this title as a sandbox, look at the page history.
192.76.8.77 (
talk) 22:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per 21,000 (!!!) incoming links that would be broken for no particularly good reason.
eviolite(talk) 02:37, 20 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Deputy editor
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. LizRead!Talk! 02:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete both. Could apply to the deputy/assistant of any type of editor. I think it would be better to defer to search results rather than targeting
Editor (disambiguation), though that would probably be an improvement over the current target.
Mdewman6 (
talk) 20:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 18:11, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Kevin Sellers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. In addition to not being mentioned at the target, participants supported deleting this redirect to allow the search results to guide the readers to their desired subject, which may include the screenwriter or what appears to be an audio engineer (mentioned at
Supralingua and
Star Wars: The Clone Wars (2008 TV series)). There was insufficient support to conclude that one of these individuals was the primary target to justify retargeting the nominated redirect elsewhere.
✗plicit 23:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned at target. There are passing mentions of a seemingly unrelated screenwiter in various articles. ~~~~ User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk) 17:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep, retarget or create article - The case of German and Williams brought him in. His name can also be retargeted to a suitable page, or an article can be created for the screen writer. --
Jax 0677 (
talk) 18:20, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Jax 0677: What do you mean by The case of German and Williams brought him in? --
Tavix(
talk) 20:56, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
So what? Do you think that is relevant enough to the case to have in the article? Do you disagree with
General Ization's
removal of the "unrelated murder arrest" section? --
Tavix(
talk) 17:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Reply - No reason to remove it, and I am willing for the quorum to discuss that here. Additionally, Sellers wrote Blue Skies Again, which would be a suitable redirect. --
Jax 0677 (
talk) 20:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete to reveal search results. --
Tavix(
talk) 20:56, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, for the same reason I removed the mention of Sellers' confession to an unrelated murder from the target article. Even if it was relevant to mention that he was questioned about the Williams/German murders,
WP:BLP1E. The tipster may have thought it was appropriate to mention Sellers to the investigators of the Williams/German murders, but there is no evidence that he was ever seriously considered a suspect in those murders, and we do not generally list everyone who has been questioned in a murder investigation, much less consider them notable enough for an article (or even a redirect). General IzationTalk 00:26, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 18:10, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
Veverve (
talk) 20:40, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment - I have started this section to discuss whether or not "Kevin Sellers" should redirect to Blue Skies Again. --
Jax 0677 (
talk) 17:12, 19 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Maybe, but this does not need its own subsection of the debate. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 19:32, 19 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete to facilitate uninhibited Search (there are 8 mentions).
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 13:12, 20 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pink Friday 2
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
no mention at target --
dylx 17:39, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Apparently the rumored name for another album/follow-up to
Pink Friday since 2020. Delete. I'm also okay with adding a mention of it to
Pink Friday and redirecting to the appropriate section, but prefer deleting per
WP:CRYSTAL.
eviolite(talk) 03:15, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 18:08, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
0rz
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. LizRead!Talk! 02:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Implausible
Mixed script redirect, the first charecter here is the number zero rather than the letter o (I suppose 0 vs O isn't really mixed script, but the same arguments apply and it's just as implausible as a search term).
192.76.8.77 (
talk) 17:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: Similar redirects have previously been kept at RfD as "plausible", though I can't link any specific cases right now. ~~~~ User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk) 18:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Emoticon#Orz which is probably the only plausible use of "orz" that could have the o replaced with a 0.
eviolite(talk) 18:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Pretty common alternative spelling online I would say
C933103 (
talk) 05:27, 14 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment this is a very plausible typo since it is very common to substitute 0 for o and vice versa. Also the [o] key is next to the [0] key on QWERTY English language keyboards. And Arabic numerals appear on English language keyboards, so it isn't like it is a script that doesn't appear on Englsh language keyboards --
65.92.246.142 (
talk) 06:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 18:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Plausible to mistake or mistype "0" instead of a capital "O", so should target
Orz, its current target, which is a dab page for any use of orz.
Mdewman6 (
talk) 20:37, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nominator
192.76.8.77 (
talk) 19:36, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
CNR from article space, not encylopedic —
xaosfluxTalk 14:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Request withdrawn bad nomination! —
xaosfluxTalk 14:48, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
WikiProject Women in Red
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nominator.
192.76.8.77 (
talk) 19:36, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Recently created CNR from article space. —
xaosfluxTalk 14:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Request withdrawn bad nomination! —
xaosfluxTalk 14:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Chemical Bond Approach
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
Otto Theodor Benfey#Earlham College. The retarget proposals addresses concerns raised by deletion and has late momentum. signed, Rosguilltalk 01:43, 2 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Deletion, because the former refers to a now discontinued textbook, meaning it should not be a redirect to the latter.
RekishiEJ (
talk) 09:23, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Not particularly opposed to this deletion. I waited rather long time for someone to make redirects from some missing topics lists I had noticed and then decided to make them myself and there are bound to be mistakes. In fact, I would welcome help with
my own lists of missing topics; some are certain to be just worthy of a redirect -
Skysmith (
talk) 11:17, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Otto Theodor Benfey#Earlham College for now. It appears that the Chemical Bond Approach also refers to a course/teaching method, and there are a few papers on it, so it's possible that
Chemistry education could be expanded with a mention to it (which would IMO be a better target.)
eviolite(talk) 03:40, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Well, the general concept would be a good redirect target for
Chemical bond approach, which doesn't currently exist, but the proper noun should target the book. The book is actually
The Chemical Bond Approach (which also doesn't exist as a redirect currently), but I still think the capitalized form should target the book, a case of
WP:DIFFCAPS, or technically, as a
WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT as a shortened version of the name for the book, taking priority over an incorrectly capitalized form of the concept in general, which I don't believe is really a proper noun.
Mdewman6 (
talk) 08:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
But yeah, since all of the pedagogical stuff stems from tbe book, if the book were described at a target like
Chemical education, more so than the brief mention at the proposed target, then yes that would then be a better target.
Mdewman6 (
talk) 08:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 14:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:Aleph
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 01:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Rather misleading since the target is not necessarily a transcription of
aleph in a Semitic script, and especially since it makes it harder to describe
aleph numbers in mathematics. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 08:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 06:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Weak keep per
MOS:APOSTROPHE, which says Letters resembling apostrophes, such as ʻokina, saltillo, Hebrew ayin and Arabic hamza, should be represented by those templates or by their Unicode values. - this should also extend to {{aleph}}. The standard Latin script transliteration of aleph indeed appears to be ʾ (not sure what "not necessarily a transcription" means - also see
Modifier letter right half ring), and I highly disagree that it "makes it harder to describe aleph numbers", as in that context it would be represented as <math>\aleph</math> or {{math|ℵ}}. The fact that it is not used at all is interesting though - I wonder if the plain Unicode character or its codepoint is used instead - so my !vote is weak. {{Rhr}} itself does not have mainspace uses either.
eviolite(talk) 04:05, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 14:36, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Weak 'delete'. I don't think it much matters either way.
— kwami (
talk) 23:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:54, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:Ancillariidaee-stub
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy Deleted. Under criteria G7.
192.76.8.77 (
talk) 20:13, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:K-stub
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:54, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete I'd expect this to be about Potassium (K) or Korea (K-Pop, K-Drama, K-Cinema, K-Rock, etc) --
65.92.246.142 (
talk) 05:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Unorganized territory (disambiguation)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G14. LizRead!Talk! 02:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)reply
CommentThesmp can you give a reason for proposed deletion? I'm not sure whether the issue is the potentially unrequired addition of (disambiguation) or something else.
Bonoahx (
talk) 20:10, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Bonoahx, first of all a page with '... (disambiguation)' in its title should not be redirected to an article. Secondly I opened an
merger proposal you may want to leave a comment there too.
Unincorporated area covers both the United States and Canada and all other countries, while
Unorganized area covers only Canada. --
Thesmp (
talk) 20:13, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Thank you, I think Delete per nom as it's not a disambiguation page and could potentially
WP:ASTONISH. I will reserve judgment on the merger though as I'm not familiar with the subject.
Bonoahx (
talk) 20:17, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete under Criterion
WP:G14 as A redirect that ends in "(disambiguation)" but does not redirect to a disambiguation page or a page that performs a disambiguation-like function..
192.76.8.77 (
talk) 20:18, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Talk:High-rise building
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Procedural close this was from a recent bold rename from High-rise building to Tower block. If that requires discussion, it should be opened separately.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff) 15:13, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
It Doesn't Often Snow At Christmas
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Australian Domestic Market
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay(talk) 15:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)reply
I see three main issues with this redirect. Firstly, the term (in reference to cars) appears to be totally made up, trying to be some equivalent to
Japanese domestic market. I can find no useage in reliable sources but this
[2] seems to suggest it is not really a term that is used. Secondly, even if the term is used by reliable sources, it would be about the automobiles specifically made in and for the local market, whereas the target is about automobile manufacturing in Australia both for domestic sale and export. Finally, the term is clearly quite ambigous, and could refer to just about anything. I do note that it is linked to in two articles,
Chrysler Hemi-6 Engine and
Volvo Redblock Engine, both piped, and in my opinion both should be removed (and I will shortly do so).
A7V2 (
talk) 08:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The two incoming links have been removed. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 08:04, 9 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:22, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. Highly ambiguous, not an established phrase for anything in particular as JDM is. Google searches show mostly aviation-related topics but also livestock and wine; JSTOR shows results about cinema, tobacco, energy, general economics/trading, and so on. If the redirect stays, it should be redirected to
Aviation in Australia, but as I said it's nowhere near an established term that can only refer to that.
eviolite(talk) 02:45, 20 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
MicroScript (programming language)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Was merged into target article by AfD
here and was removed from the target article as unreferenced/nonnotable
here. Figured I'd ask the community before messing with this. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 00:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
I can't say I really recall this, but if we aren't hosting any content at all on this extremely minor programming language delete seems like the obvious call. One could argue it was the more reasonable outcome of the original AFD, as the comments there besides the nom are all
WP:INHERIT arguments.
Beeblebrox (
talk) 01:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete as there does not appear to be enough secondary coverage to sustain any mention of it in the target article.
eviolite(talk) 02:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Tonga Time
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy Retarget. Speedy Retarget by @
Orangemike: who didn't close discussion here. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 23:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
(non-admin closure)reply
It would make more sense for this page to redirect to the
Time in Tonga article, than to the main
Tonga article.
Hextor26 (
talk) 00:14, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Yes. The article
Time in Tonga didn't exist at the time the redirect was created. So I agree.
Colonies Chris (
talk) 00:41, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedy close and
WP:BOLDly redirect. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:20, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Hextor26: uncontroversial (or seemingly uncontroversial) retargets like this don't require discussion. Of course it's fine if you aren't sure what a redirect should point to, or someone has reverted your retarget, but this one seems pretty obvious and you could have just changed the target. Retarget per nom.
A7V2 (
talk) 06:24, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 18, 2022.
Hackney North Star
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete.
✗plicit 23:56, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
There’s nothing called Hackney North Star it’s just called North Star it was accidentally put down as Hackney North Star.
BurudaKidd (
talk) 19:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Procedural, not properly tagged for deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 23:58, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:Mozambican -politician-stub
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Wikipedia:SANDBOX
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
✗plicit 23:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Marked as a "shortcut", but is the same length as the target.
Zuata (
talk) 21:59, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. Completley valid {{R from modification}}. This redirect has over 21,000 incoming links and receives over 200 page views a month. Since this is fully protected it also has the nice side effect of preventing people using this title as a sandbox, look at the page history.
192.76.8.77 (
talk) 22:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per 21,000 (!!!) incoming links that would be broken for no particularly good reason.
eviolite(talk) 02:37, 20 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Deputy editor
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. LizRead!Talk! 02:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete both. Could apply to the deputy/assistant of any type of editor. I think it would be better to defer to search results rather than targeting
Editor (disambiguation), though that would probably be an improvement over the current target.
Mdewman6 (
talk) 20:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 18:11, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Kevin Sellers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. In addition to not being mentioned at the target, participants supported deleting this redirect to allow the search results to guide the readers to their desired subject, which may include the screenwriter or what appears to be an audio engineer (mentioned at
Supralingua and
Star Wars: The Clone Wars (2008 TV series)). There was insufficient support to conclude that one of these individuals was the primary target to justify retargeting the nominated redirect elsewhere.
✗plicit 23:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned at target. There are passing mentions of a seemingly unrelated screenwiter in various articles. ~~~~ User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk) 17:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep, retarget or create article - The case of German and Williams brought him in. His name can also be retargeted to a suitable page, or an article can be created for the screen writer. --
Jax 0677 (
talk) 18:20, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Jax 0677: What do you mean by The case of German and Williams brought him in? --
Tavix(
talk) 20:56, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
So what? Do you think that is relevant enough to the case to have in the article? Do you disagree with
General Ization's
removal of the "unrelated murder arrest" section? --
Tavix(
talk) 17:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Reply - No reason to remove it, and I am willing for the quorum to discuss that here. Additionally, Sellers wrote Blue Skies Again, which would be a suitable redirect. --
Jax 0677 (
talk) 20:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete to reveal search results. --
Tavix(
talk) 20:56, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, for the same reason I removed the mention of Sellers' confession to an unrelated murder from the target article. Even if it was relevant to mention that he was questioned about the Williams/German murders,
WP:BLP1E. The tipster may have thought it was appropriate to mention Sellers to the investigators of the Williams/German murders, but there is no evidence that he was ever seriously considered a suspect in those murders, and we do not generally list everyone who has been questioned in a murder investigation, much less consider them notable enough for an article (or even a redirect). General IzationTalk 00:26, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 18:10, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
Veverve (
talk) 20:40, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment - I have started this section to discuss whether or not "Kevin Sellers" should redirect to Blue Skies Again. --
Jax 0677 (
talk) 17:12, 19 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Maybe, but this does not need its own subsection of the debate. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 19:32, 19 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete to facilitate uninhibited Search (there are 8 mentions).
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 13:12, 20 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pink Friday 2
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
no mention at target --
dylx 17:39, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Apparently the rumored name for another album/follow-up to
Pink Friday since 2020. Delete. I'm also okay with adding a mention of it to
Pink Friday and redirecting to the appropriate section, but prefer deleting per
WP:CRYSTAL.
eviolite(talk) 03:15, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 18:08, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
0rz
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. LizRead!Talk! 02:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Implausible
Mixed script redirect, the first charecter here is the number zero rather than the letter o (I suppose 0 vs O isn't really mixed script, but the same arguments apply and it's just as implausible as a search term).
192.76.8.77 (
talk) 17:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: Similar redirects have previously been kept at RfD as "plausible", though I can't link any specific cases right now. ~~~~ User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk) 18:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Emoticon#Orz which is probably the only plausible use of "orz" that could have the o replaced with a 0.
eviolite(talk) 18:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Pretty common alternative spelling online I would say
C933103 (
talk) 05:27, 14 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment this is a very plausible typo since it is very common to substitute 0 for o and vice versa. Also the [o] key is next to the [0] key on QWERTY English language keyboards. And Arabic numerals appear on English language keyboards, so it isn't like it is a script that doesn't appear on Englsh language keyboards --
65.92.246.142 (
talk) 06:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 18:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Plausible to mistake or mistype "0" instead of a capital "O", so should target
Orz, its current target, which is a dab page for any use of orz.
Mdewman6 (
talk) 20:37, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nominator
192.76.8.77 (
talk) 19:36, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
CNR from article space, not encylopedic —
xaosfluxTalk 14:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Request withdrawn bad nomination! —
xaosfluxTalk 14:48, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
WikiProject Women in Red
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nominator.
192.76.8.77 (
talk) 19:36, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Recently created CNR from article space. —
xaosfluxTalk 14:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Request withdrawn bad nomination! —
xaosfluxTalk 14:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Chemical Bond Approach
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
Otto Theodor Benfey#Earlham College. The retarget proposals addresses concerns raised by deletion and has late momentum. signed, Rosguilltalk 01:43, 2 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Deletion, because the former refers to a now discontinued textbook, meaning it should not be a redirect to the latter.
RekishiEJ (
talk) 09:23, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Not particularly opposed to this deletion. I waited rather long time for someone to make redirects from some missing topics lists I had noticed and then decided to make them myself and there are bound to be mistakes. In fact, I would welcome help with
my own lists of missing topics; some are certain to be just worthy of a redirect -
Skysmith (
talk) 11:17, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Otto Theodor Benfey#Earlham College for now. It appears that the Chemical Bond Approach also refers to a course/teaching method, and there are a few papers on it, so it's possible that
Chemistry education could be expanded with a mention to it (which would IMO be a better target.)
eviolite(talk) 03:40, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Well, the general concept would be a good redirect target for
Chemical bond approach, which doesn't currently exist, but the proper noun should target the book. The book is actually
The Chemical Bond Approach (which also doesn't exist as a redirect currently), but I still think the capitalized form should target the book, a case of
WP:DIFFCAPS, or technically, as a
WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT as a shortened version of the name for the book, taking priority over an incorrectly capitalized form of the concept in general, which I don't believe is really a proper noun.
Mdewman6 (
talk) 08:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
But yeah, since all of the pedagogical stuff stems from tbe book, if the book were described at a target like
Chemical education, more so than the brief mention at the proposed target, then yes that would then be a better target.
Mdewman6 (
talk) 08:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 14:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:Aleph
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 01:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Rather misleading since the target is not necessarily a transcription of
aleph in a Semitic script, and especially since it makes it harder to describe
aleph numbers in mathematics. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 08:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 06:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Weak keep per
MOS:APOSTROPHE, which says Letters resembling apostrophes, such as ʻokina, saltillo, Hebrew ayin and Arabic hamza, should be represented by those templates or by their Unicode values. - this should also extend to {{aleph}}. The standard Latin script transliteration of aleph indeed appears to be ʾ (not sure what "not necessarily a transcription" means - also see
Modifier letter right half ring), and I highly disagree that it "makes it harder to describe aleph numbers", as in that context it would be represented as <math>\aleph</math> or {{math|ℵ}}. The fact that it is not used at all is interesting though - I wonder if the plain Unicode character or its codepoint is used instead - so my !vote is weak. {{Rhr}} itself does not have mainspace uses either.
eviolite(talk) 04:05, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 14:36, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Weak 'delete'. I don't think it much matters either way.
— kwami (
talk) 23:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:54, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:Ancillariidaee-stub
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy Deleted. Under criteria G7.
192.76.8.77 (
talk) 20:13, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:K-stub
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:54, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete I'd expect this to be about Potassium (K) or Korea (K-Pop, K-Drama, K-Cinema, K-Rock, etc) --
65.92.246.142 (
talk) 05:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Unorganized territory (disambiguation)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G14. LizRead!Talk! 02:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)reply
CommentThesmp can you give a reason for proposed deletion? I'm not sure whether the issue is the potentially unrequired addition of (disambiguation) or something else.
Bonoahx (
talk) 20:10, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Bonoahx, first of all a page with '... (disambiguation)' in its title should not be redirected to an article. Secondly I opened an
merger proposal you may want to leave a comment there too.
Unincorporated area covers both the United States and Canada and all other countries, while
Unorganized area covers only Canada. --
Thesmp (
talk) 20:13, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Thank you, I think Delete per nom as it's not a disambiguation page and could potentially
WP:ASTONISH. I will reserve judgment on the merger though as I'm not familiar with the subject.
Bonoahx (
talk) 20:17, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete under Criterion
WP:G14 as A redirect that ends in "(disambiguation)" but does not redirect to a disambiguation page or a page that performs a disambiguation-like function..
192.76.8.77 (
talk) 20:18, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Talk:High-rise building
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Procedural close this was from a recent bold rename from High-rise building to Tower block. If that requires discussion, it should be opened separately.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff) 15:13, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
It Doesn't Often Snow At Christmas
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Australian Domestic Market
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay(talk) 15:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)reply
I see three main issues with this redirect. Firstly, the term (in reference to cars) appears to be totally made up, trying to be some equivalent to
Japanese domestic market. I can find no useage in reliable sources but this
[2] seems to suggest it is not really a term that is used. Secondly, even if the term is used by reliable sources, it would be about the automobiles specifically made in and for the local market, whereas the target is about automobile manufacturing in Australia both for domestic sale and export. Finally, the term is clearly quite ambigous, and could refer to just about anything. I do note that it is linked to in two articles,
Chrysler Hemi-6 Engine and
Volvo Redblock Engine, both piped, and in my opinion both should be removed (and I will shortly do so).
A7V2 (
talk) 08:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The two incoming links have been removed. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 08:04, 9 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:22, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. Highly ambiguous, not an established phrase for anything in particular as JDM is. Google searches show mostly aviation-related topics but also livestock and wine; JSTOR shows results about cinema, tobacco, energy, general economics/trading, and so on. If the redirect stays, it should be redirected to
Aviation in Australia, but as I said it's nowhere near an established term that can only refer to that.
eviolite(talk) 02:45, 20 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
MicroScript (programming language)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Was merged into target article by AfD
here and was removed from the target article as unreferenced/nonnotable
here. Figured I'd ask the community before messing with this. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 00:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
I can't say I really recall this, but if we aren't hosting any content at all on this extremely minor programming language delete seems like the obvious call. One could argue it was the more reasonable outcome of the original AFD, as the comments there besides the nom are all
WP:INHERIT arguments.
Beeblebrox (
talk) 01:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete as there does not appear to be enough secondary coverage to sustain any mention of it in the target article.
eviolite(talk) 02:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Tonga Time
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy Retarget. Speedy Retarget by @
Orangemike: who didn't close discussion here. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 23:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
(non-admin closure)reply
It would make more sense for this page to redirect to the
Time in Tonga article, than to the main
Tonga article.
Hextor26 (
talk) 00:14, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Yes. The article
Time in Tonga didn't exist at the time the redirect was created. So I agree.
Colonies Chris (
talk) 00:41, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedy close and
WP:BOLDly redirect. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:20, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Hextor26: uncontroversial (or seemingly uncontroversial) retargets like this don't require discussion. Of course it's fine if you aren't sure what a redirect should point to, or someone has reverted your retarget, but this one seems pretty obvious and you could have just changed the target. Retarget per nom.
A7V2 (
talk) 06:24, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.