This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 17, 2022.
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 25#Timepass & Time pass
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 26#Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands
I found no source claiming this expression is ever used to designate this group or Old Catholicism.
Britannica does not say anything;
Google scholar uses refer to
catholic (term) with no reference to Old Catholics. It was previously stated that "Ancient Catholic Church" was one of the names of this group;
I have removed this information since it was nowhere to be found.
The best explanation I can find is that it is an erroneous translation of the expression 'Oud-Katholieke' ('Old Catholic').
The expression itself is very ambiguous.
Therefore, I think those should be deleted.
Note: the separation between this RfD and
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands is on purpose.
Veverve (
talk)
22:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 26#Live entertainment
If
Tradewind is ambiguous—which has been the editorial consensus
since 2006—then I think Tradewinds is as well. There's good reason to think that a reader spelling the term this way is looking for one of the eight entities called "Tradewinds" we disambiguate (or the one called TradeWinds), rather than for the concept of
trade winds, usually spelled as two words. Thus I think we should retarget to
Tradewind. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she/they)
05:38, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: (WikiNav still not working.)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
07:04, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:55, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Not mentioned in target article, thus not being clear what this redirect is meant to refer. (Also, per the redirect's edit history, looks as though the page was an article that was redirected a few days after it was created in 2011.) Steel1943 ( talk) 18:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
05:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
21:54, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete per WP:XY. The three subjects of this redirect ( Harry Potter (character), Ron Weasley, and Hermoine Granger) are distinct subjects with their own articles. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:40, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
such redirects point to a location in which both topics are discussed(all three in this case). I was trying to find a good place where they are all mentioned together. List of Harry Potter characters does a poor job of signifying character significance. Same for Wizarding World#Recurring cast and characters. Then I realized the current target gives this information in the second(!) sentence:
The novels chronicle the lives of a young wizard, Harry Potter, and his friends Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley, all of whom are students at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.That is a good introduction of the characters in question and includes links to all three articles should the searcher want to learn more about any or all of these characters. -- Tavix ( talk) 18:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
04:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
21:53, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 30#Triangulare
I do not know what to to with this redirect. This redirect seems very unlikely to help anyone. It also has capitalisation mistakes.
@
Shhhnotsoloud: has pointed out the article
Bigamy existed, and suggested at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 12#Bigamy (in Canon Law) that the redirect be deleted.
I would like to point out in case it may be useful, that
Legality of polygamy exists. However, I am not sure if it would be a good redirect, as the redirect might not be useful in itself with such a name.
Veverve (
talk)
13:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
16:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete because "History of Zoology" is not ambiguous and the target is not a disambiguation page. Speedy delete previously declined in Oct 19. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 18:08, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
06:29, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:53, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 1#Mana (Anglo-Saxon)
Breast cancer did not originate in anything related to Albania and the redirect is from Albanian to English. Faster than Thunder ( talk | contributions) 17:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Retargeting to Racism might be better than a cross-namespace redirect to this category which is a non-exhaustive list of articles. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 16:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 2#Left-wing fascism
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 30#Fascismo
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 30#Para-fascism
This relatively new redirect is cross-namespace but does not have to be. A better target may be Eden baronets (In the 2nd paragraph of Earl of Avon, the wikilink to Eden baronets is piped as "Eden family"). Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 13:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
This redirect is misleading, and basically an WP:EGG redirect. 1-2 finishes are not unique to Formula One, or even motorsport. It is unreasonable to assume that most, (or even 5% of) people looking up 1-2 finish, are looking for a Formula One stat. SSSB ( talk) 11:34, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
06:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
11:42, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 1#La Nueva
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 30#Barkburr
This redirect doesn't make sense to me. A reader searching on "emotional turmoil" is not looking for a discussion of van Gogh's state of mind while painting Wheat Fields. I wasn't able to find a more likely target; Emotion doesn't mention turmoil, and Emotional conflict has a single mention with no content to explain emotional turmoil. Many articles include the term, but none explain or discuss it. Schazjmd (talk) 20:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there more support for
emotional conflict?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
08:24, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Looking at older versions of this article before it was turned into a redirect it was "Drakes" in those and that has its own page now. The section "Drake Supermarkets" this redirect points to in Foodland (South Australia) no longer exists.
Options:
- Cube00 ( talk) 06:38, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 17, 2022.
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 25#Timepass & Time pass
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 26#Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands
I found no source claiming this expression is ever used to designate this group or Old Catholicism.
Britannica does not say anything;
Google scholar uses refer to
catholic (term) with no reference to Old Catholics. It was previously stated that "Ancient Catholic Church" was one of the names of this group;
I have removed this information since it was nowhere to be found.
The best explanation I can find is that it is an erroneous translation of the expression 'Oud-Katholieke' ('Old Catholic').
The expression itself is very ambiguous.
Therefore, I think those should be deleted.
Note: the separation between this RfD and
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands is on purpose.
Veverve (
talk)
22:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 26#Live entertainment
If
Tradewind is ambiguous—which has been the editorial consensus
since 2006—then I think Tradewinds is as well. There's good reason to think that a reader spelling the term this way is looking for one of the eight entities called "Tradewinds" we disambiguate (or the one called TradeWinds), rather than for the concept of
trade winds, usually spelled as two words. Thus I think we should retarget to
Tradewind. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she/they)
05:38, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: (WikiNav still not working.)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
07:04, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:55, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Not mentioned in target article, thus not being clear what this redirect is meant to refer. (Also, per the redirect's edit history, looks as though the page was an article that was redirected a few days after it was created in 2011.) Steel1943 ( talk) 18:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
05:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
21:54, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete per WP:XY. The three subjects of this redirect ( Harry Potter (character), Ron Weasley, and Hermoine Granger) are distinct subjects with their own articles. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:40, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
such redirects point to a location in which both topics are discussed(all three in this case). I was trying to find a good place where they are all mentioned together. List of Harry Potter characters does a poor job of signifying character significance. Same for Wizarding World#Recurring cast and characters. Then I realized the current target gives this information in the second(!) sentence:
The novels chronicle the lives of a young wizard, Harry Potter, and his friends Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley, all of whom are students at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.That is a good introduction of the characters in question and includes links to all three articles should the searcher want to learn more about any or all of these characters. -- Tavix ( talk) 18:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
04:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
21:53, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 30#Triangulare
I do not know what to to with this redirect. This redirect seems very unlikely to help anyone. It also has capitalisation mistakes.
@
Shhhnotsoloud: has pointed out the article
Bigamy existed, and suggested at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 12#Bigamy (in Canon Law) that the redirect be deleted.
I would like to point out in case it may be useful, that
Legality of polygamy exists. However, I am not sure if it would be a good redirect, as the redirect might not be useful in itself with such a name.
Veverve (
talk)
13:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
16:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete because "History of Zoology" is not ambiguous and the target is not a disambiguation page. Speedy delete previously declined in Oct 19. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 18:08, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
06:29, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:53, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 1#Mana (Anglo-Saxon)
Breast cancer did not originate in anything related to Albania and the redirect is from Albanian to English. Faster than Thunder ( talk | contributions) 17:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Retargeting to Racism might be better than a cross-namespace redirect to this category which is a non-exhaustive list of articles. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 16:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 2#Left-wing fascism
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 30#Fascismo
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 30#Para-fascism
This relatively new redirect is cross-namespace but does not have to be. A better target may be Eden baronets (In the 2nd paragraph of Earl of Avon, the wikilink to Eden baronets is piped as "Eden family"). Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 13:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
This redirect is misleading, and basically an WP:EGG redirect. 1-2 finishes are not unique to Formula One, or even motorsport. It is unreasonable to assume that most, (or even 5% of) people looking up 1-2 finish, are looking for a Formula One stat. SSSB ( talk) 11:34, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
06:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
11:42, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 1#La Nueva
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 30#Barkburr
This redirect doesn't make sense to me. A reader searching on "emotional turmoil" is not looking for a discussion of van Gogh's state of mind while painting Wheat Fields. I wasn't able to find a more likely target; Emotion doesn't mention turmoil, and Emotional conflict has a single mention with no content to explain emotional turmoil. Many articles include the term, but none explain or discuss it. Schazjmd (talk) 20:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there more support for
emotional conflict?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
08:24, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Looking at older versions of this article before it was turned into a redirect it was "Drakes" in those and that has its own page now. The section "Drake Supermarkets" this redirect points to in Foodland (South Australia) no longer exists.
Options:
- Cube00 ( talk) 06:38, 17 April 2022 (UTC)