This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 15, 2021.
Nonsense article created by an indefinitely blocked editor, see the entry's talk, procedural request fror deletion KIENGIR ( talk) 00:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
The article that this pointed to has been moved to Stuart Restoration. It makes no mention of fictional representations of the restoration. ( t · c) buidhe 20:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 23#(identifier) wikidata soft redirects
Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a duly sourced mention is added. signed, Rosguill talk 18:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
These number could refer to anything on Earth, no reason to redirect direct it to one particular football games when thousands of football games have this score Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 01:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Not a legal expert here, but "spoliation" does not always refer to spoliation of evidence; it can refer to general looting or pillaging. Google Dictionary defines the word as:
I think that a disambiguation page should be made with a link to looting as well as spoliation of evidence. Bangalamania ( talk) 19:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
I don't entirely agree with this redirect. On Wikipedia:About_the_sandbox#List_of_sandboxes, it says that the talk pages of all sandboxes are also sandboxes themselves. But this talk page is not redirecting to any sandbox, instead redirecting to Wikipedia talk:About the sandbox. But because user Lua sandboxes are always Module:Sandbox/Username/Module name, It's unclear to me what should be done with this redirect 54nd60x ( talk) 07:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
:::@
Pppery: Ok, maybe retarget to
Module:Sandbox?
54nd60x (
talk)
02:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
The name "Kamalam" has been given by the government of Gujara, India to this fruit. This is easy to verify. Seems like a reasonable redirect, but it's not mentioned in the article because all attempts to do so are reverted as WP:UNDUE - regional name only. So do we delete the redirect or add the mention in the article? MB 19:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
{{
redirect|kamalam|the Gujarati dragonfruit|Pitaya}}
or somesuchPlease add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf ( talk) 17:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Not only is it an implausible spelling of "Pussy" (unless it was " I Taut I Taw a Puddy-Tat") it doesn't even point to the Pussy Galore article. I'm leaning towards deletion but if it is kept, it should be retargeted to Pussy Galore. Dominicmgm ( talk) 16:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Implausible typo due to missing "ief" at end. Dominicmgm ( talk) 16:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
They should either both redirect to the corresponding "spelling" rcat templates ({{ R from alternative spelling}}, {{ R from misspelling}}) or to the corresponding "name" rcat templates ({{ R from alternative name}}, {{ R from incorrect name}}) or possibly to {{ R from modification}}. I would prefer both the first and the last over the second. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
{{
R from incorrect spelling}}
. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
01:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC); revised: 02:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC){{
R from incorrect hyphenation}}
to {{
R from incorrect spelling}}
(same goes for {{
R from incorrect punctuation}}
, below). The {{
R from alternative punctuation}}
and {{
R from alternative hyphenation}}
should continue to redir to {{
R from alternative spelling}}
. I've tweaked my !vote to reflect this. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼 —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
02:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC){{
R from incorrect punctuation}}
(likely to be an alias of {{
R from misspelling}}
unless/until we want a separate subcategory for it and make it a real template; I think right this moment it unnecessarily vaguely goes to the parent one level up, {{
R from incorrect name}}
). As for your list, some of that's not right. En dashes are not hyphens, so
Dunning Kruger effect is an {{
R from missing punctuation}}
(now redirs to {{
R from incorrect punctuation}}
) not an {{
R from missing hyphenation}}
(never mind that the latter presently redirs to {{
R from incorrect punctuation}}
; that might not always be true). Variants mistakenly using em dash instead of en dash should be {{
R from incorrect punctuation}}
because neither dash is a hyphen, and an em dash is never used for this purpose (in our style guide or anyone else's). Versions with hyphens instead of en dashes are probably fine with {{
R from alternative hyphenation}}
because various style guides do not use en dashes at all and instead supply a hyphen for this structure (it's a valid, well-attested style, just not WP:MOS style). I think I noted above, or meant to, that some people are going to overly-narrowly try to apply "spelling" to mean "letters, and letters only" when we mean "letters and other characters in the name". So, the template and categories may need documentation adjustments to indicate that they are inclusive of this, but that we prefer to use more specific templates for punctuation matters, in case we ever decide to more narrowly subcategorize them. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
00:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
They should both either redirect to the corresponding "spelling" rcat templates ({{ R from alternative spelling}}, {{ R from misspelling}}) or to {{ R from modification}}. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:10, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
{{
R from incorrect name}}
. Done. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
01:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC){{
R from incorrect punctuation}}
should go to {{
R from incorrect spelling}}
{{
R from incorrect name}}
(as in the case just above this one); fixed.{{
R from modification}}
. Might have been my own mistake. See RfD just above this one for additional details. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
01:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC); revised 02:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
{{
R from incorrect spelling}}
is a redirect itself to {{
R from misspelling}}
. I don't remember what the reason is for it's current target.
MClay1 (
talk)
10:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
{{
R from missing punctuation}}
or {{
R from alternative hyphenation}}
, they never need to be "exposed" to these being subcategorized under or redirecting to spelling templates. No head need asplode. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
00:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)PS: Actually making
Category:Redirects from incorrect punctuation be a real subcat of
Category:Redirects from misspellings would probably be helpful at this point. So probably would renaming the latter to
Category:Redirects from incorrect spellings, so it is more consistent with the rest of these names. The fact that misspellings is a legitimate word doesn't mean that our hands are tied into using it. Anyway, if there was a real subcat for the punctuation gaffes, and {{
R from incorrect punctuation}}
was a real template, this would ease some confusion by having all the hyphen error, etc., Rcat redirs to it, instead of to {{
R from misspelling}}
, which I would rename to {{
R from incorrect spelling}}
for consistency (i.e., just flip the template/redirect relationship between those two pagenames). Having punctuation ones redir to one with "spelling" in the name may trigger overly narrow and prescriptivist notions of what "spelling" can mean). This would fix several forms of confusion at once (cluttered category, inconsistently named category & template, and terminological dispute). I suppose it would even allow both spellings and modifications to be parent categories for anyone who would be confused to not find punctuation stuff under modifications. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
19:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Minor character from warhammer 40,000, not mentioned anywhere on wikipedia. The article this is supposed to be targeting was redirected in 2017 following an AfD nomination, so as it stands this redirect does not help readers. 86.23.109.101 ( talk) 13:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Minor species from the warhammer 40,000 universe, not mentioned at the target article or anywhere else on wikipedia. This used to target a list article where the species had an unsourced 1 line entry, which was converted into a redirect over a year ago due to being unsourced and tagged for notability issues for 6 years. As it stands this redirect is completely unhelpful to readers. 86.23.109.101 ( talk) 13:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Minor, non notable character from the warhammer 40,000 universe, not mentioned at the target article or anywhere else in wikipedia. The section this redirect is supposed to be targeting hasn't existed for years. The article content here was transwikied to the 40K wikia in 2008, after which it was converted into a redirect with the edit summary "transwikied already, no 3rd party sources possible." 86.23.109.101 ( talk) 13:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
An extremeley minor, non-notable faction from the warhammer 40,000 universe that is not mentioned at the target article or anywhere else in the encyclopedia. The article in the page history was prodded in 2008, which resulted in the content being transwikied to the 40K wikia and the page turned into a redirect after it was found that no thrid party sources at all cover this faction 86.23.109.101 ( talk) 13:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
A redirect to a DAB page. According to a note on the Talk Page, this title relates to ¿Dónde está Elisa? (American TV series); but that article does not mention it. The redirect is ambiguously linked in five articles, in all of which it relates to the 1997 Chilean telenovela es:Playa salvaje. Delete to encourage article creation/translation, if justified. Narky Blert ( talk) 11:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 22#Peg Bowen
Stub article. Redirect claims that it's linked because she's the only "Anice", in Wikipedia, which may have once been true but now is not (see Anice Badri, Anice Das Anice George). AllegedlyHuman ( talk) 09:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
{{
distinguish|Anis|Anise}}
hatnote as all three are homophones in at least some accents, the other two pages already have hatnotes to each other which will need updating to include this one if not deleted.
Thryduulf (
talk)
12:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
This seems to be an unofficial Discord client, but it is not mentioned at the target, so it might be better to show the reader we do not have any information on it. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Not mentioned in the target, or in List of Matrix series characters as of this edit; the only other mention is in Tory Mussett, which I don't think would be a useful target. – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 20:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
We don't seem to have any coverage of settings in the Matrix films anymore, so there's nowhere for these to point. Each is mentioned in a handful of articles but none strikes me as a useful target. – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 19:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Old autobiographical draft redirected to the mainspace, neither this redirect nor the old content appears useful. Hog Farm Talk 07:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Self promotional draft redirected to the mainspace in 2018, neither this title nor the old autobiographical content appears useful Hog Farm Talk 07:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Should be retargeted to List of nicknames used by Donald Trump § Sleepy Joe - someone searching this is likely more interested in the nickname than the person. See Crazy Bernie. Elliot321 ( talk | contribs) 04:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Not mentioned in target article, [ https://dh.scripts.mit.edu/home/ small dorm community doesn't seem to warrant a redirect. Hog Farm Talk 04:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Not mentioned in target article, Google primarily brings up a defunct manufacturer in Ohio. Doesn't seem to warrant a redirect to here. Hog Farm Talk 04:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Not mentioned in target article - apparently he's the dean of admissions at Harvard, but I'm not convinced that that's enough to warrant a mention in the main university article (also the name of a "prominent East Tennessee newspaperman" mentioned at Daniel Ellis (Unionist). Not sure what is the best thing to do with this, but the current target tells a reader nothing. Hog Farm Talk 04:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to be mentioned or explained anywhere on enwiki. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starf*ck (party) (from 2006) deleted this content as not even meeting 2006 notability guidelines, which were extremely low. Doesn't seem to even warrant a redirect. Hog Farm Talk 03:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Rarely viewed (9 views in 2020 [3]) unhelpful redirect given that there are multiple places called " Diss". ( t · c) buidhe 01:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 22#BIXie
Unnecessary redirect. This redirects to a section that says "there is no Avenue G". Natg 19 ( talk) 00:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 15, 2021.
Nonsense article created by an indefinitely blocked editor, see the entry's talk, procedural request fror deletion KIENGIR ( talk) 00:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
The article that this pointed to has been moved to Stuart Restoration. It makes no mention of fictional representations of the restoration. ( t · c) buidhe 20:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 23#(identifier) wikidata soft redirects
Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a duly sourced mention is added. signed, Rosguill talk 18:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
These number could refer to anything on Earth, no reason to redirect direct it to one particular football games when thousands of football games have this score Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 01:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Not a legal expert here, but "spoliation" does not always refer to spoliation of evidence; it can refer to general looting or pillaging. Google Dictionary defines the word as:
I think that a disambiguation page should be made with a link to looting as well as spoliation of evidence. Bangalamania ( talk) 19:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
I don't entirely agree with this redirect. On Wikipedia:About_the_sandbox#List_of_sandboxes, it says that the talk pages of all sandboxes are also sandboxes themselves. But this talk page is not redirecting to any sandbox, instead redirecting to Wikipedia talk:About the sandbox. But because user Lua sandboxes are always Module:Sandbox/Username/Module name, It's unclear to me what should be done with this redirect 54nd60x ( talk) 07:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
:::@
Pppery: Ok, maybe retarget to
Module:Sandbox?
54nd60x (
talk)
02:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
The name "Kamalam" has been given by the government of Gujara, India to this fruit. This is easy to verify. Seems like a reasonable redirect, but it's not mentioned in the article because all attempts to do so are reverted as WP:UNDUE - regional name only. So do we delete the redirect or add the mention in the article? MB 19:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
{{
redirect|kamalam|the Gujarati dragonfruit|Pitaya}}
or somesuchPlease add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf ( talk) 17:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Not only is it an implausible spelling of "Pussy" (unless it was " I Taut I Taw a Puddy-Tat") it doesn't even point to the Pussy Galore article. I'm leaning towards deletion but if it is kept, it should be retargeted to Pussy Galore. Dominicmgm ( talk) 16:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Implausible typo due to missing "ief" at end. Dominicmgm ( talk) 16:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
They should either both redirect to the corresponding "spelling" rcat templates ({{ R from alternative spelling}}, {{ R from misspelling}}) or to the corresponding "name" rcat templates ({{ R from alternative name}}, {{ R from incorrect name}}) or possibly to {{ R from modification}}. I would prefer both the first and the last over the second. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
{{
R from incorrect spelling}}
. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
01:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC); revised: 02:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC){{
R from incorrect hyphenation}}
to {{
R from incorrect spelling}}
(same goes for {{
R from incorrect punctuation}}
, below). The {{
R from alternative punctuation}}
and {{
R from alternative hyphenation}}
should continue to redir to {{
R from alternative spelling}}
. I've tweaked my !vote to reflect this. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼 —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
02:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC){{
R from incorrect punctuation}}
(likely to be an alias of {{
R from misspelling}}
unless/until we want a separate subcategory for it and make it a real template; I think right this moment it unnecessarily vaguely goes to the parent one level up, {{
R from incorrect name}}
). As for your list, some of that's not right. En dashes are not hyphens, so
Dunning Kruger effect is an {{
R from missing punctuation}}
(now redirs to {{
R from incorrect punctuation}}
) not an {{
R from missing hyphenation}}
(never mind that the latter presently redirs to {{
R from incorrect punctuation}}
; that might not always be true). Variants mistakenly using em dash instead of en dash should be {{
R from incorrect punctuation}}
because neither dash is a hyphen, and an em dash is never used for this purpose (in our style guide or anyone else's). Versions with hyphens instead of en dashes are probably fine with {{
R from alternative hyphenation}}
because various style guides do not use en dashes at all and instead supply a hyphen for this structure (it's a valid, well-attested style, just not WP:MOS style). I think I noted above, or meant to, that some people are going to overly-narrowly try to apply "spelling" to mean "letters, and letters only" when we mean "letters and other characters in the name". So, the template and categories may need documentation adjustments to indicate that they are inclusive of this, but that we prefer to use more specific templates for punctuation matters, in case we ever decide to more narrowly subcategorize them. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
00:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
They should both either redirect to the corresponding "spelling" rcat templates ({{ R from alternative spelling}}, {{ R from misspelling}}) or to {{ R from modification}}. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:10, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
{{
R from incorrect name}}
. Done. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
01:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC){{
R from incorrect punctuation}}
should go to {{
R from incorrect spelling}}
{{
R from incorrect name}}
(as in the case just above this one); fixed.{{
R from modification}}
. Might have been my own mistake. See RfD just above this one for additional details. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
01:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC); revised 02:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
{{
R from incorrect spelling}}
is a redirect itself to {{
R from misspelling}}
. I don't remember what the reason is for it's current target.
MClay1 (
talk)
10:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
{{
R from missing punctuation}}
or {{
R from alternative hyphenation}}
, they never need to be "exposed" to these being subcategorized under or redirecting to spelling templates. No head need asplode. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
00:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)PS: Actually making
Category:Redirects from incorrect punctuation be a real subcat of
Category:Redirects from misspellings would probably be helpful at this point. So probably would renaming the latter to
Category:Redirects from incorrect spellings, so it is more consistent with the rest of these names. The fact that misspellings is a legitimate word doesn't mean that our hands are tied into using it. Anyway, if there was a real subcat for the punctuation gaffes, and {{
R from incorrect punctuation}}
was a real template, this would ease some confusion by having all the hyphen error, etc., Rcat redirs to it, instead of to {{
R from misspelling}}
, which I would rename to {{
R from incorrect spelling}}
for consistency (i.e., just flip the template/redirect relationship between those two pagenames). Having punctuation ones redir to one with "spelling" in the name may trigger overly narrow and prescriptivist notions of what "spelling" can mean). This would fix several forms of confusion at once (cluttered category, inconsistently named category & template, and terminological dispute). I suppose it would even allow both spellings and modifications to be parent categories for anyone who would be confused to not find punctuation stuff under modifications. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
19:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Minor character from warhammer 40,000, not mentioned anywhere on wikipedia. The article this is supposed to be targeting was redirected in 2017 following an AfD nomination, so as it stands this redirect does not help readers. 86.23.109.101 ( talk) 13:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Minor species from the warhammer 40,000 universe, not mentioned at the target article or anywhere else on wikipedia. This used to target a list article where the species had an unsourced 1 line entry, which was converted into a redirect over a year ago due to being unsourced and tagged for notability issues for 6 years. As it stands this redirect is completely unhelpful to readers. 86.23.109.101 ( talk) 13:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Minor, non notable character from the warhammer 40,000 universe, not mentioned at the target article or anywhere else in wikipedia. The section this redirect is supposed to be targeting hasn't existed for years. The article content here was transwikied to the 40K wikia in 2008, after which it was converted into a redirect with the edit summary "transwikied already, no 3rd party sources possible." 86.23.109.101 ( talk) 13:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
An extremeley minor, non-notable faction from the warhammer 40,000 universe that is not mentioned at the target article or anywhere else in the encyclopedia. The article in the page history was prodded in 2008, which resulted in the content being transwikied to the 40K wikia and the page turned into a redirect after it was found that no thrid party sources at all cover this faction 86.23.109.101 ( talk) 13:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
A redirect to a DAB page. According to a note on the Talk Page, this title relates to ¿Dónde está Elisa? (American TV series); but that article does not mention it. The redirect is ambiguously linked in five articles, in all of which it relates to the 1997 Chilean telenovela es:Playa salvaje. Delete to encourage article creation/translation, if justified. Narky Blert ( talk) 11:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 22#Peg Bowen
Stub article. Redirect claims that it's linked because she's the only "Anice", in Wikipedia, which may have once been true but now is not (see Anice Badri, Anice Das Anice George). AllegedlyHuman ( talk) 09:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
{{
distinguish|Anis|Anise}}
hatnote as all three are homophones in at least some accents, the other two pages already have hatnotes to each other which will need updating to include this one if not deleted.
Thryduulf (
talk)
12:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
This seems to be an unofficial Discord client, but it is not mentioned at the target, so it might be better to show the reader we do not have any information on it. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Not mentioned in the target, or in List of Matrix series characters as of this edit; the only other mention is in Tory Mussett, which I don't think would be a useful target. – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 20:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
We don't seem to have any coverage of settings in the Matrix films anymore, so there's nowhere for these to point. Each is mentioned in a handful of articles but none strikes me as a useful target. – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 19:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Old autobiographical draft redirected to the mainspace, neither this redirect nor the old content appears useful. Hog Farm Talk 07:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Self promotional draft redirected to the mainspace in 2018, neither this title nor the old autobiographical content appears useful Hog Farm Talk 07:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Should be retargeted to List of nicknames used by Donald Trump § Sleepy Joe - someone searching this is likely more interested in the nickname than the person. See Crazy Bernie. Elliot321 ( talk | contribs) 04:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Not mentioned in target article, [ https://dh.scripts.mit.edu/home/ small dorm community doesn't seem to warrant a redirect. Hog Farm Talk 04:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Not mentioned in target article, Google primarily brings up a defunct manufacturer in Ohio. Doesn't seem to warrant a redirect to here. Hog Farm Talk 04:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Not mentioned in target article - apparently he's the dean of admissions at Harvard, but I'm not convinced that that's enough to warrant a mention in the main university article (also the name of a "prominent East Tennessee newspaperman" mentioned at Daniel Ellis (Unionist). Not sure what is the best thing to do with this, but the current target tells a reader nothing. Hog Farm Talk 04:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to be mentioned or explained anywhere on enwiki. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starf*ck (party) (from 2006) deleted this content as not even meeting 2006 notability guidelines, which were extremely low. Doesn't seem to even warrant a redirect. Hog Farm Talk 03:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Rarely viewed (9 views in 2020 [3]) unhelpful redirect given that there are multiple places called " Diss". ( t · c) buidhe 01:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 22#BIXie
Unnecessary redirect. This redirects to a section that says "there is no Avenue G". Natg 19 ( talk) 00:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)