The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Ape research → Animal testing on non-human primates  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Ambiguous, could refer to any sort of research on apes, including zoological, taxonomic, etc. SpicyMilkBoy ( talk) 23:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete. This redirect is ambiguous and may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 19:16, 10 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• T:MP → Talk:Main Page  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This is a pseudo-namespace redirect of a type that is strongly discouraged. Unlike all the remaining 80 or so T: redirects, it doesn't go to a template namespace, and it's further confusing because it has absolutely nothing to do with either Template:mp or Template:Main page. Still, I wouldn't have bothered nominating it for deletion – presumably people use it so why shouldn't they? – but then I noticed that the redirect was discussed at this 2010 RfD. The discsussion resulted in deletion, only for the redirect to be recreated a month later, and – surreally – eventually sealed with indefinite full protection, apparently to stop people from trying to get it deleted. If we're going to keep a redirect that's confusing in so many ways, we'd need an explicit consensus and evidence of significant use, neither of which I can see – it's got 80, or fewer, uses – for a shortcut to one of Wikipedia's most-popular project pages (and until just now, one prominently advertised there) – that's a paltry number. The few people who like that sort of shortcut can instead use the straightforward and regular WT:MP; typing one extra letter isn't too much to ask for, is it? – Uanfala (talk) 22:07, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete. This redirect (and any redirect T:Foo that targets a Talk page) is ambiguous and may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep. The Main Page is uniquely located (in article space but is really a portal), and T:MP was specifically exempted from the cross-namespace rules when they were first introduced in 2009. The 2010 deletion discussion was overturned because it was never announced on Talk:Main Page and only three people participated. I notice you haven't informed that page either. It's a useful redirect with numerous incoming links and there doesn't seem to be any benefit to getting rid of it. Modest Genius ^talk 10:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • PS. Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_December_29#T: is also relevant. Modest Genius ^talk 12:33, 4 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep as above, plus it's a useful shorthand. The C of E God Save the Queen! ( talk) 11:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep The Main Page is a special case. Now that the history of why the RfD was overturned has been explained to the OP maybe they will withdraw this. P-K3 ( talk) 12:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • If it turns out this redirect is useful to a large number of people, then I'd happily withdraw. But I'm not seeing that now, and I'm still not seeing any particularly strong justification for keeping a redirect that's confusing at so many levels. – Uanfala (talk) 12:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Ambiguous and potentially confusing. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep Useful, historically well used shortcut. No problem with keeping it as an exception to normal practice. Plus, it literally is an acronym for the page itself, which I find its most useful feature. -- Jayron 32 12:53, 7 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep Since T:MP is exempt from the cross namespace rules since 2009 and is not disruptive and well used 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 ( talk) 23:36, 7 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Hog Farm ( talk) 17:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Arrowroot, son of Arrowshirt → Bored of the Rings  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at target article, was formerly an article that would be a comprehensive GNG fail back in 2002 and 2003. Hog Farm ( talk) 21:50, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Keep Added and cited. That article is certainly on a notable topic, and it's certainly worth mentioning some of the character parodies, so I've done so there. Also, these redirects are entirely plausible search terms, and readers using them should be rewarded with a correct target as a result. This one gets 100 searches a year, for example. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 07:18, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Hog Farm ( talk) 17:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Frito Bugger → Bored of the Rings  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article, mention was removed last year in the nuking of an OR section. Hog Farm ( talk) 21:43, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Keep, as for Arrowroot, included at target and a plausible search term. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 07:19, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Hog Farm ( talk) 17:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Dildo Bugger → Bored of the Rings  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

No longer mentioned in target, mention was removed last year as OR. Hog Farm ( talk) 21:41, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Keep, as for Arrowroot, included at target and a plausible search term. (I must say that when I set to work to rescue the key Middle-earth articles from wholesale slaughter, I did not imagine that the task would demand the defence of this Priapically-named character; but if we can't laugh about Tolkien then I don't know where we are.) Chiswick Chap ( talk) 07:19, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Stronger Neo‐Minophagen C → Glycyrrhizin  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, nor are the individual words in the redirect title. I would suggest deletion unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:31, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

This is a preparation that's used to treat chronic hepatitis in Japan, and it contains glycyrrhizin as its primary active ingredient. I had encountered some people suggesting it be used to treat COVID-19 elsewhere on the internet, and so I was looking for it on Wikipedia but didn't find anything about it, hence the redirect. I may add a reference to it in the target article thereafter. See: Iino, Shiro; Tango, Toshiro; Matsushima, Takashi; Toda, Gotaro; Miyake, Kazuhiko; Hino, Kunihiko; Kumada, Hiromitsu; Yasuda, Kiyomi; Kuroki, Tetsuo; Hirayama, Chisato; Suzuki, Hiroshi (2001-01-01). "Therapeutic effects of stronger neo-minophagen C at different doses on chronic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis". Hepatology Research. 19 (1): 31–40. doi: 10.1016/S1386-6346(00)00079-6. ISSN  1386-6346. Mvolz ( talk) 19:39, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete - It's not appropriate for Wikipedia to speculate on medical science like this. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 07:09, 28 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Relisting comment I note that Mvolz added some content to the target article, but it was removed by Zefr. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 21:07, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete, unless there is a stable mention of the subject, which in any case should not be capitalised. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:14, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Negrodynamics → Racism in the United States  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

What? Absolutely confusing redirect. TheAwesome Hwyh 20:56, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete as WP:NOTNEO. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Speedy delete - This is just trolling. Google / ddg searches show nothing but Stormfront (website) and similar neo-Nazi drivel. Grayfell ( talk) 23:16, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom and per above. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete - A Google search for me brought up five mentions: This redirect, to neo-Nazi things on Stormfront (website), a mention on Imgur, and an Urban Dictionary entry claiming that it's the name for the scientific study of Cornrows and aerodynamics. Delete this junk. Hog Farm ( talk) 23:42, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per above: obscure neologism, extremely loaded, no reliable sources for it to be discussed anywhere on Wikipedia. – Uanfala (talk) 11:47, 4 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• H'w'd → Hollywood  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Extremely unlikely. TheAwesome Hwyh 20:51, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete not used. CrazyBoy826 ( talk) 20:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete does not explain stylization in the article. If this is a title used by a music artist, then point to that. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:16, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• This appears to be a term used by Variety. See https://variety.com/static-pages/slanguage-dictionary/ . - Eureka Lott 22:03, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Angeles Mesa Drive Airport → Hollywood Burbank Airport  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Nominating on behalf of @ BeenAroundAWhile: This page leads to an entirely different airport from the one which used to be on Crenshaw Boulevard. I am surprised it was ever put up here CrazyBoy826 ( talk) 20:12, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete confusing. Picture https://www.pinterest.com/pin/399342691942271992/ is pinterest file that shows title of Rogers Airport which is mentioned by Howard Hughes as the airport where Hughes learned to fly. https://www.larchmontbuzz.com/larchmont-village-life/wilshire-fairfax-vintage-photos-rogers-airport/ https://miraclemilela.com/the-miracle-mile/aviation-history-of-the-miracle-mile/ AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Horsecar. Formally no consensus, but retargeting appears to be preferable to keeping the status quo. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:28, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Horse-Drawn Streetcars → Main Street, U.S.A.  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Does not exclusively refer to Disneyworld; recommend retarget to Horsecar. TheAwesome Hwyh 16:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget per nom. The earliest examples were in 1807 in Wales, a little earlier than Disney and on a different continent. Narky Blert ( talk) 18:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete this capitalised redirect, which would infer a proper name, for which Enwiki has nothing. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 15:24, 26 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete - This isn't a proper name for anything, as stated above. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 13:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget per nom. CrazyBoy826 ( talk) 20:50, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:26, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Pedia → Wikipedia  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This is a moderately common suffix, isn't used exclusively to refer to Wikipedia. Hog Farm ( talk) 22:27, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to encyclopedia, a more suitable target. MarkZusab ( talk) 22:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget - I agree that this should go to ' encyclopedia'. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 02:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Weak retarget to encyclopedia, though it is ambiguous. —  J947 ^[cont] 03:51, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Changing to weak disambiguate per Tavix. —  J947 ^[cont] 19:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. This redirect is ambiguous and may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 11:41, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Dabify per Uanfala below. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:19, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete as ambiguous. Could also be confused with pediatrics, Pedia-Profen, Pedia Care, PediaPress, Pedia (gens) and Lex Pedia. Possibly disambiguate - but full title matches are scant, and I would rather leave the search engine to do its job. Narky Blert ( talk) 08:14, 26 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Disambiguate. Most of Narky's list wouldn't be suitable for a dab, but I think we have enough with the gens and a "nickname" entry for encyclopedia (with Wikipedia as a sub-bullet?), along with Wiktionary links to wikt:pedia and wikt:-pedia. Some of the other things could make plausible see also entries (like pediatrics). -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 19:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Disambiguate same as above. CrazyBoy826 ( talk) 20:51, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete I don't see usage as a brand independent from the PTM's PediaCare, PediaPress are all PTM's. That just leaves a dictionary alias for encyclopedia. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Dabify, draft available below the redirect. At least four eligible entries. – Uanfala (talk) 22:42, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:26, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• IP地址 → IP address  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Non English and not mentioned in article 1.Ayana ( talk) 19:16, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Weak keep this is Chinese for "IP address", but there is no specific connection between IP addresses and Chinese. CrazyBoy826 ( talk) 20:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Per WP:RFFL a lack of a connection would be a reason to delete.-- 69.157.252.96 ( talk) 21:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete as not for English Wikipedia. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per WP:RFFL. - CHAMPION ^{( talk) ( contributions) ( logs)} 02:28, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. 我们不是中文维基百科. -- Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 09:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Nickelodeon Yugoslavia → Nickelodeon (Central & Eastern European TV channel)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target. Given that the target article says that the channel was founded in 1998, I don't see how it could have ever had a Yugoslavian version. I would suggest deletion unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:57, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. However, Yugoslavia was mentioned on Nickelodeon (Montenegrin TV channel), which also redirects to Nickelodeon (Central & Eastern European TV channel) now. -- Wow ( talk) 22:29, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Ze plane! Ze plane!. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 ( talk) 19:12, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Da Plane → Fantasy Island  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Propose retarget to Ze plane! Ze plane!; that is an article dedicated to this quote. TheAwesome Hwyh 16:37, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget per nom. Veritycheck✔️ ( talk) 17:12, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget per nom; seems to be the primary topic. —  J947 ^[cont] 19:53, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget per nom. CrazyBoy826 ( talk) 20:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Ze plane! Ze plane! as above. Common spelling variant. [1] AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:32, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:26, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• California Chronic → California  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Nonsensical? I'm not sure what this is supposed to refer to. TheAwesome Hwyh 16:34, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete sounds like a PTM for various companies and organizations, but no particular one that goes strictly by this name. It wouldn't make sense to redirect to the state. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:34, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:26, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Graphenspiele → Video game  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

German translation of the name of a type of video game, delete per WP:RFFL, no particular affinity between German and video games. Hog Farm ( talk) 16:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete Per the reasons mentioned at the RFD at Gra wideo.-- 69.157.252.96 ( talk) 21:06, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete I would consider Video gaming in Germany but this doesn't have the loanword wide usage. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:36, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per WP:RFFL. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:25, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Gra wideo → Video game  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Appears to be Polish (according to Google translate), delete per WP:RFFL, as there's no strong connection between Polish and video games. Hog Farm ( talk) 16:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete that and the one above that per WP:RFFL. Video games in general don't have a particular connection to any language. Sure, it would be appropriate to create a redirect in Polish or German to a video game developer headquartered in Poland or Germany (or any other Polish- or German- speaking country, for that matter; same goes with video games developed in these countries), but for this...just no. Regards, SONIC 678 16:35, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete there is not a particularly strong connection between video games and Poland.-- 69.157.252.96 ( talk) 21:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete this doesn't have the loanword wide usage. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:37, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per WP:RFFL. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Dispatches (TV TV series) → Dispatches (TV programme)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Left over from a move (perhaps because of the duplicate "TV?"), this redirect only got 16 pageviews in 2019...and nothing links to it. Not sure how useful it is now. Regards, SONIC 678 16:10, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Unambiguous error, useless clutter. Narky Blert ( talk) 19:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Meh; useless to nominate. —  J947 ^[cont] 19:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete as housekeeping. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:37, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete, unambiguously created in error. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete, obviously created in error. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Email#Operation. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• How email works → Email  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

WP:NOTFAQ – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 15:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep – WP:NOTFAQ only applies on articles. -- Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 15:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Refine to Email#Operation as helpful and harmless. NOTFAQ doesn't apply; it states: Wikipedia articles should not list frequently asked questions (FAQs), emphasis mine. —  J947 ^[cont] 19:29, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Refine per J947, the reader's questions will be answered in that section. Hog Farm ( talk) 19:43, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep per Soumyabrata; someone might reasonably type this in, and this reader will end up at a desired location, and there's no way that it would be causing problems for anything else. Nyttend backup ( talk) 20:12, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Email#Operation as this is more helpful and WP:NOTFAQ does not apply to redirects or any other non article content 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 ( talk) 16:21, 8 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 ( talk) 19:11, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• How chocolate is made → Chocolate#Production  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

Dismal pageviews, WP:NOTFAQ. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 15:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep – WP:NOTFAQ only applies on articles. -- Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 15:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep - Section is about how chocolate is made, so it's helpful. Hog Farm ( talk) 15:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep as helpful and harmless per Hog Farm. NOTFAQ doesn't apply; it states: Wikipedia articles should not list frequently asked questions (FAQs), emphasis mine. —  J947 ^[cont] 19:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep per Soumyabrata; someone might reasonably type this in, and this reader will end up at a desired location, and there's no way that it would be causing problems for anything else. Also note that this has significant history that probably needs to be kept for licensing reasons. Nyttend backup ( talk) 20:12, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep I can well imagine that someone will enter that. -- TheImaCow ( talk) 10:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• 0ld English → Old English  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• 0man → Oman  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• 0rganization → Organization  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• 0wain Lawgoch → Owain Lawgoch  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Implausible search terms, per precedent at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_December_29#Oxygen_redirects and Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2007_March_16#0wnership_→_Total_cost_of_ownership. See also current RfD Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_May_1#0bama. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 15:01, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep; harmless and unambiguous. Not much to be gained by deleting these at all. —  J947 ^[cont] 19:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep, since these are unusually plausible typos. Pld English and 9ld English are both one character away from Old English (and ditto for the others), but they're graphically quite different — if you just glance quickly at what you typed, you'll see the error. Conversely, O and 0 are similar enough that a brief glance might not show you your error, so while you're not more likely to make the typo, you're more likely to search for it because you're less likely to fix it. Nyttend backup ( talk) 20:12, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Weak keep all per the above stuff. As Nyttend says, that error is quite plausible, since the 0 key is above the O on a keyboard. Regards, SONIC 678 23:27, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete all. These are errors, and we don't need a redirect for every single article beginning with "O". Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete all. if we want these to be found with "0" instead of "O" search should find them, instead of having to create every redirect. Peter James ( talk) 20:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep all' 0 is on top of O on QWERTY keyboards 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 ( talk) 16:22, 8 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete all per precedent and WP:COSTLY. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 05:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Old school. The discussion is more of a no consensus, but redirection appears to be preferable to a pure keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• 0ld school → MTV Classic (American TV channel)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 14:53, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Weak retarget to Old School, since the O and 0 keys are adjacent to each other on a keyboard in addition to their characters looking similar. I can see a chance of someone's finger slipping upward while typing in the O. Also, "old school" can mean anything.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonic678 ( talk • contribs) 16:13, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Old School as helpful, harmless, and unambiguous. No reason to delete. —  J947 ^[cont] 19:36, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep per my comments above for 0ld English. Retargeting, of course, is much better than keeping at the current target. Nyttend backup ( talk) 20:12, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep and obvious retarget to Old School per the nomination per #0ld English. CrazyBoy826 ( talk) 20:56, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. This is an error and we don't need redirects for every article beginning with "O". Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom and Shhhnotsoloud. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:29, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Peter James ( talk) 20:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• We don't need redirects for every article beginning with "O", but should we delete them? No. That would just be annoying for readers and nothing else. —  J947 ^[cont] 21:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC) reply

  It encourages creation of similar redirects; these should be discouraged. Peter James ( talk) 21:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC) reply

  Why should they be discouraged? —  J947 ^[cont] 21:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete per precedent and WP:COSTLY. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 05:02, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:21, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Diamond pickaxe → Pickaxe  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Wooden pickaxe → Pickaxe  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Stone pickaxe → Pickaxe  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Iron pickaxe → Pickaxe  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Diamond axe → Axe  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Diamond shovel → Shovel  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

These are all recently created redirects (by CityOfSails2) from some minecraft cruft to their real-world counterpart, which is unhelpful. I'd favor deleting these, but I understand if folks think they should head to Minecraft or something; I redirected Redstone (Minecraft) there away from Stone (geology). ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 13:37, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete all as WP:GAMECRUFT, except possibly Diamond pickaxe if deemed important enough. Six of many questionable contributions by this user, who is now blocked for 1 week. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 14:40, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete all as game minutae, not even mentioned in the Minecraft article. Hog Farm ( talk) 15:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• My preference at the moment is to delete all as anyone searching these up will not be helped by Minecraft#Survival mode – which only contains information that the reader almost certainly knows already. However, would a soft redirect to their respective Fandom/ Gamepedia web pages be allowed? I don't think so, but just tossing the idea out there. —  J947 ^[cont] 19:48, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • No, we only softredirect to WMF projects. IIRC there are/were a few WP-space to meatball, but not beyond that. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 11:15, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete/Keep So I would delete them all, unless these above mentioned redirects are possible, then I am for the redirects to the Gamepedia-Wiki. -- TheImaCow ( talk) 11:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:21, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Zhe frog → Zhe (Cyrillic)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Unclear how "frog" is relevant to this topic. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 12:50, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Oh wow this brings me back. A decade ago there used to be an image of a frog in this page for some reason, which caused a lot of drama.

It got deleted eventually and nobody remembers this, so let's delete the redirect. 77.98.105.119 ( talk) 12:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• The word for "frog" in many Slavic languages starts with ж (zhe), and so the image of a frog typically features in pictorial alphabet charts. However, as far as I know there are no stable associations between letters and words in Cyrillic (the way there are say for Thai), so the redirect doesn't really serve a purpose. The discussion referred to by 77.98.105.119 is at Talk:Zhe (Cyrillic)#Official ж-looking frog discussion, and the image appears to be the one on the right (caption copied from article at the time). It's one of those silly things that could draw a hearty chuckle, but there was no way the image could have been kept, and there's no way the redirect could be kept either. – Uanfala (talk) 13:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per Uanfala's detailed explanation. Narky Blert ( talk) 13:58, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per above, very outdated. CrazyBoy826 ( talk) 20:55, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per Uanfala. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:28, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Evil Genius (album). Good lord, this didn't need a discussion. Primefac ( talk) 14:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• The Evil Genius (album) → Gucci Mane discography  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

The album is called Evil Genius (album) so we could retarget there or delete as potentially ambiguous in future. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 08:58, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget. This could have easily been retargeted without opening a discussion at RfD. The album was initially titled "The Evil Genius", as Evil Genius (album) states. I have retargeted it there. Ss 112 09:16, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • @ Ss112: I chose to open an RfD because I see a choice between retarget and delete. Whether or not you agree, you should wait for the outcome of the RfD before taking unilateral action. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:43, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
    • @ Shhhnotsoloud: Yes, and most users usually just decide for themselves instead of always jumping to go to RfD. You are being heavy-handed by reverting my retarget when that's probably going to be the outcome, as it's a valid name for the reason I just stated. This is a complete waste of time all around. Don't bother pinging me if you reply, I've turned pings off. Ss 112 10:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget. Per Ss112's reasoning. AshMusique ( talk) 12:01, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:21, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• 2015 FIA WTCC Race of Russia → 2015 World Touring Car Championship  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• 2015 FIA WTCC Race of Slovakia → 2015 World Touring Car Championship  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• 2015 FIA WTCC Race of France → 2015 World Touring Car Championship  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• 2015 FIA WTCC Race of Japan → 2015 World Touring Car Championship  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• 2015 FIA WTCC Race of China → 2015 World Touring Car Championship  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• 2015 FIA WTCC Race of Thailand → 2015 World Touring Car Championship  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• 2015 FIA WTCC Race of Portugal → 2015 World Touring Car Championship  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• 2015 FIA WTCC Race of Qatar → 2015 World Touring Car Championship  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Delete. Per WP:RFD deletion rationale number 10. These redirects link to an article which has minimal information about these individual races, and it discourages article creation having blue links in the season article ( 2015 World Touring Car Championship). Note the first few races of the season do have articles A7V2 ( talk) 07:40, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete all per nom. WP:RfD#D10 clearly applies here.
  SSSB ( talk) 09:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete all per nom. Rpo.castro ( talk) 16:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:21, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• List of Shrek: The Series episodes → Shrek (franchise)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Another Shrek: The Series redirect. Delete per the March 17 discussion about this. Regards, SONIC 678 05:48, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom consistent with the previous RfD linked. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:01, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to DF. WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) - CHAMPION ^{( talk) ( contributions) ( logs)} 02:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• D.F. → Mexico City  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Propose retarget to the disambiguation page DF, as there are multiple things this could plausibly refer to. TheAwesome Hwyh 03:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to DF per nom. —  J947 ^[cont] 04:20, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget per nom and tag as {{ R from ambiguous term}}. Narky Blert ( talk) 05:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to DF per nom and above. As of late January 2016, Mexico City's no longer the Distrito Federal (what this redirect is probably referring to), so its abbreviation doesn't need to go there. Regards, SONIC 678 05:28, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget as ambiguous.
  SSSB ( talk) 08:51, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget as ambiguous. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:02, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to the dab page, has no set meaning. It's WP:SNOWING. Hog Farm ( talk) 15:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Snow – There is a clear consensus to retarget this redirect. -- Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 15:20, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Snow ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 00:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:20, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Inside Self-Storage → Informa  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

No logical connection, and appears to be a trend of redirections creased by suspicious account. ZimZalaBim ^talk 01:49, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Comment ditto what I said for Supermarket News... the website Inside Self-Storage appears to be published by Informa. See [2]. A7V2 ( talk) 08:01, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Enwiki has no information about "Inside Self-Storage" but an uninhibited Search will reveal some results in citations. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:04, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Inside Self-Storage is published by Informa, hence the redirect to the Informa page. Inside Self-Storage is a major source of news, rankings, and other information on the self-storage industry. The redirect gets several page views per day. The request for deletion is completely motivated by ad-hominem/personal reasons because the nominator did not like another one of my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikieditor600 ( talk • contribs) 18:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • @ Wikieditor600: Please WP:sign your posts. Please also read Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:43, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Inside Self-Storage is ISSN 1087-4054, published since monthly since 1991 by Informa subsidiary Virga Publishing (apparently a freestanding company until 2014), and because Virga has no article, we need to redirect to Informa as long as we have a working redirect. (Redirecting a minor publication name to its publisher seems fine to me.) I didn't find any other publications with this name, so my deletion rationale for the ambiguous Supermarket News doesn't apply. Nyttend backup ( talk) 13:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 11:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Timeline of the 2005 Pacific typhoon seaosn → Timeline of the 2005 Pacific typhoon season  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• 2005 atlantic hurricane seasno → 2005 Atlantic hurricane season  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• 2013 washington nationals seaosn → 2013 Washington Nationals season  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• 1940-41 nhl seaosn → 1940–41 NHL season  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• 2010 Formula Renault 2.0 Northern European Cup season season → 2010 Formula Renault 2.0 Northern European Cup  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

While there are plausible misspellings of "season" resulting from transposition (since the A and E keys are adjacent to the S key on a keyboard), I don't know about these two, since the O and N keys...aren't, so I'm not sure how useful these are. Oh, and there's a duplicate there as well. Regards, SONIC 678 01:21, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete Implausible typo redirect. CrazyBoy826 ( talk) 01:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep; nothing is to be gained by deleting these redirects. Useless to nominate. —  J947 ^[cont] 04:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

  @ J947: Nothing is to be gained by keeping them either. Don't understand why it's "useless" to nominate these type of redirects, when clearly they were made by mistake and are not helpful for anyone. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:26, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

  @ CycloneYoris: If anyone searches one of these redirects up they get helped. That is the usefulness of these redirects; deleting it will only inconvienience the occaisional reader. See RHARMFUL. —  J947 ^[cont] 23:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Implausible typo, clutter. The correct version of the first one appears in the search box after typing in "Timeline of the 2005 P". Narky Blert ( talk) 05:34, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. These are all unambiguous errors. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:07, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Unnecessary redirects with implausible typos. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Comment I would first note that it isn't an implausible typo, but certainly not a common one. As the one who created the "1940-41 nhl seaosn" I have a feeling that was the case when I did that (back in 2006, so I have no recollection whatsoever). I know for myself I will on occasion create redirects like the above to save myself from typos like that. That said I don't really lean either way: I'm sure they aren't often used (I haven't looked at the stats to confirm this), but there really isn't anything lost by keeping them. Kaiser matias ( talk) 21:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• No. ~ AC5230 talk 00:08, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Clarification: we just don't need these redirects. pointless. ~ AC5230 talk 00:10, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. All are implausible typos. Flibirigit ( talk) 08:40, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.