This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 17, 2020.
Rated R&B
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix(
talk) 01:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Another case of an example of an online magazine being redirected to
Online magazine. I would suggest deletion unless a duly sourced mention can be added to the target. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete, not a hugely notable publication and we don't redirect names of publications to general wikipedia pages.
→ Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (
Talk) - 08:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Regrowing vegetable
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix(
talk) 01:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
I can see what the initial editor was getting at here, but I don't think this is a helpful redirect. "Regrowing vegetable" makes me think more of
Vegetative reproduction or
Cutting (plant). Given that the redirect term is also ungrammatical, I think that deletion is preferable to disambiguation. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Rosguill, the topic is very important today for a lot of people. I prefer disambiguation to deletion. In the future, perhaps a full article (there is more than a book about it). Hope you can help. Best wishes.
BoldLuis (
talk) 23:06, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
BoldLuis, what exactly do you think the phrase regrowing vegetable means? signed, Rosguilltalk 23:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
I think that it's an ungrammatical phrase with no single clear meaning. You're the one who thinks that this is a meaningful search term that could be a useful redirect. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:21, 19 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Ungrammatical and sort of confusing.
CycloneYoristalk! 06:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Draconius Wright
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 06:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. While
a search on the Ace Attorney wiki showed me Ryūnosuke Naruhodō's name in the search field, but neither of these names are mentioned on his article, or any of the articles that appear in the search. Regards,
SONIC678 01:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete, these are fan terms that have not caught on for a "what if Dai Gyakuten Saiban, a Japanese-only game set in the Meiji period, were localized to be set in the US with American characters like the other Ace Attorney games were" scenario.--
AlexandraIDV 15:34, 21 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete fan name which is not covered in the target article and likely never will be.--
69.157.254.64 (
talk) 03:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Comunión Tradicionalista Carlista
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
/r/The Schulz
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The topic was covered in a "similar subreddits" section that was removed by @
BLDM in November. See diff. -
Eureka Lott 22:40, 2 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. A redirect about a subreddit really does need a mention in the target article.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 20:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 21:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
Shhhnotsoloud unless a due mention is added in the target article. --Stay safe,
◊PRAHLADbalaji (
M•T•A•
C) This message was left at 00:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Multi-classing
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Overly vague gaming term. I'd surmise this is the case in many games, including a number of prominent RPGs. But not being mentioned in
Character class, it should probably be deleted to allow the search engine to do its job. ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 20:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Move without leaving a redirect to the same titles with the qualifier (Dungeons & Dragons) and refine target to
Character class (Dungeons & Dragons)#Multiclassing. The concept is described in the target, and that will get readers to what they're looking for without impeding the search tool.
Narky Blert (
talk) 12:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 21:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Purple wedge
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 06:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned at the target, a Google Scholar search doesn't suggest that this term primarily refers to Ukrainian settlement in Kuban. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguilltalk 20:23, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Completely vague and it seems unrelated to target.
CycloneYoristalk! 00:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 21:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete, I also couldn't find anything about it on Wikipedia other than a reference over at
Green Ukraine (other than which no articles link to this title). It is apparently a region, like the
yellow and
gray wedges, but we don't have
Purple Ukraine. Regards,
SONIC678 16:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Lolbert
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix(
talk) 01:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned at the target, doesn't appear to have any use in reliable sources. I would suggest deletion unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguilltalk 20:21, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - According to lolberts.com, "A lolbert is a derogatory and bigoted word used to demean and belittle market libertarians." However, this can't be verified in reliable sources. The only usages for this word in reliable sources I could find were as a surname and parts of names of organizations.
Hog Farm (
talk) 00:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 21:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Five Rivers of Lebennin
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:46, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
While Lebennin is mention in the target article, it is not in a context of any rivers. WP has content about Lebennin, but not the Five Rivers of Lebennin.
Hog Farm (
talk) 23:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 00:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. No mention of these rivers at target article.
CycloneYoristalk! 01:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 21:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
It's Ma'am
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per
WP:G5/
WP:G7 as all editors involved with the article that have not been violating blocks are in agreement that deletion is appropriate. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:38, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
I don't think that this unambiguously refers to misgendering, as it could also refer to
Miss vs.
Mrs. vs.
Ma'am. Before being converted to a redirect, this was an article created by a now-blocked sockpuppet and converted to a redirect by
Þjarkur, so I don't have any qualms about discussing deletion here as opposed to restoring the prior article and taking it to AfD. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. The phrase does unambiguously refer to a particular meme (I can't imagine those looking for "
Ma'am" writing this title), but having this redirect isn't really helpful since the target doesn't discuss that which a reader would be looking for. I had reinstated the redirect the original author had first created, but it's not a good one. (Could possibly be
WP:G5'd?). – Thjarkur(talk) 22:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
路面電車
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 06:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment: I made these. I added them as there was "Tramvia" (Catalan) and "Straßenbahn/Strassenbahn" (German). So I added Spanish, Chinese, Italian and Japanese.
Hkbusfan (
talk) 01:36, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: I made these because I noticed Catalan (according to Google Translate) and German redirects existed, but I now understand that they were unnecessary. Should we delete those other ones too?
Hkbusfan (
talk) 01:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Bach Ma Nationa Park
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
These pages don't seem to get very many pageviews compared to their targets, possibly because of the questionably plausible misspelling of "national" (some of them being the results of pagemoves years ago)...not sure how useful they are now. Regards,
SONIC678 20:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete all. In the case of the Vijayaba redirect, it was probably a courtesy to the page's creator/most recent editor so that they could find the page and not re-create it on the bad title. Enough time has passed that we don't need it for that purpose. —C.Fred (
talk) 22:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep all for the usual reason: what is to be gained by deleting these redirects? — J947[cont] 02:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep all The Nationa Register one was a move after a misspelling also. So maybe dropping an 'l' is not so unlikely? At any rate, I dont see how
WP:RFD#DELETE is met, and these types of discussions take up more time than the benefit, if any, they provide.—
Bagumba (
talk) 08:52, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete all. Unambiguously created in error, useless clutter.
Narky Blert (
talk) 10:11, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete all, obvious misspellings - no need to perpetuate.
Dan arndt (
talk) 01:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete all. Wikipedia has about 6 mio articles, with an average of 20 characters (estimated from a few random articles) per title. If we had a redirect for every forgotten character in every title, this makes 120 mio redirects. Avoiding them is clearly a gain. So if there is no other reason than that a user could accidentally forget the 'l', the redirects should clearly be deleted. Presumably the wikipedia search engine already is smart enough to come up with the corrected title anyway, when given the title without 'l'. -
Jochen Burghardt (
talk) 15:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The Lion King (movie)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I will also note this redirect has existed since 2003, so careful consideration should definitely be taken before changing this redirect. TheAwesomeHwyh 17:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Justice League (2017 movi)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Seems to have been made in error. Is this useful? TheAwesomeHwyh 17:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per
K4 and
RHARMFUL. Is this useful?Yes. Is it helpful to delete this? No. — J947[cont] 02:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Non-standard qualifier, overspecific, and misspelt with it.
Narky Blert (
talk) 10:13, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. This appears to have been created in error.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 17:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ballymacoda village
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Unnecessary
WP:EASTEREGG redirect. Meets
WP:RfD#D10 as a redirect which could "plausibly be expanded into an article, where the target article contains virtually no information on the subject". The target article, in fact, contains zero information about the subject. None at all. While the titular article could, perhaps, be expanded with more information about the subject (the village), the correct title for such an article would simply be "Ballymacoda". Without the "village" suffix. It is possibly best to leave that as a red link. For now. Per
WP:REDYES. To "encourage" someone to create the article. Right now, the redirect serves no purpose. Other than, perhaps, to obscure the fact that the intended article/content is "missing". Anyway, whatever the case about what might occur later,
WP:RfD#D10 applies to the current redirect....
Guliolopez (
talk) 17:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Guliolopez (
talk) 17:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Lust of The Beatles Songs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. This is a clear typo, but it is no more or less plausible than for any other articles or redirects starting "List of..." (there are more than quarter of a million), yet this is the only one with a "Lust of" redirect. It got 11 hits last year which suggests it is being used, but not sufficiently significantly for such an obvious typo to be justified in my opinion.
Thryduulf (
talk) 16:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Unambiguously created in error; or, if RS can be found, to encourage article creation.
Narky Blert (
talk) 16:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Based on the history, the creation appears to have been intentional rather than in error.
Thryduulf (
talk) 16:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The non-standard capitalisation suggests as much.
Narky Blert (
talk) 10:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Coronababy
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Already in use by the media and likely to become an article in 9 months. See
here and other search results.
Philafrenzy (
talk) 21:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. While the word might already be in use, it's still a neologism, bordering on protologism, and doesn't appear anywhere on Wikipedia (other than this redirect and
user:Coronababy13 whose only edit was to create their unrelated userpage, which I'm about to send to MfD, in 2014). We also don't currently have any content, that I've found, about the topic where it would make sense - unsurprising as we're at least 7-9 months away from any reliable information about any demographic trends. Deletion should though be without prejudice to recreation when we do have content if the term takes hold.
Thryduulf (
talk) 22:08, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Not mentioned either at the target or anywhere else in WP. A reader following this redirect will find precisely zero information, useful or otherwise.
Narky Blert (
talk) 10:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Would need an article on the subject. We have a number of invented words like
Covidiot aswell.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email) 12:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Sir, unlike the newly coined terms like 'Coronababy', 'Covidiot' has become very popular in a short time (known as
hot word). --
Soumya-8974talkcontribssubpages 17:55, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Anime and Manga
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retarget to
Glossary of anime and manga per Tavix, there doesn't seem to be reason to think that people'd be searching for anime over manga using this term. Regards,
SONIC678 22:55, 16 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory(
u •
t •
c) 14:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Glossary of anime and manga per Tavix. Clearly a very plausible search term, and we have a target that is clearly relevant to both terms.
Thryduulf (
talk) 16:19, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Flag of New Swabia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:REDLINK. As far as I have been able to find, we do not have any content about this topic, although such content would likely be encyclopaedic.
Thryduulf (
talk) 16:23, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Well, not about the flag, but we have
New Swabia (never heard of it before!). There's no specific flag content there, aside from the flag itself. A REDLINK is reasonable, but I'd actually support keeping this and redirecting it to
New Swabia since, if someone is searching for the flag of New Swabia, that's the only place it exists on the wiki, and they can at least see what it looks like. ~ Amory(
u •
t •
c) 19:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The lack of flag content is why I'm opposed to retargetting. If someone is looking for information about the flag of New Swabia they'll almost certainly have heard of and know a little about New Swabia (and if not they can easily search for it), they will be looking for information specifically about the flag. They will not though find what they are looking for on Wikipedia and we should not mislead them into thinking they will.
Thryduulf (
talk) 20:54, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
New Swabia per Amory, having it redirect there rather than to flags of Nazi Germany would be more helpful to readers looking for information about it. Regards,
SONIC678 19:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Tom and Angela (musical group)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:41, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Tom and Angela are two characters, who are not officially a music group. Besides, the Redirect Views Tool shows that there have been zero views of the redirect since God-knows-when.
RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (
talk) 09:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
M_(HDL)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:41, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
This appears to be an error: 'M' is not an
HDL, and the target is the name of a commercial company. That company is in the appropriate industry, but does not develop HDLs
EML101 (
talk) 08:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment On the one hand, there does not appear to be anything called "M" that is associated with HDL or Mentor Graphics (doing a web search on "M" is problematic, so I make have missed something.) The only "M" language I know of is
MUMPS.
On the other hand, the claim that Mentor Graphics does not develop HDLs appears to be untrue. See
[1]
I am leaning towards delete. --
Guy Macon (
talk) 10:36, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Mentor is well-known and respected, but doesn't develop HDLs (not publicly, anyway). It simply implements compilers (and infrastructure) for existing (IEEE) HDLs (VHDL, Verilog, etc). It is possible they had an in-house 'M' at some stage, but I'm not aware of it. I think this was just a simple mistake.
EML101 (
talk) 15:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Futbol
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Futébol, keep the rest. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Nom gave no formal reason, so with what are you agreeing?
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 05:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Futbol and probably Fútbol too. I've definitely seen Futbol used as an unambiguous reference to Association Football and it seems to be even more common in America (in order to not call it Soccer but still distinguish it from American Football which they generally just call Football). For example see
[2] and
[3]. Neutral on the others.
A7V2 (
talk) 06:49, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak keep Futbol and Fútbol, because of the amount of Spanish spoken in USA. Delete the rest per
WP:RFFL (especially Fútebol - the Portuguese word doesn't have an accent).
Narky Blert (
talk) 10:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep all per
WP:RFOREIGN, Football is uber-popular in countries where these languages are spoken—so much so that the Spanish form in particular has entered the English vernacular in the United States as a way for those who want to refer to soccer as football, but to distinguish from the more popular American football. --
Tavix(
talk) 11:51, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
DeleteFutébol as the incorrect form of the word, but keep the rest per Tavix's findings. Regards,
SONIC678 12:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
GiantSnowman 15:20, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Futébol as it appears to be incorrect, but keep the others. The sport is very popular in countries where those languages are spoken, providing the strong connection that
WP:RFFL looks for.
Hog Farm (
talk) 21:12, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Some are clearly
WP:RFOREIGN while the rest are logical typos or search terms. Redirects are cheap.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 05:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Futébol as implausible. Keep Fútbol and Futbol as the large impact of Latinos in U.S. soccer means that these words have crossed over to English. Neutral on Voetbal, the Dutch have had a large impact on football but the word itself hasn't crossed into English more than any other foreign name of the game. I don't suggest redirecting it to "Football in the Netherlands" as that would ignore the fact that Belgium is a very relevant football country too.
Wallachia Wallonia (
talk) 14:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 01:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete futébol, keep others as they are often used to refer to association football.
PCN02WPS (
talk |
contribs) 16:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Fist of the North Star: La Película
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 06:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
This movie doesn't seem to have a connection to Spanish (not helping matters is the first part is in English), and this title doesn't seem to get very many pageviews per year since July 2015...not sure how useful it is. Regards,
SONIC678 01:20, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 01:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Mixed English and Spanish, makes no sense.
Narky Blert (
talk) 12:20, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment: I also found the version without the accent, which I'll be adding here. Working on it...done. Regards,
SONIC678 15:14, 23 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Lefnui
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:38, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned in target article, only mention on the WP is in the sentence "During this time, science fiction fandom produced many fanzines with little or no Tolkien content but Tolkien-inspired names: Ancalagon, Glamdring, Lefnui, Mathom, Perian, Ringwraith, Shadowfax, Silmé, and undoubtedly others." at
Tolkien fandom. That content doesn't exactly illuminate the meaning of this.
Hog Farm (
talk) 23:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 00:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 01:27, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Teletherapy
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
I'm not sure if this is the appropriate target page for this redirect. This phrase could mean therapy for mental health that is online. I recommend that this either be disambiguated or retargeted.
Interstellarity (
talk) 11:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. This could mean anything. Therapy by telepathy? by telekinesis? by television? by televangelists? Or, therapy designed to counter an addiction to television?
Narky Blert (
talk) 18:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Telehealth, as the most likely topic going forward.
BD2412T 03:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguilltalk 19:34, 2 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. The vast majority of teletherapy mentions on Wikipedia use the term in a radiation therapy context. There are a handful of mentions that use the term to refer to
telehealth,
telerehabilitation, and
online counseling, so a disambiguation page may be useful, as well. I think we have a clear primary topic, though. -
Eureka Lott 23:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Disambiguate No clear primary topic and can refer to many things including EBR, other radiation therapies and telehealth etc
1.Ayana (
talk) 23:47, 2 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment. DAB page entries must either have relevant bluelinks or satisfy
WP:DABMENTION. That would be impossible here.
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguilltalk 21:27, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 01:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pribyslavitz
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
Přibyslavice. Reasonable arguments have been made that most uses of this spelling are likely to refer to
Kingdom Come: Deliverance's setting, but other reasonable arguments are made that it's a very plausible Anglicisation of Přibyslavice, of which there are several real-life towns named as such, one of which the game's setting was based on. Given there's minimal discussion of this in the video game's section, there's a rough consensus here that retargeting to the disambiguation page at
Přibyslavice is the option least likely to confuse the majority of readers, as that's where all these options are mentioned. ~
mazcatalk 15:00, 27 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Mbdfar has asserted that Pribyslavitz is the anglicized term from the video game to refer to this specific village of Přibyslavice. Those searching for the real life analog would use this name. I cannot find any evidence online, on Wikipedia or on Google Scholar that this is the case. If sources backing up this interpretation, I would suggest either redirecting to
Kingdom Come: Deliverance, or possibly deletion, as it does not appear to currently be mentioned at that target. signed, Rosguilltalk 20:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Rosguill, I'll admit, this is a tough one to prove. All I can say is that it is common for the German words for Czech locations often switch the -ice ending for itz, (
see German words for Czech locations). Hence, Přibyslavice becomes Pribyslavitz. I was going off of the location in the game (
see gameplay map) where it is referred to as Pribyslavitz. If this is insubstantial, I would support a redirect to
Přibyslavice as it could theoretically be used for any location of this name.
Mbdfar (
talk) 21:27, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. German WP has two articles on places called
de:Přibyslavice, and neither has this German exonym (rather,
Přibyslavice/Przibislawitz and
Pribislaw/Přibislawitz). Czech WP has articles on four places,
cs:Přibyslavice, and gives German exonyms for three of them:
Przibislawitz/Pschibislawitz,
Pribislaw and
Pschibislawitz. Neither German nor Czech WP knows any Pribyslavitz.
Přibyslavice (Prague-East District) (no equivalent in German or Czech) asserts that the village is called Pribyslavitz in Kingdom Come: Deliverance. Google searches show that that game takes place in Pribyslavitz, which was razed in 1390 or 1391; but I could find nothing to connect it with Přibyslavice (Prague-East District) or anywhere else, and it may be fictional. That is all too tenuous to keep this redirect.
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:47, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per confirmation from game designer
Dan Vávra (
see tweet). To reiterate, the majority of people looking for this location would search the term 'Pribyslavitz' as used in the American version of the video game.
Mbdfar (
talk) 00:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Per that confirmation, I wonder whether the better target may not still be
Kingdom Come: Deliverance, as it seems like the game is the only place this spelling is used per Narky's comment above. Anyone further interested in the inspiration for the location can follow links from that page to
Přibyslavice (Prague-East District)signed, Rosguilltalk 00:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Rosguill, I think keeping the more specific redirect makes sense.
Narky Blert also noted that this is the only known location be called this term. If people are using the search bar to find this village, I think it would be more user friendly to keep the redirect as it is. I don't see the benefit to having people scrolling to find the article link on the KCD page.
Mbdfar (
talk) 00:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Mbdfar, I'm not seeing why we should assume that they're searching for the village to find the real-life equivalent, rather than information about it related to the game itself. If we point the search term to
Kingdom_Come:_Deliverance#Setting, then they won't need to scroll at all. signed, Rosguilltalk 01:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Rosguill, that is a valid point. I suppose I was projecting my own interests a bit. If you believe it to be the best course of action, I support your idea of a retarget to
Kingdom_Come:_Deliverance#Setting. I appreciate the discussion.
Mbdfar (
talk) 01:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 01:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Přibyslavice. I buy the argument that
Pribyslavitz is a possible anglicization of
Přibyslavice, and would be used to find the real-world village that the video game version is based on. However, if this is a valid anglicization, it would be valid for any of the
Přibyslavices. If this was explained at Kingdom Come: Deliverance, I'd be fine with a retarget there, but as it stands, it would be too much of an Easter egg for my liking. --
Tavix(
talk) 01:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
First choice
Kingdom_Come:_Deliverance#Setting, second choice
Přibyslavice (disambiguation). We have established in this discussion so far that the only notable use of the exact spelling "Pribyslavitz" is in the video game, but the video game location is in turn based on the real place in Prague. I accept the argument that "Pribyslavitz" is a plausible Anglicization of Přibyslavice, but the combined choice of retaining the Y, converting the Ř into R, and parsing CE as TZ make this rather idiosyncratic and only works in English. Until we see any resident of any of the Přibyslavice start calling their village Pribyslavitz, I think the video game location is the primary topic.
Deryck C. 17:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Přibyslavice per Tavix. Given that the town only gets a single mention in the video game article, with minimal context, this makes the most sense to me. --
BDD (
talk) 18:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Attitudinal indicator
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. This redirect is ambiguous and may cause confusion.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 17:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
American Civil War homefront
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
There were two home fronts during the war, it's not really appropriate to pick on side of the conflict for this.
Hog Farm (
talk) 21:08, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 01:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
... neither of which mention "homefront" in the text of the article.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 17:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. These redirects are ambiguous and may cause confusion.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 17:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
V*
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 18:37, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Disambiguate: I immediately assumed that this was dual space due to the V (which has extra prominence for notating
vector spaces, while the Kleene star notation is just a general *). — MarkH21talk 18:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: In both meanings, "V" is an arbitrary variable name. Although vector spaces are favorably named "V", other names are used as well (e.g. "W"). We wouldn't have a direct of
(a+b)^2 and
(x+y)^2 and ... to
binomial theorem, either. -
Jochen Burghardt (
talk) 14:24, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: In both meanings this is the * that is meaningful, not the whole expression. In fact, both meanings, are listed in
* (but surprisingly none in
* (disambiguation)). Having this redirect is exactly the same as having a redirect for
yellow tulip because many tulips are yellow (fortunately, this redirect does not exist).
D.Lazard (
talk) 14:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 00:55, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
10 Things You Need to Know About Losing Weight
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
This appears to just be the name of a documentary they made- not sure if this redirect is necessary. TheAwesomeHwyh 19:45, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - as stated, it appears to have been
a one-off documentary, but looking at the history of the article it looks like it just listed the '10 things' rather than any information about the actual documentary, so can't be restored as a stub. It's not particularly useful as it stands. Bobtalk 23:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Actually, might be more useful as a redirect to
Michael Mosley (broadcaster), in which case it's not really doing any harm. Bobtalk 23:07, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 00:54, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete; basically no useful information about it at either possible target. I don't see any hypothetical reader that would particularly be helped by being sent to either. ~
mazcatalk 23:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Li Changgeng
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. --
Tavix(
talk) 01:00, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned at the target, internet searches just returned results for contemporary people with this name. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguilltalk 20:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment This is a transliteration of "李长庚", which is an alternative name for the target according to
Baidu Baike (non-RS).
zh:李長庚 exists, but is about a general who lived between 1752 - 1807. Other people with this name who prominently appear in search results include a musician and a general manager for a financial firm in Taiwan. - CHAMPION(
talk) (
contributions) (
logs) 23:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 00:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Given the above comment about Baidu Baike using this spelling, I'm fine with this being closed as no consensus if no one else has anything to add before then. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:56, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 17, 2020.
Rated R&B
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix(
talk) 01:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Another case of an example of an online magazine being redirected to
Online magazine. I would suggest deletion unless a duly sourced mention can be added to the target. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete, not a hugely notable publication and we don't redirect names of publications to general wikipedia pages.
→ Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (
Talk) - 08:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Regrowing vegetable
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix(
talk) 01:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
I can see what the initial editor was getting at here, but I don't think this is a helpful redirect. "Regrowing vegetable" makes me think more of
Vegetative reproduction or
Cutting (plant). Given that the redirect term is also ungrammatical, I think that deletion is preferable to disambiguation. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Rosguill, the topic is very important today for a lot of people. I prefer disambiguation to deletion. In the future, perhaps a full article (there is more than a book about it). Hope you can help. Best wishes.
BoldLuis (
talk) 23:06, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
BoldLuis, what exactly do you think the phrase regrowing vegetable means? signed, Rosguilltalk 23:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
I think that it's an ungrammatical phrase with no single clear meaning. You're the one who thinks that this is a meaningful search term that could be a useful redirect. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:21, 19 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Ungrammatical and sort of confusing.
CycloneYoristalk! 06:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Draconius Wright
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 06:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. While
a search on the Ace Attorney wiki showed me Ryūnosuke Naruhodō's name in the search field, but neither of these names are mentioned on his article, or any of the articles that appear in the search. Regards,
SONIC678 01:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete, these are fan terms that have not caught on for a "what if Dai Gyakuten Saiban, a Japanese-only game set in the Meiji period, were localized to be set in the US with American characters like the other Ace Attorney games were" scenario.--
AlexandraIDV 15:34, 21 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete fan name which is not covered in the target article and likely never will be.--
69.157.254.64 (
talk) 03:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Comunión Tradicionalista Carlista
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
/r/The Schulz
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The topic was covered in a "similar subreddits" section that was removed by @
BLDM in November. See diff. -
Eureka Lott 22:40, 2 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. A redirect about a subreddit really does need a mention in the target article.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 20:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 21:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
Shhhnotsoloud unless a due mention is added in the target article. --Stay safe,
◊PRAHLADbalaji (
M•T•A•
C) This message was left at 00:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Multi-classing
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Overly vague gaming term. I'd surmise this is the case in many games, including a number of prominent RPGs. But not being mentioned in
Character class, it should probably be deleted to allow the search engine to do its job. ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 20:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Move without leaving a redirect to the same titles with the qualifier (Dungeons & Dragons) and refine target to
Character class (Dungeons & Dragons)#Multiclassing. The concept is described in the target, and that will get readers to what they're looking for without impeding the search tool.
Narky Blert (
talk) 12:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 21:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Purple wedge
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 06:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned at the target, a Google Scholar search doesn't suggest that this term primarily refers to Ukrainian settlement in Kuban. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguilltalk 20:23, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Completely vague and it seems unrelated to target.
CycloneYoristalk! 00:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 21:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete, I also couldn't find anything about it on Wikipedia other than a reference over at
Green Ukraine (other than which no articles link to this title). It is apparently a region, like the
yellow and
gray wedges, but we don't have
Purple Ukraine. Regards,
SONIC678 16:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Lolbert
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix(
talk) 01:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned at the target, doesn't appear to have any use in reliable sources. I would suggest deletion unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguilltalk 20:21, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - According to lolberts.com, "A lolbert is a derogatory and bigoted word used to demean and belittle market libertarians." However, this can't be verified in reliable sources. The only usages for this word in reliable sources I could find were as a surname and parts of names of organizations.
Hog Farm (
talk) 00:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 21:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Five Rivers of Lebennin
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:46, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
While Lebennin is mention in the target article, it is not in a context of any rivers. WP has content about Lebennin, but not the Five Rivers of Lebennin.
Hog Farm (
talk) 23:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 00:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. No mention of these rivers at target article.
CycloneYoristalk! 01:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 21:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
It's Ma'am
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per
WP:G5/
WP:G7 as all editors involved with the article that have not been violating blocks are in agreement that deletion is appropriate. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:38, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
I don't think that this unambiguously refers to misgendering, as it could also refer to
Miss vs.
Mrs. vs.
Ma'am. Before being converted to a redirect, this was an article created by a now-blocked sockpuppet and converted to a redirect by
Þjarkur, so I don't have any qualms about discussing deletion here as opposed to restoring the prior article and taking it to AfD. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. The phrase does unambiguously refer to a particular meme (I can't imagine those looking for "
Ma'am" writing this title), but having this redirect isn't really helpful since the target doesn't discuss that which a reader would be looking for. I had reinstated the redirect the original author had first created, but it's not a good one. (Could possibly be
WP:G5'd?). – Thjarkur(talk) 22:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
路面電車
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 06:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment: I made these. I added them as there was "Tramvia" (Catalan) and "Straßenbahn/Strassenbahn" (German). So I added Spanish, Chinese, Italian and Japanese.
Hkbusfan (
talk) 01:36, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: I made these because I noticed Catalan (according to Google Translate) and German redirects existed, but I now understand that they were unnecessary. Should we delete those other ones too?
Hkbusfan (
talk) 01:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Bach Ma Nationa Park
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
These pages don't seem to get very many pageviews compared to their targets, possibly because of the questionably plausible misspelling of "national" (some of them being the results of pagemoves years ago)...not sure how useful they are now. Regards,
SONIC678 20:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete all. In the case of the Vijayaba redirect, it was probably a courtesy to the page's creator/most recent editor so that they could find the page and not re-create it on the bad title. Enough time has passed that we don't need it for that purpose. —C.Fred (
talk) 22:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep all for the usual reason: what is to be gained by deleting these redirects? — J947[cont] 02:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep all The Nationa Register one was a move after a misspelling also. So maybe dropping an 'l' is not so unlikely? At any rate, I dont see how
WP:RFD#DELETE is met, and these types of discussions take up more time than the benefit, if any, they provide.—
Bagumba (
talk) 08:52, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete all. Unambiguously created in error, useless clutter.
Narky Blert (
talk) 10:11, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete all, obvious misspellings - no need to perpetuate.
Dan arndt (
talk) 01:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete all. Wikipedia has about 6 mio articles, with an average of 20 characters (estimated from a few random articles) per title. If we had a redirect for every forgotten character in every title, this makes 120 mio redirects. Avoiding them is clearly a gain. So if there is no other reason than that a user could accidentally forget the 'l', the redirects should clearly be deleted. Presumably the wikipedia search engine already is smart enough to come up with the corrected title anyway, when given the title without 'l'. -
Jochen Burghardt (
talk) 15:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The Lion King (movie)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I will also note this redirect has existed since 2003, so careful consideration should definitely be taken before changing this redirect. TheAwesomeHwyh 17:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Justice League (2017 movi)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Seems to have been made in error. Is this useful? TheAwesomeHwyh 17:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per
K4 and
RHARMFUL. Is this useful?Yes. Is it helpful to delete this? No. — J947[cont] 02:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Non-standard qualifier, overspecific, and misspelt with it.
Narky Blert (
talk) 10:13, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. This appears to have been created in error.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 17:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ballymacoda village
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Unnecessary
WP:EASTEREGG redirect. Meets
WP:RfD#D10 as a redirect which could "plausibly be expanded into an article, where the target article contains virtually no information on the subject". The target article, in fact, contains zero information about the subject. None at all. While the titular article could, perhaps, be expanded with more information about the subject (the village), the correct title for such an article would simply be "Ballymacoda". Without the "village" suffix. It is possibly best to leave that as a red link. For now. Per
WP:REDYES. To "encourage" someone to create the article. Right now, the redirect serves no purpose. Other than, perhaps, to obscure the fact that the intended article/content is "missing". Anyway, whatever the case about what might occur later,
WP:RfD#D10 applies to the current redirect....
Guliolopez (
talk) 17:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Guliolopez (
talk) 17:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Lust of The Beatles Songs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. This is a clear typo, but it is no more or less plausible than for any other articles or redirects starting "List of..." (there are more than quarter of a million), yet this is the only one with a "Lust of" redirect. It got 11 hits last year which suggests it is being used, but not sufficiently significantly for such an obvious typo to be justified in my opinion.
Thryduulf (
talk) 16:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Unambiguously created in error; or, if RS can be found, to encourage article creation.
Narky Blert (
talk) 16:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Based on the history, the creation appears to have been intentional rather than in error.
Thryduulf (
talk) 16:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The non-standard capitalisation suggests as much.
Narky Blert (
talk) 10:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Coronababy
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Already in use by the media and likely to become an article in 9 months. See
here and other search results.
Philafrenzy (
talk) 21:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. While the word might already be in use, it's still a neologism, bordering on protologism, and doesn't appear anywhere on Wikipedia (other than this redirect and
user:Coronababy13 whose only edit was to create their unrelated userpage, which I'm about to send to MfD, in 2014). We also don't currently have any content, that I've found, about the topic where it would make sense - unsurprising as we're at least 7-9 months away from any reliable information about any demographic trends. Deletion should though be without prejudice to recreation when we do have content if the term takes hold.
Thryduulf (
talk) 22:08, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Not mentioned either at the target or anywhere else in WP. A reader following this redirect will find precisely zero information, useful or otherwise.
Narky Blert (
talk) 10:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Would need an article on the subject. We have a number of invented words like
Covidiot aswell.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email) 12:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Sir, unlike the newly coined terms like 'Coronababy', 'Covidiot' has become very popular in a short time (known as
hot word). --
Soumya-8974talkcontribssubpages 17:55, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Anime and Manga
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retarget to
Glossary of anime and manga per Tavix, there doesn't seem to be reason to think that people'd be searching for anime over manga using this term. Regards,
SONIC678 22:55, 16 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory(
u •
t •
c) 14:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Glossary of anime and manga per Tavix. Clearly a very plausible search term, and we have a target that is clearly relevant to both terms.
Thryduulf (
talk) 16:19, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Flag of New Swabia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:REDLINK. As far as I have been able to find, we do not have any content about this topic, although such content would likely be encyclopaedic.
Thryduulf (
talk) 16:23, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Well, not about the flag, but we have
New Swabia (never heard of it before!). There's no specific flag content there, aside from the flag itself. A REDLINK is reasonable, but I'd actually support keeping this and redirecting it to
New Swabia since, if someone is searching for the flag of New Swabia, that's the only place it exists on the wiki, and they can at least see what it looks like. ~ Amory(
u •
t •
c) 19:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The lack of flag content is why I'm opposed to retargetting. If someone is looking for information about the flag of New Swabia they'll almost certainly have heard of and know a little about New Swabia (and if not they can easily search for it), they will be looking for information specifically about the flag. They will not though find what they are looking for on Wikipedia and we should not mislead them into thinking they will.
Thryduulf (
talk) 20:54, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
New Swabia per Amory, having it redirect there rather than to flags of Nazi Germany would be more helpful to readers looking for information about it. Regards,
SONIC678 19:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Tom and Angela (musical group)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:41, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Tom and Angela are two characters, who are not officially a music group. Besides, the Redirect Views Tool shows that there have been zero views of the redirect since God-knows-when.
RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (
talk) 09:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
M_(HDL)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:41, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
This appears to be an error: 'M' is not an
HDL, and the target is the name of a commercial company. That company is in the appropriate industry, but does not develop HDLs
EML101 (
talk) 08:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment On the one hand, there does not appear to be anything called "M" that is associated with HDL or Mentor Graphics (doing a web search on "M" is problematic, so I make have missed something.) The only "M" language I know of is
MUMPS.
On the other hand, the claim that Mentor Graphics does not develop HDLs appears to be untrue. See
[1]
I am leaning towards delete. --
Guy Macon (
talk) 10:36, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Mentor is well-known and respected, but doesn't develop HDLs (not publicly, anyway). It simply implements compilers (and infrastructure) for existing (IEEE) HDLs (VHDL, Verilog, etc). It is possible they had an in-house 'M' at some stage, but I'm not aware of it. I think this was just a simple mistake.
EML101 (
talk) 15:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Futbol
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Futébol, keep the rest. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Nom gave no formal reason, so with what are you agreeing?
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 05:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Futbol and probably Fútbol too. I've definitely seen Futbol used as an unambiguous reference to Association Football and it seems to be even more common in America (in order to not call it Soccer but still distinguish it from American Football which they generally just call Football). For example see
[2] and
[3]. Neutral on the others.
A7V2 (
talk) 06:49, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak keep Futbol and Fútbol, because of the amount of Spanish spoken in USA. Delete the rest per
WP:RFFL (especially Fútebol - the Portuguese word doesn't have an accent).
Narky Blert (
talk) 10:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep all per
WP:RFOREIGN, Football is uber-popular in countries where these languages are spoken—so much so that the Spanish form in particular has entered the English vernacular in the United States as a way for those who want to refer to soccer as football, but to distinguish from the more popular American football. --
Tavix(
talk) 11:51, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
DeleteFutébol as the incorrect form of the word, but keep the rest per Tavix's findings. Regards,
SONIC678 12:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
GiantSnowman 15:20, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Futébol as it appears to be incorrect, but keep the others. The sport is very popular in countries where those languages are spoken, providing the strong connection that
WP:RFFL looks for.
Hog Farm (
talk) 21:12, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Some are clearly
WP:RFOREIGN while the rest are logical typos or search terms. Redirects are cheap.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 05:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Futébol as implausible. Keep Fútbol and Futbol as the large impact of Latinos in U.S. soccer means that these words have crossed over to English. Neutral on Voetbal, the Dutch have had a large impact on football but the word itself hasn't crossed into English more than any other foreign name of the game. I don't suggest redirecting it to "Football in the Netherlands" as that would ignore the fact that Belgium is a very relevant football country too.
Wallachia Wallonia (
talk) 14:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 01:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete futébol, keep others as they are often used to refer to association football.
PCN02WPS (
talk |
contribs) 16:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Fist of the North Star: La Película
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 06:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
This movie doesn't seem to have a connection to Spanish (not helping matters is the first part is in English), and this title doesn't seem to get very many pageviews per year since July 2015...not sure how useful it is. Regards,
SONIC678 01:20, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 01:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Mixed English and Spanish, makes no sense.
Narky Blert (
talk) 12:20, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment: I also found the version without the accent, which I'll be adding here. Working on it...done. Regards,
SONIC678 15:14, 23 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Lefnui
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:38, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned in target article, only mention on the WP is in the sentence "During this time, science fiction fandom produced many fanzines with little or no Tolkien content but Tolkien-inspired names: Ancalagon, Glamdring, Lefnui, Mathom, Perian, Ringwraith, Shadowfax, Silmé, and undoubtedly others." at
Tolkien fandom. That content doesn't exactly illuminate the meaning of this.
Hog Farm (
talk) 23:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 00:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 01:27, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Teletherapy
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
I'm not sure if this is the appropriate target page for this redirect. This phrase could mean therapy for mental health that is online. I recommend that this either be disambiguated or retargeted.
Interstellarity (
talk) 11:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. This could mean anything. Therapy by telepathy? by telekinesis? by television? by televangelists? Or, therapy designed to counter an addiction to television?
Narky Blert (
talk) 18:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Telehealth, as the most likely topic going forward.
BD2412T 03:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguilltalk 19:34, 2 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. The vast majority of teletherapy mentions on Wikipedia use the term in a radiation therapy context. There are a handful of mentions that use the term to refer to
telehealth,
telerehabilitation, and
online counseling, so a disambiguation page may be useful, as well. I think we have a clear primary topic, though. -
Eureka Lott 23:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Disambiguate No clear primary topic and can refer to many things including EBR, other radiation therapies and telehealth etc
1.Ayana (
talk) 23:47, 2 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment. DAB page entries must either have relevant bluelinks or satisfy
WP:DABMENTION. That would be impossible here.
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguilltalk 21:27, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 01:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pribyslavitz
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
Přibyslavice. Reasonable arguments have been made that most uses of this spelling are likely to refer to
Kingdom Come: Deliverance's setting, but other reasonable arguments are made that it's a very plausible Anglicisation of Přibyslavice, of which there are several real-life towns named as such, one of which the game's setting was based on. Given there's minimal discussion of this in the video game's section, there's a rough consensus here that retargeting to the disambiguation page at
Přibyslavice is the option least likely to confuse the majority of readers, as that's where all these options are mentioned. ~
mazcatalk 15:00, 27 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Mbdfar has asserted that Pribyslavitz is the anglicized term from the video game to refer to this specific village of Přibyslavice. Those searching for the real life analog would use this name. I cannot find any evidence online, on Wikipedia or on Google Scholar that this is the case. If sources backing up this interpretation, I would suggest either redirecting to
Kingdom Come: Deliverance, or possibly deletion, as it does not appear to currently be mentioned at that target. signed, Rosguilltalk 20:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Rosguill, I'll admit, this is a tough one to prove. All I can say is that it is common for the German words for Czech locations often switch the -ice ending for itz, (
see German words for Czech locations). Hence, Přibyslavice becomes Pribyslavitz. I was going off of the location in the game (
see gameplay map) where it is referred to as Pribyslavitz. If this is insubstantial, I would support a redirect to
Přibyslavice as it could theoretically be used for any location of this name.
Mbdfar (
talk) 21:27, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. German WP has two articles on places called
de:Přibyslavice, and neither has this German exonym (rather,
Přibyslavice/Przibislawitz and
Pribislaw/Přibislawitz). Czech WP has articles on four places,
cs:Přibyslavice, and gives German exonyms for three of them:
Przibislawitz/Pschibislawitz,
Pribislaw and
Pschibislawitz. Neither German nor Czech WP knows any Pribyslavitz.
Přibyslavice (Prague-East District) (no equivalent in German or Czech) asserts that the village is called Pribyslavitz in Kingdom Come: Deliverance. Google searches show that that game takes place in Pribyslavitz, which was razed in 1390 or 1391; but I could find nothing to connect it with Přibyslavice (Prague-East District) or anywhere else, and it may be fictional. That is all too tenuous to keep this redirect.
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:47, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per confirmation from game designer
Dan Vávra (
see tweet). To reiterate, the majority of people looking for this location would search the term 'Pribyslavitz' as used in the American version of the video game.
Mbdfar (
talk) 00:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Per that confirmation, I wonder whether the better target may not still be
Kingdom Come: Deliverance, as it seems like the game is the only place this spelling is used per Narky's comment above. Anyone further interested in the inspiration for the location can follow links from that page to
Přibyslavice (Prague-East District)signed, Rosguilltalk 00:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Rosguill, I think keeping the more specific redirect makes sense.
Narky Blert also noted that this is the only known location be called this term. If people are using the search bar to find this village, I think it would be more user friendly to keep the redirect as it is. I don't see the benefit to having people scrolling to find the article link on the KCD page.
Mbdfar (
talk) 00:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Mbdfar, I'm not seeing why we should assume that they're searching for the village to find the real-life equivalent, rather than information about it related to the game itself. If we point the search term to
Kingdom_Come:_Deliverance#Setting, then they won't need to scroll at all. signed, Rosguilltalk 01:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Rosguill, that is a valid point. I suppose I was projecting my own interests a bit. If you believe it to be the best course of action, I support your idea of a retarget to
Kingdom_Come:_Deliverance#Setting. I appreciate the discussion.
Mbdfar (
talk) 01:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 01:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Přibyslavice. I buy the argument that
Pribyslavitz is a possible anglicization of
Přibyslavice, and would be used to find the real-world village that the video game version is based on. However, if this is a valid anglicization, it would be valid for any of the
Přibyslavices. If this was explained at Kingdom Come: Deliverance, I'd be fine with a retarget there, but as it stands, it would be too much of an Easter egg for my liking. --
Tavix(
talk) 01:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
First choice
Kingdom_Come:_Deliverance#Setting, second choice
Přibyslavice (disambiguation). We have established in this discussion so far that the only notable use of the exact spelling "Pribyslavitz" is in the video game, but the video game location is in turn based on the real place in Prague. I accept the argument that "Pribyslavitz" is a plausible Anglicization of Přibyslavice, but the combined choice of retaining the Y, converting the Ř into R, and parsing CE as TZ make this rather idiosyncratic and only works in English. Until we see any resident of any of the Přibyslavice start calling their village Pribyslavitz, I think the video game location is the primary topic.
Deryck C. 17:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Přibyslavice per Tavix. Given that the town only gets a single mention in the video game article, with minimal context, this makes the most sense to me. --
BDD (
talk) 18:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Attitudinal indicator
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. This redirect is ambiguous and may cause confusion.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 17:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
American Civil War homefront
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
There were two home fronts during the war, it's not really appropriate to pick on side of the conflict for this.
Hog Farm (
talk) 21:08, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 01:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
... neither of which mention "homefront" in the text of the article.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 17:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. These redirects are ambiguous and may cause confusion.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 17:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
V*
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 18:37, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Disambiguate: I immediately assumed that this was dual space due to the V (which has extra prominence for notating
vector spaces, while the Kleene star notation is just a general *). — MarkH21talk 18:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: In both meanings, "V" is an arbitrary variable name. Although vector spaces are favorably named "V", other names are used as well (e.g. "W"). We wouldn't have a direct of
(a+b)^2 and
(x+y)^2 and ... to
binomial theorem, either. -
Jochen Burghardt (
talk) 14:24, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: In both meanings this is the * that is meaningful, not the whole expression. In fact, both meanings, are listed in
* (but surprisingly none in
* (disambiguation)). Having this redirect is exactly the same as having a redirect for
yellow tulip because many tulips are yellow (fortunately, this redirect does not exist).
D.Lazard (
talk) 14:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 00:55, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
10 Things You Need to Know About Losing Weight
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
This appears to just be the name of a documentary they made- not sure if this redirect is necessary. TheAwesomeHwyh 19:45, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - as stated, it appears to have been
a one-off documentary, but looking at the history of the article it looks like it just listed the '10 things' rather than any information about the actual documentary, so can't be restored as a stub. It's not particularly useful as it stands. Bobtalk 23:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Actually, might be more useful as a redirect to
Michael Mosley (broadcaster), in which case it's not really doing any harm. Bobtalk 23:07, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 00:54, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete; basically no useful information about it at either possible target. I don't see any hypothetical reader that would particularly be helped by being sent to either. ~
mazcatalk 23:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Li Changgeng
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. --
Tavix(
talk) 01:00, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned at the target, internet searches just returned results for contemporary people with this name. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguilltalk 20:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment This is a transliteration of "李长庚", which is an alternative name for the target according to
Baidu Baike (non-RS).
zh:李長庚 exists, but is about a general who lived between 1752 - 1807. Other people with this name who prominently appear in search results include a musician and a general manager for a financial firm in Taiwan. - CHAMPION(
talk) (
contributions) (
logs) 23:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 00:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Given the above comment about Baidu Baike using this spelling, I'm fine with this being closed as no consensus if no one else has anything to add before then. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:56, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.