This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 29, 2020.
Reshef the Dark Being
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 20:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete for now since there's no good targets at the moment and it might cause confusion in its current target. He's the big bad for the GBA game
Yu-Gi-Oh! Reshef of Destruction but said article was converted to a redirect since 2011. --
Lenticel(
talk) 01:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete --
JHunterJ (
talk) 19:54, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Mmmmmm...another questionably plausible mmisspelling of "disambiguation." I'm tilting towards delete on these two, as well. Regards,
SONIC678 19:21, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. We should have a general rule that disambiguation redirects for which the word "disambiguation" is misspelled should be speedied.
BD2412T 19:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete the only spelling of "(disambiguation)" should be "(disambiguation)", since that's what the automated tools require --
65.94.170.207 (
talk) 03:05, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Chris Wood (disambiguuation)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per
WP:CSD#G7.
Thryduulf (
talk) 01:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
While I can see someone holding the U key for a bit too long here, this misspelling's plausibility is questionable. Regards,
SONIC678 19:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
BD2412T 19:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Suburban Fantasy drafts
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:26, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
"Suburban Fantasy World" was apparently the working title for Onward back when it was untitled (why would it still be untitled if it now has a title?), but strangely we don't have
Suburban Fantasy World in the article namespace. I'm not really sure if we should have these redirects lying around, and I'm tilting towards delete (especially the "untitled" ones) unless justification can be given. Regards,
SONIC678 19:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
I don't know about the first one yet but delete the other 2 since
Onward has a title and has been released in theaters.
OcelotCreeper (
talk) 20:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete all - Unhelpful CNRs, after looking through the page history, there appear to have been no mergers, and these weren't redirects leftover from moving drafts to the articlespace, so
WP:RDRAFT doesn't apply, either.
Hog Farm (
talk) 02:39, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete the first as well now that I had the time to think.
OcelotCreeper (
talk) 17:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Khnum-Satet-Anuket
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete. The term is not mentioned at the target page, and a searcher would learn nothing about the subject there.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 18:21, 13 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk) 19:41, 20 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget per Narky. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk) 19:02, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Juvenoia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retarget - This is a bit of a curious issue. Since there's a distinction between '
ephebiphobia' as the loathing of young people generally and '
juvenoia' as the distaste for the culture of young people, what with all of the challenging of traditional values, I went ahead and created the section '
Ephebiphobia#Juvenoia'. I propose going over there instead.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 13:07, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget per CoffeeWithMarkets suggestion. signed, Rosguilltalk 19:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk) 19:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget per CofffeeWith Markets.
Thryduulf (
talk) 20:53, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
🅰
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:25, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
I've also added 🅿 as a similar case (with different current target) to the nomination.
1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk) 20:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:REMOJI, the ABO emojis symbolize the blood types and the P emoji symbolizes parking. --
Tavix(
talk) 20:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep all - While alternate uses exist, indeed, for all of these redirects, there are overriding associations in every case. Things seem fine to me.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 05:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep all per
WP:REMOJI. These all have clear defined meanings that have a clearly relevant target article.
Thryduulf (
talk) 12:50, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep all; provides interesting information about why these characters have emoji versions.
Spitzak (
talk) 20:08, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Slimane (disambigition)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete --
JHunterJ (
talk) 19:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Hopefully we can get rid of a lot more of these such inappropriate redirects.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 16:29, 4 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - I agree. There's no particularly good reason to keep this. It's not really a plausible typo.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 16:28, 4 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Dick Doyle (disambiguiation)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete --
JHunterJ (
talk) 19:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Fightan gaems
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:25, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - The only way I can get this to make sense is as a phonetical spelling of a heavy drawl.
Hog Farm (
talk) 20:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Ultra Super Mega Strong Delete. First off, who searches a word ending in ing with an, since the i and n are 2 spaces apart, ehilw the a and n are 7 spaces apart, and second, who searches up game as gaem, the e are far apart from each other on the keyboard. This is implausible on so many levels.
OcelotCreeper (
talk) 21:10, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
delete as unlikely misspelling --
Lenticel(
talk) 01:43, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Flat-nosed
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Partial title match for "flat-nosed pit viper". Not a plausible search term. Neelix creation
Plantdrew (
talk) 00:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - There's also flat-nosed bats, I believe. Ambiguous.
Hog Farm (
talk) 01:57, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per ambiguity. Either that or create a disambiguation page (unless of course one already exists).
OcelotCreeper (
talk) 02:54, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguilltalk 18:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget to the DAB page
StarM 23:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Changing !vote to retarget per Narky Blert and others.
Hog Farm (
talk) 02:40, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete --
JHunterJ (
talk) 19:46, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Typo and error in disambig qualifier. Existed under this title for one day.
1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk) 17:44, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Merged the nominations now and commented the discussions (in all but one case only my own comments) out.
1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk) 18:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete all. Misspelled standard qualifiers are unnecessary clutter.
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Hiromi Fuji
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No participants seem in favour of keeping it; plausibility of double-typo pages is questionable at best. ~
mazcatalk 18:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Two spelling errors, would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Two errors is usually one too many to be plausible.
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:31, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Again, what you think is implausible does not matter. — J947(
user |
cont |
ess), at 22:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak delete; pageviews seem largely bot-driven. Slightly more harm than it's worth. — J947(
user |
cont |
ess), at 22:09, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Mga Amang-Tagapagtatag ng Estados Unidos
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:24, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Hеpi ТV
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:24, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ptolomaeus Crater
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retarget to disambiguation as above. Lots of crater options. The Gundam ones seem to be named after the Martian ones, and these seem to be common typos or spelling variants.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 13:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Hallow ground
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I'm not sure about this use of "hallow" as an adjective. I can't mind many RS uses that aren't poor translations or have meanings other than "holy". If it must be kept, I suggest retarget to the disambigation page
Hallowed Ground.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 10:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget to the dab page, as it's a very plausible error for that term in more than one potential meaning.
Thryduulf (
talk) 10:29, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget per above. It's a very likely misspelling. Rare adjective, and even rarer noun and verb.
Narky Blert (
talk) 11:46, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget per above as plausible and helpful for searches.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 13:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
List of college men's soccer coaches with 350 wins
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
J. R. R. R. R. Tolkien
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:23, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
It's interesting why someone why someone would search his name with four "R.'s," when his name didn't have that many. I'm tilting towards delete here. Regards,
SONIC678 05:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. No way is this useful.
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. rredirrect is an implausible typo.
OcelotCrreeperr (
talk) 16:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete as nonsense.
Hog Farm (
talk) 20:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. Look. Nothing in
R#CRD says that this should be deleted. D8 doesn't really, it says: If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name, it is unlikely to be useful. However, this
has been useful—to over 400 readers in the past 3 years. Also, D8 is inferior to
RHARMFUL, which concludes in: Therefore consider the deletion only of either harmful redirects or of recent ones. Is this harmful? No. Is this recently created?
No.Sure, it may be searched often just as a joke—but hey, redirecting them is better than putting them on a screen where they can start a draft with the Article Wizard. It can become a huge waste of time if they follow through with that process. Also, it isn't always a joke search—when multitasking you can get a bit forgetful, and your fingers may repetitively follow the same pattern on the keyboard. In that scenario, a straight redirect simply reduces the number of needless clicks.Furthermore, what is to be gained from deleting this redirect? The clogging-up-search-engines argument doesn't apply in this case, as the redirect will only show up if you search up 'J. R. R. R.'. When that happens for me there is no direct link in the search results to
J. R. R. Tolkien—only the redirect being immensely helpful in helping readers navigate to the
primary topic. As such, nothing is to be gained by deleting this redirect—other than useless drafts and annoyed readers. — J947(
user |
cont |
ess), at 20:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per J947 and redirects are cheap.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 04:37, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete not a plausible search term.
LEPRICAVARK (
talk) 16:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per J947. We have nothing to lose from this redirect. Anyone looking for the "real" J. R. R. R. R. Tolkien can go
here.
Renerpho (
talk) 14:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment. From my view, this discussion has so far been delete !voters asserting that the redirect is implausible, or nonsense, or both – and keep !voters saying with evidence that implausibility/your view of nonsensicality does not matter. I wonder which posits the stronger argument... — J947(
user |
cont |
ess), at 20:47, 3 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Would this typo be needed if one uses the search bar? I spell many searches wrong, yet the hovering suggested results understand what I mean. If someone uses too many Rs, I imagine the search engine would show them the correct page with the correct spelling. —
MonkeyStolen234 (
talk) 23:30, 3 April 2020 (UTC)reply
FWIW, it shows me
J. R. R. Tolkien when I search up J. R. R. R. but not when I search up J. R. R. R. R. — J947(
user |
cont |
ess), at 23:43, 3 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Kangarooo (2014 film)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:23, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
This redirect was moved to the correct spelling (even though the misspelling could be plausible) back in 2014 (the supposed year of its release, which was
deleted over half a year ago) and survived all these years since the move. I don't think it makes sense to retain this when the correctly spelled one has already been deleted. Regards,
SONIC678 05:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: Wrong spelling, and it is not a 2014 film. --Kailash29792(talk) 05:53, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete no sense in keeping this after we deleted the correctly-spelled 2014 redirect.
LEPRICAVARK (
talk) 16:11, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Halloweeen (2007) remake
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:23, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
...another interesting redirect with three consecutive repetitions of a letter (not in its official title), this time from (maybe) holding the E key for too long. I'm leaning towards deleting this. Regards,
SONIC678 05:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Misspelling, and a malformed qualifier.
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. The target isn't a remake of Halloween (2007).
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 08:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Article titles mentioning it is a remake would be "Film name (year remake)". The 3 e's instead of 2 could be a plausible typo though.
OcelotCreeper (
talk) 18:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
delete as unlikely misspelling --
Lenticel(
talk) 01:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - I do want to say, though, that 'Halloweeen' itself, while an unlikely typo, appears to have at least some worth. This particular redirect isn't worth keeping. I would be way more on the fence if it were 'Halloweeen (2007 movie)' or something like that.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 05:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete too many problems to be useful.
LEPRICAVARK (
talk) 16:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
SS Elllen
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
While SS Laura was renamed Ellen in 1881, her name didn't have three "L's" in it. I'm thinking we should delllete this redirect for that reason. Regards,
SONIC678 05:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Suppport - All joking aside, it appears I made a typo when I created the redirect. The correct redirect exists, so this can be deleted.
Mjroots (
talk) 06:21, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
George Washington between the wars
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Unlikely search term. Formerly an article.
TheAwesomeHwyh 03:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
CommentWP:MAD Merge and Delete -- this was an article that was merged into the target article, so the
WP:EDITHISTORY must be kept around somewhere. You could rename the redirect to some more useful name instead, and keep the edit history attached to it. Per
WP:CWW this information needs to stay around. --
65.94.170.207 (
talk) 08:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:MAD. The title is not in the way of anything else so it's best left where it is.
Thryduulf (
talk) 10:32, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - Given how the redirect is reasonably helpful as is, all previous edit history aside, I'm inclined to disagree with deletion. As it stands when including the edit history, we should absolutely keep this.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 05:21, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
I can see someone holding the P key for too long here, but this misspelling doesn't seem to be plausible, and this seems to be more useless search bar clutter. Regards,
SONIC678 00:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Two errors in the qualifier, "ppp" and capital "R".
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:05, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
delete as unlikely misspelling --
Lenticel(
talk) 01:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - This just doesn't appear helpful. I agree.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 05:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Clouds (ssong)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
I don't ssee why ssomeone would ssearch with this missspelling ass a common noun, other than holding the S key for too long. Maybe delete thesse redirectss, unlesss a jusstification can be provided. Regardss,
SSONIC678 00:13, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: we shouldn't have redirects with misspellings or typos in a common disambiguator. These two redirects were the result of typos in the title upon creation, in both cases amended almost immediately. –
Uanfala (talk) 00:57, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per above. Unnecessary clutter.
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:09, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 29, 2020.
Reshef the Dark Being
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 20:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete for now since there's no good targets at the moment and it might cause confusion in its current target. He's the big bad for the GBA game
Yu-Gi-Oh! Reshef of Destruction but said article was converted to a redirect since 2011. --
Lenticel(
talk) 01:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete --
JHunterJ (
talk) 19:54, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Mmmmmm...another questionably plausible mmisspelling of "disambiguation." I'm tilting towards delete on these two, as well. Regards,
SONIC678 19:21, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. We should have a general rule that disambiguation redirects for which the word "disambiguation" is misspelled should be speedied.
BD2412T 19:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete the only spelling of "(disambiguation)" should be "(disambiguation)", since that's what the automated tools require --
65.94.170.207 (
talk) 03:05, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Chris Wood (disambiguuation)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per
WP:CSD#G7.
Thryduulf (
talk) 01:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
While I can see someone holding the U key for a bit too long here, this misspelling's plausibility is questionable. Regards,
SONIC678 19:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
BD2412T 19:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Suburban Fantasy drafts
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:26, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
"Suburban Fantasy World" was apparently the working title for Onward back when it was untitled (why would it still be untitled if it now has a title?), but strangely we don't have
Suburban Fantasy World in the article namespace. I'm not really sure if we should have these redirects lying around, and I'm tilting towards delete (especially the "untitled" ones) unless justification can be given. Regards,
SONIC678 19:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
I don't know about the first one yet but delete the other 2 since
Onward has a title and has been released in theaters.
OcelotCreeper (
talk) 20:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete all - Unhelpful CNRs, after looking through the page history, there appear to have been no mergers, and these weren't redirects leftover from moving drafts to the articlespace, so
WP:RDRAFT doesn't apply, either.
Hog Farm (
talk) 02:39, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete the first as well now that I had the time to think.
OcelotCreeper (
talk) 17:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Khnum-Satet-Anuket
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete. The term is not mentioned at the target page, and a searcher would learn nothing about the subject there.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 18:21, 13 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk) 19:41, 20 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget per Narky. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk) 19:02, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Juvenoia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retarget - This is a bit of a curious issue. Since there's a distinction between '
ephebiphobia' as the loathing of young people generally and '
juvenoia' as the distaste for the culture of young people, what with all of the challenging of traditional values, I went ahead and created the section '
Ephebiphobia#Juvenoia'. I propose going over there instead.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 13:07, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget per CoffeeWithMarkets suggestion. signed, Rosguilltalk 19:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk) 19:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget per CofffeeWith Markets.
Thryduulf (
talk) 20:53, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
🅰
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:25, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
I've also added 🅿 as a similar case (with different current target) to the nomination.
1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk) 20:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:REMOJI, the ABO emojis symbolize the blood types and the P emoji symbolizes parking. --
Tavix(
talk) 20:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep all - While alternate uses exist, indeed, for all of these redirects, there are overriding associations in every case. Things seem fine to me.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 05:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep all per
WP:REMOJI. These all have clear defined meanings that have a clearly relevant target article.
Thryduulf (
talk) 12:50, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep all; provides interesting information about why these characters have emoji versions.
Spitzak (
talk) 20:08, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Slimane (disambigition)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete --
JHunterJ (
talk) 19:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Hopefully we can get rid of a lot more of these such inappropriate redirects.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 16:29, 4 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - I agree. There's no particularly good reason to keep this. It's not really a plausible typo.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 16:28, 4 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Dick Doyle (disambiguiation)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete --
JHunterJ (
talk) 19:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Fightan gaems
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:25, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - The only way I can get this to make sense is as a phonetical spelling of a heavy drawl.
Hog Farm (
talk) 20:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Ultra Super Mega Strong Delete. First off, who searches a word ending in ing with an, since the i and n are 2 spaces apart, ehilw the a and n are 7 spaces apart, and second, who searches up game as gaem, the e are far apart from each other on the keyboard. This is implausible on so many levels.
OcelotCreeper (
talk) 21:10, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
delete as unlikely misspelling --
Lenticel(
talk) 01:43, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Flat-nosed
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Partial title match for "flat-nosed pit viper". Not a plausible search term. Neelix creation
Plantdrew (
talk) 00:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - There's also flat-nosed bats, I believe. Ambiguous.
Hog Farm (
talk) 01:57, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per ambiguity. Either that or create a disambiguation page (unless of course one already exists).
OcelotCreeper (
talk) 02:54, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguilltalk 18:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget to the DAB page
StarM 23:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Changing !vote to retarget per Narky Blert and others.
Hog Farm (
talk) 02:40, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete --
JHunterJ (
talk) 19:46, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Typo and error in disambig qualifier. Existed under this title for one day.
1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk) 17:44, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Merged the nominations now and commented the discussions (in all but one case only my own comments) out.
1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk) 18:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete all. Misspelled standard qualifiers are unnecessary clutter.
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Hiromi Fuji
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No participants seem in favour of keeping it; plausibility of double-typo pages is questionable at best. ~
mazcatalk 18:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Two spelling errors, would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Two errors is usually one too many to be plausible.
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:31, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Again, what you think is implausible does not matter. — J947(
user |
cont |
ess), at 22:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak delete; pageviews seem largely bot-driven. Slightly more harm than it's worth. — J947(
user |
cont |
ess), at 22:09, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Mga Amang-Tagapagtatag ng Estados Unidos
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:24, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Hеpi ТV
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:24, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ptolomaeus Crater
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retarget to disambiguation as above. Lots of crater options. The Gundam ones seem to be named after the Martian ones, and these seem to be common typos or spelling variants.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 13:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Hallow ground
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I'm not sure about this use of "hallow" as an adjective. I can't mind many RS uses that aren't poor translations or have meanings other than "holy". If it must be kept, I suggest retarget to the disambigation page
Hallowed Ground.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 10:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget to the dab page, as it's a very plausible error for that term in more than one potential meaning.
Thryduulf (
talk) 10:29, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget per above. It's a very likely misspelling. Rare adjective, and even rarer noun and verb.
Narky Blert (
talk) 11:46, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget per above as plausible and helpful for searches.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 13:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
List of college men's soccer coaches with 350 wins
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
J. R. R. R. R. Tolkien
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:23, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
It's interesting why someone why someone would search his name with four "R.'s," when his name didn't have that many. I'm tilting towards delete here. Regards,
SONIC678 05:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. No way is this useful.
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. rredirrect is an implausible typo.
OcelotCrreeperr (
talk) 16:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete as nonsense.
Hog Farm (
talk) 20:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. Look. Nothing in
R#CRD says that this should be deleted. D8 doesn't really, it says: If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name, it is unlikely to be useful. However, this
has been useful—to over 400 readers in the past 3 years. Also, D8 is inferior to
RHARMFUL, which concludes in: Therefore consider the deletion only of either harmful redirects or of recent ones. Is this harmful? No. Is this recently created?
No.Sure, it may be searched often just as a joke—but hey, redirecting them is better than putting them on a screen where they can start a draft with the Article Wizard. It can become a huge waste of time if they follow through with that process. Also, it isn't always a joke search—when multitasking you can get a bit forgetful, and your fingers may repetitively follow the same pattern on the keyboard. In that scenario, a straight redirect simply reduces the number of needless clicks.Furthermore, what is to be gained from deleting this redirect? The clogging-up-search-engines argument doesn't apply in this case, as the redirect will only show up if you search up 'J. R. R. R.'. When that happens for me there is no direct link in the search results to
J. R. R. Tolkien—only the redirect being immensely helpful in helping readers navigate to the
primary topic. As such, nothing is to be gained by deleting this redirect—other than useless drafts and annoyed readers. — J947(
user |
cont |
ess), at 20:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per J947 and redirects are cheap.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 04:37, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete not a plausible search term.
LEPRICAVARK (
talk) 16:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per J947. We have nothing to lose from this redirect. Anyone looking for the "real" J. R. R. R. R. Tolkien can go
here.
Renerpho (
talk) 14:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment. From my view, this discussion has so far been delete !voters asserting that the redirect is implausible, or nonsense, or both – and keep !voters saying with evidence that implausibility/your view of nonsensicality does not matter. I wonder which posits the stronger argument... — J947(
user |
cont |
ess), at 20:47, 3 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Would this typo be needed if one uses the search bar? I spell many searches wrong, yet the hovering suggested results understand what I mean. If someone uses too many Rs, I imagine the search engine would show them the correct page with the correct spelling. —
MonkeyStolen234 (
talk) 23:30, 3 April 2020 (UTC)reply
FWIW, it shows me
J. R. R. Tolkien when I search up J. R. R. R. but not when I search up J. R. R. R. R. — J947(
user |
cont |
ess), at 23:43, 3 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Kangarooo (2014 film)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:23, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
This redirect was moved to the correct spelling (even though the misspelling could be plausible) back in 2014 (the supposed year of its release, which was
deleted over half a year ago) and survived all these years since the move. I don't think it makes sense to retain this when the correctly spelled one has already been deleted. Regards,
SONIC678 05:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: Wrong spelling, and it is not a 2014 film. --Kailash29792(talk) 05:53, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete no sense in keeping this after we deleted the correctly-spelled 2014 redirect.
LEPRICAVARK (
talk) 16:11, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Halloweeen (2007) remake
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:23, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
...another interesting redirect with three consecutive repetitions of a letter (not in its official title), this time from (maybe) holding the E key for too long. I'm leaning towards deleting this. Regards,
SONIC678 05:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Misspelling, and a malformed qualifier.
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. The target isn't a remake of Halloween (2007).
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 08:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Article titles mentioning it is a remake would be "Film name (year remake)". The 3 e's instead of 2 could be a plausible typo though.
OcelotCreeper (
talk) 18:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
delete as unlikely misspelling --
Lenticel(
talk) 01:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - I do want to say, though, that 'Halloweeen' itself, while an unlikely typo, appears to have at least some worth. This particular redirect isn't worth keeping. I would be way more on the fence if it were 'Halloweeen (2007 movie)' or something like that.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 05:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete too many problems to be useful.
LEPRICAVARK (
talk) 16:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
SS Elllen
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
While SS Laura was renamed Ellen in 1881, her name didn't have three "L's" in it. I'm thinking we should delllete this redirect for that reason. Regards,
SONIC678 05:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Suppport - All joking aside, it appears I made a typo when I created the redirect. The correct redirect exists, so this can be deleted.
Mjroots (
talk) 06:21, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
George Washington between the wars
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Unlikely search term. Formerly an article.
TheAwesomeHwyh 03:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
CommentWP:MAD Merge and Delete -- this was an article that was merged into the target article, so the
WP:EDITHISTORY must be kept around somewhere. You could rename the redirect to some more useful name instead, and keep the edit history attached to it. Per
WP:CWW this information needs to stay around. --
65.94.170.207 (
talk) 08:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:MAD. The title is not in the way of anything else so it's best left where it is.
Thryduulf (
talk) 10:32, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - Given how the redirect is reasonably helpful as is, all previous edit history aside, I'm inclined to disagree with deletion. As it stands when including the edit history, we should absolutely keep this.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 05:21, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
I can see someone holding the P key for too long here, but this misspelling doesn't seem to be plausible, and this seems to be more useless search bar clutter. Regards,
SONIC678 00:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Two errors in the qualifier, "ppp" and capital "R".
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:05, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
delete as unlikely misspelling --
Lenticel(
talk) 01:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - This just doesn't appear helpful. I agree.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 05:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Clouds (ssong)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
I don't ssee why ssomeone would ssearch with this missspelling ass a common noun, other than holding the S key for too long. Maybe delete thesse redirectss, unlesss a jusstification can be provided. Regardss,
SSONIC678 00:13, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: we shouldn't have redirects with misspellings or typos in a common disambiguator. These two redirects were the result of typos in the title upon creation, in both cases amended almost immediately. –
Uanfala (talk) 00:57, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per above. Unnecessary clutter.
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:09, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.