This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 20, 2019.
Porn2ube
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Not mentioned in the redirect article and no such website or name exists, I'm assuming a website did exist in '07 (judging by this revision
[1]) however the pageviews have been very low since creation, Thanks, –
Davey2010Talk21:37, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Assuming "porn2ube.com" was the address then back in 2007 the website redirected back to another porno website
[2] (nsfw) and so I'm assuming this was created as a way to advertise the website before the p2u was redirected to another site?, It's a wild guess tho. –
Davey2010Talk21:44, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Not mentioned in the target article either now or when the redirect was created in 2007. I assume this was an actual website at one time but the redirect clearly isn't useful now.
PC78 (
talk)
16:10, 21 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Search results
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
N295ck
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Not mentioned at the target, the edit summary from when this was created is Payne Stewart plane registry, which I don't think is a useful redirect. signed, Rosguilltalk17:37, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
keep It is the plane’s registry number, and it cost nothing to keep it here in case anyone searches for that unique obscure term.
Tiptopper (
talk)
@
Tiptopper: Could you please provide a source to back up your claim? As mentioned above, the target article does not support this redirect and the more relevant article,
1999 South Dakota Learjet crash uses N47BA as the plane registry number. The cost of the redirect is not in question, so that is irrelevant. --
Tavix(
talk)20:55, 21 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Murus Mediae
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The reason why I created this redirect is because I stumbled upon the term when looking at a map used somewhere in an article here on the English wikipedia (I forgot where exactly). I know Latin, but not everyone does, so someone else looking at the map might wonder about it, therefore I created a redirect.
Michael! (
talk)
18:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep per Michael! and google books results which show it is a term used occasionally, principally it seems in 19th Century works, with this meaning.
Thryduulf (
talk)
20:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I find these useful. For example if someone is searching for a list of food faddists/pseudoscientific authors it is redirected to the category where they are all listed.
Psychologist Guy (
talk)
18:29, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Reluctant delete. The guideline is pretty clear that this is a delete situation, although I have some sentiment that this is a case of a guideline that exists for guideline's sake (something that also is common with categories), and really isn't helping our readers. --
Tryptofish (
talk)
19:55, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Expand into a proper list. A list can give more context than a cateogory (date, language, etc. ) and is hence much more useful. As for following guidelines that don't seem helpful, WP:IAR. DGG (
talk )
05:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Expand per DGG. I disagreed with elevating this idea to the status of guideline in part because of situations like this (and in part because there are times when redirecting to the category is actually going to be the best thing in the circumstances). We shoudln't need to IAR, but if that's what required then ignore away.
Thryduulf (
talk)
20:42, 26 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Wayne Tucker
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
There is no mention of Wayne Tucker at the target article. There are a few trivial passing mentions of people named Wayne Tucker in other articles, so it's probably best to let the search engine handle this. --
Tavix(
talk)17:07, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:Wikipedia book
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Mangal Pandey metro station
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
This rank is not exclusive to Germany.
Uses on Wikipedia show American usage, mostly in the past, though that's
not a reason to disfavor them. There's at least
one living academic whose article mentions a junior professor position, though it's possible there's confusion there with his time as a junior fellow. It might be better to retarget to
List of academic ranks. Curiously, the German rank is only mentioned in a footnote there. "Junior associate professor" is listed for Japan. --
BDD (
talk)
15:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Karuthachan
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
It's plausible that this is an alternate name for the subject, but it's not mentioned at the target, doesn't appear to be mentioned in the lead of the linked Malayalam Wikipedia article, and I don't see anything in a cursory internet search that would suggest that the terms are interchangeable. signed, Rosguilltalk20:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Kuttichathans are a class of demons. Karuthachan is one them. There are around 390 Kuttichathans. Their names are Vishnumaya, Parakkutty, Arukolai, Karuthachan, Mookkan, Kappiri, Kurudi, Karimkannan, etc.
The article
Kuttichathan is being continuously vandalized by IP edits and recently a single purpose account
User:Athuldevcr. These POV pushers want to remove all the information about other Kuttichathans except Vishnumaya because presumably they want to support the interests of sorcery businesses like
this and
this. Once again I have reverted the article to the original form. You are invited to check it now before getting vandalized again. Also can you take some measures to stop spamming in the page? -
99v (
talk)
20:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)reply
That seems reasonable enough, although it would be good to see a reliable source backing this up (in which case I would go ahead and close this discussion). As for protecting the page, it looks like no one's made any changes for about a month, so I don't think there's anything to be done right now. If vandalism persists, put in a request at
WP:RPP and try to engage the other editors on the talk page. If that doesn't work, bring it to
WP:ANI. signed, Rosguilltalk21:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Not mentioned at the target article. Whatever the relationship between Karuthachan and Kuttichathan, the target article needs serious work. It indeed makes reference to multiple Kuttichathans, but the way the article is written now, "Vishnumaya" should really be the title. --
BDD (
talk)
17:54, 18 June 2019 (UTC)reply
I stand by part of my statement above, but at least the concern regarding this redirect have been addressed. --
BDD (
talk)
15:06, 28 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
A redirect to a DAB page with no full title matches. There is a film called The Boys (apparently only the one) -
IMDb entry - on which we have no article. I propose deletion to encourage article creation.Retarget per PC78.
Narky Blert (
talk)
12:04, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Tōkyo
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
This article should be deleted because there should be macrons on either no letters or both o's in Tokyo. We already have a redirect for the proper macron spelling Tōkyō. Tōkyo is inaccurate!
Hkbusfan (
talk)
06:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 20, 2019.
Porn2ube
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Not mentioned in the redirect article and no such website or name exists, I'm assuming a website did exist in '07 (judging by this revision
[1]) however the pageviews have been very low since creation, Thanks, –
Davey2010Talk21:37, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Assuming "porn2ube.com" was the address then back in 2007 the website redirected back to another porno website
[2] (nsfw) and so I'm assuming this was created as a way to advertise the website before the p2u was redirected to another site?, It's a wild guess tho. –
Davey2010Talk21:44, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Not mentioned in the target article either now or when the redirect was created in 2007. I assume this was an actual website at one time but the redirect clearly isn't useful now.
PC78 (
talk)
16:10, 21 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Search results
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
N295ck
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Not mentioned at the target, the edit summary from when this was created is Payne Stewart plane registry, which I don't think is a useful redirect. signed, Rosguilltalk17:37, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
keep It is the plane’s registry number, and it cost nothing to keep it here in case anyone searches for that unique obscure term.
Tiptopper (
talk)
@
Tiptopper: Could you please provide a source to back up your claim? As mentioned above, the target article does not support this redirect and the more relevant article,
1999 South Dakota Learjet crash uses N47BA as the plane registry number. The cost of the redirect is not in question, so that is irrelevant. --
Tavix(
talk)20:55, 21 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Murus Mediae
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The reason why I created this redirect is because I stumbled upon the term when looking at a map used somewhere in an article here on the English wikipedia (I forgot where exactly). I know Latin, but not everyone does, so someone else looking at the map might wonder about it, therefore I created a redirect.
Michael! (
talk)
18:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep per Michael! and google books results which show it is a term used occasionally, principally it seems in 19th Century works, with this meaning.
Thryduulf (
talk)
20:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I find these useful. For example if someone is searching for a list of food faddists/pseudoscientific authors it is redirected to the category where they are all listed.
Psychologist Guy (
talk)
18:29, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Reluctant delete. The guideline is pretty clear that this is a delete situation, although I have some sentiment that this is a case of a guideline that exists for guideline's sake (something that also is common with categories), and really isn't helping our readers. --
Tryptofish (
talk)
19:55, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Expand into a proper list. A list can give more context than a cateogory (date, language, etc. ) and is hence much more useful. As for following guidelines that don't seem helpful, WP:IAR. DGG (
talk )
05:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Expand per DGG. I disagreed with elevating this idea to the status of guideline in part because of situations like this (and in part because there are times when redirecting to the category is actually going to be the best thing in the circumstances). We shoudln't need to IAR, but if that's what required then ignore away.
Thryduulf (
talk)
20:42, 26 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Wayne Tucker
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
There is no mention of Wayne Tucker at the target article. There are a few trivial passing mentions of people named Wayne Tucker in other articles, so it's probably best to let the search engine handle this. --
Tavix(
talk)17:07, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:Wikipedia book
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Mangal Pandey metro station
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
This rank is not exclusive to Germany.
Uses on Wikipedia show American usage, mostly in the past, though that's
not a reason to disfavor them. There's at least
one living academic whose article mentions a junior professor position, though it's possible there's confusion there with his time as a junior fellow. It might be better to retarget to
List of academic ranks. Curiously, the German rank is only mentioned in a footnote there. "Junior associate professor" is listed for Japan. --
BDD (
talk)
15:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Karuthachan
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
It's plausible that this is an alternate name for the subject, but it's not mentioned at the target, doesn't appear to be mentioned in the lead of the linked Malayalam Wikipedia article, and I don't see anything in a cursory internet search that would suggest that the terms are interchangeable. signed, Rosguilltalk20:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Kuttichathans are a class of demons. Karuthachan is one them. There are around 390 Kuttichathans. Their names are Vishnumaya, Parakkutty, Arukolai, Karuthachan, Mookkan, Kappiri, Kurudi, Karimkannan, etc.
The article
Kuttichathan is being continuously vandalized by IP edits and recently a single purpose account
User:Athuldevcr. These POV pushers want to remove all the information about other Kuttichathans except Vishnumaya because presumably they want to support the interests of sorcery businesses like
this and
this. Once again I have reverted the article to the original form. You are invited to check it now before getting vandalized again. Also can you take some measures to stop spamming in the page? -
99v (
talk)
20:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)reply
That seems reasonable enough, although it would be good to see a reliable source backing this up (in which case I would go ahead and close this discussion). As for protecting the page, it looks like no one's made any changes for about a month, so I don't think there's anything to be done right now. If vandalism persists, put in a request at
WP:RPP and try to engage the other editors on the talk page. If that doesn't work, bring it to
WP:ANI. signed, Rosguilltalk21:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Not mentioned at the target article. Whatever the relationship between Karuthachan and Kuttichathan, the target article needs serious work. It indeed makes reference to multiple Kuttichathans, but the way the article is written now, "Vishnumaya" should really be the title. --
BDD (
talk)
17:54, 18 June 2019 (UTC)reply
I stand by part of my statement above, but at least the concern regarding this redirect have been addressed. --
BDD (
talk)
15:06, 28 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
A redirect to a DAB page with no full title matches. There is a film called The Boys (apparently only the one) -
IMDb entry - on which we have no article. I propose deletion to encourage article creation.Retarget per PC78.
Narky Blert (
talk)
12:04, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Tōkyo
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
This article should be deleted because there should be macrons on either no letters or both o's in Tokyo. We already have a redirect for the proper macron spelling Tōkyō. Tōkyo is inaccurate!
Hkbusfan (
talk)
06:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.