This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 22, 2018.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Right to property. --
Tavix (
talk)
19:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in the target article, so the reader seeking the definition of the term is left none the wiser. I'm not a legal scholar but this strikes me as a concept that could plausibly be notable in its own right, so
WP:RDEL #10 would apply. –
Arms & Hearts (
talk)
23:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
Coffee //
have a ☕️ //
beans //
04:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
This is really just an "implausible typo/misnomer". This is really a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name that I don't see any use for. Just because the "I" key is next to the "U" key is not a reason for a redirect to be created, nor does it make it a "plausible typo". I stand by the R3 nomination fully.
Sky
Warrior
22:49, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete, because the redirect serves no purpose and takes away from Wikipedia's professionalism as I noted at
Special:Diff/821835555. Best,
Kevin (aka
L235 ·
t ·
c)
00:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete -
2018 government shutdown doesn't exist as a redirect at the time of this vote, so having a misspelled version of that as a redirect is ridiculous.
PCHS-NJROTC
(Messages)Have a blessed day.
00:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - This is an attempt to draw from Wikipedia's professionalism, and the term has nothing to do with the actual article besides being a change of wording. --
Kirbanzo (
talk)
00:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - I assume this was intended as a joke, it adds nothing Wikipedia.
Jonpatterns (
talk)
10:18, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Keep - Keep per
WP:CHEAP as a plausible misspelling. These redirects were kept after speedy deletion, while "Government shitdown" and "shitdown" were deleted without an
RFD while these two were kept after speedy deletion.
2018 government shutdown exists now. --
Jax 0677 (
talk)
13:27, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- I counter your WP:CHEAP argument with
WP:COSTLY. It would argue that such a misspelling would be unlikely to happen, at least not on a regular basis, and as such does not need a redirect.
Sky
Warrior
14:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Keep the second word it is a typo I have seen before. It also has some currency as a satirical expression. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
15:18, 23 January 2018 (UTC).
reply
- Delete as promoting
MOS:NEO. If most of the news agencies are calling it that and self-censoring, like sh*tdown, then reconsider. But it might be just a handful of biased sites.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
17:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - not particularly plausible outside of redirecting every single possible way someone could use the wrong vowel in the spelling of a word (which we should not do, to be clear.)
Sergecross73
msg me
18:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Humorous but unlikely typo.
JOE
BRO
64
18:49, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Gratuitously offensive and loaded. Unlikely and implausible search term.
Sjakkalle
(Check!)
20:25, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Keep It is a plausible typo. Those letters are right beside each other on a conventional keyboard. Just because there is a swear word does not mean the typo is implausible.
groig (
talk)
21:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Weak keep mostly based on
WP:CHEAP. But, my real reason for commenting here is to point out that while government shitdown
is trending on google, it's also
an unmeasurably small (i.e. rounds off to 0) fraction of searches for government shutdown. Redirects are not my field of wiki-expertise, so I have no idea how that relates to our policy. FWIW, shitdown comes up with zero hits on the NYTimes internal search. --
RoySmith
(talk)
21:41, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- If there are practically zero hits on a search, then that would mean that such a misspelling is not likely to happen, and a redirect is not needed.
Sky
Warrior
22:56, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete not a particularly plausible typo.
Lepricavark (
talk)
16:39, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as being implausible, and objectively useless.
ToThAc (
talk)
01:08, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Besides being a rather implausible typo ... I can't stop thinking that this redirect represents some sort of fundraiser where members of the government take dumps for charity. (Yay sense of humor.)
Steel1943 (
talk)
21:30, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Wikipedia isn't supposed to censor swear words, but that doesn't make it a place to put up Sailorese humor in a non-educational context either.
MrHumanPersonGuy (
talk)
13:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete, these are not plausible typos, and the sophomoric humour that comes from having redirects from swears isn't a good enough reason to keep them.
Lankiveil (
speak to me)
02:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC).
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
1912 Queensland state electon
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy delete. G7, obvious typo --
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions
19:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Delete, implausible typo, no links to it.
Iffy★
Chat --
21:03, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 30#Multi Screen
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
06:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Far too vague to redirect to any article. There are plenty of other electronics with 2 screens.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
20:16, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
List of Nintendo DS lite accessories
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 30#List of Nintendo DS lite accessories
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions
00:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Seems like an implausible typo that was just created as a fork of the main article until being redirected.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
20:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Nintendo DS Cracked Hinges
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions
00:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Many games have a Moon level or zone, like DuckTales. There's no reason to redirect this to this article, or any article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
19:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Category:Fictional rogue planets
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 30#Category:Fictional rogue planets
List of Final Fantasy V locations
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus. Consider this a group closure for the three List of Final Fantasy location nominations. There was slightly different discussion, but it does not make sense for them to have differing results, noting that nobody explicitly suggested such. This is without prejudice against someone restoring the list and nominating at AfD if they desire. --
Tavix (
talk)
19:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
As usual, Setting section is not a list, this redirect is unnecessary.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
08:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Restore this
revision of
List of Final Fantasy V locations, then send to
WP:AFD. This is yet another case of a {{
R with history}} that was
blanked and redirected without a
WP:AFD discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk)
13:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Lets not wasted a bunch of editor time by restoring a 10-year-old article revision only to turn around and delete it. I appreciate that this redirect did not follow some policy or another that mandates that we never, ever get rid of fancruft without making sure it takes a lot of time, but trying to retroactively fix process violations from the past decade is a complete waste of time for everyone involved. --
Pres
N
18:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- I disagree that my suggestion is a waste of time, considering that if I thought it was a waste of time, I would have never suggested it. RfD is not the place where judgement calls should be made on former content of such a magnitude hiding in the edit history of a redirect. RfD is for forming consensus regarding the usefulness of the redirect itself ... which essentially has nothing to do with article content in the redirect's edit history. AfD is more equipped with editors and a process for forming consensus on the content in the edit history ... considering that the page in the edit history was an article.
Steel1943 (
talk)
21:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Restore per Steel1943, plausible article needs discussion in AfD.
Galobtter (
pingó mió)
17:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC) (closer note two other similar discussions (on other list of xyz locations with same comments on this page)
reply
- Keep. Don't see how the article would be kept at AFD, and the current target does present some of the information sought. ----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions
17:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
List of Final Fantasy IV locations
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus. Consider this a group closure for the three List of Final Fantasy location nominations. There was slightly different discussion, but it does not make sense for them to have differing results, noting that nobody explicitly suggested such. This is without prejudice against someone restoring the list and nominating at AfD if they desire. --
Tavix (
talk)
19:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Yet again, Setting section has no list, making this redirect unnecessary.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
07:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Restore this
revision of
List of Final Fantasy IV locations, retarget
List of Final Fantasy IV Locations to
List of Final Fantasy IV locations, then send
List of Final Fantasy IV locations to
WP:AFD. This is yet another case of a {{
R with history}} that was
blanked and redirected without a
WP:AFD discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk)
13:14, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Lets not wasted a bunch of editor time by restoring a 10-year-old article revision only to turn around and delete it. I appreciate that this redirect did not follow some policy or another that mandates that we never, ever get rid of fancruft without making sure it takes a lot of time, but trying to retroactively fix process violations from the past decade is a complete waste of time for everyone involved. --
Pres
N
18:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- I disagree that my suggestion is a waste of time, considering that if I thought it was a waste of time, I would have never suggested it. RfD is not the place where judgement calls should be made on former content of such a magnitude hiding in the edit history of a redirect. RfD is for forming consensus regarding the usefulness of the redirect itself ... which essentially has nothing to do with article content in the redirect's edit history. AfD is more equipped with editors and a process for forming consensus on the content in the edit history ... considering that the page in the edit history was an article.
Steel1943 (
talk)
21:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Restore per Steel1943, plausible article needs discussion in AfD.
Galobtter (
pingó mió)
17:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC) (closer note two other similar discussions (on other list of xyz locations with same comments on this page)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
List of Final Fantasy III locations
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus. Consider this a group closure for the three List of Final Fantasy location nominations. There was slightly different discussion, but it does not make sense for them to have differing results, noting that nobody explicitly suggested such. This is without prejudice against someone restoring the list and nominating at AfD if they desire. --
Tavix (
talk)
19:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
The setting section has no list of locations. Superfluous redirect.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
07:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Restore this
revision of
List of Final Fantasy III locations, then send to
WP:AFD. This is yet another case of a {{
R with history}} that was
blanked and redirected without a
WP:AFD discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk)
13:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Lets not wasted a bunch of editor time by restoring a 10-year-old article revision only to turn around and delete it. I appreciate that this redirect did not follow some policy or another that mandates that we never, ever get rid of fancruft without making sure it takes a lot of time, but trying to retroactively fix process violations from the past decade is a complete waste of time for everyone involved. --
Pres
N
18:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- I disagree that my suggestion is a waste of time, considering that if I thought it was a waste of time, I would have never suggested it. RfD is not the place where judgement calls should be made on former content of such a magnitude hiding in the edit history of a redirect. RfD is for forming consensus regarding the usefulness of the redirect itself ... which essentially has nothing to do with article content in the redirect's edit history. AfD is more equipped with editors and a process for forming consensus on the content in the edit history ... considering that the page in the edit history was an article.
Steel1943 (
talk)
21:52, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Revert to the article version and send to WP:AFD per
User:Steel1943. WP:RFD shouldn't be used to discretely delete articles. That's the purpose of WP:AFD. --
Lenticel (
talk)
01:32, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Restore per Steel1943, plausible article needs discussion in AfD.
Galobtter (
pingó mió)
17:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC) (closer note two other similar discussions (on other list of xyz locations with same comments on this page)
reply
- Delete per nom. Absent evidence of bad faith, I don't see anything procedurally wrong about deleting such a redirect. This has been a redirect for over a decade (!) without apparent complaint. As for the substance, the article seems like it was a blatant
WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE violator. If it were taken to AfD, deletion seems
quite likely. --
BDD (
talk)
18:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- I'd still say weak keep on merits as a redirect as harmless redirect targeting to where one can find the most information.
Galobtter (
pingó mió)
06:29, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. Don't see how the article could be kept, so I would prefer to just keep it without going to AFD. While the current article doesn't have a dedicated list section, it does cover many locations within the game, so the information sought is somewhat there. ----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions
17:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Paunline (Nintendo character)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
17:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Calling the subjects in the target "monsters" is wrong/misleading. Also, per the redirect' edit history, it seems that the subject of this redirect is an unnotable web site made by a third party, almost like a wiki for antagonists in the Mario series.
Steel1943 (
talk)
17:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 30#Shithole
Federal President of Switzerland
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 30#Federal President of Switzerland
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
17:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Implausible search term. Gets barely any pageviews as a redirect.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
15:31, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
06:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Implausible typo with very few page views.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
15:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
Killiondude (
talk)
06:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in the target article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
15:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
17:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Not at all mentioned in the target article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
15:22, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Woodensuperman (
talk •
contribs)
13:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Confusing redirect as individual is not mentioned at target. He seems to have written a number of novels, the novelization for this film being just one of them.
[2] --
wooden
superman
15:22, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
17:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
The subject of this redirect is not mentioned at its target. The subject of the redirect is an enemy character exclusive to
Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door, but it's not mentioned there either. Since it's a random unnotable enemy in a
RPG-style game, it's inclusion in Wikipedia would essentially be a
WP:GAMEGUIDE violation.
Steel1943 (
talk)
14:03, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - Only shows up in one game, and in one area within that one game, no less? This seems like a pointless bit of trivia even if we had detailed information at the targeted page, which we don't anyways. I agree.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk)
01:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
17:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
The misspelling of the word "Goomba" is too unlikely.
Steel1943 (
talk)
13:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - agree that there's too many bizarre parts here to make it a likely search term. (Misspelling of Goomba, randomly tagging "mario enemies" at the end, the fact that its plural and not singular, etc.)
Sergecross73
msg me
18:42, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 30#Boom Boom (video games)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 30#Koopa Troop
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:29, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
The grammar of this redirect is too poor to be plausible.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
03:55, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete no other articles with "The history on". They are usually "The history of". Also, since there are no articles detailing the history of the franchise besides the franchise article itself, this would raise false expectations.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
18:05, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Halo#Fictional entities.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:29, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
While humorous, this is plain misleading as a redirect. I'm sure anyone looking for "that guy from Halo" can navigate to the series page and read a few sentences in.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
03:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Beyond the mere fact that the game has achievements (something shared by countless other games), nothing about them are mentioned in the target article. Unnecessary redirect.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
03:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in target article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
03:33, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned at all in the target article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
03:25, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 29#Hawaii missile alert
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Implausible search term.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
00:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in target article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
00:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
No "delay" is mentioned in target article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
00:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Confirmed Halo 3 Elements
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Needless to say the time for this to be deleted for
WP:CRYSTALBALL has long passed, so now it should just be deleted as implausible.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
00:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
No way this term isn't too vague not to redirect here.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
00:17, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Yet again, not mentioned at all in target article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
00:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
I'm guessing it's the callsign of one of the characters, but it's not mentioned at all in the target article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
00:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in the target article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
00:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in target article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
00:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in the target article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
00:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
List of Weapons in Halo 2
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
There is no such list of weapons in the target article, unnecessary redirect.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
00:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in target article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
00:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in target article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
00:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 29#Party pizza