The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was wrong forum. Discussion now at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 June 11#Category:Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria politicians Non admin closure. Ego White Tray ( talk) 04:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Also this should be removed, article was moved to Category:GERB politicians

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was wrong forum. Discussion now at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 June 11#Category:Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria politicians Non admin closure. Ego White Tray ( talk) 04:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The same thing as above

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was wrong forum and already done anyway. Non admin closure. Ego White Tray ( talk) 04:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Democratic and Social Centre was derived from non existent acronym. party name is CDS - People's Party

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was wrong forum. It appears that this editor was requesting a rename, but the article already has the name desired. Non admin closure. Ego White Tray ( talk) 04:45, 11 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Di Rupo created only one cabinet so article is Di Rupo Government. If Di Rupo create next cabinet article will be simply renamed without redirect.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. The clear consensus is that this redirect is useful and will take the reader to information that they are likely to be seeking. WP:RNEUTRAL is also relevant. NAC. The Whispering Wind ( talk) 20:15, 15 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Gay blood donation → MSM blood donor controversy ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

Non-neutral and inaccurate redirect. 'Gay' is not the same as 'men who have sex with men'. - Mr X 21:56, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Despite the MrX's dispute regarding the definition of "gay", "Gay blood donation" is a plausible search phrase, and it is likely the searcher would find the information that they seek at "MSM blood donor controversy". Axl ¤ [Talk] 22:50, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• I am for MSM blood donor controversy because MSM and/or Men who have sex with men are more accurate terms. If the acronym is a problem we could always change it to 'men who have sex with men blood donor controversy.' @ Axl:, "Keep" may be a little bit confusing because MSM blood donor controversy is what the page is currently titled as. -- Prcc27 ( talk) 23:26, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

I think that MrX wants to have the redirect deleted. I would like to keep the redirect. Axl ¤ [Talk] 23:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the clarification, since the page used to be called that- I think it's best to keep the redirect. Prcc27 ( talk) 01:41, 9 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep: plausible search term, specifically for those unaware of "MSM" term. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 04:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• keep MSM term is obscure and in any case people who are thinking of this more expansively need to end up at the article that's going to tell them that the situation is more limited than that. Mangoe ( talk) 17:03, 9 June 2014 (UTC) reply

UPDATE: The page was renamed to Men who have sex with men blood donor controversy; I still think we should keep the Gay blood donation redirect because even though msm and gay aren't the same thing, it is very likely that people will type "Gay blood donation" instead of "Men who have sex with men blood donor controversy." -- Prcc27 ( talk) 23:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep. While the page should not be called Gay blood donation for the reason stated, this a useful redirect for the target page. Readers visiting this will be looking for the information at the target, so no reason to present them with a red link. 82.132.246.244 ( talk) 18:50, 11 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:46, 26 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Gino Marley → 808 Mafia ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

He is not a member of the production team and has only worked with them a handful of times. Someone looking them up is unlikely to find much information on that page. STATic message me! 21:04, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Jouette Herlin → Jacques Herlin ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

Doesn't make any sense - seems to be a combination of his real name and his stage name. In any case it is unlikely and confusing. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 16:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. It's unclear whether this is a FORRED case. But the keep arguments demonstrate that this term may have some limited usage, and could thus be used as a search term. -- BDD ( talk) 16:30, 27 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Ukrajina → Ukraine ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

Czech is not an official language of Ukrainee whatsoever. Thus Delete. The ChampionMan 1234 10:25, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete: indeed no specific ties. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 13:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep, a plausible phonetic spelling of the country's name in its own language. Mentioned in the article. Siuenti ( talk) 22:13, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Phonetic? If you read "Ukrajina" following English pronunciation rules, you won't get closer then with "Ukraine". — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 15:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC) reply
    • Actually I should have called it a transcription, but if you follow the usual pronunciation of Slavic alphabets, or the IPA, you will get it about right. Siuenti ( talk) 22:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC) reply
      • This word is neither English nor IPA transcription of Ukraine's name in Ukrainian or English. There is no Ukrainian pronunciation of this word, because Ukrainian uses Cyrillic. In fact your arguments are only valid for languages that have no ties with Ukraine, so WP:FORRED applies. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 22:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC) reply
        • See Scientific transliteration of Cyrillic and please update the article if the IPA transcription is incorrect. Siuenti ( talk) 09:01, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply
          • Per Scientific transliteration of Cyrillic Ukarine's name should be transliterated as "Ukraïna" ("Ukrajina" version is long obsolete). IPA transcription in article is correct, particularly in not matching this redirect: ukrɑˈjinɑ. Anyway, both rationales are inappropriate overextensions of language-specific ties. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 09:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply
            • It's very silly to expect someone to find a ï when they are using a western keyboard for example. Siuenti ( talk) 09:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply
              • Not nearly as silly as to expect someone retyping "Ukrajina" when looking up what "Ukraïna" may stand for. And it is no sillier then to expect someone to use transliterated text, particularily given that transliteration always comes in context of original, which is already served by Україна. P.S.: thank you for the hint, IPA transcription in the article is indeed wrong: it should be "ukrɑˈinɑ". — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 09:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply
                • The original might be on a piece of paper or someone's memory. Siuenti ( talk) 12:01, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply
                  • Sure. And in such case it would either be rewritten verbatim or with "i", but not with "ji". At least unless the person is knowledgable enough to search for "Ukraine" directly. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 15:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply
                    • Yi_(Cyrillic) and Romanization of Ukrainian also give "ji" as a possible transliteration of Ї. Thus it might be found that way in transliterated text, or typed that way by someone who knows/sees "Україна" but doesn't have a Cyrillic keyboard. Siuenti ( talk) 20:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply
                      • "Ukrajina" can only found in transliterated text if reader is capable of reading of text in Ukrainian – otherwise every word there is unknown. I can't believe that this skill comes without knowledge of either Ukrainian or English name of the country. I can't believe that there are people who know the rules of romanization of Ukrainian, but don't know the country's name. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 23:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply
                        • They might know it in English, but prefer to use the endonym. Siuenti ( talk) 06:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC) reply
                          • Then it should be deleted as very harmful to avoid confusing readers about availability of Language-based redirects. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 06:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC) reply
                            • This kind of redirect is supposed to be available, since it's in a language related to the topic. Deleting it would be a cause for confusion. Siuenti ( talk) 22:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC) reply
                • The IPA in the article was correct. I have put the /j/ back. Gorobay ( talk) 15:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply
                  • Then IPA for Ukrainian should be fixed, because it has no /j/ whatsoever. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 16:01, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply
                    • It need not be fixed: it addresses /j/ in note 1. Gorobay ( talk) 16:29, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply
                      • I see now. Thank you and sorry for noise. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 23:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete The redirect has no use. -- Prcc27 ( talk) 23:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep, “Ukrajina” is the Latin transcription of “Україна” according to most Slavic orthographies. Ukrainian is a Slavic language. � ( talk) 13:57, 22 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Graig Weich. As this appears to be the only topic that could sensibly be referred to as "Weich," this appears to be the clearest course of action. Dabs with two items are allowed, but it's good to avoid them when practical. -- BDD ( talk) 16:26, 27 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Weich → Dirk Nowitzki ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

• Disambiguate delete-no reason for that word to redirect there, no mention in article Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 10:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. It may also happen to qualify for WP:RFD#DELETE criterion #3. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 13:23, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Retarget to Graig Weich or disambiguate between Weichs, Graig Weich and Maximilian von Weichs with redirect from Weichs (disambiguation) created to point to Weich. I prefer "retarget" option though. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 07:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Redirect to Weichs or probably make a dab with Weichs and Graig Weich.-- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 05:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Disambiguate per Lenticel -- 65.94.171.126 ( talk) 04:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget all to Maternal insult per consensus, that was where they were all targeted until 6 March 2014‎ when blocked sock User:Nedgreiner retargeted them. I would add that Internet slang is not excluded from the Project, see Category:Internet slang for example. NAC. The Whispering Wind ( talk) 02:10, 21 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Ur mummy → Mother ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

Wikipedia is not a place for interget slang, thus delete and also delete Ur mommy, Ur mommah and Urmom The ChampionMan 1234 09:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to the same place as Your mother which is Maternal insult. Siuenti ( talk) 10:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete all per nom. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 13:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Maternal insult per Siuenti -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 01:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete all or Retarget them. -- Prcc27 ( talk) 23:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete or retarget to maternal insult -- 65.94.171.126 ( talk) 04:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:45, 26 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Shuntian Fu → Beijing ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

From what I can understand by googling it, Shuntian Fu is a place in Taiwan, quite far away from the place mentioned in the target. If this is a notable place, this should be deleted per REDLINK and expanded, but it does not seem to be notable from what I gather from the Google search The ChampionMan 1234 09:29, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Comment there's several "Shuntian Fu", atleast one of which is in Beijing. Anyways delete WP:REDLINK as the information isn't being found. -- 65.94.171.126 ( talk) 04:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Politics of Beijing. -- BDD ( talk) 21:44, 26 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• The People's Government of Beijing Municipality → Beijing ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

The city itself is not the same as the government of the city. The topic seems notable enough. I can't find a page to retarget this to. The ChampionMan 1234 09:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Politics of Beijing where 'People's Government of Beijing' is mentioned. The Whispering Wind ( talk) 20:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 13:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• 封面 → Main Page ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

I'm Chinese and I know that this literally means "front cover". Hoever the corresponding page on zh.wiki is called zh:Wikipedia:首页 which literally translates as "main page". Thus this serves no use. The ChampionMan 1234 09:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete, not relevant for English public. -- Lumi ( talk) 10:18, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom.-- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 02:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Comment: This is the name of the main page in the Gan Wikipedia. Gorobay ( talk) 13:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete: main page of English Wikipedia has no strong connections with any language besides English. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 15:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete the Main Page portal on English Wikipedia is not the topic of "front cover". -- 65.94.171.126 ( talk) 04:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep, absent stated arguments for doing anything else. -- BDD ( talk) 21:42, 26 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• User:Aimsplode/sig2 → Main Page ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] The ChampionMan 1234 09:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep: harmless; redirects in userspace are not our business. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 13:34, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:41, 26 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Beurajil → Brazil ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

Not in native language of country, also delete Burajil and Burachil. A quick google search of any of these names does not give me the answer to what language this is in, but I know its not in the native llanguage of the country. Regards, The ChampionMan 1234 08:29, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Update: I have discovered that I have nominated many redirects for deletion and it endend up notifying 68.72.116.165. Regards, The ChampionMan 1234 08:37, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Did you mean to nominate Burajil and Burachil? They should be deleted too. That IP editor seems to have created many deletion-worthy ko-Latn redirects. Gorobay ( talk) 13:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Comment: they are probably Korean. Siuenti ( talk) 10:06, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Yes, in any case, its nothing to do with Brazil whatsoever The ChampionMan 1234 10:13, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete per WP:FORRED. Why this one wasn't closed already? — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 05:32, 25 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:40, 26 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Evan Rachel Wood on Little Secrets → Little Secrets ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

deletion, unlikely search term based on nn interview Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 03:56, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. This is essentially the same issue as the April 18 discussion, as several editors have noticed. Given the subject's own preferences and a history of deletion, I agree that this should've gone with the redirects deleted then. -- BDD ( talk) 03:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Jon jafari → Game Grumps ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

Please delete this redirect per Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_April_18#JonTron. This is basically the same thing but with JonTron's real name and a lower case "j" in his last name. GamerPro64 03:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep Harmless, likely search term. -- The ChampionMan 1234 09:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep There is no reason to delete either Jon Jafari or this. It is a likely search term and there's no better target. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 16:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply
  • But JonTron isn't even part of Game Grumps anymore. He himself doesn't want his name associated with the Wikipedia page. GamerPro64 22:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Obvious Delete - This should've been deleted after the RfD but somehow slipped through the cracks. ☺ ·  Salvidrim! ·  ✉ 16:11, 23 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete per outcome of Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 April 18#JonTron. I agree with BDD that WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE applies here. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 23:03, 23 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete both. JohnCD ( talk) 13:24, 15 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Wisconsin Highway 141 → U.S. Route 141 ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• Wisconsin Highway 151 → U.S. Route 151 ( links to redirect • history • stats

Please delete this redirect as it causes confusion. There never was a Wisconsin Highway 141 [1]. There are many U.S. Routes in Wisconsin and the reader shouldn't be searching for a non-existent highway. Royal broil 02:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Delete. This also applies to Wisconsin Highway 151 → U.S. Route 151. In both cases, there is a faulty assumption. Yes, some numbers did line up, but these pair don't. Imzadi 1979  → 02:54, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the addition, and I agree that the 151 redirect should be added to the discussion. Royal broil 02:59, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete: misleading redirects. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 15:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete -- Prcc27 ( talk) 04:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.