![]() | Skip to:
Table of contents /
current discussions /
old business (bottom). |
![]() | Please do not nominate your
user page (or
subpages of it) for deletion here. Instead, add {{
db-userreq}} at the top of any such page you no longer wish to keep; an
administrator will then delete the page. See
Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion for more information. |
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
Miscellany for deletion (MfD) is a place where Wikipedians decide what should be done with problematic pages in the namespaces which aren't covered by other specialized deletion discussion areas. Items sent here are usually discussed for seven days; then they are either deleted by an administrator or kept, based on community consensus as evident from the discussion, consistent with policy, and with careful judgment of the rough consensus if required.
Filtered versions of the page are available at
What may be nominated for deletion here:
Requests to undelete pages deleted after discussion here, and debate whether discussions here have been properly closed, both take place at Wikipedia:Deletion review, in accordance with Wikipedia's undeletion policy.
Before nominating a page for deletion, please consider these guidelines:
Deleting pages in your own userspace |
|
Duplications in draftspace? |
|
Deleting pages in other people's userspace |
|
Policies, guidelines and process pages |
|
WikiProjects and their subpages |
|
Alternatives to deletion |
|
Alternatives to MfD |
|
Please check the aforementioned list of deletion discussion areas to check that you are in the right area. Then follow these instructions:
Instructions on listing pages for deletion:
| ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
To list a page for deletion, follow this three-step process: (replace PageName with the name of the page, including its namespace, to be deleted) Note: Users must be logged in to complete step II. An unregistered user who wishes to nominate a page for deletion should complete step I and post their reasoning on Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion with a notification to a registered user to complete the process.
|
V | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CfD | 0 | 0 | 4 | 34 | 38 |
TfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
MfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
FfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
RfD | 0 | 0 | 4 | 30 | 34 |
AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Administrator instructions for closing and relisting discussions can be found here.
A list of archived discussions can be located at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Archived debates.
Speedy delete: It's a fake Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 03:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
This is a violation of numerous site policies.
1) Editors should not use Wikipedia for content that they insist other editors are not allowed to read or discuss. 2) The title is deliberately misleading; the page is not a talk-page archive, but an extremely long and rambling article about the "Donald Trump pee tape" and other rumors involving Russia. 3) Some of the accusations and insinuations against Mr. Trump are BLP violations; the clear intention of the article is to engage in personal attacks against Mr. Trump. Walsh90210 ( talk) 15:01, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
This kind of harassment. I would be interested in seeing and reviewing the draft guideline.
@ Robert McClenon: please clarify a few things for me:
Please answer my questions. The content is based on myriad RS, many of the highest quality and reliability, as this has national security implications and is the subject of FBI and Congressional investigations, testimony, and several lawsuits by Trump, which he has lost.
You should read these DYK? items. Myriad RS are behind each one:
Did you know?
And one more:
I do not use words lightly in my draft article, and, whenever necessary, I have used words like "alleged", which is what we do with unproven claims and allegations. The rumor has not been misrepresented as proven fact. It's an extremely notable and serious rumor that did not start with the Steele dossier, and Trump has repeatedly lied about it. That increases the notability, as RS have documented these lies. The topic easily passes the GNG notability guideline. If someone has a problem with some of the content, I have written, right at the top of the page, for them to "email me". -- Valjean ( talk) (PING me) 22:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:FAKEARTICLE, fake article for Drummore Primary School JaggedHamster ( talk) 21:05, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:2024 CrowdStrike outages |
---|
The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. Nom withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 ( t • c) 08:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC) This should be moved to draftspace [ osunpokeh/ talk/ contributions] 08:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
|
All prior XfDs for this page: |
This is a recently-created, highly niche WikiProject (focusing on a single musical artist) whose creator has since been indefinitely blocked and only has three other participants. It didn't follow the recommended process for creating a wikiproject by proposing it and gathering a group of interested editors before creation. Unfortunately we know from experience that such narrowly-focused wikiprojects are almost never successful and just end up cluttering projectspace and diluting attention from other, broader and more viable, collaborations in the subject area. Creating a SZA task force of WikiProject Music might be an alternative, but again this needs more than a few interested editors to be meaningful. – Joe ( talk) 15:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
This is a recently-created, highly niche WikiProject (focusing on a single city) with only one participant. It didn't follow the recommended process for creating a wikiproject by proposing it and gathering a group of interested editors before creation. Unfortunately we know from experience that such narrowly-focused wikiprojects are almost never successful and just end up cluttering projectspace and diluting attention from other, broader and more viable, collaborations in the subject area. Creating a Jerusalem task force of WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration might be an alternative, but again this needs more than one interested editor to be meaningful. – Joe ( talk) 15:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
This is a recently-created, highly niche WikiProject with only two participants. It didn't follow the recommended process for creating a wikiproject by proposing it and gathering a group of interested editors before creation. Unfortunately we know from experience that such narrowly-focused wikiprojects are almost never successful and just end up cluttering projectspace and diluting attention from other, broader and more viable, collaborations in the subject area. Creating a task force of WikiProject Cricket might be an alternative, but again this needs more than a few interested editors to be meaningful. – Joe ( talk) 15:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
This is a recently-created, highly niche WikiProject with only one participant. It didn't follow the recommended process for creating a wikiproject by proposing it and gathering a group of interested editors before creation. Unfortunately we know from experience that such narrowly-focused wikiprojects are almost never successful and just end up cluttering projectspace and diluting attention from other, broader and more viable, collaborations in the subject area. Creating a Dardistan task force of WikiProject South Asia might be an alternative, but again this needs more than one interested editor to be meaningful. – Joe ( talk) 15:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be an abandoned draft article (on a topic we already cover) rather than a WikiProject. – Joe ( talk) 14:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
This is a recently-created, highly niche WikiProject (focusing on a single artist) with only one participant. It didn't follow the recommended process for creating a wikiproject by proposing it and gathering a group of interested editors before creation. Unfortunately we know from experience that such narrowly-focused wikiprojects are almost never successful and just end up cluttering projectspace and diluting attention from other, broader and more viable, collaborations in the subject area. Creating a Ledisi task force of WikiProject Music might be an alternative, but again this needs more than one interested editor to be meaningful. – Joe ( talk) 14:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
This is in clear violation of Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tropical_cyclones/Archive_43#RFC:_ACE_Calcs; this is nothing but an WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of info if it's not going to be used in the article. Also WP:NOTDATABASE, WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Although there is some dispute as to how this should be done, it appears that the consensus is to use the figures from a trusted source. However, our ACE calculations can also be used as placeholders in lieu of more reliable figures.
WP:NOTWEBHOST violation. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTWEBHOST violation. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:39, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes, this is a draft, and while things don't have to be perfect, a 5 year crystal ball is pushing it. Q T C 23:19, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
See Also:
No useful content Frietjes ( talk) 14:24, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
No useful contentis true but misleading, either deliberately misleading or bizarre. The nominator blanked the portal, removing a link to the lead article, Billy Murray (singer), immediately before nominating the portal for deletion. They were therefore technically in compliance with the {{ MFD}} tag, which says
do not blank, merge, or move it, or remove this notice. So the nominator first blanked the portal, which removed useful content, and then nominated the portal for deletion.
Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:44, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
While Ambasing is a real place, this page is mostly vandalism. The demographics section appears to be real, but is taken entirely from another page (I can't post a link to it because of the spam blacklist), word-for-word. Tymewalk ( talk) 05:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Blatant WP:NOTWEBHOST violation. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:09, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete userboxes. ISO 639 code for Moldovan, mo, has been deprecated. ( https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_changes.php) -- Lucjim ( talk) 21:38, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
The content of this page was merged here in 2007 after an AfD was closed with disposition to merge the content into Khaled Mashal (mentioned on the talk page here). Unless it was later removed (I haven't checked super thoroughly), that doesn't seem to have ever actually happened. But especially looking at this 17 years later, I'm not sure there's anything worth merging in here. The arguments for this were basically already made in the AfD. And if no one's actually ever going to merge this content, this page has no reason to exist. Kinsio ( talk ★ contribs ★ rights) 19:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Msalauddind89/sandbox |
---|
The result of the discussion was: delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:50, 17 July 2024 (UTC) Unattributed copy of Ahmed Sofa. Created over three years ago with no attempt to work on the content. ✗ plicit 11:55, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Drbogdan/BogdanDennis-PhD-Dissertation-1973 |
---|
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗ plicit 02:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be a semi-complete and search-engine indexed version of a page that was recently deleted through MfD, which can be found at Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Drbogdan/BogdanDennis-PhD-Dissertation-1973-TEXT, from a user who has been CBANed for promotional content. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 22:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Everything below this point is old business; the 7-day review period that began 13:05, 14 July 2024 (UTC) ended today on 21 July 2024. Editors may continue to add comments until the discussion is closed but they should keep in mind that the discussion below this marker may be closed at any time without further notice. Discussions that have already been closed will be removed from the page automatically by Legobot and need no further action. |
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/Juve Merda |
---|
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗ plicit 02:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC) This was nominated at the wrong venue (TFD). This is a procedural nomination on my part and I express no opinion on the merits. The original nominating statement is: Offensive against Juventus Football Club, "merda" in Italian is a vulgar word equivalent to "shit" Qwerty 9706 ( talk) 11:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Colonial Empires/Userbox/CEBASICBOX |
---|
The result of the discussion was: keep. bibliomaniac 1 5 20:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Colonialism was redirected and is no longer a project or task force. Gonnym ( talk) 09:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
|
![]() | Skip to:
Table of contents /
current discussions /
old business (bottom). |
![]() | Please do not nominate your
user page (or
subpages of it) for deletion here. Instead, add {{
db-userreq}} at the top of any such page you no longer wish to keep; an
administrator will then delete the page. See
Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion for more information. |
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
Miscellany for deletion (MfD) is a place where Wikipedians decide what should be done with problematic pages in the namespaces which aren't covered by other specialized deletion discussion areas. Items sent here are usually discussed for seven days; then they are either deleted by an administrator or kept, based on community consensus as evident from the discussion, consistent with policy, and with careful judgment of the rough consensus if required.
Filtered versions of the page are available at
What may be nominated for deletion here:
Requests to undelete pages deleted after discussion here, and debate whether discussions here have been properly closed, both take place at Wikipedia:Deletion review, in accordance with Wikipedia's undeletion policy.
Before nominating a page for deletion, please consider these guidelines:
Deleting pages in your own userspace |
|
Duplications in draftspace? |
|
Deleting pages in other people's userspace |
|
Policies, guidelines and process pages |
|
WikiProjects and their subpages |
|
Alternatives to deletion |
|
Alternatives to MfD |
|
Please check the aforementioned list of deletion discussion areas to check that you are in the right area. Then follow these instructions:
Instructions on listing pages for deletion:
| ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
To list a page for deletion, follow this three-step process: (replace PageName with the name of the page, including its namespace, to be deleted) Note: Users must be logged in to complete step II. An unregistered user who wishes to nominate a page for deletion should complete step I and post their reasoning on Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion with a notification to a registered user to complete the process.
|
V | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CfD | 0 | 0 | 4 | 34 | 38 |
TfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
MfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
FfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
RfD | 0 | 0 | 4 | 30 | 34 |
AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Administrator instructions for closing and relisting discussions can be found here.
A list of archived discussions can be located at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Archived debates.
Speedy delete: It's a fake Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 03:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
This is a violation of numerous site policies.
1) Editors should not use Wikipedia for content that they insist other editors are not allowed to read or discuss. 2) The title is deliberately misleading; the page is not a talk-page archive, but an extremely long and rambling article about the "Donald Trump pee tape" and other rumors involving Russia. 3) Some of the accusations and insinuations against Mr. Trump are BLP violations; the clear intention of the article is to engage in personal attacks against Mr. Trump. Walsh90210 ( talk) 15:01, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
This kind of harassment. I would be interested in seeing and reviewing the draft guideline.
@ Robert McClenon: please clarify a few things for me:
Please answer my questions. The content is based on myriad RS, many of the highest quality and reliability, as this has national security implications and is the subject of FBI and Congressional investigations, testimony, and several lawsuits by Trump, which he has lost.
You should read these DYK? items. Myriad RS are behind each one:
Did you know?
And one more:
I do not use words lightly in my draft article, and, whenever necessary, I have used words like "alleged", which is what we do with unproven claims and allegations. The rumor has not been misrepresented as proven fact. It's an extremely notable and serious rumor that did not start with the Steele dossier, and Trump has repeatedly lied about it. That increases the notability, as RS have documented these lies. The topic easily passes the GNG notability guideline. If someone has a problem with some of the content, I have written, right at the top of the page, for them to "email me". -- Valjean ( talk) (PING me) 22:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:FAKEARTICLE, fake article for Drummore Primary School JaggedHamster ( talk) 21:05, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:2024 CrowdStrike outages |
---|
The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. Nom withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 ( t • c) 08:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC) This should be moved to draftspace [ osunpokeh/ talk/ contributions] 08:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
|
All prior XfDs for this page: |
This is a recently-created, highly niche WikiProject (focusing on a single musical artist) whose creator has since been indefinitely blocked and only has three other participants. It didn't follow the recommended process for creating a wikiproject by proposing it and gathering a group of interested editors before creation. Unfortunately we know from experience that such narrowly-focused wikiprojects are almost never successful and just end up cluttering projectspace and diluting attention from other, broader and more viable, collaborations in the subject area. Creating a SZA task force of WikiProject Music might be an alternative, but again this needs more than a few interested editors to be meaningful. – Joe ( talk) 15:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
This is a recently-created, highly niche WikiProject (focusing on a single city) with only one participant. It didn't follow the recommended process for creating a wikiproject by proposing it and gathering a group of interested editors before creation. Unfortunately we know from experience that such narrowly-focused wikiprojects are almost never successful and just end up cluttering projectspace and diluting attention from other, broader and more viable, collaborations in the subject area. Creating a Jerusalem task force of WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration might be an alternative, but again this needs more than one interested editor to be meaningful. – Joe ( talk) 15:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
This is a recently-created, highly niche WikiProject with only two participants. It didn't follow the recommended process for creating a wikiproject by proposing it and gathering a group of interested editors before creation. Unfortunately we know from experience that such narrowly-focused wikiprojects are almost never successful and just end up cluttering projectspace and diluting attention from other, broader and more viable, collaborations in the subject area. Creating a task force of WikiProject Cricket might be an alternative, but again this needs more than a few interested editors to be meaningful. – Joe ( talk) 15:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
This is a recently-created, highly niche WikiProject with only one participant. It didn't follow the recommended process for creating a wikiproject by proposing it and gathering a group of interested editors before creation. Unfortunately we know from experience that such narrowly-focused wikiprojects are almost never successful and just end up cluttering projectspace and diluting attention from other, broader and more viable, collaborations in the subject area. Creating a Dardistan task force of WikiProject South Asia might be an alternative, but again this needs more than one interested editor to be meaningful. – Joe ( talk) 15:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be an abandoned draft article (on a topic we already cover) rather than a WikiProject. – Joe ( talk) 14:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
This is a recently-created, highly niche WikiProject (focusing on a single artist) with only one participant. It didn't follow the recommended process for creating a wikiproject by proposing it and gathering a group of interested editors before creation. Unfortunately we know from experience that such narrowly-focused wikiprojects are almost never successful and just end up cluttering projectspace and diluting attention from other, broader and more viable, collaborations in the subject area. Creating a Ledisi task force of WikiProject Music might be an alternative, but again this needs more than one interested editor to be meaningful. – Joe ( talk) 14:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
This is in clear violation of Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tropical_cyclones/Archive_43#RFC:_ACE_Calcs; this is nothing but an WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of info if it's not going to be used in the article. Also WP:NOTDATABASE, WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Although there is some dispute as to how this should be done, it appears that the consensus is to use the figures from a trusted source. However, our ACE calculations can also be used as placeholders in lieu of more reliable figures.
WP:NOTWEBHOST violation. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTWEBHOST violation. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:39, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes, this is a draft, and while things don't have to be perfect, a 5 year crystal ball is pushing it. Q T C 23:19, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
See Also:
No useful content Frietjes ( talk) 14:24, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
No useful contentis true but misleading, either deliberately misleading or bizarre. The nominator blanked the portal, removing a link to the lead article, Billy Murray (singer), immediately before nominating the portal for deletion. They were therefore technically in compliance with the {{ MFD}} tag, which says
do not blank, merge, or move it, or remove this notice. So the nominator first blanked the portal, which removed useful content, and then nominated the portal for deletion.
Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:44, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
While Ambasing is a real place, this page is mostly vandalism. The demographics section appears to be real, but is taken entirely from another page (I can't post a link to it because of the spam blacklist), word-for-word. Tymewalk ( talk) 05:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Blatant WP:NOTWEBHOST violation. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:09, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete userboxes. ISO 639 code for Moldovan, mo, has been deprecated. ( https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_changes.php) -- Lucjim ( talk) 21:38, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
The content of this page was merged here in 2007 after an AfD was closed with disposition to merge the content into Khaled Mashal (mentioned on the talk page here). Unless it was later removed (I haven't checked super thoroughly), that doesn't seem to have ever actually happened. But especially looking at this 17 years later, I'm not sure there's anything worth merging in here. The arguments for this were basically already made in the AfD. And if no one's actually ever going to merge this content, this page has no reason to exist. Kinsio ( talk ★ contribs ★ rights) 19:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Msalauddind89/sandbox |
---|
The result of the discussion was: delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:50, 17 July 2024 (UTC) Unattributed copy of Ahmed Sofa. Created over three years ago with no attempt to work on the content. ✗ plicit 11:55, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Drbogdan/BogdanDennis-PhD-Dissertation-1973 |
---|
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗ plicit 02:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be a semi-complete and search-engine indexed version of a page that was recently deleted through MfD, which can be found at Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Drbogdan/BogdanDennis-PhD-Dissertation-1973-TEXT, from a user who has been CBANed for promotional content. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 22:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Everything below this point is old business; the 7-day review period that began 13:05, 14 July 2024 (UTC) ended today on 21 July 2024. Editors may continue to add comments until the discussion is closed but they should keep in mind that the discussion below this marker may be closed at any time without further notice. Discussions that have already been closed will be removed from the page automatically by Legobot and need no further action. |
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/Juve Merda |
---|
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗ plicit 02:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC) This was nominated at the wrong venue (TFD). This is a procedural nomination on my part and I express no opinion on the merits. The original nominating statement is: Offensive against Juventus Football Club, "merda" in Italian is a vulgar word equivalent to "shit" Qwerty 9706 ( talk) 11:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Colonial Empires/Userbox/CEBASICBOX |
---|
The result of the discussion was: keep. bibliomaniac 1 5 20:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Colonialism was redirected and is no longer a project or task force. Gonnym ( talk) 09:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
|