The list was kept by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC) [1]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list removal because the list itself is unreferenced. It's been an FL for a long time but even back in 2009, the list content should have been referenced, but it wasn't. Schwede 66 18:58, 16 November 2022 (UTC) reply
This nomination has stalled out with no consensus to delist. It looks like the nominator's major concerns were addressed, so I'm going to close this. I did add some accessibility fixes as well. -- Pres N 14:43, 9 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The list was kept by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC) [2]. reply
A 2007 candidate that is almost wholly unsourced - most of the inline citations are actually unsupported notes. This is particularly concerning as part of this list falls under WP:BLP as many of these draft picks are still living. This would not pass WP:FLC in its current state and needs significant work. Hog Farm Talk 17:58, 7 December 2022 (UTC) reply
This nomination has stalled out with no consensus to delist. It looks like the nominator is fine with dropping it, so I'm going to close this. I would prefer for the tables to have explicit cites, however, or that, at minimum, there should be a statement above the tables saying which general references were used rather than having the reader guess. I did add some accessibility fixes as well. -- Pres N 14:43, 9 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The list was kept by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC) [1]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list removal because the list itself is unreferenced. It's been an FL for a long time but even back in 2009, the list content should have been referenced, but it wasn't. Schwede 66 18:58, 16 November 2022 (UTC) reply
This nomination has stalled out with no consensus to delist. It looks like the nominator's major concerns were addressed, so I'm going to close this. I did add some accessibility fixes as well. -- Pres N 14:43, 9 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The list was kept by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC) [2]. reply
A 2007 candidate that is almost wholly unsourced - most of the inline citations are actually unsupported notes. This is particularly concerning as part of this list falls under WP:BLP as many of these draft picks are still living. This would not pass WP:FLC in its current state and needs significant work. Hog Farm Talk 17:58, 7 December 2022 (UTC) reply
This nomination has stalled out with no consensus to delist. It looks like the nominator is fine with dropping it, so I'm going to close this. I would prefer for the tables to have explicit cites, however, or that, at minimum, there should be a statement above the tables saying which general references were used rather than having the reader guess. I did add some accessibility fixes as well. -- Pres N 14:43, 9 February 2023 (UTC) reply