The list was kept by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:35, 25 August 2017 (UTC) [1]. reply
I am not actually nominating this list for removal but instead for a reassessment, and I hope this nomination ends with a "Keep" consensus. Since its promotion to a featured status, this page had changed substantially and was in a sorry state. I updated it, removed unsourced statements, introduced a clickable skyline image, and changed its structure per my standardization efforts. I'm looking for comments on those changes, and I hope the list's featured status will be affirmed. If this is not the place to seek help in such cases like this one, please feel free to tell me what courses of action I should take in the future – for example updating the article after nominating it for featured list removal or mass removing lists in a similar state and then nominating them for a featured status. Sandvich18 ( talk) 10:58, 5 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Hope these suggestions help out. Beyond that, I think the list looks good. Sportsguy17 ( T • C) 20:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Closing as keep- seeing as this was a reassessment, not a removal candidate, I'm fine not holding out for multiple reviewers trying to help "fix" it. -- Pres N 02:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was kept by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:34, 25 August 2017 (UTC) [2]. reply
I am not actually nominating this list for removal but instead for a reassessment, and I hope this nomination ends with a "Keep" consensus. Since its promotion to a featured status, this page had changed substantially and was in a very sorry state. I updated it, removed unsourced statements, introduced a clickable skyline image, and changed its structure per my standardization efforts. I'm looking for comments on those changes, and I hope the list's featured status will be affirmed. If this is not the place to seek help in such cases like this one, please feel free to tell me what courses of action I should take in the future – for example updating the article after nominating it for featured list removal or mass removing lists in a similar state and then nominating them for a featured status. Sandvich18 ( talk) 09:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC) reply
My comments that I made at the Portland, Oregon one apply here as well. Sportsguy17 ( T • C) 20:27, 8 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Closing as keep- seeing as this was a reassessment, not a removal candidate, I'm fine not holding out for multiple reviewers trying to help "fix" it. -- Pres N 02:54, 24 August 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:34, 25 August 2017 (UTC) [3]. reply
This article sadly no longer reflects an article of good standing. Problems include, but are not limited to:
There were problems of WP:OWNership shortly after the list went through its FLC, and I see no point in trying to rescue this from someone who has stated that the featured process "is of little interest to me as I believe the process is broken in many ways". - SchroCat ( talk) 08:20, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Ugh. The problems with this list are fixable. But no one is willing to fix them, which is frustrating for everyone involved. Delisting. -- Pres N 02:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:33, 25 August 2017 (UTC) [4]. reply
Notified: WT:WPMUSIC
The previous FLRC in 2014 dealt with sourcing issues that appeared to have been taken care of. The article has changed significantly since then. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 08:04, 15 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Delisting. -- Pres N 02:54, 24 August 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was kept by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:35, 25 August 2017 (UTC) [1]. reply
I am not actually nominating this list for removal but instead for a reassessment, and I hope this nomination ends with a "Keep" consensus. Since its promotion to a featured status, this page had changed substantially and was in a sorry state. I updated it, removed unsourced statements, introduced a clickable skyline image, and changed its structure per my standardization efforts. I'm looking for comments on those changes, and I hope the list's featured status will be affirmed. If this is not the place to seek help in such cases like this one, please feel free to tell me what courses of action I should take in the future – for example updating the article after nominating it for featured list removal or mass removing lists in a similar state and then nominating them for a featured status. Sandvich18 ( talk) 10:58, 5 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Hope these suggestions help out. Beyond that, I think the list looks good. Sportsguy17 ( T • C) 20:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Closing as keep- seeing as this was a reassessment, not a removal candidate, I'm fine not holding out for multiple reviewers trying to help "fix" it. -- Pres N 02:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was kept by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:34, 25 August 2017 (UTC) [2]. reply
I am not actually nominating this list for removal but instead for a reassessment, and I hope this nomination ends with a "Keep" consensus. Since its promotion to a featured status, this page had changed substantially and was in a very sorry state. I updated it, removed unsourced statements, introduced a clickable skyline image, and changed its structure per my standardization efforts. I'm looking for comments on those changes, and I hope the list's featured status will be affirmed. If this is not the place to seek help in such cases like this one, please feel free to tell me what courses of action I should take in the future – for example updating the article after nominating it for featured list removal or mass removing lists in a similar state and then nominating them for a featured status. Sandvich18 ( talk) 09:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC) reply
My comments that I made at the Portland, Oregon one apply here as well. Sportsguy17 ( T • C) 20:27, 8 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Closing as keep- seeing as this was a reassessment, not a removal candidate, I'm fine not holding out for multiple reviewers trying to help "fix" it. -- Pres N 02:54, 24 August 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:34, 25 August 2017 (UTC) [3]. reply
This article sadly no longer reflects an article of good standing. Problems include, but are not limited to:
There were problems of WP:OWNership shortly after the list went through its FLC, and I see no point in trying to rescue this from someone who has stated that the featured process "is of little interest to me as I believe the process is broken in many ways". - SchroCat ( talk) 08:20, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Ugh. The problems with this list are fixable. But no one is willing to fix them, which is frustrating for everyone involved. Delisting. -- Pres N 02:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:33, 25 August 2017 (UTC) [4]. reply
Notified: WT:WPMUSIC
The previous FLRC in 2014 dealt with sourcing issues that appeared to have been taken care of. The article has changed significantly since then. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 08:04, 15 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Delisting. -- Pres N 02:54, 24 August 2017 (UTC) reply