The list was kept by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:25, 22 April 2021 (UTC) [1]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it no longer meets our accessibility guidelines as required under WP:FLCR #5. Specifically, the tables have no captions, and they lack unique row-headers, which should be the title of the release in each case. RexxS ( talk) 13:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC) reply
scope="col"
to each column. Honestly, I think a bigger issue would be most of the references going to Amazon store pages. The accessibility issues described are easy to rectify, but if there aren't reliable sources, then that indicates deeper issues. (Edit: Looks like Amazon is OK for release dates. Not sure about the notes, however, but since most of them are basically "they did this one song" or are cited to
Oricon, I would guess it would be fine? I don't know.)
MSG17 (
talk)
23:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
replyThe stated issues with the list have been fixed, and there is no consensus to delist at this time. As a side note, thank you RexxS for nominating this- we should probably do an large-scale accessibility review of our older FLs, but in the meantime this nomination prompted me to start doing structured accessibility reviews of our active FLCs, which has already started to lead to repeat nominators fixing accessibility issues prior to nomination. -- Pres N 03:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC) reply
The list was kept by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC) [2]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it is long overdue. It was promoted in 2014 following this discussion which was overwhelmed by User:Vensatry, User:Sahara4u (because it favors them) giving the impression that it is being vetted properly without any regard to WP:NLIST and the fact that whole list is sourced with ESPNcricinfo match reports. No credible source discusses it as a set or group which is required so this list, in fact, fails WP:NLIST. Its counterpart List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at Bellerive Oval and many others were deleted recently for the same reason. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls on Irish cricket grounds, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at Carisbrook, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at Dubai International Cricket Stadium. Thanks. Störm (talk) 02:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:28, 29 April 2021 (UTC) [3]. reply
There are barely any pictures on this page, probably due to a mass purge of UAE building images on Commons some years ago. I might try to add some more images to this page in the next few weeks, but for now I don't think it deserves to be featured. Kestreltail ( talk) 04:57, 14 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Although there's one keep here, I'm going to go ahead and delist- while the issues the nominator brought up may or may not be an issue, the large lack of citations are pretty glaring. Lots of the buildings are unreferenced, parts of the list seem out of date from at least 2019 (or at least additions have been made piecemeal and the wording not cleaned up for other parts), and after 3 months there's not much movement on this list. -- Pres N 19:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC) [4]. reply
This is an old 2008 promotion, and it seems to have not been maintained in the interim. The lead is quite short and contains only two citations (2). Many of its entries explicitly lack citations, many of the apparent citations are notes, and many actual citations are just to statoids.com. Some entries are questionable (eg. French DOMs, Jakarta), or to meet only part of the leads inclusion criteria (eg. Spanish regions can not all, by definition, "in relation to the majority of other sub-national territories in the same country, enjoy a special status including some legislative powers"). CMD ( talk) 16:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC) reply
Delisting. -- Pres N 22:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC) reply
The list was kept by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:25, 22 April 2021 (UTC) [1]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it no longer meets our accessibility guidelines as required under WP:FLCR #5. Specifically, the tables have no captions, and they lack unique row-headers, which should be the title of the release in each case. RexxS ( talk) 13:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC) reply
scope="col"
to each column. Honestly, I think a bigger issue would be most of the references going to Amazon store pages. The accessibility issues described are easy to rectify, but if there aren't reliable sources, then that indicates deeper issues. (Edit: Looks like Amazon is OK for release dates. Not sure about the notes, however, but since most of them are basically "they did this one song" or are cited to
Oricon, I would guess it would be fine? I don't know.)
MSG17 (
talk)
23:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
replyThe stated issues with the list have been fixed, and there is no consensus to delist at this time. As a side note, thank you RexxS for nominating this- we should probably do an large-scale accessibility review of our older FLs, but in the meantime this nomination prompted me to start doing structured accessibility reviews of our active FLCs, which has already started to lead to repeat nominators fixing accessibility issues prior to nomination. -- Pres N 03:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC) reply
The list was kept by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC) [2]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it is long overdue. It was promoted in 2014 following this discussion which was overwhelmed by User:Vensatry, User:Sahara4u (because it favors them) giving the impression that it is being vetted properly without any regard to WP:NLIST and the fact that whole list is sourced with ESPNcricinfo match reports. No credible source discusses it as a set or group which is required so this list, in fact, fails WP:NLIST. Its counterpart List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at Bellerive Oval and many others were deleted recently for the same reason. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls on Irish cricket grounds, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at Carisbrook, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at Dubai International Cricket Stadium. Thanks. Störm (talk) 02:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:28, 29 April 2021 (UTC) [3]. reply
There are barely any pictures on this page, probably due to a mass purge of UAE building images on Commons some years ago. I might try to add some more images to this page in the next few weeks, but for now I don't think it deserves to be featured. Kestreltail ( talk) 04:57, 14 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Although there's one keep here, I'm going to go ahead and delist- while the issues the nominator brought up may or may not be an issue, the large lack of citations are pretty glaring. Lots of the buildings are unreferenced, parts of the list seem out of date from at least 2019 (or at least additions have been made piecemeal and the wording not cleaned up for other parts), and after 3 months there's not much movement on this list. -- Pres N 19:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC) [4]. reply
This is an old 2008 promotion, and it seems to have not been maintained in the interim. The lead is quite short and contains only two citations (2). Many of its entries explicitly lack citations, many of the apparent citations are notes, and many actual citations are just to statoids.com. Some entries are questionable (eg. French DOMs, Jakarta), or to meet only part of the leads inclusion criteria (eg. Spanish regions can not all, by definition, "in relation to the majority of other sub-national territories in the same country, enjoy a special status including some legislative powers"). CMD ( talk) 16:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC) reply
Delisting. -- Pres N 22:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC) reply