The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 03:01, 30 December 2015 (UTC) [1]. reply
Amitabh Bachchan is considered to be one of the greatest actor of this planet. He has nearly 220 acting credits, including films like Sholay, Agneepath, Aankhen, Sarkar, Black and Paa. This list a well-written and well-sourced listing of his career. Yashthepunisher ( talk) 16:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Quick comment – Given the length of his career, make sure that all his films are listed in the chronological order of release date. Also, you might want to move the films that he had produced to a separate table to avoid confusion. Also, I cannot find any of his minor works (TV shows, documentaries, etc.,) of the pre-90s era. There must be a few, I guess. — Vensatry (Talk) 07:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from Dharmadhyaksha
I shall review the list when all of the comments above are addressed. -- Frankie talk 22:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Frankie talk |
---|
Comments from FrB.TG
|
I think the lead cannot accomodate more than this, considering his work. Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 10:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Support. It is a decent list, considering Bachchan's work in multiple fields. IMO, it satisfies the FL criteria. Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 08:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Oppose
Support After reading through the prose and checking out the references, I'm certain this meets the FL criteria. The references are all formatted correctly (I couldn't spot one issue) and the prose is well written. I couldn't find anything wrong with the table either! JAG UAR 14:15, 13 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Comment to the delegates – There is some indirect form of canvassing by the nominator. — Vensatry (Talk) 16:50, 13 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Additional comments (to justify my oppose)
Delegate note
Okay; this nomination is getting a little out of hand. Vensatry are you still opposing this nomination? Please base your decision solely on the list's content, not on actions the nominator may or may not have taken in regards to this or prior FLCs; that will be taken into consideration separately from the list's quality concerns. -- Pres N 01:39, 24 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Prose concerns after re-visit
Final take
Okay, last call. Vensatry: still opposing after these last changes? It looks like the one outstanding is that the producer roles are in the same table as his acting roles, which I agree is strange, and you also seem to want narrator roles split out, which I'm more ambivalent about. Is there anything else?
Yashthepunisher: just to correct you, peer reviews can be opened for any reason at all; you don't need to have "multiple issues raised by multiple editors". Also, am I reading correctly that you don't know how to split the film table into two tables- one for acting and one for producing? That's... odd, but if so I can split it for you. -- Pres N 17:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Question – "He returned to the screen after a five-year absence with the box-office success Shahenshah (1988)." This sentence implies that he had no releases until 1988 – what about Geraftaar and Aakhree Raasta? "He also earned the Filmfare Award for Best Actor for Hum, following which he took a long hiatus from acting". He had five straight releases after Hum. Not sure if a three-year period could be termed 'long hiatus'. But then, he made 'special appearances' in a few films during this period. — Vensatry (Talk) 17:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Okay, I've split the producer roles out into their own table. I'm going to be closing this nom today; I want to write up something talking about my reasoning and my thoughts on this nomination. -- Pres N 17:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Closing Notes
This nomination is a hard one to close (any nomination with multiple supporters and one oppose is), but now that we've finalized on one sticking point that the nominator and final reviewer can't agree on, I think it's time to do so. Before I come to that sticking point, though, there's something I want to address- the interactions of the nominator Yashthepunisher and the reviewers, especially Vensatry. On one hand, Vensatry got pretty harsh in their review, at times crossing the line into condescending or paternalistic. It's a little much, and I think the reason behind it is that sometimes you're not as clear when you ask for something as you think you are, and you get angry that the nominator doesn't understand you because you think they're just avoiding the issue. That's rather understandable, though, because even just reading this nomination, I got kind of frustrated with Yashthepunisher.
Yash- this is your nomination. When you nominate a list, you're agreeing to fix issues that the reviewers bring up, or explain why you disagree if you do. It's not really cool to try to brush off any problems that seem difficult to fix by asking the reviewers to fix it themselves, or find the sources themselves. There seemed to be a lot of problems around missing entire roles and getting dates wrong, which are kind of the point of the list and kind of on you to fix when the issue is found. It's also not really cool to brush off prose concerns with "I didn't write that"- the lead is only four paragraphs. It's concerning that this nomination is so long, and due to factual concerns more than grammar or formatting.
In the end, though, everything got cleared up except for one thing- the style of the lead. I find it a little disappointing that the nom thinks that the lead is "acceptable", but not actually "good", and is fine with that, though I think Vensatry could have been clearer on what exactly they were looking for earlier on, instead of just "written better". I agree with Vensatry that the Laurence Olivier list is a much better lead example- he had a similarly long and full career, and the lead is well-written, talking about the overall shape of his career. Morgan Freeman's career isn't as long, and has the same issue as the lead here- the lead is just half of the tables, with content chopped out and shoved in a prose format that's harder to read than the table. It just an overlong summary; it tells me nothing about Amitabh Bachchan that I don't then find out reading the table. Literally; all I know about the man after reading the article is that he's been in a ton of films; I don't know why his career shifted over time, not really. Apparently, that's "acceptable", and has passed for other FLCs. I don't like it, but I'm a delegate, not the dictator of lists.
Since the remaining problem is "acceptable", I guess I have to pass this as an "acceptable" FLC. You should consider making the lead more than a list of roles, though, in case consensus changes in the future and FLRC comes knocking. -- Pres N 18:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:47, 29 December 2015 (UTC) [12]. reply
Whiplash is a 2014 drama directed by Damien Chazelle about a jazz drummer fighting to survive in a studio band led by a tyrannical conductor. The film received many accolades especially for the performance of J. K. Simmons in the latter role. As usual look forward to all the helpful comments on how to improve it. Cowlibob ( talk) 19:41, 11 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from
GagaNutella
|
---|
|
Comment - I don't think one is allowed to have more than two open nominations. As this is your third, the other two being this and this one, I think one of these should be taken care of. -- Frankie talk 17:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from
Johanna
|
---|
The table and nitpick-y stuff like reference italics were all fine. Clear this up and I'll be happy to support. :) Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214) talk to me! see my work 04:26, 26 November 2015 (UTC) reply
|
Comments –
Okay, skimmed through the list and didn't see anything I had a problem with, so closing this nom as passed. -- Pres N 17:29, 28 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 03:16, 23 December 2015 (UTC) [13]. reply
I am nominating the 1988 Oscars for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I also followed how the 1929, 1987, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015 were written. Birdienest81 ( talk) 18:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Support — Looks good. Jimknut ( talk) 00:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Johanna (talk to me!) 03:19, 18 December 2015 (UTC) reply |
---|
;Comments from Johanna
@ Birdienest81: This looks like a very good article! As you can see, I just had a few prose comments. The tables look great and it's well on its way to becoming an FL! Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214) talk to me! see my work 03:42, 22 November 2015 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved Comments from
SNUGGUMS
|
---|
Let's have a look.....
That's all from me. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 19:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Frankie talk |
---|
Comment – nice work. I've got a few concerns with references but they are not major anyway:
|
The list was promoted by Hawkeye7 via FACBot ( talk) 18:43, 14 December 2015 (UTC) [14]. reply
This article details the discography of American R&B singer Tinashe, perhaps best known for her breakout single " 2 On". Since then, she has gone on to collaborate with the likes of Iggy Azalea, Calvin Harris and Chris Brown. Thankyou for all comments in advance. Azealia911 talk 11:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from Calvin999 Here are some quick initial comments at a glance
— Calvin999 16:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from IndianBio For the urls which require subscription, can you please have it as part of the {{ cite web}} template itself? Use subscription=yes and it will auto generate the string. — Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 16:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from SNUGGUMS
Resolved comments from
SNUGGUMS
|
---|
Decent overall, but I can't support yet. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 03:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC) reply |
Comments from Eurofan88
Comments from GagaNutella It looks great after the edits above. Now I think you need to add her music videos in this article. Here are some FL examples you can follow: Gotye discography, M.I.A. discography, LMFAO discography. GagaNutella talk 18:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from FrB.TG
Resolved comments from Frankie talk |
---|
|
Comment by Godot13 - lead image needs Alt text.-- Godot13 ( talk) 04:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from Adabow
publisher
parameter of citation templates instead of the work
one.
Adabow (
talk)
04:08, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
reply
Adabow ( talk) 03:22, 14 November 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Hawkeye7 via FACBot ( talk) 18:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC) [16]. reply
Hey all, back again with the 8th World Fantasy Award list, and #34 overall in our perpetual FLC series of sci-fi/fantasy award lists. This list is the counterpart to the recent FL World Fantasy Special Award—Professional, and acts as the non-professional "other" category of the World Fantasy Awards, covering your editors of non-professional magazines, heads of hobby fantasy publishers, and general amateur contributors to the Fantasy literary field. If you saw/reviewed the Professional list, this is basically identical with different names/contributions. Thanks for reviewing! -- Pres N 16:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from Harrias
Other than that, I really can't see much wrong with this. Harrias talk 16:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments by Dudley
The list was promoted by Hawkeye7 via FACBot ( talk) 18:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC) [17]. reply
Lady Gaga in less than ten years has won several awards such as the Grammys, Brits, and VMAs. After a long work, we believe it meets the criteria. The awards in this list are reliable and we've added sources for all of them. GagaNutella talk 22:19, 1 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Maile — Maile ( talk) 14:10, 10 November 2015 (UTC) reply |
---|
;Comments by Maile
|
Resolved comments from Johanna talk to me! see my work 21:25, 11 December 2015 (UTC) reply |
---|
;Comments from Johanna
|
Support from an IP with a few comments:
Support . Well-written list, good work! TheFame08 ( talk) 04:55, 5 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC) [18]. reply
Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara is a 2011 film about self discoveries of three friends during a trip in Spain. It is the recipient of several National Film Awards, Filmfare Awards and other major Indian awards. As this is for featured list, I am expecting constructive criticism from reviewers and I will take care of them in its entirety. Hoping for the best. -- Frankie talk 15:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Support — Fixed a few minor issues myself. Can't see much ado about this list. Well done, Frankie. Keep up the good work. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 04:50, 22 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Thanks Giants for the clarification. @ Dharmadhyaksha: You may continue your review if you wish to. -- Frankie talk 18:00, 26 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from Yashthepunisher
Resolved comments from Johanna talk to me! see my work 20:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC) reply |
---|
;Comments from Johanna
That's about it for me. I'll be happy to support once this is fixed. Johanna talk to me! see my work 03:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 10:14, 11 December 2015 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments from Pavanjandhyala
Let me know when you are done with all of them. Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 16:56, 7 December 2015 (UTC) reply |
Support Good job on the list. Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 10:14, 11 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments –
The list was promoted by Hawkeye7 via FACBot ( talk) 18:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC) [19]. reply
So far as I know, this is the first list of nature reserves managed by a British wildlife trust nominated for FLC. It includes photographs of all the sites. Dudley Miles ( talk) 19:14, 23 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Support – a lovely page, and much more than a mere list. Plainly meets the FL criteria in my view. Only two comments. At Pryor's Wood, should "sparrowshawks" be "sparrowhawks"? And the absence of a Description for Rye Meads looks like an unintentional omission (FL criterion 3 (a) came briefly to mind), though I am perfectly prepared to be told it isn't. – Tim riley talk 20:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Comment Another interesting list.
Most of these are minor quibbles and shouldn't be too difficult to resolve.— Rod talk 21:17, 23 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Comment by Godot13
FLC is running a bit slow right now, so recusing myself as a delegate to review this list.
Not much overall! If this was helpful, consider optionally reviwing my FLC up above. -- Pres N 18:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 19:20, 11 December 2015 (UTC) [20]. reply
Here is another association football club's list of notable records and relevant statistics nominated for featured status. This one belongs to FC Porto, an historical Portuguese side with a vast domestic and European palmarès. I created this list from scratch and followed other similar and already featured pages during its development, so here's hoping that this one may have the same fate. Thank you in advance for your reviews. Parutakupiu ( talk) 19:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Mattythewhite ( talk) 22:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments from Mattythewhite
Thanks, Mattythewhite ( talk) 17:49, 26 October 2015 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Lemonade51 ( talk) 17:38, 6 November 2015 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments from Lemonade
|
Support from an IP with a few comments:
Alright, closing this nomination as passed. -- Pres N 17:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 10:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC) [21]. reply
An oft forgotten aspect of Hurricane Katrina's devastating landfall in the United States, this tornado outbreak was actually the largest such event on record in Georgia for the month of August. A record-shattering 18 tornadoes touched down on August 29 (previous highest was a mere 2 twisters) across Georgia. The outbreak also marked the first known tornadic fatality in August in Georgia and furthermore is the costliest such event during the month for the state. Over the course of nearly five days, 57 tornadoes touched down across 8 states as a result of Katrina.
In terms of formatting, the tornado table was created in mirror of the one constructed during the List of tornadoes in the 1999 Oklahoma tornado outbreak FLC two years back and should meet all MOS standards. Although the article title doesn't inherently imply a list, I opted to focus the content on the tornadoes themselves rather than the meteorological conditions that would be present in most other tornado outbreak articles. If these details were to be expanded upon, it would simply be monotonous repetition of the same exact situation on five separate days. Anyways, I hope you all enjoy reading this little article and I look forward to comments/criticisms to make it the best it can be! ~ Cyclonebiskit ( chat) 16:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Support
All in all a good read! Hurricanehink ( talk) 22:47, 4 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Looks pretty good otherwise. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:00, 6 December 2015 (UTC) reply
All good to go now; passed. Delegate note: using this nomination as a test of the new bot-assisted closing procedure. -- Pres N 20:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 03:01, 30 December 2015 (UTC) [1]. reply
Amitabh Bachchan is considered to be one of the greatest actor of this planet. He has nearly 220 acting credits, including films like Sholay, Agneepath, Aankhen, Sarkar, Black and Paa. This list a well-written and well-sourced listing of his career. Yashthepunisher ( talk) 16:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Quick comment – Given the length of his career, make sure that all his films are listed in the chronological order of release date. Also, you might want to move the films that he had produced to a separate table to avoid confusion. Also, I cannot find any of his minor works (TV shows, documentaries, etc.,) of the pre-90s era. There must be a few, I guess. — Vensatry (Talk) 07:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from Dharmadhyaksha
I shall review the list when all of the comments above are addressed. -- Frankie talk 22:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Frankie talk |
---|
Comments from FrB.TG
|
I think the lead cannot accomodate more than this, considering his work. Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 10:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Support. It is a decent list, considering Bachchan's work in multiple fields. IMO, it satisfies the FL criteria. Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 08:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Oppose
Support After reading through the prose and checking out the references, I'm certain this meets the FL criteria. The references are all formatted correctly (I couldn't spot one issue) and the prose is well written. I couldn't find anything wrong with the table either! JAG UAR 14:15, 13 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Comment to the delegates – There is some indirect form of canvassing by the nominator. — Vensatry (Talk) 16:50, 13 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Additional comments (to justify my oppose)
Delegate note
Okay; this nomination is getting a little out of hand. Vensatry are you still opposing this nomination? Please base your decision solely on the list's content, not on actions the nominator may or may not have taken in regards to this or prior FLCs; that will be taken into consideration separately from the list's quality concerns. -- Pres N 01:39, 24 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Prose concerns after re-visit
Final take
Okay, last call. Vensatry: still opposing after these last changes? It looks like the one outstanding is that the producer roles are in the same table as his acting roles, which I agree is strange, and you also seem to want narrator roles split out, which I'm more ambivalent about. Is there anything else?
Yashthepunisher: just to correct you, peer reviews can be opened for any reason at all; you don't need to have "multiple issues raised by multiple editors". Also, am I reading correctly that you don't know how to split the film table into two tables- one for acting and one for producing? That's... odd, but if so I can split it for you. -- Pres N 17:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Question – "He returned to the screen after a five-year absence with the box-office success Shahenshah (1988)." This sentence implies that he had no releases until 1988 – what about Geraftaar and Aakhree Raasta? "He also earned the Filmfare Award for Best Actor for Hum, following which he took a long hiatus from acting". He had five straight releases after Hum. Not sure if a three-year period could be termed 'long hiatus'. But then, he made 'special appearances' in a few films during this period. — Vensatry (Talk) 17:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Okay, I've split the producer roles out into their own table. I'm going to be closing this nom today; I want to write up something talking about my reasoning and my thoughts on this nomination. -- Pres N 17:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Closing Notes
This nomination is a hard one to close (any nomination with multiple supporters and one oppose is), but now that we've finalized on one sticking point that the nominator and final reviewer can't agree on, I think it's time to do so. Before I come to that sticking point, though, there's something I want to address- the interactions of the nominator Yashthepunisher and the reviewers, especially Vensatry. On one hand, Vensatry got pretty harsh in their review, at times crossing the line into condescending or paternalistic. It's a little much, and I think the reason behind it is that sometimes you're not as clear when you ask for something as you think you are, and you get angry that the nominator doesn't understand you because you think they're just avoiding the issue. That's rather understandable, though, because even just reading this nomination, I got kind of frustrated with Yashthepunisher.
Yash- this is your nomination. When you nominate a list, you're agreeing to fix issues that the reviewers bring up, or explain why you disagree if you do. It's not really cool to try to brush off any problems that seem difficult to fix by asking the reviewers to fix it themselves, or find the sources themselves. There seemed to be a lot of problems around missing entire roles and getting dates wrong, which are kind of the point of the list and kind of on you to fix when the issue is found. It's also not really cool to brush off prose concerns with "I didn't write that"- the lead is only four paragraphs. It's concerning that this nomination is so long, and due to factual concerns more than grammar or formatting.
In the end, though, everything got cleared up except for one thing- the style of the lead. I find it a little disappointing that the nom thinks that the lead is "acceptable", but not actually "good", and is fine with that, though I think Vensatry could have been clearer on what exactly they were looking for earlier on, instead of just "written better". I agree with Vensatry that the Laurence Olivier list is a much better lead example- he had a similarly long and full career, and the lead is well-written, talking about the overall shape of his career. Morgan Freeman's career isn't as long, and has the same issue as the lead here- the lead is just half of the tables, with content chopped out and shoved in a prose format that's harder to read than the table. It just an overlong summary; it tells me nothing about Amitabh Bachchan that I don't then find out reading the table. Literally; all I know about the man after reading the article is that he's been in a ton of films; I don't know why his career shifted over time, not really. Apparently, that's "acceptable", and has passed for other FLCs. I don't like it, but I'm a delegate, not the dictator of lists.
Since the remaining problem is "acceptable", I guess I have to pass this as an "acceptable" FLC. You should consider making the lead more than a list of roles, though, in case consensus changes in the future and FLRC comes knocking. -- Pres N 18:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:47, 29 December 2015 (UTC) [12]. reply
Whiplash is a 2014 drama directed by Damien Chazelle about a jazz drummer fighting to survive in a studio band led by a tyrannical conductor. The film received many accolades especially for the performance of J. K. Simmons in the latter role. As usual look forward to all the helpful comments on how to improve it. Cowlibob ( talk) 19:41, 11 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from
GagaNutella
|
---|
|
Comment - I don't think one is allowed to have more than two open nominations. As this is your third, the other two being this and this one, I think one of these should be taken care of. -- Frankie talk 17:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from
Johanna
|
---|
The table and nitpick-y stuff like reference italics were all fine. Clear this up and I'll be happy to support. :) Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214) talk to me! see my work 04:26, 26 November 2015 (UTC) reply
|
Comments –
Okay, skimmed through the list and didn't see anything I had a problem with, so closing this nom as passed. -- Pres N 17:29, 28 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 03:16, 23 December 2015 (UTC) [13]. reply
I am nominating the 1988 Oscars for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I also followed how the 1929, 1987, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015 were written. Birdienest81 ( talk) 18:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Support — Looks good. Jimknut ( talk) 00:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Johanna (talk to me!) 03:19, 18 December 2015 (UTC) reply |
---|
;Comments from Johanna
@ Birdienest81: This looks like a very good article! As you can see, I just had a few prose comments. The tables look great and it's well on its way to becoming an FL! Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214) talk to me! see my work 03:42, 22 November 2015 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved Comments from
SNUGGUMS
|
---|
Let's have a look.....
That's all from me. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 19:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Frankie talk |
---|
Comment – nice work. I've got a few concerns with references but they are not major anyway:
|
The list was promoted by Hawkeye7 via FACBot ( talk) 18:43, 14 December 2015 (UTC) [14]. reply
This article details the discography of American R&B singer Tinashe, perhaps best known for her breakout single " 2 On". Since then, she has gone on to collaborate with the likes of Iggy Azalea, Calvin Harris and Chris Brown. Thankyou for all comments in advance. Azealia911 talk 11:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from Calvin999 Here are some quick initial comments at a glance
— Calvin999 16:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from IndianBio For the urls which require subscription, can you please have it as part of the {{ cite web}} template itself? Use subscription=yes and it will auto generate the string. — Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 16:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from SNUGGUMS
Resolved comments from
SNUGGUMS
|
---|
Decent overall, but I can't support yet. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 03:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC) reply |
Comments from Eurofan88
Comments from GagaNutella It looks great after the edits above. Now I think you need to add her music videos in this article. Here are some FL examples you can follow: Gotye discography, M.I.A. discography, LMFAO discography. GagaNutella talk 18:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from FrB.TG
Resolved comments from Frankie talk |
---|
|
Comment by Godot13 - lead image needs Alt text.-- Godot13 ( talk) 04:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from Adabow
publisher
parameter of citation templates instead of the work
one.
Adabow (
talk)
04:08, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
reply
Adabow ( talk) 03:22, 14 November 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Hawkeye7 via FACBot ( talk) 18:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC) [16]. reply
Hey all, back again with the 8th World Fantasy Award list, and #34 overall in our perpetual FLC series of sci-fi/fantasy award lists. This list is the counterpart to the recent FL World Fantasy Special Award—Professional, and acts as the non-professional "other" category of the World Fantasy Awards, covering your editors of non-professional magazines, heads of hobby fantasy publishers, and general amateur contributors to the Fantasy literary field. If you saw/reviewed the Professional list, this is basically identical with different names/contributions. Thanks for reviewing! -- Pres N 16:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from Harrias
Other than that, I really can't see much wrong with this. Harrias talk 16:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments by Dudley
The list was promoted by Hawkeye7 via FACBot ( talk) 18:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC) [17]. reply
Lady Gaga in less than ten years has won several awards such as the Grammys, Brits, and VMAs. After a long work, we believe it meets the criteria. The awards in this list are reliable and we've added sources for all of them. GagaNutella talk 22:19, 1 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Maile — Maile ( talk) 14:10, 10 November 2015 (UTC) reply |
---|
;Comments by Maile
|
Resolved comments from Johanna talk to me! see my work 21:25, 11 December 2015 (UTC) reply |
---|
;Comments from Johanna
|
Support from an IP with a few comments:
Support . Well-written list, good work! TheFame08 ( talk) 04:55, 5 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC) [18]. reply
Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara is a 2011 film about self discoveries of three friends during a trip in Spain. It is the recipient of several National Film Awards, Filmfare Awards and other major Indian awards. As this is for featured list, I am expecting constructive criticism from reviewers and I will take care of them in its entirety. Hoping for the best. -- Frankie talk 15:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Support — Fixed a few minor issues myself. Can't see much ado about this list. Well done, Frankie. Keep up the good work. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 04:50, 22 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Thanks Giants for the clarification. @ Dharmadhyaksha: You may continue your review if you wish to. -- Frankie talk 18:00, 26 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from Yashthepunisher
Resolved comments from Johanna talk to me! see my work 20:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC) reply |
---|
;Comments from Johanna
That's about it for me. I'll be happy to support once this is fixed. Johanna talk to me! see my work 03:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 10:14, 11 December 2015 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments from Pavanjandhyala
Let me know when you are done with all of them. Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 16:56, 7 December 2015 (UTC) reply |
Support Good job on the list. Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 10:14, 11 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments –
The list was promoted by Hawkeye7 via FACBot ( talk) 18:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC) [19]. reply
So far as I know, this is the first list of nature reserves managed by a British wildlife trust nominated for FLC. It includes photographs of all the sites. Dudley Miles ( talk) 19:14, 23 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Support – a lovely page, and much more than a mere list. Plainly meets the FL criteria in my view. Only two comments. At Pryor's Wood, should "sparrowshawks" be "sparrowhawks"? And the absence of a Description for Rye Meads looks like an unintentional omission (FL criterion 3 (a) came briefly to mind), though I am perfectly prepared to be told it isn't. – Tim riley talk 20:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Comment Another interesting list.
Most of these are minor quibbles and shouldn't be too difficult to resolve.— Rod talk 21:17, 23 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Comment by Godot13
FLC is running a bit slow right now, so recusing myself as a delegate to review this list.
Not much overall! If this was helpful, consider optionally reviwing my FLC up above. -- Pres N 18:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 19:20, 11 December 2015 (UTC) [20]. reply
Here is another association football club's list of notable records and relevant statistics nominated for featured status. This one belongs to FC Porto, an historical Portuguese side with a vast domestic and European palmarès. I created this list from scratch and followed other similar and already featured pages during its development, so here's hoping that this one may have the same fate. Thank you in advance for your reviews. Parutakupiu ( talk) 19:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Mattythewhite ( talk) 22:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments from Mattythewhite
Thanks, Mattythewhite ( talk) 17:49, 26 October 2015 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Lemonade51 ( talk) 17:38, 6 November 2015 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments from Lemonade
|
Support from an IP with a few comments:
Alright, closing this nomination as passed. -- Pres N 17:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 10:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC) [21]. reply
An oft forgotten aspect of Hurricane Katrina's devastating landfall in the United States, this tornado outbreak was actually the largest such event on record in Georgia for the month of August. A record-shattering 18 tornadoes touched down on August 29 (previous highest was a mere 2 twisters) across Georgia. The outbreak also marked the first known tornadic fatality in August in Georgia and furthermore is the costliest such event during the month for the state. Over the course of nearly five days, 57 tornadoes touched down across 8 states as a result of Katrina.
In terms of formatting, the tornado table was created in mirror of the one constructed during the List of tornadoes in the 1999 Oklahoma tornado outbreak FLC two years back and should meet all MOS standards. Although the article title doesn't inherently imply a list, I opted to focus the content on the tornadoes themselves rather than the meteorological conditions that would be present in most other tornado outbreak articles. If these details were to be expanded upon, it would simply be monotonous repetition of the same exact situation on five separate days. Anyways, I hope you all enjoy reading this little article and I look forward to comments/criticisms to make it the best it can be! ~ Cyclonebiskit ( chat) 16:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Support
All in all a good read! Hurricanehink ( talk) 22:47, 4 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Looks pretty good otherwise. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:00, 6 December 2015 (UTC) reply
All good to go now; passed. Delegate note: using this nomination as a test of the new bot-assisted closing procedure. -- Pres N 20:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC) reply