January 11
Category:Fictional space force personnel
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 19#Category:Fictional space force personnel
Category:Fictional characters with disfigurements
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 19#Category:Fictional characters with disfigurements
Category:Nazis who committed suicide in Nazi Germany
Category:21st-century controversies by country
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge as nominated.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 03:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one (or two in the 21st cent) category in each category, which is unhelpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 22:04, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Clone characters in Neon Genesis Evangelion
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: dual merge as nominated.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 03:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Made by a blocked user, obvious
WP:NARROWCAT that doesn't have any potential to get larger. Should be dual upmerged to both its parent categories.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 21:56, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Support dual merger
AHI-3000 (
talk) 22:01, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Azerbaijani composers by century
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge as nominated.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 03:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one category in each of these categories, which isn't helpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 21:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Franco-Flemish composers by century
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to
Category:Franco-Flemish composers.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 03:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's nothing else in the parent categorym which is unhelpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 21:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Murder committed by female minors
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 19#Category:Murder committed by female minors
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename to
Category:Women American football executives.
(non-admin closure)
Qwerfjkl
talk 23:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: All major sports leagues in America have had women executives but this is the only one which categorizes them as such.
WP:EGRS since it is specific to a league (IMO, a very small target at this time) rather than the sport.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 21:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Rename per Marcocapelle AND previous precedent, instead of merging.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 17:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Sportswriters
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 20#Category:Sportswriters
Category:Murders of IDF soldiers
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure)
Qwerfjkl
talk 17:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Duel merge as these are still military casualties
Mason (
talk) 04:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkl
talk 19:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Merge to
Category:Israeli military casualties.
AHI-3000 (
talk) 21:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Merge per nom, but exclude the two biographies
to be from being put directly under
Category:Murder in Israel.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Only if these people were actually killed on Israeli territory. The country which soldiers serve does not always match the location of their deaths.
Dimadick (
talk) 18:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Polymaths by nationality
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete.
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_January_20#Category:Polymaths is persuasive precedent, and emphasized anew here, that "polymath" is ill-defined, subjective, or
WP:SYNTH in most cases, and not a defining-characteristic intersection-category for all individuals that are in two or more subject-area categories (polymath). Several ideas for list-articles are potentially viable. In most cases, the inividuals are already in other "... people" subcats, so generally just remove from the "... polymaths" cat rather than merging.
DMacks (
talk) 03:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Non-defining
Mason (
talk) 04:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Support in principle, per precedent (there is no
Category:Polymaths). But just delete, do not merge, the articles are already in other categories by nationality.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Further comment:
Category:Polymaths was deleted after
this discussion.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 17:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. Firstly, what's the difference compared to other, very similar categories (e.g. philanthropists, dissidents) which already exist? Should we delete them? Secondly, this category has been deleted several times a long time ago because "it was undefined, which allows almost anyone to be included in it if they have demonstrated any sort of ability in more than one discipline or area of life" or so. But if you read the article
Polymath, it is clearly defined: an individual whose knowledge spans a substantial number of subjects, known to draw on complex bodies of knowledge to solve specific problems and polymaths include the great scholars and thinkers of the Renaissance and Enlightenment, who excelled at several fields in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and the arts. Furthermore, and last but not least (on the contrary), if a person is mentioned as a polymath in reliable sources, then this fact should be respected, and that's what the Wikipedia rules say, don't they? --
Silve
rije 20:18, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Thank you for posting this here. The issue of defining is key. If they excelled in multiple fields, the person belongs in each of those categories, not a grab back category that effectively says that they belong in multiple categories. And what counts as different fields? Does that mean that biostatisicians are all polymaths because they excel in biology AND statistics?
Mason (
talk) 21:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Probably not. But if they excelled in SEVERAL, MULTIPLE fields, they belong to each of those categories, but also to the Category:Polyhistor as well. I see no reason why this person should not also belong to that category; there are other categories that similarly overlap (e.g. urban planners, architects, civil engineers, architecture writers…). BUT I REPEAT, only if, and it is decisive here, such a person is listed in the relevant sources (encyclopedias, lexicons, etc.) as polymath, so it should also be in Wikipedia, as stated in its rules. And you did not answer the question of similar categories (philanthropists, dissidents) in which a person can also belong to multiple categories? --
Silve
rije 23:47, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- You're correct that I didn't answer your question about similar categories because those are not relevant here. The issue is that this category has been deleted by consensus several times on the basis of not being well defined. What has changed in the last ten years to make this category well defined?
Mason (
talk) 21:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkl
talk 19:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Support nom per Marcocapelle.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 13:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Defining a polymath as someone whose knowledge spans a substantial number of subjects is too subjective for a category: what is a substantial number and how much knowledge is required from each? Defining a polymath by being called a polymath in sources is equally vague. If anything, a list may be more appropriate because that will allow quoting sources.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:51, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Why should defining a polymath by being called a polymath in sources be vague? If someone is a polymath in sources, then so be it. Or should we go against Wikipedia's rule
WP:NOR and do our own research? --
Silve
rije 23:23, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- How many sources would you need? What if sources contradict each other? Again, that is much better elaborated in a list.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 09:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Please, be serious. I need no sources; Wikipedia needs. How many? As usual in any other article. Contradictions? As usual; why should it be something special here? --
Silve
rije 19:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Just Delete/Support in Principle If someone is defined by multiple things, enter them in multiple categories but the intersection is not notable. No objection to a list, but that can be outside of CFD. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 16:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Property companies of Ireland
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 19#Category:Property companies of Ireland
Category:Armenian Roman Catholics
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: no consensus.
(non-admin closure)
Qwerfjkl
talk 18:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 23:28, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: merge, category contains only one article which is unhelpful for navigation.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 23:28, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Support per nom
Mason (
talk) 00:00, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Oppose. Most Catholics from Armenia are likely to be in fact
Armenian Catholics, i.e. Eastern Catholics. This may be a side effect of recent splits/rename at
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 16 § Category:Armenian Catholics and
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 16 § Category:Armenian Catholic priests. I guess that the logical conclusion of these renamings would be to browse the categories and add all Armenian/Eastern Catholics that are actually from Armenia to such a category, but certainly not to confuse it with Latins.
Place Clichy (
talk) 06:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Oppose the first, to which I have added
Thaddeus (bishop of Caffa); merge the second as
WP:SOFTDELETE but to all its current parents
Category:Armenian Roman Catholics,
Category:Benedictines and
Category:Armenian Christian monks. –
Fayenatic
London 13:03, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Re:
Category:Armenian Benedictines, I believe it can be kept as part of larger tree
Category:Benedictines by nationality. Parent categories using "Catholic" are a bit anachronistic if directly placed at
Simeon of Mantua, who died in 1016, but they are not really out of place as he was indeed a Benedictine monk. Intermediate category
Category:Armenian Benedictines is totally defining for him, and certainly better than
Category:Armenian Roman Catholics or
Category:Catholics from Armenia. I suggest it should be kept.
Place Clichy (
talk) 17:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkl
talk 17:32, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Thanks,
Place Clichy.
Simeon of Mantua is in
Armenian saints which are understood as Christian saints, so perhaps there is no need for a Catholic category. If he's the only notable Benedictine of Armenian origin, the single-member category is not very useful for categorisation. But if there's no consensus here, perhaps it would be better to have a fresh nomination of all the single-member subcats of
Benedictines by nationality. –
Fayenatic
London 11:00, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The
Mekhitarists follow the rule of Saint Benedict, so we may consider adding
Category:Mekhitarists to
Category:Armenian Benedictines, in the same fashion that
Category:Cistercians by nationality is in
Category:Benedictines by nationality.
Category:Benedictines by nationality, and more largely
Category:Members of Catholic orders and societies by nationality, is a set that's useful for navigation and there are plenty of one-page categories there. It's a situation not unlike that of
Category:Argentine popes/
Category:Polish popes, although with more potential for expansion.
Place Clichy (
talk) 13:41, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkl
talk 19:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:1981 Spanish novels
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: procedural keep. This should be done as a mass nomination (@
Mason).
(non-admin closure)
Qwerfjkl
talk 18:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. This is the only year Spanish novel category.
Mason (
talk) 03:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkl
talk 18:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- @
Uriahheep228 please populate these categories with more pages, they all have between 1 and 4 pages in them.
Mason (
talk) 21:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- If the categories do not get populated beyond 4, I would lean towards merging the entire tree. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 17:13, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkl
talk 19:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- I suppose this requires an extended nomination, containing at least all categories until 1990.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 19:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- I'd prefer merging all of 20th century years or even the whole tree for consistency. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 22:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The consistent thing to do is to keep all the categories. There's a good amount of notable Spanish novels from all these years, regardless of how many currently have articles. The category tree is useful even if some categories end up with only one entry (currently, 1981 is the only such case).
Uriahheep228 (
talk) 17:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep There is plenty of scope to expand this category tree.
Dimadick (
talk) 08:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Not quite, there are only 25 articles in the 20th-century category and not in a year category.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 12:13, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Merge per Marco's suggestion.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 17:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Merge for Now per
WP:MFN and
WP:NARROWCAT with no objection to later recreating of the article count grows. But, for right now, having a 1-article category does not aid navigation. - 16:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Judo national governing bodies logos
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: dual merge to grandparent categories.
(non-admin closure)
Qwerfjkl
talk 18:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Unhelpful to diffuse judo logos to this level of detail.
Mason (
talk) 02:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkl
talk 18:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Also note that the
Category:Sports governing body logos by sport has a lot of double categories holding a single file.
Respublik (
talk) 12:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkl
talk 19:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:History of climbing
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: no consensus.
(non-admin closure)
Qwerfjkl
talk 18:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Single category in here that's unhelpful for navigation.
Mason (
talk) 02:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
reply
- @
Marcocapelle:
Mason (
talk) 02:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Just delete, the subcategory is already in
Category:Mountaineering which is a subcategory of
Category:Climbing.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Climbing includes rock climbing (and other forms of climbing), which are not mountaineering, so the existing
Category:History of mountaineering would not work. Per below, we could merge them into
Category:History of climbing and mountaineering, or just leave them separate.
Aszx5000 (
talk) 14:52, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
Merge with
Category:History of mountaineering, and rename to
Category:History of climbing and mountaineering. More articles could go into both these categories, but whether they are climbing or mountaineering is moot in places (and ice climbing and competition climbing can be added). Better to have a new category that combines them both.
Aszx5000 (
talk) 14:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
reply
- That should be preceded by a merger of
Category:Climbing with
Category:Mountaineering (to which I would not oppose).
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
reply
- I think that would be too big a step, and one that would require a lot more thought as they are big categories (and there are differences, which some feel very strongly about), and it may not be helpful for reader. However, sometimes it is more efficient to merge them on a specific category basis.
Aszx5000 (
talk) 02:02, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkl
talk 18:17, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Meanwhile some articles have been added to the category but they are not specifically about history, so that leaves my earlier delete vote unchanged.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Those articles are mainly about climbing history (history of rock climbing in various countries, and the history of milestones in various forms of rock and solo climbing).
Aszx5000 (
talk) 11:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkl
talk 19:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. There are a few more articles now in the category that are primarily "history of climbing" (especially rock climbing) related. The structure also mirrors the structure in WikiCommons where there are separate "History of Climbing" and "History of Mountaineering" categories (both linked to in the en-WP categories). Other historical climbing articles will be added (e.g. history of ice climbing), so worth keeping at this stage. Would not recommend lumping it into the head "Climbing" category, which we should keep as clear as possible.
Aszx5000 (
talk) 11:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Impractical sorting algorithms
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 20#Category:Impractical sorting algorithms
Category:Fictional creditors and moneylenders
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure)
Seawolf35
T--
C 04:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Tiny category with only one member, made by a blocked user. Should be merged as unnecessary.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 18:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- I would expect "people in finance" to refer to professional bankers, accountants etc. but that is the not case in the one article. Just delete? (Otherwise merge per nom.)
Marcocapelle (
talk) 19:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete the one article,
Jessica (The Merchant of Venice), is defined by theft and eloping but not money lending. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 16:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Sportspeople by country and populated place
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure)
Seawolf35
T--
C 04:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Only contain 1 sub-category. Upmerge as appropriate below. Note
Category:Sportspeople from Bangkok is already in
Category:Sportspeople by province in Thailand so dual merge is not necessary in that case. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 17:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional water sports people
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 19#Category:Fictional water sports people
Category:Fictional winter sportspeople
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to
Category:Fictional sportspeople.
(non-admin closure)
Seawolf35
T--
C 04:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Wowee - only two tiny categories. A clear
WP:NARROWCAT created by a blocked user that should be merged.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 17:01, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Neuroscience competitions
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to
Category:Science competitions.
(non-admin closure)
Seawolf35
T--
C 04:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Only contains 2 articles. Both articles are already in
Neuroscience organizations so dual merge is not needed. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 17:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Merge for now per nom, without objection to recreate the category when more articles are available.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:03, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Women and education
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 22#Category:Women and education
Category:Fictional cult members
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename to
Category:Fictional cultists. No consensus with
no prejudice against speedy renomination on whether the category should be deleted or not.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 22:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: While I am not opposed to this category's existence, the more common term is
cultist, not "cult member".
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 16:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Support renaming
AHI-3000 (
talk) 18:32, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Support renaming. Betther use of English.
Dimadick (
talk) 08:51, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
History of the Republic of New Granada
Lists of films by country or language
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: split.
(non-admin closure)
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 19:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
Dozens more categories covering 1920 to 2025
|
|
- Nominator's rationale:
The mix of country and language makes the navigation and searching unnecessary complicated. Not all American films are in English. This seems to have been mostly been done for the Indian films as they are split by language (which isn't a valid reason for this imo). As a side note, I'm not sure how many of these currently have language articles so some might be empty after the split. --
Gonnym (
talk) 16:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Planned amusement parks
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: reverse merge, i.e. merge
Category:Upcoming Amusement parks to
Category:Planned amusement parks.
(non-admin closure)
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 19:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Categories seem to cover the same topic
DeputyBeagle (
talk) 15:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: I'm happy with reverse merge. Makes more sense now I think about it
DeputyBeagle (
talk) 14:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Reverse merge per nom, the 2nd one is new and has a more promotional-sounding name (and improper capitalization).
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 16:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Reverse merge to the older page.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:15, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Support revere merge
Mason (
talk) 21:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Reverse merge Several "planned" parks were never completed.
Dimadick (
talk) 08:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Reverse Merge per @
Dimadick:, leaves room for plans that fell through. -
RevelationDirect (
talk)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional parasites and parasitoids
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 20#Category:Fictional parasites and parasitoids
Category:Deities and spirits
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename
Category:Deities and spirits to
Category:Spirits and
Category:Fictional deities and spirits to
Category:Fictional spirits. No consensus with
no prejudice against speedy renomination on the proposed merge.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 21:59, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: There's already a "Deities" category, and there's no specific article about the concept of spirits as used here. This is therefore a
WP:SUBJECTIVECAT that should be merged into either "Mythological creatures" or "Legendary creatures". The only alternative name I can think of is "Supernatural beings", but there's no article about that either, and that can also be potentially subjective.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 14:18, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep both categories, but alternately rename them to
Category:Spirits and
Category:Fictional spirits.
AHI-3000 (
talk) 19:03, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Oppose, not all articles are about mythology. The alt rename is fine to remove redundancy in the category names.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- @
Marcocapelle: The point is that they would go into mythological and legendary creatures as appropriate, as I said in the description. I just picked mythological as the target because as far as I know the tool I use doesn't let you pick multiple merge destinations.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 21:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The
Holy Spirit is typically depicted as one of the persons in the
Trinity. An aspect of the Christian god, rather than a distinct entity.
Dimadick (
talk) 09:04, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Split if necessary. The concept of
spirit as an animating force typically includes spirits of humans and animals, which are not perceived as
deities.
Dimadick (
talk) 09:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional vampire types
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 20#Category:Fictional vampire types
Category:Fictional space units and formations
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: reverse merge, i.e. merge
Category:Space navies to
Category:Fictional space units and formations.
(non-admin closure)
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 20:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Totally overlapping categories. One of these should not exist, but I don't mind if it's reverse-merged either based on what title people think is better. The "Space navies" category has existed for much longer but has no real-world analogue. Another possibility is that the merge goes through as proposed, but then "Space navies" is renamed "Fictional space units and formations" as probably should have been done.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 13:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Reverse merge
Category:Space navies into
Category:Fictional space units and formations, if only because the former has no real-life counterpart while the latter can be compared with
Category:Space units and formations.
AHI-3000 (
talk) 18:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional counterterrorism organizations
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 20#Category:Fictional counterterrorism organizations
Category:Fictional political organizations
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to
Category:Fictional organizations.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 00:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Most of these don't qualify as "political organizations" and have been miscategorized. When you eliminate those, this category is too small to be necessary and its members can be dual upmerged.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 12:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Oppose
AHI-3000 (
talk) 18:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Wikipedia:NOTAVOTE
Mason (
talk) 21:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- This doesn't seem very true to me, all these discussions come down to whichever group of people dominate the discussion for a so-called "consensus".
AHI-3000 (
talk) 00:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The editing guidelines are right there for anyone to read. People link the relevant ones in many discussions. If you choose to ignore them, jump right into a massive category creation spree, and then think people are ganging up on you, that's on you.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 01:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Merge per nom, only fictional political parties and fictional revolutionary organizations surely qualify for this category.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Merge Really just per truth in advertising since most of the contents either don't seem that political or there's clearer categories for them to go into. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 17:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional government investigations of the paranormal
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: purge nominated category and THEN merge with target category.
(non-admin closure)
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 20:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: When you purge everything that's not actually an article about a fictional government agency, such as TV series and franchises, this category is too small to be necessary. Not sure whether it should be merged to this target or
Category:Fictional detective agencies, but it should be merged somewhere.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 12:40, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Rename to
Category:Fictional paranormal investigation agencies, and purge any subcategories or articles that aren't about a specific fictional organization. Strongly oppose any deletion or merger of this category.
AHI-3000 (
talk) 19:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Purge and merge per nom, since there are very few articles about fictional agencies in this category.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:49, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Purge and Merge per nom. The title would lead you to believe the contents would be the investigations, but the actual contens are about government agencies. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 17:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional military aviators
Category:Fictional commercial aviators
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 19#Category:Fictional commercial aviators
Category:EVA pilots
American sports journalists
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: withdrawn Will be relisted but with a different set of categories.
(non-admin closure)
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 20:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale:
WP:EGRS. Merge/delete as per nomination. For full disclosure: I created all but two of these.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 11:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Please note: withdrawing this due to misunderstanding a policy. Will relist but with a different set of categories.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 20:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep all. Jewish Americans and African-Americans both have unique experiences in sports journalism.
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]. You cannot claim that something fails
WP:EGRS when it so obviously does not. Given the preponderance of sources about these topics, the question posed in EGRS, i.e. "At all times, the bottom line remains can a valid, encyclopedic main article be written for this grouping?" is obviously true here.--
User:Namiba 17:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- @
Namiba, not the first one though. Male sportswriters are the norm, not the exception. In fact, its the only one the sportswriters category sorted by men, something I didn't know when I made it.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 20:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Also to add: still figuring out
WP:EGRS - its a very thin line between what is and isn't within its scope.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 20:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:African-American Crooners
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename to
Category:African-American crooners. Refs found for this intersection, just needs MOS fix
DMacks (
talk) 10:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: No explanation or criteria for definition, unnecessary and unhelpful.
Ghmyrtle (
talk) 09:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep but rename
Category:African-American crooners. The history of African-American crooners is well-documented
[5]
[6]--
User:Namiba 17:40, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep Per Namiba, the history of African-American crooners is well documented
[7]
Polemic-nerd (
talk) 19:01, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Rename with lower-case "crooners".
Binksternet (
talk) 18:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Rename, but keep. per namiba
Mason (
talk) 21:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Rename to
Category:African-American crooners. Noting for the record that this was
closed by
Polemic-nerd as keep, but was
reopened by
Pppery as a
WP:BADNAC after I
made a request at
WP:AN.
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 00:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Comment. As proposer here, I'm now prepared to withdraw the deletion request so long as the title is changed to include the lower case "crooners".
Ghmyrtle (
talk) 07:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional Australian characters by descent
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: dual merge as nominated.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 23:58, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory each.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional European people by nationality
Category:Libyco-Berber
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: dual merge into
Category:Berber history and
Category:Berber languages.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 23:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: merge, only two articles in this category which already are directly interlinked.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Berber people by religion
Category:Gloria Groove live albums
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: dual merge to
Category:Live albums by Brazilian artists and
Category:Gloria Groove albums; no prejudice against recreation if the category can be appropriately populated.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 23:44, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Sole entry is a redirect. Not much point in keeping it separate.
QuietHere (
talk |
contributions) 04:49, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Harford County, Connecticut
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 23:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Qualifies for speedy deletion/merging under
WP:C2A
Staraction (
talk) 04:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Specifically, "Harford County" is a misspelling of "
Hartford County, Connecticut"
Staraction (
talk) 04:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:15th-century American people
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete all four categories. (The two categories added later were added in the first 24 hours of the discussion, which is sufficient notice.)
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 23:41, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: No one is defined as being American until the 16th century. Moreover the only page in this entire tree isn't even a person
Mason (
talk) 03:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: Whole tree exists just to house one article in three different places. Should probably also add
Category:15th-century American women and
Category:15th-century Native Americans as they won't be doing much different on their own.
QuietHere (
talk |
contributions) 04:57, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional vehicle operators
Category:Fictional university and college personnel
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: keep.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 23:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary subgrouping made by a blocked user.
WP:NARROWCAT.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 03:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional au pairs
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to
Category:Fictional domestic workers. Categorization of
the only page in the category (at the time of this comment) can take place at
Talk:Shannon Rutherford.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 23:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Too few members to make this a viable category. Should be merged.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 02:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Support per nom
Mason (
talk) 02:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Support in principle but deletion is a good option as well. This is not a defining characteristic of the article.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Members of the Aycinena family in Central America
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename to
Category:Aycinena family.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 23:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: All this extra information isn't needed
Mason (
talk) 02:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:18th-century Central American people by nationality
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge as nominated.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 23:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one category in here, which is unhelpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 02:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wilhelmstrasse
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure)
Qwerfjkl
talk 23:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SHAREDNAME &
WP:NONDEFINING
- This category contains articles about streets that either are or were named after
Wilhelm II. They really have nothing else in common. If anyone wants to create a list article, all the category contents are already in
this disambiguation page. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 02:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Background In the past, we've deleted similar categories for roads and bridges named after people
here and
here. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 02:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Listify --
65.92.247.66 (
talk) 22:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- No objection to listifying outside of CFD, but I was having trouble finding an online English source to satisfy
WP:NLIST. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 17:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. If someone in the future finds some
WP:LISTN sources, the contents of the category as of this comment are
Marshal Ferdinand Foch Street, Bydgoszcz,
Wilhelm Strasse (which is a dab page which lists the other members of the category),
Wilhelmstrasse,
Wilhelmstraße (Wiesbaden), and
Wilhelmstraße (Spandau). But before !voting to listify I would want to see some LISTN sources to avoid creating a page just for it to get sent to AfD.
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 23:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Things named after Christa McAuliffe
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 23:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SHAREDNAME &
WP:NONDEFINING
-
Christa McAuliffe was the teacher astronaut who was killed in the Challenger Space Shuttle disaster. Even if they weren't named after her, everything in this category would still exist but would just be named after a different astronaut (with
one exception). All the category contents are already
right here in the main article for any reader interested in this topic. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 02:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Background In the past, we've deleted similar categories
here,
here,
here,
here,
here, and
here. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 02:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - As the creator of the category: I hadn't read yet
WP:SHAREDNAME but yes, that applies to this situation. Sorry about that. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Poxy4 (
talk •
contribs) 21:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Listify --
65.92.247.66 (
talk) 22:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- It's in a narrative paragraph not a list, but the article are linked in her biography article. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 17:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:17th century in Pembrokeshire
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to
Category:History of Pembrokeshire.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 21:58, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Unhelpful for navigation. Upmerge for now as it only has one page in it
Mason (
talk) 02:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional female soldiers and warriors
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: split as nominated.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster (
talk · he/him) 23:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Nominator's rationale: Not the same thing and there is no real reason for these two things to be grouped together. This split would also apply to
Category:Fictional female soldiers and warriors by medium and its subcategories.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 02:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Support splitting
AHI-3000 (
talk) 19:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Support splitting We define real-life
warriors as members of tribal or clan-based warrior cultures, as opposed to organized armies.
Dimadick (
talk) 09:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.