![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2023 August 5. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Happy to userfy this for a restart but the majority of the keep votes underline the paucity of strong sources. Spartaz Humbug! 14:59, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Very poorly sourced. Fails WP:GNG. US-Verified ( talk) 23:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 02:55, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
no original research is needed to extract the content. But I think we're still a little short of the NBASIC threshold of
significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.The mid-to-late 20th century is a difficult period to research in general, and the best material here might be in sources that are either offline or in nonpublic databases, and also possibly in Urdu. But I would say that I'm not really seeing the kind of signature in the search results that would make me think "there must be more out there", which leaves me unpersuaded that we really have encyclopedia material here. So I find myself leaning toward either slow deletion (draftification) or the fast kind. (I am saddened to see that the former SOLDIER essay seems to have been deprecated based on an RFC close by an involved and now CU-blocked user who ignored multiple reasoned dissents. But I guess it is what it is at this point.) -- Visviva ( talk) 17:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2023 August 5. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Happy to userfy this for a restart but the majority of the keep votes underline the paucity of strong sources. Spartaz Humbug! 14:59, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Very poorly sourced. Fails WP:GNG. US-Verified ( talk) 23:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 02:55, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
no original research is needed to extract the content. But I think we're still a little short of the NBASIC threshold of
significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.The mid-to-late 20th century is a difficult period to research in general, and the best material here might be in sources that are either offline or in nonpublic databases, and also possibly in Urdu. But I would say that I'm not really seeing the kind of signature in the search results that would make me think "there must be more out there", which leaves me unpersuaded that we really have encyclopedia material here. So I find myself leaning toward either slow deletion (draftification) or the fast kind. (I am saddened to see that the former SOLDIER essay seems to have been deprecated based on an RFC close by an involved and now CU-blocked user who ignored multiple reasoned dissents. But I guess it is what it is at this point.) -- Visviva ( talk) 17:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)