The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Declined prod due to contestation on article's talk page. However that rationale was that he was associated with a few notable people, and his input at
Gayhurst House. However notability is not inherited. He could warrant a mention on both the
Everard Digby and Gayhurst articles, but there is no notability on his own.
Onel5969TT me14:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Maybe it is too early in the AM here, but I am having trouble deciphering the prose of the article. I think this needs an editor to sort out the convoluted intro.
Lightburst (
talk)
14:52, 15 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete I already PRODed this. Looking at it again I still don’t think the subject is notable. As you can see on the talk page creator suggested merging part of it into another article. I’d be fine with that but I think the fundamental point is that while the subject was connected with notable people, he wasn’t notable himself.
Mccapra (
talk)
02:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Declined prod due to contestation on article's talk page. However that rationale was that he was associated with a few notable people, and his input at
Gayhurst House. However notability is not inherited. He could warrant a mention on both the
Everard Digby and Gayhurst articles, but there is no notability on his own.
Onel5969TT me14:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Maybe it is too early in the AM here, but I am having trouble deciphering the prose of the article. I think this needs an editor to sort out the convoluted intro.
Lightburst (
talk)
14:52, 15 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete I already PRODed this. Looking at it again I still don’t think the subject is notable. As you can see on the talk page creator suggested merging part of it into another article. I’d be fine with that but I think the fundamental point is that while the subject was connected with notable people, he wasn’t notable himself.
Mccapra (
talk)
02:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.