The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non notable game, website links dont work (even though it says archive) and the only proof i could find of it's existence is
https://github.com/swisspol/WaterRace. Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 23:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment The references do work when inputted into the Wayback Machine, so technically it would only need one more reference to pass
WP:GNG.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 08:30, 15 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep: in addition to the reviews already listed in the article, there's
magazine coverage including reviews that can be found on Archive.org.--
AlexandraIDV 10:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep I think that the review from MacWorld magazine found by Alexandra seals the deal that this page is notable, per
WP:NEXIST it should remain.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 22:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)reply
I can't get any of the links in the article to work and can't see an actual review from the link provided above. Can anyone provide links to the reviews in question?
Hobit (
talk) 02:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Things seemed a bit of a vague wave. Again, the sources in the article all appear to no longer exist, so it would be ideal if those were updated.
Hobit (
talk) 19:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep: Notable. Agree that review from MacWorld magazine found by Alexandra seals the deal per
WP:NEXIST. -
Ret.Prof (
talk) 18:01, 21 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep, as there are enough reviews to show notability.
Jackattack1597 (
talk) 19:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non notable game, website links dont work (even though it says archive) and the only proof i could find of it's existence is
https://github.com/swisspol/WaterRace. Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 23:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment The references do work when inputted into the Wayback Machine, so technically it would only need one more reference to pass
WP:GNG.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 08:30, 15 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep: in addition to the reviews already listed in the article, there's
magazine coverage including reviews that can be found on Archive.org.--
AlexandraIDV 10:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep I think that the review from MacWorld magazine found by Alexandra seals the deal that this page is notable, per
WP:NEXIST it should remain.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 22:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)reply
I can't get any of the links in the article to work and can't see an actual review from the link provided above. Can anyone provide links to the reviews in question?
Hobit (
talk) 02:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Things seemed a bit of a vague wave. Again, the sources in the article all appear to no longer exist, so it would be ideal if those were updated.
Hobit (
talk) 19:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep: Notable. Agree that review from MacWorld magazine found by Alexandra seals the deal per
WP:NEXIST. -
Ret.Prof (
talk) 18:01, 21 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep, as there are enough reviews to show notability.
Jackattack1597 (
talk) 19:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.