From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Daniel ( talk) 09:11, 23 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Wacław Chamrat (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources found mention the author in connection with the Chronicle, but do not have WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. There is no article for Chronicle of Biała to merge or redirect to.  //  Timothy ::  talk  06:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 06:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Merge into History of Bielsko-Biała as that article is seemingly one of the only few pages on the internet that mentions him. Flounder fillet ( talk) 00:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Draftify or merge fper Ff above. I am not seeing anything about this person outside a mention in passing in my BEFORE. It is possible that his work ( Kronika miasta Białej/ Kronika Chamrata) would pass WP:GNG, and the author may want to write an article about it, but per WP:NINHERIT, it does not mean we need an article about his creator, about whom next to nothing is known (but if the article about his work is notable, a short bio section there would be fine). That said, I am concerned that the two sources listed are not linked and seem very hard to verify, the presumed academic article (" Kronika miasta Białej z lat 1732–1768 zwana Kroniką Chamrata") does not return any google (gscolar/gbook) hits outside Wikipedia and its mirrors. Due to verification trouble, I lean draftify as first choice, merge as second. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist so we can get a consensus on whether to Keep, Delete, Draftify or Merge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Daniel ( talk) 09:11, 23 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Wacław Chamrat (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources found mention the author in connection with the Chronicle, but do not have WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. There is no article for Chronicle of Biała to merge or redirect to.  //  Timothy ::  talk  06:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 06:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Merge into History of Bielsko-Biała as that article is seemingly one of the only few pages on the internet that mentions him. Flounder fillet ( talk) 00:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Draftify or merge fper Ff above. I am not seeing anything about this person outside a mention in passing in my BEFORE. It is possible that his work ( Kronika miasta Białej/ Kronika Chamrata) would pass WP:GNG, and the author may want to write an article about it, but per WP:NINHERIT, it does not mean we need an article about his creator, about whom next to nothing is known (but if the article about his work is notable, a short bio section there would be fine). That said, I am concerned that the two sources listed are not linked and seem very hard to verify, the presumed academic article (" Kronika miasta Białej z lat 1732–1768 zwana Kroniką Chamrata") does not return any google (gscolar/gbook) hits outside Wikipedia and its mirrors. Due to verification trouble, I lean draftify as first choice, merge as second. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist so we can get a consensus on whether to Keep, Delete, Draftify or Merge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook