The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Closing this on the basis of
WP:CSK #3 - a call for deletion with no other explanation or a call for splitting cannot be considered an "accurate deletion rationale", especially given the SIGCOV reliable sourcing shown to exist. Discussion on splitting can continue at the article's talk page. Regards,
(non-admin closure)Goldsztajn (
talk)
21:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment If you're saying that it should be deleted or split solely because it is a biography of two brothers, then that is not a valid reason for deletion. It is perfectly acceptable to have a biography on two closely connected people in the same article. I will note, however, that it is an unsourced biography.
AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (
talk)
04:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep, a quick search returns a few sources that bundle the brothers together. On the other hand, the French and Russian Wikipedia currently have separate articles for each of them, so there may be some good reason for that as well. But more importantly, as pointed out by others, this is not a matter of deletion.
Aintabli (
talk)
15:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Closing this on the basis of
WP:CSK #3 - a call for deletion with no other explanation or a call for splitting cannot be considered an "accurate deletion rationale", especially given the SIGCOV reliable sourcing shown to exist. Discussion on splitting can continue at the article's talk page. Regards,
(non-admin closure)Goldsztajn (
talk)
21:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment If you're saying that it should be deleted or split solely because it is a biography of two brothers, then that is not a valid reason for deletion. It is perfectly acceptable to have a biography on two closely connected people in the same article. I will note, however, that it is an unsourced biography.
AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (
talk)
04:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep, a quick search returns a few sources that bundle the brothers together. On the other hand, the French and Russian Wikipedia currently have separate articles for each of them, so there may be some good reason for that as well. But more importantly, as pointed out by others, this is not a matter of deletion.
Aintabli (
talk)
15:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.