![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2017 January 23. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:50, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
I have serious doubts this biography meets WP:PROF. I've looked at [1] and the numbers seem on the low side. I'll ping User:Randykitty for a second opinions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 23:42, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Not delete: based on the logic (not the rules) presented by the request - /info/en/?search=J%C3%BCrgen_Matth%C3%A4us (article exists, despite: google scholar does not return even the first searches on him or his topic (however, /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability_(academics) - there is a warning of citation metrics as reliable), the Matthaus article is under-referenced, etc etc. - Argument: I believe that notability issue should be taken in the perspective of the local context (I was proving this part before), with certain level of reservation due to the different standards. However, things shall be documented (I was trying to support the article in question with reliable sources). I was somehow, trying to make some additional argument on the issue raised - it is easy to write delete - no quotations but takes bit more time on reading the things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colcody2000 ( talk • contribs) 13:23, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2017 January 23. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:50, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
I have serious doubts this biography meets WP:PROF. I've looked at [1] and the numbers seem on the low side. I'll ping User:Randykitty for a second opinions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 23:42, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Not delete: based on the logic (not the rules) presented by the request - /info/en/?search=J%C3%BCrgen_Matth%C3%A4us (article exists, despite: google scholar does not return even the first searches on him or his topic (however, /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability_(academics) - there is a warning of citation metrics as reliable), the Matthaus article is under-referenced, etc etc. - Argument: I believe that notability issue should be taken in the perspective of the local context (I was proving this part before), with certain level of reservation due to the different standards. However, things shall be documented (I was trying to support the article in question with reliable sources). I was somehow, trying to make some additional argument on the issue raised - it is easy to write delete - no quotations but takes bit more time on reading the things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colcody2000 ( talk • contribs) 13:23, 20 January 2017 (UTC)