The result was Keep " Ukrainophobia" as a redirect to " Anti-Ukrainian sentiment". Keep " Anti-Ukrainian sentiment". -- MZMcBride ( talk) 23:46, 31 December 2008 (UTC) reply
:
Ukrainophobia (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) (
delete) – (
View log)
The article is completely unsourced, thereby it fails
WP:V. As it stands now, I am well within the rights of policy to blank the entire page as
WP:BURDEN is not met, as I do dispute the article, in that being unreferenced, it can only be regarded as
WP:OR/
WP:SYN, and it reads like a
WP:SOAPBOX (former oppressor? All of the Ukrainian political leaders....?) We have anti-whatever sentiment articles on WP, and they are warranted so long as core policies are met, which at this stage this article doesn't meet a single one, so wouldn't object to an article in future which complies with policy (i.e. delete without prejudice).
Russavia
Dialogue
Stalk me 05:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
“ | Of course there have been people at various times in history who have displayed or expressed dislike of Greeks. And of course other people criticising the former have employed terms like "anti-Greek" or "anti-Hellenic" to describe them. Ancient Judaeans disliking Hellenistic tyranny; Romans disliking Ancient Greek culture; Turks disliking Greeks in 1950s Istanbul; Western media critical of Greek expansion in the early 20th century; Romanians disliking their Greek Phanariot overlords in the early 19th century; Latins disliking Byzantines in the Middle Ages; 20th-century Americans giving preference to their Turkish allies over their Greek ones; proponents of "Afrocentrism" jealous of Greece's perceived monopoly of grand cultural heritage. Of course that's all sourceable. The point is: There is no scholarly literature ( WP:RS) that discusses all these disparate historical situations as part of a single story, a single unified pattern or phenomenon. The article commits OR by constructing "a novel narrative" from these unrelated instances. | ” |
The result was Keep " Ukrainophobia" as a redirect to " Anti-Ukrainian sentiment". Keep " Anti-Ukrainian sentiment". -- MZMcBride ( talk) 23:46, 31 December 2008 (UTC) reply
:
Ukrainophobia (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) (
delete) – (
View log)
The article is completely unsourced, thereby it fails
WP:V. As it stands now, I am well within the rights of policy to blank the entire page as
WP:BURDEN is not met, as I do dispute the article, in that being unreferenced, it can only be regarded as
WP:OR/
WP:SYN, and it reads like a
WP:SOAPBOX (former oppressor? All of the Ukrainian political leaders....?) We have anti-whatever sentiment articles on WP, and they are warranted so long as core policies are met, which at this stage this article doesn't meet a single one, so wouldn't object to an article in future which complies with policy (i.e. delete without prejudice).
Russavia
Dialogue
Stalk me 05:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
“ | Of course there have been people at various times in history who have displayed or expressed dislike of Greeks. And of course other people criticising the former have employed terms like "anti-Greek" or "anti-Hellenic" to describe them. Ancient Judaeans disliking Hellenistic tyranny; Romans disliking Ancient Greek culture; Turks disliking Greeks in 1950s Istanbul; Western media critical of Greek expansion in the early 20th century; Romanians disliking their Greek Phanariot overlords in the early 19th century; Latins disliking Byzantines in the Middle Ages; 20th-century Americans giving preference to their Turkish allies over their Greek ones; proponents of "Afrocentrism" jealous of Greece's perceived monopoly of grand cultural heritage. Of course that's all sourceable. The point is: There is no scholarly literature ( WP:RS) that discusses all these disparate historical situations as part of a single story, a single unified pattern or phenomenon. The article commits OR by constructing "a novel narrative" from these unrelated instances. | ” |