The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete The drafts were rejected for a reason and and a COI editor, declared or not, repeatedly trying to put an article into the mainspace without being cleared by a reviewer is a violation of policy. Best,
GPL93 (
talk)
20:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)reply
There is nothing, to my knowledge, that requires an article creator to make use of the broken Articles for Creation process. This is not to say this piece should not be deleted, only that I believe you are misrepresenting policy.
Carrite (
talk)
21:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete This is an article that simply does not support a claim of notability with reliable and verifiable sources. Perhaps this should be a draft or go back to AfC, but it's unclear that the editor behind this article understands the process of creating a proper Wikipedia article.
Alansohn (
talk)
04:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. I did my
WP:BEFORE when first draftifying this. The subject doesn't meet the relevant notability criteria, as there is a lack of in depth-coverage in secondary sourcing, and no SNG such as
WP:ANYBIO appears to be fulfilled. I'll additionally note that AfC isn't mandatory and not following the AfC process and having a COI are not reasons to delete.—
Alalch E.09:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete, per the above. This subject is non-notable, and the creator may have a conflict of interest. Secondary and in depth sourcing is also absent.
HarukaAmaranth春香23:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Per above, plus the article is heavily biased towards the person based on tone (hence why a close connection is plausible) and that close connection is strengthened by the person not being notable enough to have much unbiased coverage.
CharlieEdited (
talk)
15:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment - If this truly has been through the AfD process before, feel free to Salt. Not passing the slow, arbitrary, inconsistent Articles for Creation process is no terminal first strike, however.
Carrite (
talk)
21:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete The drafts were rejected for a reason and and a COI editor, declared or not, repeatedly trying to put an article into the mainspace without being cleared by a reviewer is a violation of policy. Best,
GPL93 (
talk)
20:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)reply
There is nothing, to my knowledge, that requires an article creator to make use of the broken Articles for Creation process. This is not to say this piece should not be deleted, only that I believe you are misrepresenting policy.
Carrite (
talk)
21:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete This is an article that simply does not support a claim of notability with reliable and verifiable sources. Perhaps this should be a draft or go back to AfC, but it's unclear that the editor behind this article understands the process of creating a proper Wikipedia article.
Alansohn (
talk)
04:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. I did my
WP:BEFORE when first draftifying this. The subject doesn't meet the relevant notability criteria, as there is a lack of in depth-coverage in secondary sourcing, and no SNG such as
WP:ANYBIO appears to be fulfilled. I'll additionally note that AfC isn't mandatory and not following the AfC process and having a COI are not reasons to delete.—
Alalch E.09:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete, per the above. This subject is non-notable, and the creator may have a conflict of interest. Secondary and in depth sourcing is also absent.
HarukaAmaranth春香23:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Per above, plus the article is heavily biased towards the person based on tone (hence why a close connection is plausible) and that close connection is strengthened by the person not being notable enough to have much unbiased coverage.
CharlieEdited (
talk)
15:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment - If this truly has been through the AfD process before, feel free to Salt. Not passing the slow, arbitrary, inconsistent Articles for Creation process is no terminal first strike, however.
Carrite (
talk)
21:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.