From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 21:37, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Tekla Juniewicz

Tekla Juniewicz (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Standard supercentenarian bio. Fails WP:BIO1E, WP:NOPAGE, WP:ANYBIO. As with many other such articles which have previously been deleted, no worthwhile encyclopedic information that is not contained in List of supercentenarians by continent or similar. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 08:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC) reply

A redirect would be expected. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 22:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Keep. This page is very nice and I feel bad for the poor author to have his eloquently written page taken down. ❤ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.200.180.226 ( talk) 21:06, 10 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The article is good, well written, concise and important. I do not see what there is to gain from deleting it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.31.39.140 ( talk) 13:09, 5 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 21:37, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Tekla Juniewicz

Tekla Juniewicz (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Standard supercentenarian bio. Fails WP:BIO1E, WP:NOPAGE, WP:ANYBIO. As with many other such articles which have previously been deleted, no worthwhile encyclopedic information that is not contained in List of supercentenarians by continent or similar. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 08:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC) reply

A redirect would be expected. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 22:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Keep. This page is very nice and I feel bad for the poor author to have his eloquently written page taken down. ❤ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.200.180.226 ( talk) 21:06, 10 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The article is good, well written, concise and important. I do not see what there is to gain from deleting it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.31.39.140 ( talk) 13:09, 5 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook