The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Speedy Delete On second thoughts, editors can request
WP:REFUND if and when he wins the elections. Speedy, as such articles should not have been created in the first place as it is jumping the gun.
– robertsky (
talk)
03:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Robertsky, the decision for redirect vs delete is based on the longstanding convention that it's appropriate to redirect a non-notable candidate to an election page. The fact that the article should not have been created has nothing to do with it, both outcomes agree that it should not have been created. signed, Rosguilltalk03:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect per longstanding practice to redirect candidate's names to the article about the corresponding election. If he wins, the article can be recreated immediately.
Cullen328Let's discuss it04:00, 29 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect as per redirect reasons above
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Speedy Delete On second thoughts, editors can request
WP:REFUND if and when he wins the elections. Speedy, as such articles should not have been created in the first place as it is jumping the gun.
– robertsky (
talk)
03:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Robertsky, the decision for redirect vs delete is based on the longstanding convention that it's appropriate to redirect a non-notable candidate to an election page. The fact that the article should not have been created has nothing to do with it, both outcomes agree that it should not have been created. signed, Rosguilltalk03:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect per longstanding practice to redirect candidate's names to the article about the corresponding election. If he wins, the article can be recreated immediately.
Cullen328Let's discuss it04:00, 29 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect as per redirect reasons above
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.