From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 01:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Rocco Reed

Rocco Reed (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No substantial coverage outside of adult industry publications. Does not appear to be notable. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 21:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep I've heard of him. I go to Wikipedia to find out stuff about people I have heard of. If there is no information then Wikipedia is incomplete. Bosley John Bosley ( talk) 11:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Comment: The statement above should be disregarded since it has no connection to wikipedia policy. TheFinalMigration ( talk) 21:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 01:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Rocco Reed

Rocco Reed (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No substantial coverage outside of adult industry publications. Does not appear to be notable. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 21:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep I've heard of him. I go to Wikipedia to find out stuff about people I have heard of. If there is no information then Wikipedia is incomplete. Bosley John Bosley ( talk) 11:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Comment: The statement above should be disregarded since it has no connection to wikipedia policy. TheFinalMigration ( talk) 21:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook