The result was keep. Mark Arsten ( talk) 14:09, 9 March 2013 (UTC) reply
No indications that this artist meets WP:CREATIVE. Claims that he is represented in the collections of major museums cannot be verified. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 23:14, 6 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The article has been updating with more documentation : Publications and References to "Database of artworks in Danish state-owned and state-subsidised museums". This database is possible more misinforming than informing. The data has possible not been updater since 1991. Peter Lind are listed two times as two different people. Here : https://www.kulturarv.dk/kid/SoegKunstnerVaerker.do?kunstnerId=12915 and here again : https://www.kulturarv.dk/kid/SoegKunstnerVaerker.do?kunstnerId=14784 The entry from The Royal library only list a few of the Portrait they own by Peter Lind, and one with a wrong names. Maybe it better to skip this poor References ? Even if the credibility of the article has been questioned ?
Museum inventory are known to be mystery, occasionally you hear about a museum who find a Da Vinci in their collection they had for centuries without knowing, or the contrary something they think they have, has got missing. Eye witness reports from artist like in an interview are more reliable, they know what they shipped and if they got payed. Also photo documentation are underrated, in wikipedia it's legitm to link to an external text, but not to an external photo. Fa bene si ( talk) 21:57, 9 February 2013 (UTC) reply
More documentation : Annual report The Danish Art Foundation 1996, including list of acquisitions, on page 27 : Peter Lind Uden titel 1996, foto på filmstrimler 24.275 (Price in DKK) http://www.kunst.dk/fileadmin/_kunst2011/user_upload/Dokumenter/Kunstfonden/AArsberetninger/AArsberetning_1996.pdf This external link should not been in the reference ? I haven't seen this kind detail documentation in any artikel ? Fa bene si ( talk) 10:08, 11 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Mark Arsten ( talk) 14:09, 9 March 2013 (UTC) reply
No indications that this artist meets WP:CREATIVE. Claims that he is represented in the collections of major museums cannot be verified. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 23:14, 6 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The article has been updating with more documentation : Publications and References to "Database of artworks in Danish state-owned and state-subsidised museums". This database is possible more misinforming than informing. The data has possible not been updater since 1991. Peter Lind are listed two times as two different people. Here : https://www.kulturarv.dk/kid/SoegKunstnerVaerker.do?kunstnerId=12915 and here again : https://www.kulturarv.dk/kid/SoegKunstnerVaerker.do?kunstnerId=14784 The entry from The Royal library only list a few of the Portrait they own by Peter Lind, and one with a wrong names. Maybe it better to skip this poor References ? Even if the credibility of the article has been questioned ?
Museum inventory are known to be mystery, occasionally you hear about a museum who find a Da Vinci in their collection they had for centuries without knowing, or the contrary something they think they have, has got missing. Eye witness reports from artist like in an interview are more reliable, they know what they shipped and if they got payed. Also photo documentation are underrated, in wikipedia it's legitm to link to an external text, but not to an external photo. Fa bene si ( talk) 21:57, 9 February 2013 (UTC) reply
More documentation : Annual report The Danish Art Foundation 1996, including list of acquisitions, on page 27 : Peter Lind Uden titel 1996, foto på filmstrimler 24.275 (Price in DKK) http://www.kunst.dk/fileadmin/_kunst2011/user_upload/Dokumenter/Kunstfonden/AArsberetninger/AArsberetning_1996.pdf This external link should not been in the reference ? I haven't seen this kind detail documentation in any artikel ? Fa bene si ( talk) 10:08, 11 February 2013 (UTC) reply