The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I do not know. It only says he started the show.
WP:ENTERTAINER seems to be subjective. It says "Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment". What does it mean "prolific" or "unique"? Every good/gifted singer or composer is unique. I am simply looking at the page and think that (a) the content is mostly sourced, and (b) based on the description on page, this is someone who possibly/probably passes WP:GNG. I am not saying he definitely passes GNG, meaning that the argument for "keeping" is weak, and deletion would not be unreasonable (hence I changed the vote).
My very best wishes (
talk)
17:28, 29 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep : I'm mostly on the fence.
WP:GNG seems questionable but slightly positive (against deletion).The sources listed on the page seem to include adequate coverage of secondary sources, but whether that is significant or whether those sources are reliable for this discussion is questionable.
WP:ENTERTAINER seems questionable but slightly negative (in favor of deletion). He has certainly not satisfied "significant roles in multiple notable" events. Nor have his contributions been extraordinarily unique, prolific, or innovative. I'm marking this as weak keep only because I think the arguments for deletion are not quite sufficient to justify deletion, though they are very very close.
Radzy0 (
talk)
19:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Volunteer efforts are not supported with reliable sources. References 1 and 2 - his Instagram, reference 7 doesn't mention him as organizer, his name is on the poster among other singers announced for the concert (so, this isn't even a report from the event).
Anntinomy (
talk)
20:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Seems like No consensus right now. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk!01:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep. There need to be some English language sources. There's already a page in Ukrainian for him if you look. So he's notable in that regard; however, the norm is to have English language sources on the English Wikipedia page. If not, it's normally deleted.
JRed176 (
talk)
21:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I do not know. It only says he started the show.
WP:ENTERTAINER seems to be subjective. It says "Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment". What does it mean "prolific" or "unique"? Every good/gifted singer or composer is unique. I am simply looking at the page and think that (a) the content is mostly sourced, and (b) based on the description on page, this is someone who possibly/probably passes WP:GNG. I am not saying he definitely passes GNG, meaning that the argument for "keeping" is weak, and deletion would not be unreasonable (hence I changed the vote).
My very best wishes (
talk)
17:28, 29 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep : I'm mostly on the fence.
WP:GNG seems questionable but slightly positive (against deletion).The sources listed on the page seem to include adequate coverage of secondary sources, but whether that is significant or whether those sources are reliable for this discussion is questionable.
WP:ENTERTAINER seems questionable but slightly negative (in favor of deletion). He has certainly not satisfied "significant roles in multiple notable" events. Nor have his contributions been extraordinarily unique, prolific, or innovative. I'm marking this as weak keep only because I think the arguments for deletion are not quite sufficient to justify deletion, though they are very very close.
Radzy0 (
talk)
19:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Volunteer efforts are not supported with reliable sources. References 1 and 2 - his Instagram, reference 7 doesn't mention him as organizer, his name is on the poster among other singers announced for the concert (so, this isn't even a report from the event).
Anntinomy (
talk)
20:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Seems like No consensus right now. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk!01:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep. There need to be some English language sources. There's already a page in Ukrainian for him if you look. So he's notable in that regard; however, the norm is to have English language sources on the English Wikipedia page. If not, it's normally deleted.
JRed176 (
talk)
21:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.