From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nonsense reasoning. WP:ITSOLD is absolutely not a delete reason for anything except a minuscule flash-in-the-pan fad. (non-admin closure) Dronebogus ( talk) 08:01, 24 November 2022 (UTC) reply

My Peoples

My Peoples (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This cancelled movie has no meaning today. Wikipedia shouldn't promote it as if it were important today. Georgia guy ( talk) 19:52, 20 November 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep it's properly sourced and explains why it was nixed. Oaktree b ( talk) 20:16, 20 November 2022 (UTC) reply
    But how is it important to today's fans of Disney movies?? Georgia guy ( talk) 20:32, 20 November 2022 (UTC) reply
    How is anything of the past important to "today's" fans? That is not a valid reason for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:18, 20 November 2022 (UTC) reply
    Notability isn't transient. GNG is GNG. It's more than likely not notable for today's fans; yesterday's fans that look up the movie might find it interesting. Oaktree b ( talk) 22:56, 20 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 21:13, 20 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, not only is it sourced with reliable sources, but the rationale for deletion is invalid and has no basis in Wikipedia policy.
DonaldD23 talk to me 21:19, 20 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Speed Keep and close: No valid reason given, inside our policies, for deletion. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 01:53, 21 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Strong keep: I'm the main contributor to the article. I had been familiar with the title and Barry Cook's career, although I didn't create the article. The production was covered in reliable newspaper sources like the Los Angeles Times and Orlando Sentinel so it has notability. Although it's a minor footnote in Disney history, the production was the one of the final nails in the coffin for 2D animation at the Disney studios at the time. It was shut down in favor of Chicken Little. PrinceArchelaus ( talk) 18:52, 21 November 2022 (UTC) reply
    I strongly agree with your point to keep this article and are also very familiar with the film. Though I do have one question. Why does this article exist when My Peoples is already mentioned in the List of unproduced Disney animated projects article. Once again, I am with keeping this, I just find this article a tad bit useless when what most people know about this unreleased film is that it is, well, unreleased. NateAnimates ( talk) 07:15, 24 November 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nonsense reasoning. WP:ITSOLD is absolutely not a delete reason for anything except a minuscule flash-in-the-pan fad. (non-admin closure) Dronebogus ( talk) 08:01, 24 November 2022 (UTC) reply

My Peoples

My Peoples (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This cancelled movie has no meaning today. Wikipedia shouldn't promote it as if it were important today. Georgia guy ( talk) 19:52, 20 November 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep it's properly sourced and explains why it was nixed. Oaktree b ( talk) 20:16, 20 November 2022 (UTC) reply
    But how is it important to today's fans of Disney movies?? Georgia guy ( talk) 20:32, 20 November 2022 (UTC) reply
    How is anything of the past important to "today's" fans? That is not a valid reason for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:18, 20 November 2022 (UTC) reply
    Notability isn't transient. GNG is GNG. It's more than likely not notable for today's fans; yesterday's fans that look up the movie might find it interesting. Oaktree b ( talk) 22:56, 20 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 21:13, 20 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, not only is it sourced with reliable sources, but the rationale for deletion is invalid and has no basis in Wikipedia policy.
DonaldD23 talk to me 21:19, 20 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Speed Keep and close: No valid reason given, inside our policies, for deletion. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 01:53, 21 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Strong keep: I'm the main contributor to the article. I had been familiar with the title and Barry Cook's career, although I didn't create the article. The production was covered in reliable newspaper sources like the Los Angeles Times and Orlando Sentinel so it has notability. Although it's a minor footnote in Disney history, the production was the one of the final nails in the coffin for 2D animation at the Disney studios at the time. It was shut down in favor of Chicken Little. PrinceArchelaus ( talk) 18:52, 21 November 2022 (UTC) reply
    I strongly agree with your point to keep this article and are also very familiar with the film. Though I do have one question. Why does this article exist when My Peoples is already mentioned in the List of unproduced Disney animated projects article. Once again, I am with keeping this, I just find this article a tad bit useless when what most people know about this unreleased film is that it is, well, unreleased. NateAnimates ( talk) 07:15, 24 November 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook