The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete: Aside from the brief mention in the 2003 Phoenix New Times article about The Format, there are a couple more mentions for the subject as "Mike Jarmuz" but I am seeing
nothing specifically about the subject which could demonstrate attained notability, whether as a promoter, band manager or technician. Fails
WP:MUSICBIO and
WP:ANYBIO.
AllyD (
talk)
08:02, 29 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. There are a few very brief mentions of the individual here and there, but nothing in-depth that would allow this to pass any of the guidelines mentioned above. In addition, the main claim to notability being asserted in this article appears to be his association with notable acts, and notability is not inherited.
Rorshacma (
talk)
16:21, 29 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - No reliable sources means the article should be deleted.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete: Aside from the brief mention in the 2003 Phoenix New Times article about The Format, there are a couple more mentions for the subject as "Mike Jarmuz" but I am seeing
nothing specifically about the subject which could demonstrate attained notability, whether as a promoter, band manager or technician. Fails
WP:MUSICBIO and
WP:ANYBIO.
AllyD (
talk)
08:02, 29 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. There are a few very brief mentions of the individual here and there, but nothing in-depth that would allow this to pass any of the guidelines mentioned above. In addition, the main claim to notability being asserted in this article appears to be his association with notable acts, and notability is not inherited.
Rorshacma (
talk)
16:21, 29 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - No reliable sources means the article should be deleted.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.