The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the topic is not notable and for article deletion. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:15, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

List of Once Upon a Time opening sequences

List of Once Upon a Time opening sequences (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe a list of the opening sequences of this show is of encyclopedic value. I find no coverage of this topic in reliable sources, thus failing the notability requirements for standalone lists. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars ^{Talk to me} 23:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete - The list simply is not notable. Meatsgains ( talk) 00:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete non-notable list that lacks reliable, secondary sources. Aoba47 ( talk) 19:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete total lack of coverage in reliable secondary sources. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:05, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete – Non-notable fancruft with excessive external links to copyrighted screenshots, which may be a WP:LINKVIO issue. nyuszika7h ( talk) 20:13, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:18, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Sik K

Sik K (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable South Korean rapper. None of the 4 sources in the article establish notability. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 21:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Unable to establish significant coverage in reliable sources. James ( ^talk/ _contribs) 22:00, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:30, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Rob Galluzzo

Rob Galluzzo (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources do not support subjects notability. Additional reliable sources could not be located. Note notable enough for a WP:BLP Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 04:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC) reply

The article from The Australian is a cover section, with a photo of Rob Galluzo, along with several direct quotes about the project and his philosophy of work.

The article from the Sydney Morning Herald also features a photo (although it is archived) and has direct quotes.

These are significant Australian media outlets.

The Berlin International Film Festivale is one of the most prestigious festivals in the world. To have a dramatic film accepted for competition and as a premiere is a significant achievement in the film and entertainment world.

Warbler21 ( talk) 05:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete a non-notable filmmaker. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC) reply

added additional news and industry coverage on Galluzzo and reformatted to include more of the key career moments to make the article more clear. should have started in the sandbox - now understand the process better. cheers. Warbler21 ( talk) 19:44, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Being quoted as a spokesman of an organization is not independent coverage of him. duffbeerforme ( talk) 02:33, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Being quoted as a spokesman of an organization is not independent coverage of him, but when Rob Galluzzo is the CEO and Founder of the organization, as well as the patent holder of record, and is pictured in the article, then it certainly counts. ( talk) ^[1] Warbler21 ( talk) 11:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete. There's a little coverage, but it's mostly just quotations. I think it's still a bit too soon for an article yet. Once we've got more coverage of him specifically, instead of just quotations and trivial mentions, we can recreate the article. The SMH article above is a good start, but that's really all I can see it as. You can't hang an entire BLP on one brief article. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 01:32, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. As a result of a misclick on my part, I speedied it per A1, as it was tagged. I meant to change the rationale to A3 (no content) or G1 (patent nonsense), since "LL" hardly qualifies as content, and WP:CSD#A1 says, "If any information in the title or on the page, including links, allows an editor, possibly with the aid of a web search, to find further information on the subject in an attempt to expand or edit it, A1 is not appropriate." The subject is apparently a real upcoming TV show, but this "article" contained no content about it. Deor ( talk) 19:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Married to Medicine: Houston

Married to Medicine: Houston (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Straight out vandalism Eric S.V. ( talk) 16:57, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Speedy Delete - Under A1. Don't see how this could fall under vandalism. Dat Guy ^Talk _Contribs 18:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Speedy Delete - Per DatGuy, also may need salting as was recently deleted as a WP:COPYVIO. Mike1901 ( talk) 18:05, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Speedy Delete - A1 is definitely right. -- Dane2007 ^talk 18:05, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep considering the technicalities of the nominator targeting specific articles when the nominator has now been uncovered as being a past advertising-only account, now using a second account (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 03:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

May D

May D (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Am afraid this might be a Conflict of interest. Account creation of this article looks like a sockpuppets of Coal Press Nation who have created

• Jay Pizzle
• Fliptyce
• Ayo Jay
• Tee-Y Mix
• DJ Caise Historical Ben ( talk) 15:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 October 17. — ^{cyberbot I} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:56, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep The only popular Nigerian music award is The Headies, MTV Africa Music Award (The MAMAs) & Nigeria Entertainment Award (NEA Awards).. Winners or act nominated for this awards are mostly chosen based on popularity.. That to say the article passes criteria 8 of WP:MUSICIAN. Since Wikipedia did not note that the award must be a "major" so I don't think we should be adding our interpretation to it. May D also passes WP:GNG and since the article meet's one out of all it's criteria of WP:MUSICBIO and passes WP:GNG then it is set to be a notable article.-- Obari2Kay ( talk) 09:26, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nom's a sock and has been blocked so closing as SK, No objections to renomination by anyone in good standing. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 ^Talk 23:17, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Jay Pizzle

Jay Pizzle (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Am afraid this might be a Conflict of interest. Account creation of this article looks like a sockpuppets of Coal Press Nation who have created

• Jay Pizzle
• Fliptyce
• Ayo Jay
• Tee-Y Mix
• DJ Caise-- Historical Ben ( talk) 15:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:57, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 October 17. — ^{cyberbot I} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep The only popular Nigerian music award is The Headies, MTV Africa Music Award (The MAMAs) & Nigeria Entertainment Award (NEA Awards).. Winners or act nominated for this awards are mostly chosen based on popularity.. That to say the article passes criteria 8 of WP:MUSICIAN. Since Wikipedia did not note that the award must be a "major" so I don't think we should be adding our interpretation to it. I can also add that he has produced songs for many big names in the music industry. Jay Pizzle doesn't meet WP:GNG but has only one story on two newspapers.. Since the article meet's one out of all it's criteria, it's set to be notable. It is also stated in WP:MUSICBIO that NOT all notable articles must meet WP:GNG. I understand it doesn't meet WP:GNG but it meets WP:MUSICBIO.-- Obari2Kay ( talk) 08:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Speedy Keep per WP:SKCRIT 2. The nom is a blocked CU confirmed sock who appears to have created and commented on AfDs for disruptive purposes. (Ironically enough the sock of the sockmaster he accuses the other uses or being controlled by.) TonyBallioni ( talk) 13:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep as a technicality considering this nominator has been uncovered as being the same user of a past advertising-only account and has apparently targeted specific articles for deletion as a rampage (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 03:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fliptyce

Fliptyce (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Am afraid this might be a Conflict of interest. Account creation of this article looks like a sockpuppets of Coal Press Nation who have created

• Jay Pizzle
• Fliptyce
• Ayo Jay
• Tee-Y Mix
• DJ Caise Historical Ben ( talk) 15:26, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:00, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 October 17. — ^{cyberbot I} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:25, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep The only popular Nigerian music award is The Headies, MTV Africa Music Award (The MAMAs) & Nigeria Entertainment Award (NEA Awards).. Winners or act nominated for this awards are mostly chosen based on popularity.. That to say the article passes criteria 8 of WP:MUSICIAN. Since Wikipedia did not note that the award must be a "major" so I don't think we should be adding our interpretation to it. I can also add that he has produced songs for many big names in the music industry. Many of the singers, albums & songs he produced even have articles on Wikipedia. Fliptyce doesn't meet WP:GNG but has less stories on newspaper but more on his website.. Since the article meet's one out of all it's criteria, it's set to be notable. It is also stated in WP:MUSICBIO that NOT all notable articles must meet WP:GNG. I understand it doesn't meet WP:GNG but it meets WP:MUSICBIO.-- Obari2Kay ( talk) 08:38, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted. ( non-admin closure) Citobun ( talk) 15:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

LouišP

LouišP (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion tag removed. Non-notable startup, no references to reliable secondary sources. Article created by single-purpose conflict of interest account for promotional purposes, contrary to Wikipedia's WP:NOT policy. Citobun ( talk) 12:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close. The page was a redirect that was blanked by an IP. The correct procedure is to restore the redirect and take it to RFD if the redirect should be deleted.. --  GB  fan 16:08, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

CDisplayEx

CDisplayEx (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This user blanked it, so I'm deleting it. Eric S.V. ( talk) 12:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete, it is a minor program that seems to be bundled with malware and the section that the redirect was referencing has been removed. -- Frmorrison ( talk) 14:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Procedural question: there doesn't appear to be any article content, or any meaningful history. Is there a target where this article could be uncontroversially redirected? Otherwise I think it could be speedied under WP:A3 since it has no content. Safehaven86 ( talk) 15:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 07:54, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Hashtag United F.C.

Hashtag United F.C. (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little known "YouTube" based football (soccer) club created by a person who hasn't got their own Wiki article. Orphan article, three sources linking from major British news agencies but no major sniffs of notability. Nordic Nightfury 10:02, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 10:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 10:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 10:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 10:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 10:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep. The sources for this article are three in-depth pieces in BBC Sport, the Telegraph, and the Sun. As far as sources for British football goes, they don't get much more reliable than that. Given that articles about sports clubs fall under WP:CORP, I would argue that this article definitely meets that bar. A Train ^talk 13:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude ( talk) 14:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep - Article already cites three significant articles on the club from national media sources going well beyond WP:ROUTINE. I would also observe the following articles indicating significant coverage in non-English language sources:

1. Dag Bladet, Norway
2. La Opinion, USA

Fenix down ( talk) 16:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep Fails WP:FOOTYN but passes on wider WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnTombs48 ( talk • contribs) 17:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Keep - meets GNG. Giant Snowman 07:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 07:52, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Reading Coachway

Reading Coachway (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable coach interchange, This had been moved to Calcot Coachway however I've reverted but anyway that aside, There's nothing at all on this coach station and the only sources in the article are IKEA store locations, Sainsburys store locations and a few bus timetables, Can't find any evidence of notability on Google News, Fails GNG. – Davey2010 ^Talk 22:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• I've also notified Muxxa of this discussion as they'd moved half the article from one place to another (and then I reverted), Anyway thanks. – Davey2010 ^Talk 23:02, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:56, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:56, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Doesn't even appear to have a building. Just a bus stop. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• leaning Delete I found this and this. But overall seems like a run of the mill bus stop. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 10:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Davey2010 Is this by any chance equivalent to a "bus interchange" (something like this and this), where multiple buses start and terminate? Because interchanges might be considered notable. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 10:26, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Searching "coachway uk" on Google only returns images of actual coaches, I'm assuming they more or less look like that in the layout but it wouldn't be that busy/packed, I don't think these are start and terminate for coaches tho - I think it's just a normal bus stop for coaches and reading the article I think only one bus terminates here, Thanks, – Davey2010 ^Talk 13:03, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Ah I see. Thank you for the explanation. This looks like a normal bus stop (maybe slightly bigger in size), but still just a normal stop. I will stick with my delete then. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 13:27, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• No worries, Thanks, – Davey2010 ^Talk 13:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete I work in Reading and I have never heard of this, nor have I ever seen this coachway. Nordic Nightfury 12:37, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete - bus stations certainly can be notable but this doesn't seem to be. No good sources beyond the fact that it exists. Blythwood ( talk) 20:12, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Causeway Classic. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 ^Talk 23:18, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Causeway Carriage

Causeway Carriage (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

redundant and unnecessary because of Causeway Classic Joeykai ( talk) 05:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks - I put the non-overlapping info from the Carriage's page onto the game's page, so the article is ready to be be deleted Brholden 3 October 2016

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Merge to Causeway Classic. James ( ^talk/ _contribs) 14:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Merge all relevant material here to Causeway Classic, and then redirect this article there as a plausible search term. Ejgreen77 ( talk) 04:42, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 ^Talk 23:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Rhys James

Rhys James (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I still confirm my PROD, as these sources added are simply only interviews, triviality and other unconvincing sources; there is no inherited notability from simply appearing at some shows and events. SwisterTwister talk 16:25, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Covered by multiple reliable sources, plus multiple appearances on popular TV shows. These nominations really are getting pathetic. -- Michig ( talk) 16:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Personal attacks aside, I'll note I actually searched at local news media and am only finding interviews and other unconvincing sources (also then not including some of the ones listed as it is). SwisterTwister talk 16:39, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Passes GNG with substantial coverage in major British media. -- Arxiloxos ( talk) 16:39, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Reviews in The Guardian and The Independent are not "simply only interviews, triviality and other unconvincing sources", but exactly the kind of thing needed for notability. 86.17.222.157 ( talk) 09:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Subject profiled by major newspapers in his country which is exactly what makes him pass GNG. GuzzyG ( talk) 17:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR per low participation herein. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:58, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

List of populated places in New Mexico by population

List of populated places in New Mexico by population (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems pretty redundant. We already have List of municipalities in New Mexico which includes population for all cities, towns, and villages. We also have List of census-designated places in New Mexico which includes all census designated places and unincorporated communities. This third list is completely redundant. We can add population numbers to the latter, but it doesn't make sense to have 3 lists for the same thing. This page was chosen as redundant since it is an orphan article, no page on wikipedia links here. Mattximus ( talk) 03:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:27, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:27, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:27, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Comment. I'm not sure about this.
  • 1. The list provides functionality of sorting across all populated places, which the two other lists would not provide. And there is a lot of overlap between sizes of CDPs vs. towns: e.g. the CDP of Bernalillo(sp?) has 44,000 population, way up there.
  • 2. Contrary to the assertion in the nomination that it is an orphan, there are lots of Wikipedia articles that link to it.
  • 3. Before making any change here, could we compare to how this information is arrayed in other states? If this one is completely out of line with all the others, that would strengthen the case for deletion. What happens elsewhere does matter; Wikipedia is pretty mature in this topic area. -- do ncr am 06:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the great comments. I'll response to each one.

1. Yes there is some merit to having a list that combines the two other lists, however New Mexico would then be an odd one out. The reason there is a division between incorporated and unincorporated is sheer numbers for most states, and that they are quite different politically. The lists would often be thousands if we combined both. All states have a list of incorporated places (this can be list of cities, municipalities, cities and towns, etc...) and one list of unincorporated places (CDPs). There is no real source or citation for unincorporated non-CDP that I'm aware of and none are included here anyway.

2. Maybe I'm lost but I clicked on a random page that it says links to it, Grant County, New Mexico, but could not find the link. In fact I haven't found a single page with the link to this list.

3. A few states have this, but it's by no means normal. But all states have the two main lists: incorporated and unincorporated. This would be anomalous as far as I can tell. I wonder why New Mexico gets one, but say Alabama, Alaska, or Arkansas doesn't.

My main argument is that the data is repeated 100% in 2 other lists, that are better maintained. It is completely, 100% redundant content wise.

Thanks for your input! Mattximus ( talk) 23:39, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Re: #2, this page is included in Template:New Mexico and so is linked to every article that uses that template. So not an orphan at all. postdlf ( talk) 13:23, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep This type of lists and tables are a regular part of WP. This one is short and clear enough to be useful to readers. I don't see a logical or policy reason to delete. There is no requirement that all states have the same treatment, and even if so who says having two lists is better? Kitfoxxe ( talk) 11:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Well the main point is that all the information is 100% duplicated, and this page is an orphan... so it's not useful. Mattximus ( talk) 21:38, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

See above; not an orphan. postdlf ( talk) 13:23, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for linking me to the template. I've updated the template replacing the link with the format of other states (one for municipalities, one for unincorporated places). So now I do believe it is an orphan. Mattximus ( talk) 23:10, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. (Non-admin closure) " Pepper" @ 01:21, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Rescue 911 (pinball)

Rescue 911 (pinball) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

questionable notability Prisencolin ( talk) 07:20, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

–::Strong Keep. It is not only a real pinball machine but has also been released as video game for several platforms. -- Tochni ( talk) 18:06, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:36, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Tochni: Can you find any reliable sources that cover this? Otherwise it sounds like it should be notable if what you're claiming is true.-- Prisencolin ( talk) 20:59, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

It is availabe on Steam: http://store.steampowered.com/app/394560/ on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/FarSight-Studios-Pinball-Arcade/dp/B0084HDG8Y itunes: https://itunes.apple.com/de/app/pinball-arcade-free/id497189134?mt=8 Play Store: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.farsight.AndroidPinball.javaProject https://pinballsupernova.wordpress.com/2016/03/26/the-pinball-arcade-releases-premier-technologys-rescue-911-game-play-released-and-video/ http://www.norrispinball.com/blog/?p=125 http://www.truetrophies.com/n7953/the-pinball-arcade-rescue-911-table-revealed.htm http://www.jeuxpcmag.com/actus/34438-rescue-911-arrive-sur-pinball-arcade

It would be the only article of all pinball articles linked from The Pinball Arcade that gets deleted and would make it totally incomplete. It would be very demotivating for me to write anything for the Wikipedia project Pinball and it seems I am currently the only pinball expert who writes for Wikipedia. Perhaps I will even stop to write anything again for Wikipedia if it useless to write about Pinball machines although it is such interesting topic which includes design, history, gaming, economy, media and so on. -- Tochni ( talk) 18:24, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Withdraw seems like you know a lot more about pinball than I do, so for the time being I let the article stand. Be wary though, if the article doesn't seem to meet notability and sourcing guidelines then, it maybe renominated for AfD at any time.-- Prisencolin ( talk) 16:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:28, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Ms. Bodega

Ms. Bodega (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

subject fails MUSICBIO. Search results only bring up promotional and download-related contents about her songs except this this which I think isn't enough to establish notability. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 20:35, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 20:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 20:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 20:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply

• "Keep" But am not familiar with newspapers sites in Africa but it seems like Thisday [1], Daily Times of Nigeria [2], The Sun (Nigeria) [3] & Nigerian Tribune [4] are a reliable news source. Linda Ikeji appears to be another big entertainment blogger in Nigeria [5] , and it was recorded that Ms. Bodega also shut down Nigeria Entertainment Awards in 2015, here is a link from YouTube [6] and it was also confirmed by this big entertainment news source in Nigeria 'Pulse [7] and it seems they are know in Nigeria & Ghana, they also got nominated for "Online TV of the Year" at 2016 Nigeria Entertainment Awards [thenet.ng/2016/07/wizkid-olamide-phyno-grab-nominations-at-2016-city-people-entertainment-awards/]. So it's a "Strong keep" from me.-- JK1286W ( talk) 10:25, 29 September 2016 (UTC) reply

@ JK1286W:,the sources you cited point to one headline of her songs being inspired by Fela. It is obvious the artist hasn't been discussed extensively by reliable secondary sources to establish notability, aside the headline. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 17:06, 29 September 2016 (UTC) reply

• Weak keep: Article needs to be improve with more independent reliable source, JK1286W hope you understand Oluwa2Chainz. If not yet, kindly read Wikipedia The answer to life-- Jamzy4 ( talk) 14:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Jamzy4:, how do you improve an article that lacks in-depth details from reliable sources? Possible? — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 20:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Oluwa2Chainz:According to this discussion, you provided one references, which is Vanguard newspaper. Wikipedia believe that Local and International newspaper are notable, content which i also believe. The subject article those not need to be on few Newspaper online site to prove notability. The article subject also has won an award which is Nigeria Entertainment Awards and a references, which makes the article to meets WP:MUSICBIO to my understanding. I believe this article can be improve instead to be deleted. According to my investigation, the user who created this article is a newcomer. He or she needs to know more about writing an article on wikipedia before moving to main space thank you.

That reference is an interview and nothing more. By the way, the subject has never been nominated or won any major music award. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 18:42, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nominator – non-notable artist. First keep vote comes from article creator, a single-purpose account with probable undeclared conflict of interest. Second keep vote comes from another user with possible conflict of interest given his/her history of making articles for non-notable musical articles that include self-authored promotional photos, written in a highly promotional tone, like [ article that was deleted]. Citobun ( talk) 14:07, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Please don"t accuse me COI, i have explained myself in a polite manners.-- Jamzy4 ( talk) 17:11, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Lack independent coverage. addressing the above links. Thisday is a reproduction of this and this PR pieces, also reproduced elsewhere. Daily Times of Nigeria is one of these other reproductions. Nigerian Tribune is a variation of them. The Sun (Nigeria) is dead, not a good sign. Reproduction of PR in not good enough. duffbeerforme ( talk) 11:10, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:45, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Henry Zinavoy

Henry Zinavoy (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable author per WP:AUTHOR or WP:BIO. Absolutely zero coverage in reliable sources. --Animalparty! ( talk) 07:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! ( talk) 07:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! ( talk) 07:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• delete this is so ill-sourced, and WP:BEFORE turns up so little, I'm tempted to call this a hoax. Not notable, in any case - David Gerard ( talk) 17:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete - article fails to establish notability per Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources, most of the current content reads like an autobiography. A search for additional sources on Google returned no meaningful entries. The author's own site and social media pages are small personal sites or have been recently created, no evidence of any further literary activity beyond these few self-published pages. GermanJoe ( talk) 20:14, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete non-notable writer. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 07:47, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Paul Ascher

Paul Ascher (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Queryable speedy delete as "not notable". He was a WWII German naval officer. He is listed in the pages Mischling and Honorary Aryan and List of Nazis of non-Germanic descent. Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 05:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete this article to the best of my knowledge has never had one reference

i think that the iron cross first class is not notable as per wp:soldier as it was not the nazi germany's highest award for valor which is Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross

I think that it also fails notability as Paul aschers rank was not a flag, general or air officer, as per wp:soldier The only reason to keep is that Paul ascher may have Played an important role in a significant military event such as a major battle or campaign However this was never referenced in the article ever and i cannot find a suitable reference.

Perhaps an other editor can find a reference or a rationale to keep otherwise i say delete

On retrospect this may be a suitable reference http://www.kbismarck.com/crew/paulascher.html i am still a new user and learning please ping me if this is a suitable reference Sassmouth ( talk) 06:10, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete I agree that the subject fails notability. A Google search provide no information to establish notability. Although the site kbismarck.com [8] does reference the subject, it does not provide any information concerning notability. Cbs527 ( talk) 14:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:14, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:14, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:14, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete, not notable for stand alone article; mention of his name and position in the battleship Bismarck article is sufficient. Kierzek ( talk) 13:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete as not likely to be notable per WP:SOLDIER. Cheers, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 08:18, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete -- not senior enough to be notable per se, unless he did something specially notable. Peterkingiron ( talk) 17:00, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete -- I'm only seeing trivial mentions insufficient to establish encyclopedia notability. K.e.coffman ( talk) 08:21, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 07:43, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Jerry Toupin

Jerry Toupin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I came across this as an A7 nomination, however the claim of the author having a bestselling book would be enough to barely squeak by notability guidelines. The sources on the page are unusable to establish notability, as one is to an e-commerce site (which shouldn't be on Wikipedia at all) and the other is a WP:PRIMARY source, Toupin's YouTube channel.

A search didn't bring up much - I found this mention in a book put out by Laval University, however since Toupin graduated from the school, it'd be well within their best interests to write about him. Now this looks to be usable, but I didn't really find anything else to establish Toupin's notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete. This is a BLP with no reliable sources at all. A Train ^talk 13:25, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Comment: Would any of the stuff in his CV help out? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 06:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 06:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 06:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete, does not meet WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG, present article references from amazon.ca and youtube are not useable for notability, a gsearch brings up nothing suitable ie. mirrors, amazon, youtube, gooreads, appears to be a vanity page, having been created by JERRY1414. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Almost zero citations in GS. Why was this BLP written? Xxanthippe ( talk) 09:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC). reply

COI self-promotion, if you check the creator's username. Bearcat ( talk) 20:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete non-notable writer. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete. A writer is not automatically eligible for a Wikipedia article just because he exists — reliable source coverage, supporting a claim of notability that passes WP:AUTHOR, is necessary before an article becomes earned. But that's not what's on offer here: his own YouTube channel and a sales page for his book on Amazon are primary sources, not reliable or independent ones. And on a ProQuest search, I found nothing that would bolster his sourceability at all — although I did at least find an explanation for the "bestseller" claim: it made the local bestsellers list in the Edmonton Journal in 2015. But that's not what it takes to pass AUTHOR because bestseller; it takes making the national bestsellers list, which his book did not achieve. Also WP:COI, as the article was created by JERRY1414. Bearcat ( talk) 20:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 07:40, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Dick Hoven

Dick Hoven (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is an unsourced BLP that I suspect to be a hoax. If it is not a hoax, the person certainly fails notability tests. It had a prod tag on it, which was removed despite the PROD template's statement that says the articles needed "at least one reference to a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article." The sources in the article failed this basic test. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 03:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete Fails WP:NACTOR as he has only had minor roles Seasider91 ( talk) 18:08, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: As far as I can tell, he has had no roles, if he even exists. I looked through the cited sources and found no mention of this person. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 20:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 01:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete as unprodder. Even if he does exist, and managed and produced Baha Men (something that I agree is inadequately sourced) WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:BIO1E would still apply. — David Eppstein ( talk) 20:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete non-notable actor and music producer. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 01:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete (by RHaworth) per WP:A7. ( non-admin closure) Optakeover ^{(U) (T) (C)} 15:20, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

PAN AIR

PAN AIR (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, "logo" is a MSPaint job. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 03:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 01:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 01:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 01:17, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete Not totally convinced it's not a hoax. Let alone find a scrap of independent coverage. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 02:31, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete, the logo or company are not fictional, but have found no sources to verify notability. The only sources I have found are of a Spanish airline. Nordic Nightfury 09:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete per the above. Blythwood ( talk) 20:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Strong delete. Something is not kosher here. The picture, allegedly of the current fleet ( File:PAN AIR Fleet.jpg)? It has to be at least 20 years old. Those aircraft used to be owned by Pan Air, but they aren't any more. So, there's an actual airline at the root of the article, but the claims are so inflated as to make the article unsalvageable. — C.Fred ( talk) 01:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 07:38, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

LaNiyah Bailey

LaNiyah Bailey (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed here with the sole basis of choosing AfD instead, I still confirm my PROD as it still applies and clearly states everything of concerns here. SwisterTwister talk 21:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:49, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:49, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete article about a 12-year-old that received some attention back when she was 6 for writing a book. Wikipedia is not news, and the coverage is all flashy news coverage. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Comment I'm not !voting here, but I'd like to point out two things: 1) the article was vetted through the AfC process. 2) What does "flashy news coverage have to do with anything? Is the source reliable? Is it biased? Just because this is "feel good news" doesn't mean it isn't an RS and flashy coverage may indeed be significant and reliable depending on the subject. Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:53, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete. probably, in fact, speedy A7 and G11, both. promotion by or for a self published author of one book which is less than8 libraries. We never consider this even an indication of significance. DGG ( talk ) 04:39, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Nordic Nightfury 07:41, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Dugu Miniautotoys

Dugu Miniautotoys (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article reads as WP:OR and among the 100 or so unique ghits I get nothing that looks like a reliable source. There are sources cited, but these are not about the subject. Guy ( Help!) 12:37, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

I checked one of the cited sources at random. The Gibson book does indeed talk about Dugu models on page 49 (and other pages):

https://books.google.com.au/books?id=87Rm_p6WUccC&dq=%22Model+Veteran+and+Vintage+Cars%22&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=dugu

Across many other car model articles I have noted that user Cstevencampbell is a careful and methodical editor, not prone to making things up and not prone to inaccuracies.  Stepho   talk  14:38, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Dugu toys was a pioneer brand in the classic and veteran age toy modeling. It led the way to the greater success of other more popular brands like Solido (in its later classic lines) Rio Models and Brumm. To delete the article would cause a Wikipedia gap in the understanding of the development of toy and collectible miniature automobiles. Unfortunately, not all important subjects have a lot written about them in books, though I am continually on the lookout for better sources. -- Cstevencampbell ( talk) 22:15, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 13:35, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Several references (linked to article parenthetically) have been added. I notice some I referenced but had never added ! I would say three are very strong references from books of noted experts on toy cars (Richardson and Ralston). A couple of others were supporting sites.-- Cstevencampbell ( talk) 23:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Several more references (Spano and Force) have been added to the article, which now is much better cited and referenced.-- Cstevencampbell ( talk) 00:45, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 07:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Rexx Pincode

Rexx Pincode (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

self created article about a subject who has same name as the creator. the article fails WP:BASIC and WP:MUSICBIO — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 14:51, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 14:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 14:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete: Unremarkable musician with only trivial mentions to his songs. Fails WP:MUSIC, WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, etc. Darreg ( talk) 13:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete This article fails notabilty Sassmouth ( talk) 06:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete: Subject lacks notabilty. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I'm been doing} 07:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 07:35, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Mario Mantese

Mario Mantese (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources Meatsgains ( talk) 01:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 01:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 01:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete: no individual notability music-wise outside of his notable band – the event he is associated with as an individual is his stabbing, but I guess that might fall under WP:BLP1E. The bibliography (mostly in German) is the list of books Mantese has written, mostly spiritual guides, and don't provide any information related to the Wikipedia article. Richard3120 ( talk) 03:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete not notable on his own. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Female Autobots. Consensus for a redirect to Female Autobots ( non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 ^talk 20:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Moonracer

Moonracer (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor Transformers character. No evidence of real-world notability. Josh Milburn ( talk) 01:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 00:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete Don't really want to redirect to List of Autobots because maybe List of Turn A Gundam characters is the primary subject. Could make a dab page but dab pages are for articles, not list items. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 02:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Keep or Redirect to Female Autobots. Mathewignash ( talk) 18:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Redirect to Female Autobots per above comment. Aoba47 ( talk) 19:17, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Redirect - Female Autobots seems like the best target. Argento Surfer ( talk) 18:32, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Redirect. Merge any content if needed. Avoid redlink bait to recreate the article again, preserves history if ever needed. Montanabw ^(talk) 20:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 07:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

T For Temple U

T For Temple U (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable school song (neither asserted in article nor likely to exist based on its genre and other details). DMacks ( talk) 01:32, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 00:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Speedy delete: fails WP:NSONG quite spectacularly. Richard3120 ( talk) 00:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete - Non-notable song. -- Dane2007 ^talk 20:43, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 07:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Rachel C. Weingarten

Rachel C. Weingarten (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability and this article reads as a promotional piece. Subverted ( talk • contribs) 01:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 16:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• delete - apart from the completely promotional nature of the article, a basic WP:BEFORE finds lots by her in RSes but nothing at all about her. RSes have passing mentions of her or promotional outreach from her. No evidence of notability, nothing to base a BLP on - David Gerard ( talk) 17:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Comment: this article appears to have been edited by numerous SPAs: Kylegtk ( talk · contribs), who wrote the bulk of this article, Lavenderlass ( talk · contribs), Hooshlevesh ( talk · contribs), Delfeo ( talk · contribs), Kyledix ( talk · contribs), Pettyfourz ( talk · contribs), Donutsina ( talk · contribs), BasilBiscuitBaker ( talk · contribs), Ferzach ( talk · contribs). There's a possibility that this is paid editing (or an editor who registers, edits, then forgets his/her password). Mind matrix 16:44, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete a non-notable writer. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete - Non-notable, fails WP:GNG. -- Dane2007 ^talk 20:43, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Transformers characters. Consensus is that no independent article is needed for this character. ( non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 ^talk 20:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Swindle (Transformers)

Swindle (Transformers) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish notability. TTN ( talk) 17:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN ( talk) 17:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep or merge to List of Decepticons. BOZ ( talk) 18:24, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Redirect to List of Transformers characters per reasons already stated by nominator. Aoba47 ( talk) 14:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Redirect to Lists of Transformers characters. Swindle has been in numerous continuities and was not always a Decepticon. I think this list will be more helpful to users than List of Decepticons . Argento Surfer ( talk) 19:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Redirect to Lists of Transformers characters per Argento Surfer. There are not enough non-trivial sources for this character to have an independent article, and the above argument for the proper redirect target makes sense. 64.183.45.226 ( talk) 18:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Redirect. Merge any content if needed. Avoid redlink bait to recreate the article again, preserves history if ever needed. Montanabw ^(talk) 20:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 ^talk 20:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Seyed Ali Asghar Dastgheib

Seyed Ali Asghar Dastgheib (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks coverage in reliable sources Meatsgains ( talk) 00:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Membership of the Assembly of Experts would appear to constitute a pass of WP:POLITICIAN. 86.17.222.157 ( talk) 09:38, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep, meets WP:NPOLITICIAN as a member of the Assembly of Experts, see Iranian Assembly of Experts election, 2016 (have fixed the red link). Coolabahapple ( talk) 16:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Keep - I agree with Coolabahapple, my reading of the Assembly of Experts fits with WP:NPOLITICIAN. Smmurphy^{( Talk)} 16:20, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Keep. WP:NPOLITICIAN. Pahlevun ( talk) 13:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Keep From what I understand of the notability guidelines for politicians, the subject's position on a national-level government body would help him to pass the notability test. Now notability isn't a guarantee of inclusion in the encyclopedia, but there seem to be sufficient sources at least for a stub article (which seems to be the current state). If anything, a search should be done to expand the article; deletion seems out of the question. MezzoMezzo ( talk) 03:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.