The result was speedily deleted CSD A7 by Samir. -- ais523 09:59, 22 November 2006 ( U T C)
NN student TV station. Notabilty asserted. I have tagged it Speedy per A7 Delete Ohconfucius 03:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was deleted as copyvio by Mangojuice. -- ais523 09:57, 22 November 2006 ( U T C)
This is an article about a non-professional singing group formed by Oxford University students. It has been deleted once before, but has been recreated. The group does not appear to satisfy either WP:ORG (where there are already plenty of case precedents of non-notable student societies for deletion) and WP:MUSIC. All recordings are self-releases and they have only performed locally per information on their website. Furthermore, parts of the article are pretty blatant WP:COPYVIO of the Oxford Belles website/page. Delete Ohconfucius 02:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was closed as malformed; incorrect article name, never listed, no AfD tag on article. I've relisted this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Green (rapper) (2nd nomination). -- ais523 09:55, 22 November 2006 ( U T C)
Vanity article. Non-notable individual. Claim of being "nominated for an SRA Student Radio Award in 2005 as Best Specialist Music Program" -- a dubious claim to fame to begin with -- isn't even supported by the accompanying reference link J.R. Hercules 02:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete as unsourced and seeming WP:COI. Primary claim to notability is not established by reliable sources. The Xuzo article, conveniently created on 11 Nov 2006 and unattributed, fails the WP:RS test. Userfy on request. ~ trialsanderrors 23:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Notability (fails google test) and a vanity article evrik ( talk) 16:22, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Grand master ka 04:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This was a stub I wrote a long time ago about a local Baltimore band. It was speedied before I noticed, so I've restored it because it is clearly not speediable under A7. The article claims notability, and cites it (though the link didn't work because the source changed urls, I have found the new url and fixed the link). Whether or not it is enough is another question, so I have nominated it here. Tuf-Kat 02:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy keep, nomination by vandal, nobody else reccomends deletion. Also the issue of the nominator voting after his nomination, and claiming sockpuppets for no good reason. Complain about my boldness if you feel like it. - Amarkov blah edits 01:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
non notable - 9000 google hits [2], vs. .5 million for Lutheranism [3]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.146.140.75 ( talk • contribs)
The result was Delete.-- Hús ö nd 05:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Article is unsourced and probably unverifiable. -- Donald Albury 00:11, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Kimchi. sg 09:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This has been tried as a CSD and a prod, and on both occasions the tag was removed with little or no addition of notability-related material. Essentially, we're dealing with an article which was written by the subject and is about someone who appears to be a run-of-the-mill evangelist. I don't doubt that he's doing good works, just that he's notable. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted by admin. -- Ter e nc e Ong ( C | R) 07:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
violates WP:BAND, non-notable, note number of red links, lack of sources, etc. SkierRMH 00:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 02:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable school which fails the proposed notability guideline of WP:SCHOOL. Tarret 00:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as a repost. cholmes75 ( chit chat) 19:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a game guide. ßott e siηi (talk) 00:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was merge. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:16, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
violation of WP:SPAM, clearly an advert for a NN business; author has removed the request for speedy delete SkierRMH 00:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
*Delete per above nom's
Missvain
03:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was Delete as unsourced. ~ trialsanderrors 00:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
I first noticed this article when I saw users fighting back and forth on the reliability of forum posts as sources- there was a pretty heated debate about the software and neutrality. Anyway, I pointed out on the talk page that this article needs sources to be verified. I've pleaded for sources on the talk page and in edit summaries, saying the page could be deleted if none were presented. None have been, so it's my belief that the article does not meet WP:SOFTWARE and is not unverifiable. I couldn't find any independent reliable sources on Google either. Wafulz 00:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - keep socks were noted, also some keeps were on the grounds "what's wrong" and the delete advocates managed to "damage" some of these "keeps". Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
An (admittedly cute) animation on YouTube. Best claim to notability is that a bunch of people on Fark and Digg liked it. Disputed prod. — Cryptic 01:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted per WP:CSD G-11, advertising; then redirected to Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan per discussion. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
violates WP:SPAM (advertising), NN business, solely an advertising page SkierRMH 01:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Kimchi. sg 09:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. This "international alliance" of "150 factions across the United States, ... Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom"
spectacularly fails the google test. Prod disputed by hoa article creator. —
Cryptic
01:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was should have been speedied. Just keep re-adding the tag until a friendly neighborhood admin comes along. Grand master ka 05:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
violation of WP:BAND, non notable; new (2007) group, 1 'debut' album, no references or citations SkierRMH 01:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus - there is no such thing as precedent on Wikipedia, but nonetheless, the issue of whether to have an article on every episode of a TV series is mainly a question of whether it falls under ' indiscriminate information'. That question hasn't been answered by numerous centralised discussions and bulk AfDs and it certainly hasn't been answered here. -- Sam Blanning (talk) 00:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Episode 208 of the Naruto anime. This is just a plot summary, which does not belong on Wikipedia. Delete as indiscriminate information. Prod tag removed, so taking to full Articles for Deletion. -- Phirazo 01:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC)— Phirazo ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
The result was speedy keep (trolling). — CharlotteWebb 01:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable article that has some NPOV issues. Additionally, there really isn't much traffic on this page and http://walmart.com has much, much more information. -- Nicholas Weiner 01:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was: with, as eloquently pointed out by 152 and Garrett, no indication that MPOGD is notable (in fact, an article on the site has been deleted) and no arguments to the contrary, which means MPOGD cannot be said to confer notability through its awards, we have no non-trivial coverage by independent third-party sources or any other indication that this game is notable. Delete, not discounting arguments from anons, since a convincing case for deletion was made that has not been answered. -- Sam Blanning (talk) 00:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Completing nomination by 152.91.9.144 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS), no !vote from me yet. MER-C 02:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
See also: first nomination
The result was {{ sofixit}}. ~ trialsanderrors 10:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A list of non-notable golf courses in North Dakota. Nomination also includes the golf courses on the list:
as well as the
which fails WP:ORG as a subnational organization not the subject of multiple, independent reliable sources. JChap2007 01:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted as a blatant copyvio of http://www.aisquith.org/history.htm. cholmes75 ( chit chat) 15:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable church building. Page was prodded and second prodded. Tags removed by page author MNewnham 01:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. cholmes75 ( chit chat) 03:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Clear case thereof. Delete. -- Alynna 01:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE. The raw total was 11-3 Delete, with two of the Keeps being Weak. Aside fro Carrottop, nobody much think this article should exist. And Carrottop's arguments, while vociferous, are not strong. Herostratus 02:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Disputed speedy deletion candidate; contains borderline assertions of notability. Listing here for discussion. No vote. Chick Bowen 02:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
I set out to find ten other examples of existing biographies for youth wing presidents (chairs, co-chairs or directors) of various political parties, if anyone wants more I would be happy to spend more time researching for more, however I feel I have made my point and have demonstrated that there is precedent for articles of this type on even less noteworthy subjects. If you want to go on a delete frenzy, I also saw a great deal of party official in other party wings with articles Carrottop 79 23:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 03:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Indian relativity - delete - I want this deleted as the phrase is not notable in the field of relativity theory or well-known in popular culture. It doesn't meet WP standards. MP (talk) 19:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus ~ trialsanderrors 03:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Tagged for speedy deletion and contested; "unencyclopedic" is not a valid speedy criterion. 9/11 victim with press coverage; that may be notability be default. No vote. Chick Bowen 02:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - fails RS. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 01:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
See also Minzu hospital, Masanjia reducation through labor
Poorly written and researched article that does not link to any existing pages, and the only link to such claims is very vaguely stated as " The Epoch Times". The claims lack verificaion to confirm it as a "concentration camp", as no major media besides the Epoch Times has reported the story. -- PCPP 10:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep and cleanup. ~ trialsanderrors 03:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Over 180 kilobytes of indiscriminate mirroring from sources. Anything worth keeping should be in Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda instead, so no point to keep this. Derlay 02:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete A7 (no assertion of notability) by User:RHaworth. ColourBurst 05:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
No evidence provided to meet WP:MUSIC, questionable notability. Unreferenced. Contested prod. MER-C 02:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 03:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Yet another mall. No claim of notability whatsoever. Actually, this might now be speedy deletable under A7. Pascal.Tesson 02:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete A7. Guy ( Help!) 12:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non notable student radio station per WP:ORG. Delete Ohconfucius 03:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 03:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non notable student society per WP:ORG. Weak assertion of notability (reference to its long but interrupted history.) It is essentially an entirely new club which started in 1997 Delete Ohconfucius 03:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as a non-notable group, WP:BIO and {{ db-group}} both refer. (aeropagitica) 05:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable newly formed student society. Created in 2006, claims notability by having had a notable speaker to address the club. Delete Ohconfucius 03:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by Samir (The Scope). MER-C 09:00, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Does not appear to meet the inclusion criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (music) – Gurch 03:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as a non-notable group, WP:BIO and {{ db-group}} both refer. (aeropagitica) 05:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Notability of the organization/website Bellhalla 03:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep ~ trialsanderrors 04:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Dr.S.HUSSAIN ZAHEER MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Non notable school asserting no encyclopedic content, I don't think there's such thing as "regioncruft" but this articles assertion of "stalwarts like IICT, NGRI, CCMB" is also hopelessly relevant to only the region in which the article is commenting. The style and grammar would require a complete rewrite (with the capslock key levered off the keyboard) and the POV issues if removed would probably result in a 6 word article. Best to just bin it. •Elomis• 03:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
*DELETE. EVEN THOUGH THE PROBLEMS DESCRIBED ABOVE HAVE BEEN FIXED, THERE STILL REMAINS THE ISSUE OF VERIFIABILITY.
ONLY 13 GHITS, THE ONLY THING VERIFIED IS THAT THE SCHOOL EXISTS. (Yes, I was poking fun at the caps lock thing).
MER-C
03:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
*Delete per MER-C. --
Kicking222
03:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
*Delete No claim of notability and no multiple independent sources. Changing vote to Keep Sources were added. Sports competition notices in paper are pretty ordinary for a school, but the reference from a national paper showing three Nobel laureates interacting with the students in the science program is impressive enough to allow inclusion.
Edison
05:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
*Change of comment to Weak Keep I don't think high schools are considered notable by default per Librarianofages, I don't think anything is notable by default and must always assert it's notability clearly (hence my exclusionist philosophy). Further, systemic bias is a weasely excuse to slow consensus forming for deleting articles, notability is to be independantly asserted, not asserted more than other articles per Arkadecki, voting is evil so anyone who was requesting change of votes either in this debate or via my talk page have earned themselves a rap on the knuckles with a ruler (and a smile for their good intentions) schools always have notable people talk at them (Nobel Laureates included) because important people educate tomorrows important people so that's should be taken thinly when asserting notability. BUT all that said, this article now reads quite nicely and seems to have rushed to attain a high quality quickly while on death row, I say an 11th hour repreive is in order.
•Elomis•
21:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
•Elomis• 21:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers. (aeropagitica) 05:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Does not appear to meet the criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (music) – Gurch 03:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as {{ db-spam}} for a non-notable company, WP:CORP refers. (aeropagitica) 05:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete - This article fails to establish notability with respect to the WP:CORP criteria and I believe it is primarily an advertisement. The two main contributors are single purpose accounts: Moxa ( talk · contribs) and 60.248.66.82 ( talk · contribs), which is a Moxa corporate IP. It failed the prod process. JonHarder 03:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was'Delete' Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Does not appear to meet the criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (music) – Gurch 03:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)a reply
Bazel 04:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
User Hatto created this page because he isn't happy with the current amount of space dedicated to this "phenomena" (as he choses to call it) on the original Masashi Tashiro page. This "phenomenon" is hardly notable enough to warrant its own article and merging it would be pointless (as everything in this article is information that other editors removed from the original article). Mackan 03:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was CSD A7 - crz crztalk 04:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Article does not appear to meet the criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (music) – Gurch 04:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Informal group of Student television stations whose sole aim appears to be meeting up and giving each other awards. Delete. Ohconfucius 03:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep, with a third for those who were asked to provide source for the claim to notablity, as it's readily available from Google books. ~ trialsanderrors 08:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Student TV station and the biggest and most frequent recipient of the self-lauditary awards from NaSTA. It claims to be the longest continuously-running student TV. Methinks "So what?" Delete Ohconfucius 03:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - nobody has a right to an article - you need to prove merit, another keep didn't have a reason, copyvio concerns, .... Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN student TV station Delete per WP:ORG. Ohconfucius 03:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - One of the keep advocateds gives no rationale, another says an assertion of notability is enough, which it isn't, and another claims that it has a "right" to an entry - policy requires it to earn an entry by showing notability. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN student TV station per WP:ORG. I refer to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LUST Delete Ohconfucius 03:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was KEEP. Jayden54 13:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN student TV station per
WP:ORG. I refer to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LUST
Delete
Ohconfucius
03:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was Delete - there is no "right" to an article for TV stations - it must prove merit. Also, assertion of notability is not sufficient. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 00:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN student TV station with very small output per WP:ORG. I refer to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LUST Six of the Best Ohconfucius 03:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This should stay particular since it was featured in the sunday times, or is the world leading newspaper no longer a source of notable information? (Capt Jack Doicy)
The result was delete - the two keeps are invalid. There is no "right" to inclusion - one has to prove merit. Also, assertion of notability does not prove notability as required. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:16, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN student TV station per WP:ORG. Winner of two self-laudatary awards from NaSTA. I refer to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LUST Delete Ohconfucius 03:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This should stay (Capt Jack Doicy)
The result was delete - again, nobody has a right to an article, you must prove merit. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN student TV station per WP:ORG. Won two self-laudatary awards from NaSTA. I refer to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LUST Delete Ohconfucius 03:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This should stay particular since it was featured in the sunday times, or is the world leading newspaper no longer a source of notable information? (Capt Jack Doicy)
The result was speedy keep: I'm closing this AfD early. It was opened by a user account with no previous edits only 7 days after a previous AfD on the same article and, as with the previous AfD, it has already degenerated into a slagging match between two editors
Most other University Rag Mags (and even most university student press) don't have a wiki page, why should Twikker? — Jen Kettle ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was Delete as unsourced. Any article, to meet Wikipedia's standards, must do two things: 1. Assert the notability of its subject, and 2. document this assertion. The assertion of notability here is that the measure had ramifications outside the community and became precedent for other measures nationwide. After checking the links provided I find that the evidence for this has not been forthcoming. Simply put, if this measure was a landmark event reliable sources should not be hard to come by. ~ trialsanderrors 04:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Controversial town planning measure. Of interest only to people in this one city in California. -- RHaworth 04:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Kungfu Adam ( talk) 13:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Procedural nom. Reprod. Prodder's concern was WP:CORP. I abstain. - crz crztalk 04:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 11:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Original research, original literary analysis--I seriously doubt you can find a reliable secondary source to identify deus ex machinas in a comic strip. Night Gyr ( talk/ Oy) 04:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. AnonEMouse (squeak) 14:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Sub-stub articles for Unitarian Universalist Association districts. Each article (with exceptions I discuss individually) reads "The X District of the Unitarian Universalist Association is a district, serving Unitarian Universalist congregations in [states] X, Y and Z." Included in the nomination are:
|
|
These articles were nominated (along with the list Districts of the Unitarian Universalist Association) on September 2nd and the result was Keep. Normally I don't like renominations, but the first nomination was primarily for the list (which I am not nominating) and I am presenting different arguments for deletion than were raised in the first AfD. Moreover (and more importantly) the arguments supporting keep were particularly unconvincing. They were as follows:
Most important for our purposes, the individual districts are not covered in independent, reliable sources and so, each taken on its own, is not notable. JChap2007 05:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by Rama's Arrow. MER-C 09:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable member of a dubiously-notable band ( Circles_End). Erik Swanson 05:22, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - a combination of borderline notability and dubious sources pushes this across the line. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod: Non notable band, fails WP:MUSIC, has yet to publish their first album (and on what label?). No independent resources, the 55 distinct google hits for single file plus my best defense [32] give no more info. No more info or confirmation of the Ed Rose connection (32 distinct Google hits, most from myspace [33]) Fram 20:22, 11 November 2006 (UTC) reply
i find it funny how much effort is going into this. a fan notified us of this pending deletion; i'd be happy to clear things up. you can be the judge (national vs. "bar band").
In the past 2+ years we've been a full-time band, we've pulled off the following:
-6 US tours,over 300 shows and counting -Completed ALL of 2006 Vans Warped Tour -Completed 2 weeks of 2005 Vans Warped Tour -All tours completely self-booked and promoted -Nearly 1.4 million plays on myspace.com (over 10,000 plays daily) -Nearly 48,000 friends on myspace.com -Featured artist on myspace.com twice in a single year -Shared the stage with such acts as Red Jumpsuit Apparatus, The Gym Class Heroes, Waking Ashland, Sherwood, The Higher, The Summer Obsession, The Afters, Over It, and many more. Will also be playing as main support for Snow Patrol on 12/5/2006 @ the Fillmore Auditorium in Denver (3,600 capacity hall)... -Single 'Zombies Ate My Neighbors' now in full roration on Denver Clear Channel station 93.3 KTCL, recieving a 99% positive listener feedback rating (hasn't happened in history of station), as well as more requests than the last unsigned band they put into full rotation back in 2004...The Fray. The song (as of this week) is now in the second tier of rotation, and currently KTCL's number 8 song and climbing. -Songs featured on ESPN and FOX Sports ("Best Damn Sports Show Period") -Sold through 7,000 copies of our current EP 'My Best Defense' (released: 5/05) -Self produced/recorded 3 EP's, and; -Completed debut full length album under famed indie producer Ed Rose (Motion City Soundtrack, Senses Fail, Emery, The Get Up Kids, Brandtson, Reggie & The Full Effect, etc.)... -Ranked #2 (above Ben Gibbard) in the alternative radio charts in the "A&R Worldwide Music & Media Newsletter - October 9th, 2006"
nope, we don't have a website. nope, we don't have a label, though we're in talks with 3 of the biggest labels in the world (including virgin and epic), and several indies (including doghouse).
here are some sources, feel free to contact them (as well as any venues listed below):
ed rose (producer, www.edrose.com): ed@blacklodgerecording.com KTCL (top denver clear channel station): ericclouse@clearchannel.com (eric clouse, music director) kevin lyman (head of warped tour): kevinwarped@aol.com asylum (magazine): atari@asylummagazine.com (laura cleveland) yourhumb.com (news paper): daviss@yourhub.com (seth davis) colorado music buzz (magazine, print): 303.797.1800 (we've been featured several times) broomfield enterprize (magazine, print): kathryn.richert@gmail.com lyrics featured in worldwide distributed "revolution on canvas 2" - chris@wethepeoplerecords.net (chris haynie) sodajerk (local promoter, verify sold out shows): mike@sodajerkpresents.com
there are many, many more, but these are off the top of my head. please feel free to contact me for more...(email below)
lastly, here's our tour history (from old to new) -- please note we've played over 35 shows since this list was generated, several of which we headlined and sold out:
06/02/2004 - Canoga Park, CA - The Cobalt 06/28/2004 - Hollywood, CA - Knitting Factory (front bar) 07/02/2004 - Hollywood, CA - The Cat Club 07/06/2004 - Hollywood, CA - ClubLingerie 07/21/2004 - Canoga Park, CA - The Cobalt 08/01/2004 - Denver, CO - Larimer Lounge 08/02/2004 - Arvada, CO - Pink-E's 08/03/2004 - Arvada, CO - La Dolce Vita 08/04/2004 - Denver, CO - 15th St. Tavern 08/06/2004 - Fort Collins, CO - The Starlight 08/26/2004 - Universal City, CA - Hard Rock Cafe 09/03/2004 - Universal City, CA - Universal Bar & Grill 09/06/2004 - Los Angeles, CA - The Good Hurt 09/17/2004 - Old Town Pasadena, CA - The Equator 09/26/2004 - Universal City, CA - Universal Bar & Grill 10/20/2004 - Los Angeles, CA - The Good Hurt 11/04/2004 - Los Angeles, CA - USC Mega Show
12/13/2004 - Santa Barbara, CA - The Velvet Jones 12/14/2004 - Hollywood, CA -Knitting Factory (front bar) 12/15/2004 - San Diego, CA - Dream Street 12/16/2004 - Las Vegas, NV - The Boston 12/17/2004 - Albuquerque, NM - The Atomic Cantina 12/18/2004 - Denver, CO - 15th St. Tavern 12/22/2004 - Arvada, CO - La Dolce Vita 12/23/2004 - Denver, CO - The Hard Rock 12/28/2004 - Topeka, KS - The Boobie Trap 12/29/2004 - Cedar Falls, IA - The Reverb 12/30/2004 - Saint Louis, MO - Off Broadway 12/31/2004 - Chapel Hill, NC - Local 506 01/03/2005 - New Orleans, LA - The Neutral Ground 01/04/2005 - Austin, TX - Redrum 01/05/2005 - Oklahoma City, OK - The Conservatory 01/07/2005 - Phoenix, AZ - The Emerald 01/08/2005 - Hollywood, CA - Knitting Factory (alterknit)
01/23/2005 - Universal City, CA - Universal Bar & Grill 03/04/2005 - Tucson, AZ - Gameworks 03/05/2005 - Tempe, AZ - ASU 03/06/2005 - Phoenix, AZ - Willow House Coffee 03/11/2005 - Studio City, CA - Global Cafe 03/13/2005 - Marina Del Rey, CA - Brennan's 03/31/2005 - Hollywood, CA - Knitting Factory (front bar) 04/09/2005 - Burbank, CA - Que's River Bottom 04/13/2005 - Los Angeles, CA - Ground Zero (USC) 04/14/2005 - Hollywood, CA - The Hotel Cafe 04/23/2005 - Los Angeles, CA - USC's Relay For Life
06/28/2005 - Santa Barbara, CA - The Wildcat Lounge 06/29/2005 - Hollywood, CA - Knitting Factory (front bar) 06/30/2005 - San Diego, CA - Brick by Brick 07/01/2005 - Tucson, AZ - Gameworks 07/02/2005 - Phoenix, AZ - The Emerald 07/03/2005 - Sedona, AZ - The Raven Heart 07/05/2005 - Las Vegas, NV - Brewed Awakening 07/06/2005 - Bakersfield, CA - Studio 99 07/07/2005 - Fresno, CA - The Belmont 07/09/2005 - San Jose, CA - Tower Records 07/09/2005 - Campbell, CA - The C-Spot 07/10/2005 - Campbell, CA - The Gaslighter 07/11/2005 - Oroville, CA - Mug Shots 07/12/2005 - Portland, OR - The Paris Theatre 07/14/2005 - Missoula, MT - Higgins Hall 07/15/2005 - Bozeman, MT - Vans Warped Tour '05 07/16/2005 - Salt Lake City, UT - Vans Warped Tour '05 07/17/2005 - Denver, CO - Vans Warped Tour '05 07/18/2005 - Arvada, CO - La Dolce Vita 07/19/2005 - Denver, CO - 15th Street Tavern 07/20/2005 - Durango, CO - The Abbey Theater 07/21/2005 - Amarillo, TX - The Nat Ballroom 07/22/2005 - Oklahoma City, OK - The Showroom 07/23/2005 - Dallas, TX - The Door (main stage) 07/24/2005 - Austin, TX - The Whiskey 07/25/2005 - Houston, TX - The Southmore House 07/26/2005 - Bton Rouge, LA - The Darkroom 07/28/2005 - Jackson, MS - W.C. Don's 07/29/2005 - Memphis, TN - Tower Records 08/01/2005 - Hannibal, MO - Java Jive 08/02/2005 - Nashville, TN - The 5 Spot 08/03/2005 - Birmingham, AL - Upsidedown Plaza 08/06/2005 - Gainesville, FL - Tim & Terry's 08/07/2005 - Orlando, FL - Vans Warped Tour '05 08/08/2005 - Jacksonville, FL - Jackrabbits 08/10/2005 - Washington, DC - Vans Warped Tour '05 08/11/2005 - Scranton, PA - Vans Warped Tour '05 08/12/2005 - Concord, NC - Jillian's 08/17/2005 - Chapel Hill, NC - Local 506 08/25/2005 - Lakewood, OH - The Hi-Fi 08/26/2005 - Grand Rapids, MI - 10 Bells 08/27/2005 - Muncie, IN - 525 Wheeling 08/28/2005 - Orland Park, IL - Mojoe's 08/30/2005 - Cedar Falls, IA - The Reverb 09/01/2005 - Hannibal, MO - Jave Jive 09/03/2005 - Topeka, KS - The Boobie Trap
09/10/2005 - Scottsbluff, NE - The Underground 09/11/2005 - Arvada, CO - La Dolce Vita
09/22/2005 - Denver, CO - The Climax Lounge 09/23/2005 - Gunnison, CO - The Alamo 09/24/2005 - South Jordan, UT - The Blue Note 09/25/2005 - Elko, NV - Brew's Brother's 09/26/2005 - Reno, NV - Tower Records 09/27/2005 - Oroville, CA - Mugshots 09/28/2005 - San Jose, CA - San Jose Skate 09/29/2005 - Fresno, CA - Tower Records 09/30/2005 - Bakersfield, CA - Studio 99 10/01/2005 - Isla Vista, CA - UCSB House Party 10/02/2005 - Ventura, CA - The Livery Theatre 10/03/2005 - Los Angeles, CA - Knitting Factory (alterknit) 10/05/2005 - Yorba Linda, CA - Java Joe's 10/07/2005 - Tucson, AZ - Gameworks 10/08/2005 - Flagstaff, AZ - The Lo-Fi 10/10/2005 - Amarillo, TX - The Nat Ballroom 10/11/2005 - Austin, TX - Redrum 10/13/2005 - Norman, OK - OU (Student Union) 10/14/2005 - Lewisville, TX - Fat Daddy's Sound Shack 10/15/2005 - Baton Rouge, LA - The Darkroom 10/17/2005 - Memphis, TN - Tower Records 10/18/2005 - Hannibal, MO - Java Jive 10/19/2005 - Cedar Falls, IA - The Reverb 10/20/2005 - Omaha, NE - Sokol Underground 10/21/2005 - Topeka, KS - The Boobie Trap 10/23/2005 - Arvada, CO - La Dolce Vita
10/31/2005 - Denver, CO - The Climax 11/05/2005 - Denver, CO - The Climax 11/12/2005 - Scottsbluff, NE - The Underground
11/21/2005 - Denver, CO - The Climax 11/25/2005 - Topeka, KS - The Boobie Trap 11/26/2005 - Papillion, NE - The Rock 11/28/2005 - Hannibal, MO - Java Jive 11/29/2005 - Memphis, TN - University of Memphis 11/30/2005 - Baton Rouge, LA - The Dark Room 12/01/2005 - Houston, TX - Fitzgeralds 12/02/2005 - Austin, TX - Redrum 12/03/2005 - Dallas, TX - The Door (theatre stage) (cont’d on page #2) 12/04/2005 - San Antonio, TX - Cafe Revolucion 12/06/2005 - Amarillo, TX - The Illuminati 12/07/2005 - Albuquerque, NM - The Cell Theatre 12/08/2005 - Flagstaff, AZ - The Campus Coffee Bean 12/09/2005 - Phoenix, AZ - Four White Walls 12/10/2005 - Tucson, AZ - Gameworks 12/11/2005 - San Diego, CA - The Zombie Lounge 12/13/2005 - Hollywood, CA - The Troubadour 12/15/2005 - Bakersfield, CA - Studio 99 12/16/2005 - Las Vegas, CA - The Alley 12/16/2005 - Fresno, CA - The Belmont 12/17/2005 - Cedar City, UT - Hoover Nights 12/19/2005 - Midvale, UI - The Circuit 12/20/2005 - Elko, NV - Brew's Brothers 12/21/2005 - Salt Lake City, UT - Kilby Court 12/22/2005 - Cheyenne, WY - The Tivoli 12/23/2005 - Denver, CO - The Climax
01/07/2006 - Scottsbluff, NE - The Underground 01/19/2006 - Denver, CO - The Bluebird 01/27/2006 - Scottsbluff, NE - The Underground 01/28/2006 - Fort Collins, CO - The Starlight 01/29/2006 - Pueblo, CO - Fortino Ballroom 01/30/2006 - Colorado Springs, CO - Sand Creek HS 01/31/2006 - Castle Rock, CO - Grindwell Skatepark 02/01/2006 - Grand Junction, CO - LIFF Auditorium 02/03/2006 - Albuquerque, NM - The Cell Theatre 02/04/2006 - Amarillo, TX - The Illuminati 02/17/2006 - Brighton, CO - Riverdale Clubhouse 02/18/2006 - Scottsbluff, NE - The Underground 02/25/2006 - Topeka, KS - The Boobie Trap 03/11/2006 - Hannibal, MO - Java Jive 03/18/2006 - Papillion, NE - The Rock 03/21/2006 - Denver, CO - The Gothic Theater 03/24/2006 - Fort Collins, CO - The Starlight
04/13/2006 - Littleton, CO - The Ascot Theater 04/14/2006 - Topeka, KS - The Boobie Trap 04/15/2006 - Saint Louis, MO - Mississippi Nights 04/17/2006 - Hannibal, MO - Java Jive 04/18/2006 - Owensboro, KY - The Brother's Pizza 04/19/2006 - Chapel Hill, NC - The Local 506 04/20/2006 - Charleston, SC - Music Farm 04/22/2006 - Pensacola, FL - Sluggo's 04/23/2006 - Baton Rouge, LA - The Darkroom 04/24/2006 - Monroeville, AL - Our Place 04/25/2006 - Shreveport, LA - Flannagans 04/26/2006 - Houston, TX - The White Swan 04/27/2006 - Austin, TX - Redrum 04/28/2006 - Canton, TX - The Mad Goat 04/29/2006 - Dallas, TX - Tower Records 04/29/2006 - Dallas, TX - The Door (theatre stage) 04/30/2006 - Tulsa, OK - The Pinkeye 05/02/2006 - Amarillo, TX - The Illuminati 05/03/2006 - Albuquerque, NM - The Cell Theatre 05/04/2006 - El Paso, TX - The House of Rock & Roll 05/05/2006 - Tucson, AZ - Gameworks 05/06/2006 - Los Angeles, CA - Fais Do Do 05/07/2006 - Bakersfield, CA - Studio 99 05/08/2006 - Fresno, CA - The Belmont 05/09/2006 - Sonoma, CA - Sonoma Valley High School 05/10/2006 - San Jose, CA - San Jose Skate 05/11/2006 - Elko, NV - Brews Brother's 05/12/2006 - Denver, CO - The Bluebird
05/25/2006 - Denver, CO - Rock Island 05/27/2006 - Fort Collins, CO - The Starlight 06/03/2006 - Denver, CO - The Larimer Lounge 06/09/2006 - Albuquerque, NM - Hyperactive Music Festival 06/10/2006 - Amarillo, TX - The Illuminati 06/17/2006 - Centennial, CO - The Lifespot
06/19/2006 - Bonner Springs, KS - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/21/2006 - Nashville, TN - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/22/2006 - Jacksonville, FL - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/23/2006 - St. Petersburg, FL - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/24/2006 - Miami, FL - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/25/2006 - Orlando, FL - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/26/2006 - Ladson, SC - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/27/2006 - Raleigh, NC - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/28/2006 - Atlanta, GA - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/30/2006 - Houston, TX - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/01/2006 - Dallas, TX - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/02/2006 - Selma, TX - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/03/2006 - Las Cruces, TX - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/04/2006 - Phoenix, AZ - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/06/2006 - Chula Vista, CA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/07/2006 - Pomona, CA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/08/2006 - San Francisco, CA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/09/2006 - Fresno, CA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/11/2006 - Ventura, CA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/12/2006 - Los Angeles, CA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/13/2006 - Marysvale, CA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/14/2006 - Boise, ID - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/15/2006 - George, WA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/16/2006 - St. Helens, OR - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/17/2006 - Salt Lake City, UT - Kilby Court 07/21/2006 - Denver, CO - The Climax Lounge 07/23/2006 - Denver, CO - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/25/2006 - Maryland Heights, MO - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/26/2006 - Cincinnati, OH - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/27/2006 - Pittsburgh, PA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/28/2006 - Noblesville, IN - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/29/2006 - Detroit, MI - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/30/2006 - Tinley Park, IL - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/01/2006 - Darien Center, NY - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/02/2006 - Fitchburg, PA - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/03/2006 - Camden, NJ - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/04/2006 - Scranton, PA - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/05/2006 - Uniondale, NY - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/06/2006 - Englishtown, NJ - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/08/2006 - Charlotte, NC - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/09/2006 - Virginia Beach, VA - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/10/2006 - Bristow, VA - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/11/2006 - Cleveland, OH - Vans Warped Tour '06
08/13/2006 - Hannibal, MO - Java Jive 08/15/2006 - Topeka, KS - The Boobie Trap 08/31/2006 - Denver, CO - The Hi-Dive
hope this helps.
--sloan sloan@singlefilerock.com
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 03:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Second largest mall in the Lansing, Michigan area. No claims to notability. JChap2007 05:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, should be discussed at WP:RM and appropriate article talk pages -- Samir धर्म 05:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a redundant page of Sinhala language, as the proper name should be Sinhala not Sinhalese. It is best to provide a redirect instead. එරංග 05:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 02:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This was speedy deleted as CSD G11 spam. A DRV consensus overturned after the speedy was contested with reference to media reviews. This matter is submitted to AfD for full consideration. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 05:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 03:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notability Subject has not been demonstrated as notable per WP policy. Article heavily edited by subject's associate. Delete Green hornet 05:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 03:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC; NN Chinese artist, hard to determine G-hits w/Chinese characters. SkierRMH 05:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 03:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
violation of WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC; bio piece on NN artist SkierRMH 05:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete -- pgk 19:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
contested speedy delete; nn person, violates WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC, SkierRMH 06:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 03:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
School built in 1989 whose entire claim to noteworthiness appears to be the fact that a teacher at the school was involved in an automobile accident in which, through carelessness, he caused the death of a 6-year-old near the school. I do not accept that as a valid claim to the noteworthiness of the school. (If it'd happened in the school, maybe.) None of the information in this article that's actually about the school is sourced by anything other than the school's homepage, nor does it amount to more than a directory entry, nor do I find any potential independent reliable sources through various searches -- just directories. Shimeru 06:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Kimchi. sg 10:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
nn clubs. Sizuxng 06:22, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep after sources provided. Yomangani talk 10:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
nn website. (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amie Street) Sizuxng 06:25, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by Gurch. MER-C 08:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
non notable company. Sizuxng 06:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumba -- Suntag ☼ 18:19, 30 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Kimchi. sg 10:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
From speedy. Speedy is contested Alex Bakharev 07:04, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete as claims to notability (listed by Edison) are not verified by independent sources. Google Books and the reference desk at the local library are good starting points for offline searches for sources, but as it is the article fails Wikipedia policies. As with every deletion for lack of sources, the article can be restored or userfied if sources (which don't necessarily have to be online) are found. ~ trialsanderrors 08:20, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
From speedy. Should go to AfD instead Alex Bakharev 07:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Smashed to pieces (aka Bj'd and redirected to Chinese porcelain until something excavates it and turns it into a real article.) ~ trialsanderrors 08:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia should have an article on Ming porcelain, and this page could then be a somewhat useful redirect. But it seems that we don't. Having an article titled "Ming vase" which contains nothing but references to slapstick comedy and video games is worse than nothing. I redirected this to Chinese porcelain long ago, but the silliness has been restored. u♦p♦p♦l♦a♦n♦d 07:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:29, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball Suipd Lorry 07:22, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Kimchi. sg 10:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN chapter of national organisation, fails WP:ORG. Ohconfucius 07:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 03:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
I proposed this for deletion for lack of real notability, and no real content edits in over a year. It was then deprodded, with two additional references (the first content edits in over a year!), so I am taking it to AfD. So far all third-party references are from two online news sites, the first from 1999, the second from 2003. Weak delete. JIP | Talk 07:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - Harlsbottom's keep does not address notability problems - and the author advocated "keep" twice. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:22, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non notable chapter of national organisation. Ohconfucius 07:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 10:58, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
No Google hits for
Czolgosz Vanzettis or
"Big 386 Records". Likely hoax. Unverifiable and likely not to pass
WP:MUSIC. Nomination also includes their album. ~
trialsanderrors
08:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was speedy delete. -- RHaworth 20:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:CORP. The studio gets 72 unique Ghits, most of which directory listings and wiki mirror sites. No meaningful press articles about the company. Delete. Ohconfucius 08:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:29, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete.
Non-notable student organisation. The "membership" of 1000 is no doubt due to the fact that it's default. The content might warrant merging into the Republic Polytechnic article, but I'm not even sure of that (I'm sure there are dozens of student clubs, and this one is only for the engineering students) yandman 10:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:31, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
questionably notible school, violates several of the proposed criteria in the WP:SCHOOLcriteria, parts read like advert SkierRMH 10:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
*Weak delete I am unable to find non-trivial independent sources nor any claims of notability (and no, to those above, being accredited is not a claim of notability any more than being given citizenship is a claim of notability for
WP:BIO). This is only a weak delete because there may be a language issue here that is preventing me from fidning more sources. However, since this is listed in the Pakistan related deletions this will change to a full delete if sources aren't given in the next few days.
JoshuaZ 20:26, 18 November 2006 (UTC) Changing to very weak keep per discussion below with JJay.
JoshuaZ
04:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was speedy delete Mango juice talk 14:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Their only criteria for this article is that the school has one, so they get one too... I have submitted the school as non notable under WP:SCHOOL, so don't consider this a possible merge candidate SkierRMH 10:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 11:06, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Unverifiable, possible vanity. His name is not known in Israel and searching for עובדיה שוחר yields almost nothing. The only thing that can be notable about this is the fight against Amazon.com, and even that is dubious. Seems to me that whoever is behind this is trying to use social websites such as MySpace, Amazon.com and now Wikipedia to promote his extremist political ideas. Amir E. Aharoni 10:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - the RS and concerns about the triviality of the citations pushes this over the line. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 00:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. NN per WP:BIO, no WP:RS. Leibniz 10:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Hús ö nd 22:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 03:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Based on tone and history, appears to have been created as advertising. Notability suspect. Delete. -- Nlu ( talk) 11:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Hús ö nd 22:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The list is not even here, just a notice that the content is now located in other articles. Even if it was there, identifying people as "liberal" (or as "leaders" for that matter) without sources constitutes original research. Bletch 12:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Hús ö nd 22:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested speedy. Article makes some vague claims of notability but these are hard to sustantiate. Google presence appears minimal. More detailed research may show notability, this is a procedural nomination. Guy ( Help!) 12:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - Brad and JROBBO point to Music band criteria 7 - but this states the leading band/orchestra in a city - this is a university club, and no claim to being the leading group in the city is stated. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 01:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Tagges as WP:CSD A7 (non-notable club), but notability is asserted. Probably just another student club, but claims a couple of famous former members. Definitely not the Footlights but will do no harm to think about it for a while. Procedural nomination. Guy ( Help!) 12:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete G12. Copyvio from: [44], which itself is a copy of [45]. Mango juice talk 14:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Tagged as G4, repost of content deleted by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford Belles, but content is different and there were only two !votes. Subject scores under 120 ghits, among which I did not see, at a quick skim, anything which might count as a reliable source, nor did I see any evidence of meeting WP:MUSIC. Looks like vanispamcruftisement, but you decide. Guy ( Help!) 12:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 03:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Tagged for speedy (that way lies ArbCom!), this is a very short article for a generic primary school, written in the first person. Seems like someone has misdirected Year 6 as to what Wikipedia is for, so will a schoolwatcher please pop over and be Kind at them for a bit until they realise the problem? Anyway, I say merge to the community. Guy ( Help!) 13:04, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Deleted by Mackensen - Yomangani talk 17:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:Auto and possibly WP:Note Amists talk • contribs 13:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Hús ö nd 22:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Deletion nomination Encyclopedically non-notable university sports club. Gaelic sports are not a major sport at Cambridge. Makes dubious claim of connection with 19th century patron of GAA but club only started in 1995. College/varsity sports in UK nowhere near as important as college sports in US (and this club is for a very minor sport in the UK too) but still I'm taking this to afd rather than speedy delete due to club's participation in university gaelic sports league and the BUSA championships, whatever that may be - seeing if any gaelic sports fans want to argue for encyclopedic notability here Bwithh 13:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as an unsourced attack article listing the perceived failings of one specific person by xyr co-workers. This person is identifiable, both from the name of the article and from the picture of the person that was included in an older version of the article. Uncle G 19:51, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
nn protologism, no valid ghits so suggest made up in school one day, almost speedy A7 but taking here to be on the safe side Amists talk • contribs 13:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Kimchi. sg 15:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article has had a notability tag hanging on it for quite some time. Some changes have been made, but none of them have made this article anywhere near notable. Right now, this article is describing exactly what the club is doing from day to day, something that is not notable. Diez2 13:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete (A7) Non-notable nonsense.-- Hús ö nd 19:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article was nominated for speedy deletion over a week ago, but no admin has deleted it. I'm moving it to AfD instead, to clear out Category:Candidates for speedy deletion and to get some more input. Note that the term Mitth'ure'nourodo gets no google hits outside of wikipedia. No opinion. A ecis Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 14:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:40, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia:Verifiability "If an article topic has no reputable, reliable, third-party sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on that topic. According to Talk:Jonathan Sarfati, When this article was being heavily disputed I looked for WP:RS-compliant sources that were critical of Sarfati and was unable to find any other significant ones. The bottom line is that David is correct, Sarfati is almost off the radar screen. Furthermore, he and AiG have become even less on the radar in the last few years as the main focus among evolution groups has been dealing with intelligent design. JoshuaZ 20:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC) - In other words, he's a very minor figure in the creationist movement that it may be impossible to write a balanced article on. If we can't, we should delete him as non-notable. Adam Cuerden talk 14:11, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
-- Nick Y. 20:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN spammer. Restored from prod-deletion at user's request, with agreement to bring it to AFD for consensus. UtherSRG (talk) 14:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable general for one year in ancient Greece. Google gives me 11 unique non-wiki results. MartinDK 14:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 11:46, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Fails clearly WP:PROF. Very few relevant ghits Optimale Gu 15:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted -- HappyCamper 15:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
There is nothing in this article to suggest the subject meets WP:BIO or WP:BLP, and it seems to be a page about a radio employee, with nothing to assert notability, or indeed, anything that proves this is encyclopedic. SunStar Net 15:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to Aryabhata. The article contains material that might be usefully included in the Aryabhata article, but per the arguments the title of this article is WP:POV unsupported by the sources and as such not acceptable by policies. Edit history remains, so editors can merge the useful elements (a 5th century text is not copyrighted btw). ~ trialsanderrors 08:44, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article violates WP:RS as the reference is not published in a peer-reviewed journal, and therefore the view promoted violates WP:OR. Also I suspect a violation of WP:COPY since the text is lifted wholesale from the reference. Finally, the quoted text is not a principle of relativity. See talk:Aryabhata's relativity principle for more info. Delete -- EMS | Talk 15:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Most interesting and surprising are (IV,9) "as a man in a boat going forward sees a stationary object moving backward, just so at Lanka a man sees the stationary asterisms moving backard," and also in (IV,12) last sentence, "the gods and dwellers in hell both think constantly that the others are beneath them." This appreciation of relativity reconciles Aryabhata's position on the stationary earth for which he has been criticized by other Hindu writes.
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 11:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A game modder is not someone who creates computer games, but only creates expansion sets for them. It is possible that some member of this class may achieve encyclopedic notability for that, but I don't see evidence of it here. Note: I am listed as the creator of this article, but only because I moved the material that kept getting added to the unrelated article The Pumaman to its own article. Antaeus Feldspar 15:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 10:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Unverifiable. Created October 18, 2006. On October 17, 2006, the initial author User:Guyinredsuit had created a quite different article with the same name about a teenager born in 1992 in Victoria, Australia. Delete as a likely hoax unless verified. Lupo 15:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 03:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable Randomkiwi 09:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC) This person isn't notable. She's a lecturer and an unsuccessful candidate, without any degree of national prominence. reply
Greensill is running again and came very close to beating the incumbent last election and considering the polls are so close this time around and that the Maori Party may hold the balance of power in the next government it is important that this person be detailed. In addition she has been leader of several important Maori political movements and though may be consider un"notable" to Pakeha is considered very notable in Maori communities. WahineToa (UTC) (sorry about my format, just working this all out, kia ora!) - more importantly, Ms Greensill has contributed a great deal to the Maori community in terms of the environment, land rights and community development.
The result was Delete.-- Hús ö nd 22:13, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:AUTO, creator was John@esib.org ( talk · contribs). Contested prod. MER-C 12:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Kimchi. sg 15:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This has been tagged for notability since October 23, and no edits have come to it since then. This article does not emphazize the notability of the club, and thus it should be deleted Diez2 16:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 11:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
An "amateur" with an "extensive website" fails WP:BIO. Leibniz 14:38, 11 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Unsourced band article. Peter O. ( Talk) 16:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Withdrawn. The article can be kept. Peter O. ( Talk) 23:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
*Weak keep, per Catchpole and Dianogah. If the article can be better sourced, make that a strong keep. --
Guinnog
20:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete - socking is futile. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
An article on a podcast. I believe this easily fails notability requirements ( WP:WEB). P.B. Pilh e t / Talk 16:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Soccergirl was referenced extensively in: Podcasting for Dummies [51] Soccergirl was included on a panel at Sundance, 2005, and was written up in the Sundance Review Guide (I don't have a link for this, but the following Yahoo interview proves that she played an important role in the festival [52]. Soccergirl was also the first podcaster to adapt her show to the stage (in New York City, June 2006) and was reviewed by the print publication, New York Theater (see the review at their website: [53] Liono007 17:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Notability definition: A notable, or remarkable, person or thing; a person of note. Soccergirl has 165 shows, updated twice or three times a week since March of 2005. She has inspired many other podcasters and is considered among podcasting's pioneers. She has been nominated for a podcast award in the Mature category [54] for two years in a row (other than Dawn and Drew, the only one who was) Her name is known by anyone notable in the field. 165 episodes and worldwide recognition is a little more important than eating 6 cans of beans. Laffertyme 18:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Kungfu Adam ( talk) 13:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Unverifiable OR/ WP:BOLLOCKS. References are "ebooks". Leibniz 17:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.110.209.82 ( talk • contribs)
The result was no consensus. And the schoolyard fighting continues... ~ trialsanderrors 08:52, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable, goes on about a movie in lead paragraph, poor quality... sounds a lot like a prospectus in some places. ~ Zythe Talk to me! 17:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result wasdelete Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 01:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Is this (alleged -- I've never seen it, at least) public service announcement really sufficiently notable? Delete. -- Nlu ( talk) 17:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - strong consensus, and 1 keep sock. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Losing contestant on a reality television show. Prod was removed by User:Badlydrawnjeff with the comment that reality television contestants are "inherently notable". This contestant hasn't done anything notable before or since the show, and didn't win on the show. She's just another struggling model. About 600 hits on Google. [59]. Mikeblas 18:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This has been speedied several time, with a fair amount of grief given to the speediers, including me. So, in the interest of transparency and openness, let's have a full discussion of it. I do not believe it satisfies WP:CORP, and I also do not approve of "placeholder" articles--if an article is not yet written, there's no reason for us to have a page on it. Chick Bowen 18:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - already merged. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A former trainee football (soccer) player who never played a first-team professional game. Was released by Grimsby Town in the summer of this year and has not found a new one (either accrding to Soccerbase or Google News).
Note - he is not to be confused with his much more famous father, John Lukic. Qwghlm 18:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as {{ db-nonsense}}. (aeropagitica) 22:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Here is the whole article:
Yikes. No sources. Leibniz 18:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 18:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 10:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Losing contestant on a television reality show. About 600 Google hits. [60] Hasn't done anything notable before appearing on the show. Did a bit of a press tour after the show, but that's momentum from the show. Now, just another struggling model. Mikeblas 18:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to List of Mystery Science Theater 3000 episodes, where it's already mentioned. ~ trialsanderrors 08:55, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article has been tagged for notability since October 3. There has been one edit to it since then, but only to cleanup the page. I think that this article should be deleted for non-notability. Diez2 18:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to Garda Síochána. ~ trialsanderrors 08:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
House magazine of the Garda, total circulation 7,500, monograph of User:Rory Deegan whose other recent edits are largely to create (and argue about deletion of) articles published by the same company. I wonder if that might be significant... Guy ( Help!) 18:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Story001
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Kimchi. sg 15:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable ( WP:CORP), used for advertising (SPA Special:Contributions/Jstar4 created article, and placed See Also links to it in articles about its primary services). Renesis ( talk) 19:00, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 10:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
WP:Vanity (article creator's name is TheVille) & non-notable (Googling "The Ville" + "Robert Manier" returns only The Ville's own Myspage page) Psychonaut3000 19:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy redirect (already done). No need to delete the edit history. ~ trialsanderrors 22:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
duplication of information already in Assistant party leaders of the United States Senate. Create redirect to that article after deletion. — MrDolomite | Talk 19:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep.-- Kungfu Adam ( talk) 13:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NOT by being a dictionary entry. This article cannot be expanded further - the topic is already covered in Medical history Adam Slack 19:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Changed vote to Neutral given the changes in the article, and the additional comments that have come in. EdJohnston 23:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete a7, concert by nonnotable band. NawlinWiki 21:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Was prod'd and de-prod'd twice. Is a non-notable, non-verifiable event. P.B. Pilh e t / Talk 19:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete, any claimed notability was purely an illusion. Guy ( Help!) 21:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
non-notable; prod tag removed by creator -- Robocoder ( t| c) 19:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 10:39, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
non notable long-range transport plan for Wisconsin; every state probably has some such bland label for their attempts to schedule future projects; does anyone care? Brianyoumans 19:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Transwiki ~ trialsanderrors 09:00, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a dictionary Ratarsed 19:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete the article and {{ orfud}} the images. ~ trialsanderrors 08:03, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
WP:NOT for image galleries, especially ones full of fair use images. cholmes75 ( chit chat) 19:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki 20:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band. Veinor ( ヴエノル(talk)) 20:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 03:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This team isn't notable enough yet Killswitch Engage 20:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Keep. Winning the tag titles and having the team name consistantly mentioned by the announcers is notable enough for me. However, if we're going to look at deleting short-lived tag team articles, we should also look at Shazarian. 131.230.135.105 21:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge to Inca Empire. ~ trialsanderrors 09:05, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
We already have Inca Empire, which is all history since the empire no longer exists. This article doesn't add anything that isn't there or in History of Peru. Descendall 20:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 07:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Article was nominated for speedy deletion for non-notability and copyvio. The copyvio section was removed, and the band meets WP:MUSIC by containing "at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable" ( Dresden Dolls' Brian Viglione). I'm moving this to AfD instead. No opinion. A ecis Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 20:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was "Redirect' to formal system. Salvageable material can be retrieved from the edit history and added to the formal system article. ~ trialsanderrors 07:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Possible neologism, as the only reference claimed using that term (with or without a hyphen) is "Herrmann, Robert A.", who is probably also User:Raherrmann. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete, probably the least ambiguous A7 I've seen today. Guy ( Help!) 20:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article has been speedy-deleted twice [61], recommended for speedy again (tag was deleted), and prodded (tag was deleted). Moving to formal AfD to settle the matter. Recommend speedy-deletion, and page protection. -- Elonka 20:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 07:52, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A crap article but the subject may be notable so, much as I was tempted to nuke it on the basis of the secont para, I brought it here instead. Guy ( Help!) 20:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 03:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
From what I've seen there is no other pages for wrestlers championships and accomplishments. Ric Flair shouldn't be the exception. The most important titles should just be on the Ric Flair page, a seperate article doesn't need to list all of them. RobJ1981 20:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 07:51, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Record label, no apparent notability. NawlinWiki 20:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as it was a redirect to a User page. Why it came here, I don't understand. (aeropagitica) 22:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This guy is talking about himself. seXie (t0lk) 21:00, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was'Delete' Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 00:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:PROF. Blog stuff is no evidence of notability per WP:BIO. Leibniz 21:11, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:48, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-encyclopedic, original research, fan and musical cruft. The article goes lengths to describe the music and its usage in the several Harry Potter films. Hedwig's Theme may be notable on itself, but there's hardly much that can be said about it. I loved the soundtracks but I can't really see any reason why we should keep this article. ☢ Ҡi∊ff⌇ ↯ 21:25, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete.
Non notable school, suggest deletion under WP:SCHOOL SkierRMH 21:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
*Keep Assuming that indepedent sourcing can be found. Being a Blue Ribbon school is a claim of notability.
JoshuaZ 20:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC) Changing to Delete per Pan Dan and Wikipediatrix's comments below.
JoshuaZ
23:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Violation of WP:SPAM as nn business, advertisment SkierRMH 21:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
WP:SPAM advert, please see discussion on this page, the author states that he is working on it, however, the business ultimately is NN and no amount of work will bring it to notariety SkierRMH 21:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN "independent film". 40 G hits for "Band Posers" movie.-- Fang Aili talk 20:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all. Proto:: type 12:13, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Vanity. Issue came up after creation and same spam on NL-wiki. The so-called "organisation" and its website seem very amateuristic. User:Hsf-toshiba came up with the problem on NL-wiki, as he's into artistic roller skating , but doesn't know this "inline scating" "fedaration" however. Creator of the article has been advertising in the Artistic roller skating article too [64], too. Seems really non-professional project and vanity article about someones hobby and hobby site. LimoWreck 21:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Hi,
I don't understand what the problem is. We are a team promoting inline figure skating: that is our Mission Statement.
EIFSA and Holiday On Inlines use the same computer at offices in Rotterdam where Samantha, Stephanie and Gavin are located.
We are part of the administration of EIFSA and the Holiday On Inlines team:
EIFSA http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EIFSA/
http://www.geocities.com/eifsa_web/
HOLIDAY ON INLINES: http://geocities.com/HolidayOnInlines
http://skatehead.xs4all.nl/cpg/index.php
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HolidayOnInlines/
Inline Figure Skating has been approved by FIRS and CIPA. All the relevant info is online:
http://www.geocities.com/eifsa_infos/
http://www.geocities.com/eifsa_infos/TECHNICAL_INFO.html
Inline Figure Skating is an off-ice training option for ice skaters and an extra competition discipline for quad artistic roller skaters.
There seems to be some strange resentment towards the growing popularity of Inline Figure Skating, which is understandable but some are behaving genuinely hateful about it. Discriminating against it is nothing to be proud of, it is downright tragic!
skatingly,
Samantha Bennis
Stephiesk8 22:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Other links to related information:
http://sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/EIFSA/
http://www.frogsonice.com/skateweb/others.shtml
Artistic roller skating
USA Roller Sports -- the US governing body for roller skating.
Federation Internationale de Roller Sports
Roller Skating FAQs
European Inline Figure Skating Association
Inline skating FAQs
Speed skating info
Olympics
International Olympic Committee home page
US Olympic Committee
Dansescape.com -- competitive ballroom dancing and dance sport
Gymn-Forum.com -- gymnastics FAQs and info
http://www.frogsonice.com/skateweb/others.shtml
The result was delete. Proto:: type 12:12, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Band with no claim of passing WP:BAND. Tagged speedy and de-tagged with edit comment "rm tag, signed to major label; expand". WP:BAND says the guideline is two albums on a major label, not signed to work on one album. Weregerbil 04:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 03:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
WP:BIO, although there is one 'claim to fame', it doesn't appear that there is much substantiation of this, as well as questioning notariety, brought to attention for discussion SkierRMH 22:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedied per request. Tawker 23:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
WP:BOLLOCKS. Leibniz 22:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 07:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-noteable artist. A Google search for "'Perry Wade' artist" yields 94 results, including several instances like "Art & Artists in the Smithsonian Libraries' Collections · other resources ... Perry, Wade, AAPG, Details. Perry, Walter Scott, 1855-1934, AAPG," where Perry and Wade are adjacent through coincidence in a list of other people. Consequentially 22:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was merge. However, I'm going to disagree with you all! (muaaaaahahaha), and merge it to Jack Woltz, not the main The Godfather article, as it's a more logical location for it. Proto:: type 12:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The article contains nothing that the The Godfather article does not have. I seriously doubt this could be expanded beyond anything that does not belong in the Godfather article. And any pop culture information belongs in the film article and does not require a separate article. The Filmaker 22:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Ummm... Someone placed the link here, but didn't finish creating this page. So I've lsited it here for them. I have no status on whether the article should stay or go, but someone obviously wanted it to be deleted. Anyway, it was probably for NN or conflict of interest or something... Spawn Man 01:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. I'm gonna go ahead ( mmm, yeah) and also put a redirect to X-plane. Proto:: type 12:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable company. Veinor ( ヴエノル(talk)) 22:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
We need a newbies message but I can't remember what it is. I can advise that the closing admin may well disregard comments by people with few edits to their credits. What is needed is verification from reliable sources. Aaron Gerdes above has highlighted one such but it needs more preferably in the article. Capitalistroadster 09:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dgray xplane ( talk • contribs) 16:03 21 November 2006.
— Bnarelle ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The article is beginning to establish notability. I provided the first cite, a CNN article about XPLANE's illustrations of technical business models helping dot com investors. Industry participants and experts will continue to add their knowledge to reinforce notability and expand verifiable information.
I want to stress that this article does need cleanup, but deletion would be a loss for the wiki. If users are still finding material objectionable, I recommend we engage in a Wikipedia:BOLD,_revert,_discuss_cycle like grown-ups. ;) Aaron Gerdes 21:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Dgray xplane 01:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A company or corporation is notable if it meets any of the following criteria:
1. The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company or corporation itself. This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations except for the following: Media reprints of press releases, other publications where the company or corporation talks about itself, and advertising for the company. Works carrying merely trivial coverage, such as newspaper articles that simply report extended shopping hours or the publications of telephone numbers and addresses in business directories.
First: Reading through the list of press mentions above, I believe it will evident that the press mentions are not media reprints of press releases, nor are they advertising, nor are they publications where the company taks about itself.
Second: The articles are not trivial coverage based on the definition given here. Since the press mentions meet the first criteria, and are not covered by any of the exceptions, then I submit that XPLANE has met the standards provided by Wikipedia. Dgray xplane 22:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
KEEP: As a professional in the field of Visual Facilitation for the past 20 years, I agree that XPLANE is an appropriate topic for Wikipedia. Their work is foundational to a field that contributes to enriched understanding of complex information for businesses and communities. As a result of my research for two books on this topic I have concluded that the capacity to use visuals, symbols, icons and other pictoral references is an important skill for the "information age". The work XPLANE provides also increases their client's capacity to think systemically -- a skill that is critical during this era of globalization.-Nancy Margulies, 21 November 2006
The result was Delete muffin sales notwithstanding - Yomangani talk 10:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Just not notable enough. Was Speedied, then Prodded. President of College Democrats is nice but not notable on an encyclopedic scale. And, being a great muffin salesperson really doesn't add to that. My vote would be ***delete*** Dipics 22:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Wikipedia ate Matt's homework. ~ trialsanderrors 07:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Original research Pigman ( talk • contribs) 23:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - Terriersfan has allayed the concerns raised by Scope creep. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
In the UK, district council members are not inherently notable (all strategic issues are decided at county council level). Though he has been mayor, in this town mayor is a purely ceremonial role with no powers. The coverage in the locality article suffices.I have not found any press coverage of this John Bowing on Google here. Fails both WP:V and WP:BIO.
The result was speedy delete A7/ WP:SNOW. Chick Bowen 04:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article was tagged for notability on October 30. Although some edits have occured since then, the article quickly dissolves into nonsense. I move for this page to be deleted. Diez2 00:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep ~ trialsanderrors 04:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Dr.S.HUSSAIN ZAHEER MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Non notable school asserting no encyclopedic content, I don't think there's such thing as "regioncruft" but this articles assertion of "stalwarts like IICT, NGRI, CCMB" is also hopelessly relevant to only the region in which the article is commenting. The style and grammar would require a complete rewrite (with the capslock key levered off the keyboard) and the POV issues if removed would probably result in a 6 word article. Best to just bin it. •Elomis• 03:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
*DELETE. EVEN THOUGH THE PROBLEMS DESCRIBED ABOVE HAVE BEEN FIXED, THERE STILL REMAINS THE ISSUE OF VERIFIABILITY.
ONLY 13 GHITS, THE ONLY THING VERIFIED IS THAT THE SCHOOL EXISTS. (Yes, I was poking fun at the caps lock thing).
MER-C
03:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
*Delete per MER-C. --
Kicking222
03:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
*Delete No claim of notability and no multiple independent sources. Changing vote to Keep Sources were added. Sports competition notices in paper are pretty ordinary for a school, but the reference from a national paper showing three Nobel laureates interacting with the students in the science program is impressive enough to allow inclusion.
Edison
05:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
*Change of comment to Weak Keep I don't think high schools are considered notable by default per Librarianofages, I don't think anything is notable by default and must always assert it's notability clearly (hence my exclusionist philosophy). Further, systemic bias is a weasely excuse to slow consensus forming for deleting articles, notability is to be independantly asserted, not asserted more than other articles per Arkadecki, voting is evil so anyone who was requesting change of votes either in this debate or via my talk page have earned themselves a rap on the knuckles with a ruler (and a smile for their good intentions) schools always have notable people talk at them (Nobel Laureates included) because important people educate tomorrows important people so that's should be taken thinly when asserting notability. BUT all that said, this article now reads quite nicely and seems to have rushed to attain a high quality quickly while on death row, I say an 11th hour repreive is in order.
•Elomis•
21:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
•Elomis• 21:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was: with, as eloquently pointed out by 152 and Garrett, no indication that MPOGD is notable (in fact, an article on the site has been deleted) and no arguments to the contrary, which means MPOGD cannot be said to confer notability through its awards, we have no non-trivial coverage by independent third-party sources or any other indication that this game is notable. Delete, not discounting arguments from anons, since a convincing case for deletion was made that has not been answered. -- Sam Blanning (talk) 00:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Completing nomination by 152.91.9.144 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS), no !vote from me yet. MER-C 02:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
See also: first nomination
The result was speedily deleted CSD A7 by Samir. -- ais523 09:59, 22 November 2006 ( U T C)
NN student TV station. Notabilty asserted. I have tagged it Speedy per A7 Delete Ohconfucius 03:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was deleted as copyvio by Mangojuice. -- ais523 09:57, 22 November 2006 ( U T C)
This is an article about a non-professional singing group formed by Oxford University students. It has been deleted once before, but has been recreated. The group does not appear to satisfy either WP:ORG (where there are already plenty of case precedents of non-notable student societies for deletion) and WP:MUSIC. All recordings are self-releases and they have only performed locally per information on their website. Furthermore, parts of the article are pretty blatant WP:COPYVIO of the Oxford Belles website/page. Delete Ohconfucius 02:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was closed as malformed; incorrect article name, never listed, no AfD tag on article. I've relisted this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Green (rapper) (2nd nomination). -- ais523 09:55, 22 November 2006 ( U T C)
Vanity article. Non-notable individual. Claim of being "nominated for an SRA Student Radio Award in 2005 as Best Specialist Music Program" -- a dubious claim to fame to begin with -- isn't even supported by the accompanying reference link J.R. Hercules 02:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete as unsourced and seeming WP:COI. Primary claim to notability is not established by reliable sources. The Xuzo article, conveniently created on 11 Nov 2006 and unattributed, fails the WP:RS test. Userfy on request. ~ trialsanderrors 23:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Notability (fails google test) and a vanity article evrik ( talk) 16:22, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Grand master ka 04:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This was a stub I wrote a long time ago about a local Baltimore band. It was speedied before I noticed, so I've restored it because it is clearly not speediable under A7. The article claims notability, and cites it (though the link didn't work because the source changed urls, I have found the new url and fixed the link). Whether or not it is enough is another question, so I have nominated it here. Tuf-Kat 02:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy keep, nomination by vandal, nobody else reccomends deletion. Also the issue of the nominator voting after his nomination, and claiming sockpuppets for no good reason. Complain about my boldness if you feel like it. - Amarkov blah edits 01:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
non notable - 9000 google hits [2], vs. .5 million for Lutheranism [3]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.146.140.75 ( talk • contribs)
The result was Delete.-- Hús ö nd 05:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Article is unsourced and probably unverifiable. -- Donald Albury 00:11, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Kimchi. sg 09:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This has been tried as a CSD and a prod, and on both occasions the tag was removed with little or no addition of notability-related material. Essentially, we're dealing with an article which was written by the subject and is about someone who appears to be a run-of-the-mill evangelist. I don't doubt that he's doing good works, just that he's notable. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted by admin. -- Ter e nc e Ong ( C | R) 07:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
violates WP:BAND, non-notable, note number of red links, lack of sources, etc. SkierRMH 00:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 02:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable school which fails the proposed notability guideline of WP:SCHOOL. Tarret 00:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as a repost. cholmes75 ( chit chat) 19:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a game guide. ßott e siηi (talk) 00:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was merge. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:16, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
violation of WP:SPAM, clearly an advert for a NN business; author has removed the request for speedy delete SkierRMH 00:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
*Delete per above nom's
Missvain
03:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was Delete as unsourced. ~ trialsanderrors 00:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
I first noticed this article when I saw users fighting back and forth on the reliability of forum posts as sources- there was a pretty heated debate about the software and neutrality. Anyway, I pointed out on the talk page that this article needs sources to be verified. I've pleaded for sources on the talk page and in edit summaries, saying the page could be deleted if none were presented. None have been, so it's my belief that the article does not meet WP:SOFTWARE and is not unverifiable. I couldn't find any independent reliable sources on Google either. Wafulz 00:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - keep socks were noted, also some keeps were on the grounds "what's wrong" and the delete advocates managed to "damage" some of these "keeps". Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
An (admittedly cute) animation on YouTube. Best claim to notability is that a bunch of people on Fark and Digg liked it. Disputed prod. — Cryptic 01:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted per WP:CSD G-11, advertising; then redirected to Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan per discussion. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
violates WP:SPAM (advertising), NN business, solely an advertising page SkierRMH 01:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Kimchi. sg 09:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. This "international alliance" of "150 factions across the United States, ... Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom"
spectacularly fails the google test. Prod disputed by hoa article creator. —
Cryptic
01:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was should have been speedied. Just keep re-adding the tag until a friendly neighborhood admin comes along. Grand master ka 05:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
violation of WP:BAND, non notable; new (2007) group, 1 'debut' album, no references or citations SkierRMH 01:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus - there is no such thing as precedent on Wikipedia, but nonetheless, the issue of whether to have an article on every episode of a TV series is mainly a question of whether it falls under ' indiscriminate information'. That question hasn't been answered by numerous centralised discussions and bulk AfDs and it certainly hasn't been answered here. -- Sam Blanning (talk) 00:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Episode 208 of the Naruto anime. This is just a plot summary, which does not belong on Wikipedia. Delete as indiscriminate information. Prod tag removed, so taking to full Articles for Deletion. -- Phirazo 01:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC)— Phirazo ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
The result was speedy keep (trolling). — CharlotteWebb 01:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable article that has some NPOV issues. Additionally, there really isn't much traffic on this page and http://walmart.com has much, much more information. -- Nicholas Weiner 01:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was: with, as eloquently pointed out by 152 and Garrett, no indication that MPOGD is notable (in fact, an article on the site has been deleted) and no arguments to the contrary, which means MPOGD cannot be said to confer notability through its awards, we have no non-trivial coverage by independent third-party sources or any other indication that this game is notable. Delete, not discounting arguments from anons, since a convincing case for deletion was made that has not been answered. -- Sam Blanning (talk) 00:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Completing nomination by 152.91.9.144 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS), no !vote from me yet. MER-C 02:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
See also: first nomination
The result was {{ sofixit}}. ~ trialsanderrors 10:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A list of non-notable golf courses in North Dakota. Nomination also includes the golf courses on the list:
as well as the
which fails WP:ORG as a subnational organization not the subject of multiple, independent reliable sources. JChap2007 01:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted as a blatant copyvio of http://www.aisquith.org/history.htm. cholmes75 ( chit chat) 15:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable church building. Page was prodded and second prodded. Tags removed by page author MNewnham 01:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. cholmes75 ( chit chat) 03:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Clear case thereof. Delete. -- Alynna 01:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE. The raw total was 11-3 Delete, with two of the Keeps being Weak. Aside fro Carrottop, nobody much think this article should exist. And Carrottop's arguments, while vociferous, are not strong. Herostratus 02:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Disputed speedy deletion candidate; contains borderline assertions of notability. Listing here for discussion. No vote. Chick Bowen 02:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
I set out to find ten other examples of existing biographies for youth wing presidents (chairs, co-chairs or directors) of various political parties, if anyone wants more I would be happy to spend more time researching for more, however I feel I have made my point and have demonstrated that there is precedent for articles of this type on even less noteworthy subjects. If you want to go on a delete frenzy, I also saw a great deal of party official in other party wings with articles Carrottop 79 23:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 03:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Indian relativity - delete - I want this deleted as the phrase is not notable in the field of relativity theory or well-known in popular culture. It doesn't meet WP standards. MP (talk) 19:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus ~ trialsanderrors 03:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Tagged for speedy deletion and contested; "unencyclopedic" is not a valid speedy criterion. 9/11 victim with press coverage; that may be notability be default. No vote. Chick Bowen 02:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - fails RS. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 01:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
See also Minzu hospital, Masanjia reducation through labor
Poorly written and researched article that does not link to any existing pages, and the only link to such claims is very vaguely stated as " The Epoch Times". The claims lack verificaion to confirm it as a "concentration camp", as no major media besides the Epoch Times has reported the story. -- PCPP 10:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep and cleanup. ~ trialsanderrors 03:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Over 180 kilobytes of indiscriminate mirroring from sources. Anything worth keeping should be in Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda instead, so no point to keep this. Derlay 02:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete A7 (no assertion of notability) by User:RHaworth. ColourBurst 05:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
No evidence provided to meet WP:MUSIC, questionable notability. Unreferenced. Contested prod. MER-C 02:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 03:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Yet another mall. No claim of notability whatsoever. Actually, this might now be speedy deletable under A7. Pascal.Tesson 02:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete A7. Guy ( Help!) 12:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non notable student radio station per WP:ORG. Delete Ohconfucius 03:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 03:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non notable student society per WP:ORG. Weak assertion of notability (reference to its long but interrupted history.) It is essentially an entirely new club which started in 1997 Delete Ohconfucius 03:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as a non-notable group, WP:BIO and {{ db-group}} both refer. (aeropagitica) 05:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable newly formed student society. Created in 2006, claims notability by having had a notable speaker to address the club. Delete Ohconfucius 03:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by Samir (The Scope). MER-C 09:00, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Does not appear to meet the inclusion criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (music) – Gurch 03:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as a non-notable group, WP:BIO and {{ db-group}} both refer. (aeropagitica) 05:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Notability of the organization/website Bellhalla 03:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep ~ trialsanderrors 04:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Dr.S.HUSSAIN ZAHEER MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Non notable school asserting no encyclopedic content, I don't think there's such thing as "regioncruft" but this articles assertion of "stalwarts like IICT, NGRI, CCMB" is also hopelessly relevant to only the region in which the article is commenting. The style and grammar would require a complete rewrite (with the capslock key levered off the keyboard) and the POV issues if removed would probably result in a 6 word article. Best to just bin it. •Elomis• 03:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
*DELETE. EVEN THOUGH THE PROBLEMS DESCRIBED ABOVE HAVE BEEN FIXED, THERE STILL REMAINS THE ISSUE OF VERIFIABILITY.
ONLY 13 GHITS, THE ONLY THING VERIFIED IS THAT THE SCHOOL EXISTS. (Yes, I was poking fun at the caps lock thing).
MER-C
03:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
*Delete per MER-C. --
Kicking222
03:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
*Delete No claim of notability and no multiple independent sources. Changing vote to Keep Sources were added. Sports competition notices in paper are pretty ordinary for a school, but the reference from a national paper showing three Nobel laureates interacting with the students in the science program is impressive enough to allow inclusion.
Edison
05:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
*Change of comment to Weak Keep I don't think high schools are considered notable by default per Librarianofages, I don't think anything is notable by default and must always assert it's notability clearly (hence my exclusionist philosophy). Further, systemic bias is a weasely excuse to slow consensus forming for deleting articles, notability is to be independantly asserted, not asserted more than other articles per Arkadecki, voting is evil so anyone who was requesting change of votes either in this debate or via my talk page have earned themselves a rap on the knuckles with a ruler (and a smile for their good intentions) schools always have notable people talk at them (Nobel Laureates included) because important people educate tomorrows important people so that's should be taken thinly when asserting notability. BUT all that said, this article now reads quite nicely and seems to have rushed to attain a high quality quickly while on death row, I say an 11th hour repreive is in order.
•Elomis•
21:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
•Elomis• 21:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers. (aeropagitica) 05:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Does not appear to meet the criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (music) – Gurch 03:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as {{ db-spam}} for a non-notable company, WP:CORP refers. (aeropagitica) 05:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete - This article fails to establish notability with respect to the WP:CORP criteria and I believe it is primarily an advertisement. The two main contributors are single purpose accounts: Moxa ( talk · contribs) and 60.248.66.82 ( talk · contribs), which is a Moxa corporate IP. It failed the prod process. JonHarder 03:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was'Delete' Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Does not appear to meet the criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (music) – Gurch 03:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)a reply
Bazel 04:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
User Hatto created this page because he isn't happy with the current amount of space dedicated to this "phenomena" (as he choses to call it) on the original Masashi Tashiro page. This "phenomenon" is hardly notable enough to warrant its own article and merging it would be pointless (as everything in this article is information that other editors removed from the original article). Mackan 03:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was CSD A7 - crz crztalk 04:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Article does not appear to meet the criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (music) – Gurch 04:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Informal group of Student television stations whose sole aim appears to be meeting up and giving each other awards. Delete. Ohconfucius 03:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep, with a third for those who were asked to provide source for the claim to notablity, as it's readily available from Google books. ~ trialsanderrors 08:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Student TV station and the biggest and most frequent recipient of the self-lauditary awards from NaSTA. It claims to be the longest continuously-running student TV. Methinks "So what?" Delete Ohconfucius 03:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - nobody has a right to an article - you need to prove merit, another keep didn't have a reason, copyvio concerns, .... Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN student TV station Delete per WP:ORG. Ohconfucius 03:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - One of the keep advocateds gives no rationale, another says an assertion of notability is enough, which it isn't, and another claims that it has a "right" to an entry - policy requires it to earn an entry by showing notability. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN student TV station per WP:ORG. I refer to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LUST Delete Ohconfucius 03:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was KEEP. Jayden54 13:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN student TV station per
WP:ORG. I refer to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LUST
Delete
Ohconfucius
03:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was Delete - there is no "right" to an article for TV stations - it must prove merit. Also, assertion of notability is not sufficient. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 00:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN student TV station with very small output per WP:ORG. I refer to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LUST Six of the Best Ohconfucius 03:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This should stay particular since it was featured in the sunday times, or is the world leading newspaper no longer a source of notable information? (Capt Jack Doicy)
The result was delete - the two keeps are invalid. There is no "right" to inclusion - one has to prove merit. Also, assertion of notability does not prove notability as required. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:16, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN student TV station per WP:ORG. Winner of two self-laudatary awards from NaSTA. I refer to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LUST Delete Ohconfucius 03:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This should stay (Capt Jack Doicy)
The result was delete - again, nobody has a right to an article, you must prove merit. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN student TV station per WP:ORG. Won two self-laudatary awards from NaSTA. I refer to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LUST Delete Ohconfucius 03:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This should stay particular since it was featured in the sunday times, or is the world leading newspaper no longer a source of notable information? (Capt Jack Doicy)
The result was speedy keep: I'm closing this AfD early. It was opened by a user account with no previous edits only 7 days after a previous AfD on the same article and, as with the previous AfD, it has already degenerated into a slagging match between two editors
Most other University Rag Mags (and even most university student press) don't have a wiki page, why should Twikker? — Jen Kettle ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was Delete as unsourced. Any article, to meet Wikipedia's standards, must do two things: 1. Assert the notability of its subject, and 2. document this assertion. The assertion of notability here is that the measure had ramifications outside the community and became precedent for other measures nationwide. After checking the links provided I find that the evidence for this has not been forthcoming. Simply put, if this measure was a landmark event reliable sources should not be hard to come by. ~ trialsanderrors 04:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Controversial town planning measure. Of interest only to people in this one city in California. -- RHaworth 04:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Kungfu Adam ( talk) 13:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Procedural nom. Reprod. Prodder's concern was WP:CORP. I abstain. - crz crztalk 04:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 11:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Original research, original literary analysis--I seriously doubt you can find a reliable secondary source to identify deus ex machinas in a comic strip. Night Gyr ( talk/ Oy) 04:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. AnonEMouse (squeak) 14:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Sub-stub articles for Unitarian Universalist Association districts. Each article (with exceptions I discuss individually) reads "The X District of the Unitarian Universalist Association is a district, serving Unitarian Universalist congregations in [states] X, Y and Z." Included in the nomination are:
|
|
These articles were nominated (along with the list Districts of the Unitarian Universalist Association) on September 2nd and the result was Keep. Normally I don't like renominations, but the first nomination was primarily for the list (which I am not nominating) and I am presenting different arguments for deletion than were raised in the first AfD. Moreover (and more importantly) the arguments supporting keep were particularly unconvincing. They were as follows:
Most important for our purposes, the individual districts are not covered in independent, reliable sources and so, each taken on its own, is not notable. JChap2007 05:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by Rama's Arrow. MER-C 09:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable member of a dubiously-notable band ( Circles_End). Erik Swanson 05:22, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - a combination of borderline notability and dubious sources pushes this across the line. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod: Non notable band, fails WP:MUSIC, has yet to publish their first album (and on what label?). No independent resources, the 55 distinct google hits for single file plus my best defense [32] give no more info. No more info or confirmation of the Ed Rose connection (32 distinct Google hits, most from myspace [33]) Fram 20:22, 11 November 2006 (UTC) reply
i find it funny how much effort is going into this. a fan notified us of this pending deletion; i'd be happy to clear things up. you can be the judge (national vs. "bar band").
In the past 2+ years we've been a full-time band, we've pulled off the following:
-6 US tours,over 300 shows and counting -Completed ALL of 2006 Vans Warped Tour -Completed 2 weeks of 2005 Vans Warped Tour -All tours completely self-booked and promoted -Nearly 1.4 million plays on myspace.com (over 10,000 plays daily) -Nearly 48,000 friends on myspace.com -Featured artist on myspace.com twice in a single year -Shared the stage with such acts as Red Jumpsuit Apparatus, The Gym Class Heroes, Waking Ashland, Sherwood, The Higher, The Summer Obsession, The Afters, Over It, and many more. Will also be playing as main support for Snow Patrol on 12/5/2006 @ the Fillmore Auditorium in Denver (3,600 capacity hall)... -Single 'Zombies Ate My Neighbors' now in full roration on Denver Clear Channel station 93.3 KTCL, recieving a 99% positive listener feedback rating (hasn't happened in history of station), as well as more requests than the last unsigned band they put into full rotation back in 2004...The Fray. The song (as of this week) is now in the second tier of rotation, and currently KTCL's number 8 song and climbing. -Songs featured on ESPN and FOX Sports ("Best Damn Sports Show Period") -Sold through 7,000 copies of our current EP 'My Best Defense' (released: 5/05) -Self produced/recorded 3 EP's, and; -Completed debut full length album under famed indie producer Ed Rose (Motion City Soundtrack, Senses Fail, Emery, The Get Up Kids, Brandtson, Reggie & The Full Effect, etc.)... -Ranked #2 (above Ben Gibbard) in the alternative radio charts in the "A&R Worldwide Music & Media Newsletter - October 9th, 2006"
nope, we don't have a website. nope, we don't have a label, though we're in talks with 3 of the biggest labels in the world (including virgin and epic), and several indies (including doghouse).
here are some sources, feel free to contact them (as well as any venues listed below):
ed rose (producer, www.edrose.com): ed@blacklodgerecording.com KTCL (top denver clear channel station): ericclouse@clearchannel.com (eric clouse, music director) kevin lyman (head of warped tour): kevinwarped@aol.com asylum (magazine): atari@asylummagazine.com (laura cleveland) yourhumb.com (news paper): daviss@yourhub.com (seth davis) colorado music buzz (magazine, print): 303.797.1800 (we've been featured several times) broomfield enterprize (magazine, print): kathryn.richert@gmail.com lyrics featured in worldwide distributed "revolution on canvas 2" - chris@wethepeoplerecords.net (chris haynie) sodajerk (local promoter, verify sold out shows): mike@sodajerkpresents.com
there are many, many more, but these are off the top of my head. please feel free to contact me for more...(email below)
lastly, here's our tour history (from old to new) -- please note we've played over 35 shows since this list was generated, several of which we headlined and sold out:
06/02/2004 - Canoga Park, CA - The Cobalt 06/28/2004 - Hollywood, CA - Knitting Factory (front bar) 07/02/2004 - Hollywood, CA - The Cat Club 07/06/2004 - Hollywood, CA - ClubLingerie 07/21/2004 - Canoga Park, CA - The Cobalt 08/01/2004 - Denver, CO - Larimer Lounge 08/02/2004 - Arvada, CO - Pink-E's 08/03/2004 - Arvada, CO - La Dolce Vita 08/04/2004 - Denver, CO - 15th St. Tavern 08/06/2004 - Fort Collins, CO - The Starlight 08/26/2004 - Universal City, CA - Hard Rock Cafe 09/03/2004 - Universal City, CA - Universal Bar & Grill 09/06/2004 - Los Angeles, CA - The Good Hurt 09/17/2004 - Old Town Pasadena, CA - The Equator 09/26/2004 - Universal City, CA - Universal Bar & Grill 10/20/2004 - Los Angeles, CA - The Good Hurt 11/04/2004 - Los Angeles, CA - USC Mega Show
12/13/2004 - Santa Barbara, CA - The Velvet Jones 12/14/2004 - Hollywood, CA -Knitting Factory (front bar) 12/15/2004 - San Diego, CA - Dream Street 12/16/2004 - Las Vegas, NV - The Boston 12/17/2004 - Albuquerque, NM - The Atomic Cantina 12/18/2004 - Denver, CO - 15th St. Tavern 12/22/2004 - Arvada, CO - La Dolce Vita 12/23/2004 - Denver, CO - The Hard Rock 12/28/2004 - Topeka, KS - The Boobie Trap 12/29/2004 - Cedar Falls, IA - The Reverb 12/30/2004 - Saint Louis, MO - Off Broadway 12/31/2004 - Chapel Hill, NC - Local 506 01/03/2005 - New Orleans, LA - The Neutral Ground 01/04/2005 - Austin, TX - Redrum 01/05/2005 - Oklahoma City, OK - The Conservatory 01/07/2005 - Phoenix, AZ - The Emerald 01/08/2005 - Hollywood, CA - Knitting Factory (alterknit)
01/23/2005 - Universal City, CA - Universal Bar & Grill 03/04/2005 - Tucson, AZ - Gameworks 03/05/2005 - Tempe, AZ - ASU 03/06/2005 - Phoenix, AZ - Willow House Coffee 03/11/2005 - Studio City, CA - Global Cafe 03/13/2005 - Marina Del Rey, CA - Brennan's 03/31/2005 - Hollywood, CA - Knitting Factory (front bar) 04/09/2005 - Burbank, CA - Que's River Bottom 04/13/2005 - Los Angeles, CA - Ground Zero (USC) 04/14/2005 - Hollywood, CA - The Hotel Cafe 04/23/2005 - Los Angeles, CA - USC's Relay For Life
06/28/2005 - Santa Barbara, CA - The Wildcat Lounge 06/29/2005 - Hollywood, CA - Knitting Factory (front bar) 06/30/2005 - San Diego, CA - Brick by Brick 07/01/2005 - Tucson, AZ - Gameworks 07/02/2005 - Phoenix, AZ - The Emerald 07/03/2005 - Sedona, AZ - The Raven Heart 07/05/2005 - Las Vegas, NV - Brewed Awakening 07/06/2005 - Bakersfield, CA - Studio 99 07/07/2005 - Fresno, CA - The Belmont 07/09/2005 - San Jose, CA - Tower Records 07/09/2005 - Campbell, CA - The C-Spot 07/10/2005 - Campbell, CA - The Gaslighter 07/11/2005 - Oroville, CA - Mug Shots 07/12/2005 - Portland, OR - The Paris Theatre 07/14/2005 - Missoula, MT - Higgins Hall 07/15/2005 - Bozeman, MT - Vans Warped Tour '05 07/16/2005 - Salt Lake City, UT - Vans Warped Tour '05 07/17/2005 - Denver, CO - Vans Warped Tour '05 07/18/2005 - Arvada, CO - La Dolce Vita 07/19/2005 - Denver, CO - 15th Street Tavern 07/20/2005 - Durango, CO - The Abbey Theater 07/21/2005 - Amarillo, TX - The Nat Ballroom 07/22/2005 - Oklahoma City, OK - The Showroom 07/23/2005 - Dallas, TX - The Door (main stage) 07/24/2005 - Austin, TX - The Whiskey 07/25/2005 - Houston, TX - The Southmore House 07/26/2005 - Bton Rouge, LA - The Darkroom 07/28/2005 - Jackson, MS - W.C. Don's 07/29/2005 - Memphis, TN - Tower Records 08/01/2005 - Hannibal, MO - Java Jive 08/02/2005 - Nashville, TN - The 5 Spot 08/03/2005 - Birmingham, AL - Upsidedown Plaza 08/06/2005 - Gainesville, FL - Tim & Terry's 08/07/2005 - Orlando, FL - Vans Warped Tour '05 08/08/2005 - Jacksonville, FL - Jackrabbits 08/10/2005 - Washington, DC - Vans Warped Tour '05 08/11/2005 - Scranton, PA - Vans Warped Tour '05 08/12/2005 - Concord, NC - Jillian's 08/17/2005 - Chapel Hill, NC - Local 506 08/25/2005 - Lakewood, OH - The Hi-Fi 08/26/2005 - Grand Rapids, MI - 10 Bells 08/27/2005 - Muncie, IN - 525 Wheeling 08/28/2005 - Orland Park, IL - Mojoe's 08/30/2005 - Cedar Falls, IA - The Reverb 09/01/2005 - Hannibal, MO - Jave Jive 09/03/2005 - Topeka, KS - The Boobie Trap
09/10/2005 - Scottsbluff, NE - The Underground 09/11/2005 - Arvada, CO - La Dolce Vita
09/22/2005 - Denver, CO - The Climax Lounge 09/23/2005 - Gunnison, CO - The Alamo 09/24/2005 - South Jordan, UT - The Blue Note 09/25/2005 - Elko, NV - Brew's Brother's 09/26/2005 - Reno, NV - Tower Records 09/27/2005 - Oroville, CA - Mugshots 09/28/2005 - San Jose, CA - San Jose Skate 09/29/2005 - Fresno, CA - Tower Records 09/30/2005 - Bakersfield, CA - Studio 99 10/01/2005 - Isla Vista, CA - UCSB House Party 10/02/2005 - Ventura, CA - The Livery Theatre 10/03/2005 - Los Angeles, CA - Knitting Factory (alterknit) 10/05/2005 - Yorba Linda, CA - Java Joe's 10/07/2005 - Tucson, AZ - Gameworks 10/08/2005 - Flagstaff, AZ - The Lo-Fi 10/10/2005 - Amarillo, TX - The Nat Ballroom 10/11/2005 - Austin, TX - Redrum 10/13/2005 - Norman, OK - OU (Student Union) 10/14/2005 - Lewisville, TX - Fat Daddy's Sound Shack 10/15/2005 - Baton Rouge, LA - The Darkroom 10/17/2005 - Memphis, TN - Tower Records 10/18/2005 - Hannibal, MO - Java Jive 10/19/2005 - Cedar Falls, IA - The Reverb 10/20/2005 - Omaha, NE - Sokol Underground 10/21/2005 - Topeka, KS - The Boobie Trap 10/23/2005 - Arvada, CO - La Dolce Vita
10/31/2005 - Denver, CO - The Climax 11/05/2005 - Denver, CO - The Climax 11/12/2005 - Scottsbluff, NE - The Underground
11/21/2005 - Denver, CO - The Climax 11/25/2005 - Topeka, KS - The Boobie Trap 11/26/2005 - Papillion, NE - The Rock 11/28/2005 - Hannibal, MO - Java Jive 11/29/2005 - Memphis, TN - University of Memphis 11/30/2005 - Baton Rouge, LA - The Dark Room 12/01/2005 - Houston, TX - Fitzgeralds 12/02/2005 - Austin, TX - Redrum 12/03/2005 - Dallas, TX - The Door (theatre stage) (cont’d on page #2) 12/04/2005 - San Antonio, TX - Cafe Revolucion 12/06/2005 - Amarillo, TX - The Illuminati 12/07/2005 - Albuquerque, NM - The Cell Theatre 12/08/2005 - Flagstaff, AZ - The Campus Coffee Bean 12/09/2005 - Phoenix, AZ - Four White Walls 12/10/2005 - Tucson, AZ - Gameworks 12/11/2005 - San Diego, CA - The Zombie Lounge 12/13/2005 - Hollywood, CA - The Troubadour 12/15/2005 - Bakersfield, CA - Studio 99 12/16/2005 - Las Vegas, CA - The Alley 12/16/2005 - Fresno, CA - The Belmont 12/17/2005 - Cedar City, UT - Hoover Nights 12/19/2005 - Midvale, UI - The Circuit 12/20/2005 - Elko, NV - Brew's Brothers 12/21/2005 - Salt Lake City, UT - Kilby Court 12/22/2005 - Cheyenne, WY - The Tivoli 12/23/2005 - Denver, CO - The Climax
01/07/2006 - Scottsbluff, NE - The Underground 01/19/2006 - Denver, CO - The Bluebird 01/27/2006 - Scottsbluff, NE - The Underground 01/28/2006 - Fort Collins, CO - The Starlight 01/29/2006 - Pueblo, CO - Fortino Ballroom 01/30/2006 - Colorado Springs, CO - Sand Creek HS 01/31/2006 - Castle Rock, CO - Grindwell Skatepark 02/01/2006 - Grand Junction, CO - LIFF Auditorium 02/03/2006 - Albuquerque, NM - The Cell Theatre 02/04/2006 - Amarillo, TX - The Illuminati 02/17/2006 - Brighton, CO - Riverdale Clubhouse 02/18/2006 - Scottsbluff, NE - The Underground 02/25/2006 - Topeka, KS - The Boobie Trap 03/11/2006 - Hannibal, MO - Java Jive 03/18/2006 - Papillion, NE - The Rock 03/21/2006 - Denver, CO - The Gothic Theater 03/24/2006 - Fort Collins, CO - The Starlight
04/13/2006 - Littleton, CO - The Ascot Theater 04/14/2006 - Topeka, KS - The Boobie Trap 04/15/2006 - Saint Louis, MO - Mississippi Nights 04/17/2006 - Hannibal, MO - Java Jive 04/18/2006 - Owensboro, KY - The Brother's Pizza 04/19/2006 - Chapel Hill, NC - The Local 506 04/20/2006 - Charleston, SC - Music Farm 04/22/2006 - Pensacola, FL - Sluggo's 04/23/2006 - Baton Rouge, LA - The Darkroom 04/24/2006 - Monroeville, AL - Our Place 04/25/2006 - Shreveport, LA - Flannagans 04/26/2006 - Houston, TX - The White Swan 04/27/2006 - Austin, TX - Redrum 04/28/2006 - Canton, TX - The Mad Goat 04/29/2006 - Dallas, TX - Tower Records 04/29/2006 - Dallas, TX - The Door (theatre stage) 04/30/2006 - Tulsa, OK - The Pinkeye 05/02/2006 - Amarillo, TX - The Illuminati 05/03/2006 - Albuquerque, NM - The Cell Theatre 05/04/2006 - El Paso, TX - The House of Rock & Roll 05/05/2006 - Tucson, AZ - Gameworks 05/06/2006 - Los Angeles, CA - Fais Do Do 05/07/2006 - Bakersfield, CA - Studio 99 05/08/2006 - Fresno, CA - The Belmont 05/09/2006 - Sonoma, CA - Sonoma Valley High School 05/10/2006 - San Jose, CA - San Jose Skate 05/11/2006 - Elko, NV - Brews Brother's 05/12/2006 - Denver, CO - The Bluebird
05/25/2006 - Denver, CO - Rock Island 05/27/2006 - Fort Collins, CO - The Starlight 06/03/2006 - Denver, CO - The Larimer Lounge 06/09/2006 - Albuquerque, NM - Hyperactive Music Festival 06/10/2006 - Amarillo, TX - The Illuminati 06/17/2006 - Centennial, CO - The Lifespot
06/19/2006 - Bonner Springs, KS - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/21/2006 - Nashville, TN - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/22/2006 - Jacksonville, FL - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/23/2006 - St. Petersburg, FL - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/24/2006 - Miami, FL - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/25/2006 - Orlando, FL - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/26/2006 - Ladson, SC - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/27/2006 - Raleigh, NC - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/28/2006 - Atlanta, GA - Vans Warped Tour '06 06/30/2006 - Houston, TX - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/01/2006 - Dallas, TX - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/02/2006 - Selma, TX - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/03/2006 - Las Cruces, TX - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/04/2006 - Phoenix, AZ - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/06/2006 - Chula Vista, CA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/07/2006 - Pomona, CA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/08/2006 - San Francisco, CA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/09/2006 - Fresno, CA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/11/2006 - Ventura, CA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/12/2006 - Los Angeles, CA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/13/2006 - Marysvale, CA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/14/2006 - Boise, ID - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/15/2006 - George, WA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/16/2006 - St. Helens, OR - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/17/2006 - Salt Lake City, UT - Kilby Court 07/21/2006 - Denver, CO - The Climax Lounge 07/23/2006 - Denver, CO - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/25/2006 - Maryland Heights, MO - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/26/2006 - Cincinnati, OH - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/27/2006 - Pittsburgh, PA - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/28/2006 - Noblesville, IN - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/29/2006 - Detroit, MI - Vans Warped Tour '06 07/30/2006 - Tinley Park, IL - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/01/2006 - Darien Center, NY - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/02/2006 - Fitchburg, PA - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/03/2006 - Camden, NJ - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/04/2006 - Scranton, PA - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/05/2006 - Uniondale, NY - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/06/2006 - Englishtown, NJ - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/08/2006 - Charlotte, NC - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/09/2006 - Virginia Beach, VA - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/10/2006 - Bristow, VA - Vans Warped Tour '06 08/11/2006 - Cleveland, OH - Vans Warped Tour '06
08/13/2006 - Hannibal, MO - Java Jive 08/15/2006 - Topeka, KS - The Boobie Trap 08/31/2006 - Denver, CO - The Hi-Dive
hope this helps.
--sloan sloan@singlefilerock.com
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 03:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Second largest mall in the Lansing, Michigan area. No claims to notability. JChap2007 05:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, should be discussed at WP:RM and appropriate article talk pages -- Samir धर्म 05:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a redundant page of Sinhala language, as the proper name should be Sinhala not Sinhalese. It is best to provide a redirect instead. එරංග 05:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 02:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This was speedy deleted as CSD G11 spam. A DRV consensus overturned after the speedy was contested with reference to media reviews. This matter is submitted to AfD for full consideration. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 05:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 03:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notability Subject has not been demonstrated as notable per WP policy. Article heavily edited by subject's associate. Delete Green hornet 05:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 03:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC; NN Chinese artist, hard to determine G-hits w/Chinese characters. SkierRMH 05:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 03:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
violation of WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC; bio piece on NN artist SkierRMH 05:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete -- pgk 19:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
contested speedy delete; nn person, violates WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC, SkierRMH 06:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 03:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
School built in 1989 whose entire claim to noteworthiness appears to be the fact that a teacher at the school was involved in an automobile accident in which, through carelessness, he caused the death of a 6-year-old near the school. I do not accept that as a valid claim to the noteworthiness of the school. (If it'd happened in the school, maybe.) None of the information in this article that's actually about the school is sourced by anything other than the school's homepage, nor does it amount to more than a directory entry, nor do I find any potential independent reliable sources through various searches -- just directories. Shimeru 06:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Kimchi. sg 10:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
nn clubs. Sizuxng 06:22, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep after sources provided. Yomangani talk 10:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
nn website. (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amie Street) Sizuxng 06:25, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by Gurch. MER-C 08:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
non notable company. Sizuxng 06:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumba -- Suntag ☼ 18:19, 30 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Kimchi. sg 10:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
From speedy. Speedy is contested Alex Bakharev 07:04, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete as claims to notability (listed by Edison) are not verified by independent sources. Google Books and the reference desk at the local library are good starting points for offline searches for sources, but as it is the article fails Wikipedia policies. As with every deletion for lack of sources, the article can be restored or userfied if sources (which don't necessarily have to be online) are found. ~ trialsanderrors 08:20, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
From speedy. Should go to AfD instead Alex Bakharev 07:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Smashed to pieces (aka Bj'd and redirected to Chinese porcelain until something excavates it and turns it into a real article.) ~ trialsanderrors 08:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia should have an article on Ming porcelain, and this page could then be a somewhat useful redirect. But it seems that we don't. Having an article titled "Ming vase" which contains nothing but references to slapstick comedy and video games is worse than nothing. I redirected this to Chinese porcelain long ago, but the silliness has been restored. u♦p♦p♦l♦a♦n♦d 07:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:29, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball Suipd Lorry 07:22, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Kimchi. sg 10:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN chapter of national organisation, fails WP:ORG. Ohconfucius 07:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 03:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
I proposed this for deletion for lack of real notability, and no real content edits in over a year. It was then deprodded, with two additional references (the first content edits in over a year!), so I am taking it to AfD. So far all third-party references are from two online news sites, the first from 1999, the second from 2003. Weak delete. JIP | Talk 07:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - Harlsbottom's keep does not address notability problems - and the author advocated "keep" twice. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:22, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non notable chapter of national organisation. Ohconfucius 07:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 10:58, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
No Google hits for
Czolgosz Vanzettis or
"Big 386 Records". Likely hoax. Unverifiable and likely not to pass
WP:MUSIC. Nomination also includes their album. ~
trialsanderrors
08:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was speedy delete. -- RHaworth 20:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:CORP. The studio gets 72 unique Ghits, most of which directory listings and wiki mirror sites. No meaningful press articles about the company. Delete. Ohconfucius 08:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:29, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete.
Non-notable student organisation. The "membership" of 1000 is no doubt due to the fact that it's default. The content might warrant merging into the Republic Polytechnic article, but I'm not even sure of that (I'm sure there are dozens of student clubs, and this one is only for the engineering students) yandman 10:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:31, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
questionably notible school, violates several of the proposed criteria in the WP:SCHOOLcriteria, parts read like advert SkierRMH 10:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
*Weak delete I am unable to find non-trivial independent sources nor any claims of notability (and no, to those above, being accredited is not a claim of notability any more than being given citizenship is a claim of notability for
WP:BIO). This is only a weak delete because there may be a language issue here that is preventing me from fidning more sources. However, since this is listed in the Pakistan related deletions this will change to a full delete if sources aren't given in the next few days.
JoshuaZ 20:26, 18 November 2006 (UTC) Changing to very weak keep per discussion below with JJay.
JoshuaZ
04:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was speedy delete Mango juice talk 14:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Their only criteria for this article is that the school has one, so they get one too... I have submitted the school as non notable under WP:SCHOOL, so don't consider this a possible merge candidate SkierRMH 10:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 11:06, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Unverifiable, possible vanity. His name is not known in Israel and searching for עובדיה שוחר yields almost nothing. The only thing that can be notable about this is the fight against Amazon.com, and even that is dubious. Seems to me that whoever is behind this is trying to use social websites such as MySpace, Amazon.com and now Wikipedia to promote his extremist political ideas. Amir E. Aharoni 10:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - the RS and concerns about the triviality of the citations pushes this over the line. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 00:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. NN per WP:BIO, no WP:RS. Leibniz 10:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Hús ö nd 22:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 03:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Based on tone and history, appears to have been created as advertising. Notability suspect. Delete. -- Nlu ( talk) 11:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Hús ö nd 22:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The list is not even here, just a notice that the content is now located in other articles. Even if it was there, identifying people as "liberal" (or as "leaders" for that matter) without sources constitutes original research. Bletch 12:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Hús ö nd 22:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested speedy. Article makes some vague claims of notability but these are hard to sustantiate. Google presence appears minimal. More detailed research may show notability, this is a procedural nomination. Guy ( Help!) 12:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - Brad and JROBBO point to Music band criteria 7 - but this states the leading band/orchestra in a city - this is a university club, and no claim to being the leading group in the city is stated. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 01:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Tagges as WP:CSD A7 (non-notable club), but notability is asserted. Probably just another student club, but claims a couple of famous former members. Definitely not the Footlights but will do no harm to think about it for a while. Procedural nomination. Guy ( Help!) 12:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete G12. Copyvio from: [44], which itself is a copy of [45]. Mango juice talk 14:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Tagged as G4, repost of content deleted by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford Belles, but content is different and there were only two !votes. Subject scores under 120 ghits, among which I did not see, at a quick skim, anything which might count as a reliable source, nor did I see any evidence of meeting WP:MUSIC. Looks like vanispamcruftisement, but you decide. Guy ( Help!) 12:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 03:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Tagged for speedy (that way lies ArbCom!), this is a very short article for a generic primary school, written in the first person. Seems like someone has misdirected Year 6 as to what Wikipedia is for, so will a schoolwatcher please pop over and be Kind at them for a bit until they realise the problem? Anyway, I say merge to the community. Guy ( Help!) 13:04, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Deleted by Mackensen - Yomangani talk 17:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:Auto and possibly WP:Note Amists talk • contribs 13:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Hús ö nd 22:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Deletion nomination Encyclopedically non-notable university sports club. Gaelic sports are not a major sport at Cambridge. Makes dubious claim of connection with 19th century patron of GAA but club only started in 1995. College/varsity sports in UK nowhere near as important as college sports in US (and this club is for a very minor sport in the UK too) but still I'm taking this to afd rather than speedy delete due to club's participation in university gaelic sports league and the BUSA championships, whatever that may be - seeing if any gaelic sports fans want to argue for encyclopedic notability here Bwithh 13:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as an unsourced attack article listing the perceived failings of one specific person by xyr co-workers. This person is identifiable, both from the name of the article and from the picture of the person that was included in an older version of the article. Uncle G 19:51, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
nn protologism, no valid ghits so suggest made up in school one day, almost speedy A7 but taking here to be on the safe side Amists talk • contribs 13:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Kimchi. sg 15:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article has had a notability tag hanging on it for quite some time. Some changes have been made, but none of them have made this article anywhere near notable. Right now, this article is describing exactly what the club is doing from day to day, something that is not notable. Diez2 13:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete (A7) Non-notable nonsense.-- Hús ö nd 19:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article was nominated for speedy deletion over a week ago, but no admin has deleted it. I'm moving it to AfD instead, to clear out Category:Candidates for speedy deletion and to get some more input. Note that the term Mitth'ure'nourodo gets no google hits outside of wikipedia. No opinion. A ecis Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 14:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:40, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia:Verifiability "If an article topic has no reputable, reliable, third-party sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on that topic. According to Talk:Jonathan Sarfati, When this article was being heavily disputed I looked for WP:RS-compliant sources that were critical of Sarfati and was unable to find any other significant ones. The bottom line is that David is correct, Sarfati is almost off the radar screen. Furthermore, he and AiG have become even less on the radar in the last few years as the main focus among evolution groups has been dealing with intelligent design. JoshuaZ 20:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC) - In other words, he's a very minor figure in the creationist movement that it may be impossible to write a balanced article on. If we can't, we should delete him as non-notable. Adam Cuerden talk 14:11, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
-- Nick Y. 20:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN spammer. Restored from prod-deletion at user's request, with agreement to bring it to AFD for consensus. UtherSRG (talk) 14:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable general for one year in ancient Greece. Google gives me 11 unique non-wiki results. MartinDK 14:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 11:46, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Fails clearly WP:PROF. Very few relevant ghits Optimale Gu 15:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted -- HappyCamper 15:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
There is nothing in this article to suggest the subject meets WP:BIO or WP:BLP, and it seems to be a page about a radio employee, with nothing to assert notability, or indeed, anything that proves this is encyclopedic. SunStar Net 15:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to Aryabhata. The article contains material that might be usefully included in the Aryabhata article, but per the arguments the title of this article is WP:POV unsupported by the sources and as such not acceptable by policies. Edit history remains, so editors can merge the useful elements (a 5th century text is not copyrighted btw). ~ trialsanderrors 08:44, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article violates WP:RS as the reference is not published in a peer-reviewed journal, and therefore the view promoted violates WP:OR. Also I suspect a violation of WP:COPY since the text is lifted wholesale from the reference. Finally, the quoted text is not a principle of relativity. See talk:Aryabhata's relativity principle for more info. Delete -- EMS | Talk 15:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Most interesting and surprising are (IV,9) "as a man in a boat going forward sees a stationary object moving backward, just so at Lanka a man sees the stationary asterisms moving backard," and also in (IV,12) last sentence, "the gods and dwellers in hell both think constantly that the others are beneath them." This appreciation of relativity reconciles Aryabhata's position on the stationary earth for which he has been criticized by other Hindu writes.
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 11:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A game modder is not someone who creates computer games, but only creates expansion sets for them. It is possible that some member of this class may achieve encyclopedic notability for that, but I don't see evidence of it here. Note: I am listed as the creator of this article, but only because I moved the material that kept getting added to the unrelated article The Pumaman to its own article. Antaeus Feldspar 15:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 10:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Unverifiable. Created October 18, 2006. On October 17, 2006, the initial author User:Guyinredsuit had created a quite different article with the same name about a teenager born in 1992 in Victoria, Australia. Delete as a likely hoax unless verified. Lupo 15:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 03:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable Randomkiwi 09:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC) This person isn't notable. She's a lecturer and an unsuccessful candidate, without any degree of national prominence. reply
Greensill is running again and came very close to beating the incumbent last election and considering the polls are so close this time around and that the Maori Party may hold the balance of power in the next government it is important that this person be detailed. In addition she has been leader of several important Maori political movements and though may be consider un"notable" to Pakeha is considered very notable in Maori communities. WahineToa (UTC) (sorry about my format, just working this all out, kia ora!) - more importantly, Ms Greensill has contributed a great deal to the Maori community in terms of the environment, land rights and community development.
The result was Delete.-- Hús ö nd 22:13, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:AUTO, creator was John@esib.org ( talk · contribs). Contested prod. MER-C 12:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Kimchi. sg 15:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This has been tagged for notability since October 23, and no edits have come to it since then. This article does not emphazize the notability of the club, and thus it should be deleted Diez2 16:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 11:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
An "amateur" with an "extensive website" fails WP:BIO. Leibniz 14:38, 11 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Unsourced band article. Peter O. ( Talk) 16:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Withdrawn. The article can be kept. Peter O. ( Talk) 23:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
*Weak keep, per Catchpole and Dianogah. If the article can be better sourced, make that a strong keep. --
Guinnog
20:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete - socking is futile. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
An article on a podcast. I believe this easily fails notability requirements ( WP:WEB). P.B. Pilh e t / Talk 16:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Soccergirl was referenced extensively in: Podcasting for Dummies [51] Soccergirl was included on a panel at Sundance, 2005, and was written up in the Sundance Review Guide (I don't have a link for this, but the following Yahoo interview proves that she played an important role in the festival [52]. Soccergirl was also the first podcaster to adapt her show to the stage (in New York City, June 2006) and was reviewed by the print publication, New York Theater (see the review at their website: [53] Liono007 17:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Notability definition: A notable, or remarkable, person or thing; a person of note. Soccergirl has 165 shows, updated twice or three times a week since March of 2005. She has inspired many other podcasters and is considered among podcasting's pioneers. She has been nominated for a podcast award in the Mature category [54] for two years in a row (other than Dawn and Drew, the only one who was) Her name is known by anyone notable in the field. 165 episodes and worldwide recognition is a little more important than eating 6 cans of beans. Laffertyme 18:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Kungfu Adam ( talk) 13:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Unverifiable OR/ WP:BOLLOCKS. References are "ebooks". Leibniz 17:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.110.209.82 ( talk • contribs)
The result was no consensus. And the schoolyard fighting continues... ~ trialsanderrors 08:52, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable, goes on about a movie in lead paragraph, poor quality... sounds a lot like a prospectus in some places. ~ Zythe Talk to me! 17:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result wasdelete Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 01:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Is this (alleged -- I've never seen it, at least) public service announcement really sufficiently notable? Delete. -- Nlu ( talk) 17:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - strong consensus, and 1 keep sock. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Losing contestant on a reality television show. Prod was removed by User:Badlydrawnjeff with the comment that reality television contestants are "inherently notable". This contestant hasn't done anything notable before or since the show, and didn't win on the show. She's just another struggling model. About 600 hits on Google. [59]. Mikeblas 18:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This has been speedied several time, with a fair amount of grief given to the speediers, including me. So, in the interest of transparency and openness, let's have a full discussion of it. I do not believe it satisfies WP:CORP, and I also do not approve of "placeholder" articles--if an article is not yet written, there's no reason for us to have a page on it. Chick Bowen 18:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - already merged. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A former trainee football (soccer) player who never played a first-team professional game. Was released by Grimsby Town in the summer of this year and has not found a new one (either accrding to Soccerbase or Google News).
Note - he is not to be confused with his much more famous father, John Lukic. Qwghlm 18:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as {{ db-nonsense}}. (aeropagitica) 22:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Here is the whole article:
Yikes. No sources. Leibniz 18:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 18:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 10:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Losing contestant on a television reality show. About 600 Google hits. [60] Hasn't done anything notable before appearing on the show. Did a bit of a press tour after the show, but that's momentum from the show. Now, just another struggling model. Mikeblas 18:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to List of Mystery Science Theater 3000 episodes, where it's already mentioned. ~ trialsanderrors 08:55, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article has been tagged for notability since October 3. There has been one edit to it since then, but only to cleanup the page. I think that this article should be deleted for non-notability. Diez2 18:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to Garda Síochána. ~ trialsanderrors 08:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
House magazine of the Garda, total circulation 7,500, monograph of User:Rory Deegan whose other recent edits are largely to create (and argue about deletion of) articles published by the same company. I wonder if that might be significant... Guy ( Help!) 18:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Story001
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Kimchi. sg 15:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable ( WP:CORP), used for advertising (SPA Special:Contributions/Jstar4 created article, and placed See Also links to it in articles about its primary services). Renesis ( talk) 19:00, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 10:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
WP:Vanity (article creator's name is TheVille) & non-notable (Googling "The Ville" + "Robert Manier" returns only The Ville's own Myspage page) Psychonaut3000 19:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy redirect (already done). No need to delete the edit history. ~ trialsanderrors 22:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
duplication of information already in Assistant party leaders of the United States Senate. Create redirect to that article after deletion. — MrDolomite | Talk 19:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep.-- Kungfu Adam ( talk) 13:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NOT by being a dictionary entry. This article cannot be expanded further - the topic is already covered in Medical history Adam Slack 19:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Changed vote to Neutral given the changes in the article, and the additional comments that have come in. EdJohnston 23:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete a7, concert by nonnotable band. NawlinWiki 21:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Was prod'd and de-prod'd twice. Is a non-notable, non-verifiable event. P.B. Pilh e t / Talk 19:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete, any claimed notability was purely an illusion. Guy ( Help!) 21:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
non-notable; prod tag removed by creator -- Robocoder ( t| c) 19:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 10:39, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
non notable long-range transport plan for Wisconsin; every state probably has some such bland label for their attempts to schedule future projects; does anyone care? Brianyoumans 19:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Transwiki ~ trialsanderrors 09:00, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a dictionary Ratarsed 19:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete the article and {{ orfud}} the images. ~ trialsanderrors 08:03, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
WP:NOT for image galleries, especially ones full of fair use images. cholmes75 ( chit chat) 19:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki 20:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band. Veinor ( ヴエノル(talk)) 20:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 03:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This team isn't notable enough yet Killswitch Engage 20:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Keep. Winning the tag titles and having the team name consistantly mentioned by the announcers is notable enough for me. However, if we're going to look at deleting short-lived tag team articles, we should also look at Shazarian. 131.230.135.105 21:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge to Inca Empire. ~ trialsanderrors 09:05, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
We already have Inca Empire, which is all history since the empire no longer exists. This article doesn't add anything that isn't there or in History of Peru. Descendall 20:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 07:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Article was nominated for speedy deletion for non-notability and copyvio. The copyvio section was removed, and the band meets WP:MUSIC by containing "at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable" ( Dresden Dolls' Brian Viglione). I'm moving this to AfD instead. No opinion. A ecis Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 20:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was "Redirect' to formal system. Salvageable material can be retrieved from the edit history and added to the formal system article. ~ trialsanderrors 07:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Possible neologism, as the only reference claimed using that term (with or without a hyphen) is "Herrmann, Robert A.", who is probably also User:Raherrmann. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete, probably the least ambiguous A7 I've seen today. Guy ( Help!) 20:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article has been speedy-deleted twice [61], recommended for speedy again (tag was deleted), and prodded (tag was deleted). Moving to formal AfD to settle the matter. Recommend speedy-deletion, and page protection. -- Elonka 20:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 07:52, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A crap article but the subject may be notable so, much as I was tempted to nuke it on the basis of the secont para, I brought it here instead. Guy ( Help!) 20:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 03:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
From what I've seen there is no other pages for wrestlers championships and accomplishments. Ric Flair shouldn't be the exception. The most important titles should just be on the Ric Flair page, a seperate article doesn't need to list all of them. RobJ1981 20:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 07:51, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Record label, no apparent notability. NawlinWiki 20:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as it was a redirect to a User page. Why it came here, I don't understand. (aeropagitica) 22:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This guy is talking about himself. seXie (t0lk) 21:00, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was'Delete' Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 00:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:PROF. Blog stuff is no evidence of notability per WP:BIO. Leibniz 21:11, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:48, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-encyclopedic, original research, fan and musical cruft. The article goes lengths to describe the music and its usage in the several Harry Potter films. Hedwig's Theme may be notable on itself, but there's hardly much that can be said about it. I loved the soundtracks but I can't really see any reason why we should keep this article. ☢ Ҡi∊ff⌇ ↯ 21:25, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete.
Non notable school, suggest deletion under WP:SCHOOL SkierRMH 21:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
*Keep Assuming that indepedent sourcing can be found. Being a Blue Ribbon school is a claim of notability.
JoshuaZ 20:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC) Changing to Delete per Pan Dan and Wikipediatrix's comments below.
JoshuaZ
23:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Violation of WP:SPAM as nn business, advertisment SkierRMH 21:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
WP:SPAM advert, please see discussion on this page, the author states that he is working on it, however, the business ultimately is NN and no amount of work will bring it to notariety SkierRMH 21:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN "independent film". 40 G hits for "Band Posers" movie.-- Fang Aili talk 20:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all. Proto:: type 12:13, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Vanity. Issue came up after creation and same spam on NL-wiki. The so-called "organisation" and its website seem very amateuristic. User:Hsf-toshiba came up with the problem on NL-wiki, as he's into artistic roller skating , but doesn't know this "inline scating" "fedaration" however. Creator of the article has been advertising in the Artistic roller skating article too [64], too. Seems really non-professional project and vanity article about someones hobby and hobby site. LimoWreck 21:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Hi,
I don't understand what the problem is. We are a team promoting inline figure skating: that is our Mission Statement.
EIFSA and Holiday On Inlines use the same computer at offices in Rotterdam where Samantha, Stephanie and Gavin are located.
We are part of the administration of EIFSA and the Holiday On Inlines team:
EIFSA http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EIFSA/
http://www.geocities.com/eifsa_web/
HOLIDAY ON INLINES: http://geocities.com/HolidayOnInlines
http://skatehead.xs4all.nl/cpg/index.php
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HolidayOnInlines/
Inline Figure Skating has been approved by FIRS and CIPA. All the relevant info is online:
http://www.geocities.com/eifsa_infos/
http://www.geocities.com/eifsa_infos/TECHNICAL_INFO.html
Inline Figure Skating is an off-ice training option for ice skaters and an extra competition discipline for quad artistic roller skaters.
There seems to be some strange resentment towards the growing popularity of Inline Figure Skating, which is understandable but some are behaving genuinely hateful about it. Discriminating against it is nothing to be proud of, it is downright tragic!
skatingly,
Samantha Bennis
Stephiesk8 22:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Other links to related information:
http://sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/EIFSA/
http://www.frogsonice.com/skateweb/others.shtml
Artistic roller skating
USA Roller Sports -- the US governing body for roller skating.
Federation Internationale de Roller Sports
Roller Skating FAQs
European Inline Figure Skating Association
Inline skating FAQs
Speed skating info
Olympics
International Olympic Committee home page
US Olympic Committee
Dansescape.com -- competitive ballroom dancing and dance sport
Gymn-Forum.com -- gymnastics FAQs and info
http://www.frogsonice.com/skateweb/others.shtml
The result was delete. Proto:: type 12:12, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Band with no claim of passing WP:BAND. Tagged speedy and de-tagged with edit comment "rm tag, signed to major label; expand". WP:BAND says the guideline is two albums on a major label, not signed to work on one album. Weregerbil 04:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 03:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
WP:BIO, although there is one 'claim to fame', it doesn't appear that there is much substantiation of this, as well as questioning notariety, brought to attention for discussion SkierRMH 22:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedied per request. Tawker 23:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
WP:BOLLOCKS. Leibniz 22:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 07:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-noteable artist. A Google search for "'Perry Wade' artist" yields 94 results, including several instances like "Art & Artists in the Smithsonian Libraries' Collections · other resources ... Perry, Wade, AAPG, Details. Perry, Walter Scott, 1855-1934, AAPG," where Perry and Wade are adjacent through coincidence in a list of other people. Consequentially 22:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was merge. However, I'm going to disagree with you all! (muaaaaahahaha), and merge it to Jack Woltz, not the main The Godfather article, as it's a more logical location for it. Proto:: type 12:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The article contains nothing that the The Godfather article does not have. I seriously doubt this could be expanded beyond anything that does not belong in the Godfather article. And any pop culture information belongs in the film article and does not require a separate article. The Filmaker 22:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Y.Ichiro ( 会話) 04:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Ummm... Someone placed the link here, but didn't finish creating this page. So I've lsited it here for them. I have no status on whether the article should stay or go, but someone obviously wanted it to be deleted. Anyway, it was probably for NN or conflict of interest or something... Spawn Man 01:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. I'm gonna go ahead ( mmm, yeah) and also put a redirect to X-plane. Proto:: type 12:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable company. Veinor ( ヴエノル(talk)) 22:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
We need a newbies message but I can't remember what it is. I can advise that the closing admin may well disregard comments by people with few edits to their credits. What is needed is verification from reliable sources. Aaron Gerdes above has highlighted one such but it needs more preferably in the article. Capitalistroadster 09:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dgray xplane ( talk • contribs) 16:03 21 November 2006.
— Bnarelle ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The article is beginning to establish notability. I provided the first cite, a CNN article about XPLANE's illustrations of technical business models helping dot com investors. Industry participants and experts will continue to add their knowledge to reinforce notability and expand verifiable information.
I want to stress that this article does need cleanup, but deletion would be a loss for the wiki. If users are still finding material objectionable, I recommend we engage in a Wikipedia:BOLD,_revert,_discuss_cycle like grown-ups. ;) Aaron Gerdes 21:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Dgray xplane 01:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A company or corporation is notable if it meets any of the following criteria:
1. The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company or corporation itself. This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations except for the following: Media reprints of press releases, other publications where the company or corporation talks about itself, and advertising for the company. Works carrying merely trivial coverage, such as newspaper articles that simply report extended shopping hours or the publications of telephone numbers and addresses in business directories.
First: Reading through the list of press mentions above, I believe it will evident that the press mentions are not media reprints of press releases, nor are they advertising, nor are they publications where the company taks about itself.
Second: The articles are not trivial coverage based on the definition given here. Since the press mentions meet the first criteria, and are not covered by any of the exceptions, then I submit that XPLANE has met the standards provided by Wikipedia. Dgray xplane 22:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
KEEP: As a professional in the field of Visual Facilitation for the past 20 years, I agree that XPLANE is an appropriate topic for Wikipedia. Their work is foundational to a field that contributes to enriched understanding of complex information for businesses and communities. As a result of my research for two books on this topic I have concluded that the capacity to use visuals, symbols, icons and other pictoral references is an important skill for the "information age". The work XPLANE provides also increases their client's capacity to think systemically -- a skill that is critical during this era of globalization.-Nancy Margulies, 21 November 2006
The result was Delete muffin sales notwithstanding - Yomangani talk 10:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Just not notable enough. Was Speedied, then Prodded. President of College Democrats is nice but not notable on an encyclopedic scale. And, being a great muffin salesperson really doesn't add to that. My vote would be ***delete*** Dipics 22:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Wikipedia ate Matt's homework. ~ trialsanderrors 07:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Original research Pigman ( talk • contribs) 23:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - Terriersfan has allayed the concerns raised by Scope creep. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 04:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
In the UK, district council members are not inherently notable (all strategic issues are decided at county council level). Though he has been mayor, in this town mayor is a purely ceremonial role with no powers. The coverage in the locality article suffices.I have not found any press coverage of this John Bowing on Google here. Fails both WP:V and WP:BIO.
The result was speedy delete A7/ WP:SNOW. Chick Bowen 04:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article was tagged for notability on October 30. Although some edits have occured since then, the article quickly dissolves into nonsense. I move for this page to be deleted. Diez2 00:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep ~ trialsanderrors 04:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Dr.S.HUSSAIN ZAHEER MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Non notable school asserting no encyclopedic content, I don't think there's such thing as "regioncruft" but this articles assertion of "stalwarts like IICT, NGRI, CCMB" is also hopelessly relevant to only the region in which the article is commenting. The style and grammar would require a complete rewrite (with the capslock key levered off the keyboard) and the POV issues if removed would probably result in a 6 word article. Best to just bin it. •Elomis• 03:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
*DELETE. EVEN THOUGH THE PROBLEMS DESCRIBED ABOVE HAVE BEEN FIXED, THERE STILL REMAINS THE ISSUE OF VERIFIABILITY.
ONLY 13 GHITS, THE ONLY THING VERIFIED IS THAT THE SCHOOL EXISTS. (Yes, I was poking fun at the caps lock thing).
MER-C
03:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
*Delete per MER-C. --
Kicking222
03:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
*Delete No claim of notability and no multiple independent sources. Changing vote to Keep Sources were added. Sports competition notices in paper are pretty ordinary for a school, but the reference from a national paper showing three Nobel laureates interacting with the students in the science program is impressive enough to allow inclusion.
Edison
05:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
*Change of comment to Weak Keep I don't think high schools are considered notable by default per Librarianofages, I don't think anything is notable by default and must always assert it's notability clearly (hence my exclusionist philosophy). Further, systemic bias is a weasely excuse to slow consensus forming for deleting articles, notability is to be independantly asserted, not asserted more than other articles per Arkadecki, voting is evil so anyone who was requesting change of votes either in this debate or via my talk page have earned themselves a rap on the knuckles with a ruler (and a smile for their good intentions) schools always have notable people talk at them (Nobel Laureates included) because important people educate tomorrows important people so that's should be taken thinly when asserting notability. BUT all that said, this article now reads quite nicely and seems to have rushed to attain a high quality quickly while on death row, I say an 11th hour repreive is in order.
•Elomis•
21:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
•Elomis• 21:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was: with, as eloquently pointed out by 152 and Garrett, no indication that MPOGD is notable (in fact, an article on the site has been deleted) and no arguments to the contrary, which means MPOGD cannot be said to confer notability through its awards, we have no non-trivial coverage by independent third-party sources or any other indication that this game is notable. Delete, not discounting arguments from anons, since a convincing case for deletion was made that has not been answered. -- Sam Blanning (talk) 00:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Completing nomination by 152.91.9.144 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS), no !vote from me yet. MER-C 02:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
See also: first nomination