This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:23, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Probable vanity. Will Vernon is apparently the great-grandson of Edward Vernon, which is who this article is actually about. No notability asserted for Will, and descendants of notable people aren't inherently notable. No relevant information about Edward that isn't already in Edward Vernon is present in Will Vernon. AиDя01D TALK EMAIL 23:46, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. —
Trilobite (
Talk) 18:18, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Vanity, does not assert notability. Tagged for speedy by Xcali, and while I agree that articles like this one ought to be speediable, currently they are not. AиDя01D TALK EMAIL 23:59, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete both Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:25, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Vanity, does not assert notability. AиDя01D TALK EMAIL 00:03, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:28, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Possible vanity. Little or no content. Article fails to establish notability. Delete.
Hermione
1980 00:13, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:29, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
While dunkball is a real sport, Tyler Woods, whoever he may be, does not appear to be connected to it in any way. Safe to say the info in this article is illegitimate. Denni ☯ 00:18, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Keep. -- BD2412 talk 15:58, 2005 Jun 26 (UTC)
Violates WP:NOR - says as much in the opening paragraph. Article also doesn't seem to make much sense. Might be useful in future, but not in its current format. Delete or possibly redirect to Joseph Stalin. Hermione 1980 00:40, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete Kelly Martin 15:14, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Appears someone added a speedy tag and then User:Muijzo disagreed adding a VFD tag but never completed all the steps. Don't shoot the messanger. Evil Monkey∴ Hello 01:04, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect VH1 CDC (talk) 01:01, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming block. A programming block is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find scheduling there. Recnilgiarc 01:06, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted
Sjakkalle
(Check!) 09:30, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
No idea. Might be a candidate for speedy. What do people think?- Splash 01:11, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was redirect to VH1. -- BD2412 talk June 28, 2005 18:02 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming block. A programming block is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find scheduling there. Recnilgiarc 01:13, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 01:18, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Forumcruft. Alexa rank=463,996. nn. -- Xcali 01:15, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Redirect. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:34 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming block. A programming block is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find scheduling there. Recnilgiarc 01:17, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Redirect. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:38 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming block. A programming block is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find scheduling there. Recnilgiarc 01:19, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Redirect > VH1. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:37 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming block. A programming block is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find scheduling there. Recnilgiarc 01:21, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 08:26 (UTC)
A youth group that wants to break a world record and make a political statement in the process. While I wish them luck, I don't see how a project that garners only 50 hits is notable. -- Xcali 01:22, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was KEEP. Scimitar 16:00, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Dictdef (and non English at that). Complete article is: Gettone means "token" in Italian (whether telephone or else). Propose Transwiki and delete. RJFJR 01:23, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Redirect. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:39 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming block. A programming block is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find scheduling there. Recnilgiarc 01:24, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was KEEP (no consensus). Scimitar 16:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Neologism as far as I can tell. Gazpacho 01:24, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:12 (UTC)
Delete and merge if any appropriate to Stalin. Admits to being "unpublished MA thesis" in first sentence, so is original research, which WP:NOT.- Splash 01:27, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Redirect to VH1. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:45 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming block. A programming block is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find scheduling there. Recnilgiarc 01:31, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Transwiki to Wiktionary. Following the 22nd of June transwiki, i've changed this self-explanatorily to delete. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:43 (UTC)
Slangdef. Gazpacho 01:31, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:27 (UTC)
Delete - Not notable, not encyc. Google returns a 26 hits, none of which appear to be this person. - Splash 01:32, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was redirect to VH1. -- BD2412 talk June 28, 2005 18:08 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming block. A programming block is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find scheduling there. Recnilgiarc 01:33, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:46 (UTC)
Complement to Stalin in the Russian Civil War. Delete, per WP:NOR. Hermione 1980 01:37, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:48 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming term. This is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find out more there. Recnilgiarc 01:40, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 16:08, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This dab page contains two entries, one incorrect, one nonencyclopedic. The incorrect entry states that ".ai" is top-level domain for Antigua. (It's actually ai.) The nonencylopedic entry refers to a filename extension for Adobe Illustrator files. (Wikipedia is not a general-purpose database.) ---- Isaac R 01:39, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedy delete. – AB CD 30 June 2005 16:11 (UTC)
Non-notable comic about a school class. Gazpacho 02:04, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Please dont delete is a really cool comic and will post comic strips on the page. All clips posted will have jokes that can be reffered to by everyone.-Creator of Page pleese dont deeltete!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:09 (UTC)
A page about the name of a website. Vanity at best. Delete Andreww 02:20, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:18 (UTC)
Delete, non-notable, non-encyc, Google knows nothing. - Splash 02:45, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:11 (UTC)
A vanity article about the authors podcast. Delete Andreww 03:04, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:54 (UTC)
Non-notable offspring Denni ☯ 03:11, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:51 (UTC)
Real group. Real song. Delete real fast? Denni ☯ 03:20, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:49 (UTC)
Non-notable blogger, and may he forever stay that way. Denni ☯ 03:42, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:20 (UTC)
So useless a list as to defy description. Denni ☯ 03:47, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
Oh, and the Arkansas thing. What I meant was that there might be a song played at a dance that was played at no other dances. Howabout1 Talk to me! 02:21, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 09:04 (UTC)
Non-notable website. Denni ☯ 03:54, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 09:06 (UTC)
Please spare us articles on second-rate psychics. Denni ☯ 04:07, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 09:07 (UTC)
Best efforts could not find a Google hit. Denni ☯ 04:16, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 09:08 (UTC)
Vanity. Denni ☯ 04:21, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect to Independent film. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:09 (UTC)
Article seems to exist only for the sake of Banana Productions, nominated for deletion above -- Xcali 04:32, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Grue 3 July 2005 16:12 (UTC)
Dab page that points to a couple of file formats that use the .lsm extension. File name extensions are not encyclopedic. ---- Isaac R 04:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted as patent nonsense.
Sjakkalle
(Check!) 12:51, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Patent nonsense, though it might have merit according to its discussion page. 80.111.96.99 04:27, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 01:31 (UTC)
He's not a very outspoken advocate as claimed. Google only finds about 200 matches for his name and wireless together (if you leave out the middle initial), and not all of those are relevant. This seems like vanity to me. -- Xcali 04:28, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I disagree...I submitted this guy because I had do a presentation on his work this past Spring and it was difficult to find complete information on him (he is a pretty young fellow). Thus, my hope was to get others adding content. First saw him lecture at MIT in the fall...and have found numerous articles/text citations on the guy. The bulk of his work involved technology for 3G wireless networks. His research resulted in a way of allowing limited amounts of RF spectrum to be recycled at many times the rate allowed by existing technologies. This is currently a very big deal among wireless telco providers creating next-gen infrastructure. Also, he is CEO of a New York-based company called
Novatics. These are the basics of what I have on him. -B. Manohar Pseudo-signed edit by
24.190.83.190 (
talk ·
contribs)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect to VH1 Classic. Grue 3 July 2005 16:16 (UTC)
As with the other "VH1 programming block" articles, I recommend merge and delete -- Alan Au 05:25, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. BJAODN has been suggested, but only one has suggested it and the reasoning has not been based on the humor value of the article. Sorry about being mean and horrible, but I feel that I have to call this an outright delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 13:34 (UTC)
Vanity biography. Evil Monkey∴ Hello 05:33, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
Please don’t delete Nico’s article. It was his birthday present from a bunch of us (his friends). Nico is a dedicated, meticulous, and driven person who will likely run for president or be the next Karl Rove. Sure he isn’t important right now, but give him a few years, he’s one to look out for! So, please don’t delete our present to him.
Why not BJAODN?
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was ambiguous.
Since the discussion, several people have labored to make the content of this article more intelligible. With those edits, I am going to call this as a "merge" decision. The destination of the merge is, however, unclear. I am going to temporarily point the article to Economy of China but please see my comments on the Talk page. Rossami (talk) 5 July 2005 23:35 (UTC)
I see no reason for this page to exist. There is nothing even close to this title anywhere else on Wikipedia. The English is terrible. Only one article links here. Just taking up space Woohookitty 07:03, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 01:23 (UTC)
Non-notable professor, unless the patents are significant. Rick K 07:20, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 13:39 (UTC)
How is this possibly an encylopedia article? And what happens when construction is finished? Rick K 07:30, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 01:21 (UTC)
Vanity article, subject does not seem to be notable. Look at the user name of the author. Leithp 07:51, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:24 (UTC)
Are we a Genealogy database now? Leithp 08:40, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:55 (UTC)
Not notable. Fails the google test miserably (not one reference!). Leithp 08:47, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 16:17, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This article makes no sense except to the brilliantly mathmatical minded like Neil Mallender, who do maths for fun in their spare time. Either dumb it down a little, at least explain what it does, and in laymans terms PLEASE (Im too stupid to understand complicated maths like that) - Big al kicks ass 09:54, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 30 June 2005 16:13 (UTC)
Seems like a good person, but I don't think the organization is encyclopedically notable, nor is its founder. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:57, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 30 June 2005 16:13 (UTC)
Fancruft, zero google hits [1]. Leithp 10:03, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 16:19, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
An animation studio that animated three episodes of one show (not six, as the article implies), and nothing before or since. About a dozen relevant google hits, evenly split between forum posts asking who they are and mirrors of a Tiny Toons faq. Not notable. -- Cryptic (talk) 10:18, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - Merged and redirected --
Jonel |
Speak 15:50, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
What is useful in this article has been merged with Computer_keyboard Lmatt 10:56, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:20 (UTC)
Website, no Alexa rank, no inbound links. -- Cryptic (talk) 11:20, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Edit this pageGyverMagic|(talk)]] 13:05, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:45 (UTC)
It isn't an article, it's just some randominty. Perhaps if there was a description of his life, or what that game thingee is, but there isnt, so vfd. Supersaiyanplough| (talk) 11:36, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was no consensus for deletion, so the article will be kept. There are a number of users favoring moving this content to other articles, but there is no agreement of where to move it. Therefore I am left with no choice but to keep the article as it is until agreement of what to do with it, which would most likely be merge with somewhere, but not deletion, is reached. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 09:00 (UTC)
After reading this I wanted to clean out the bits that are speculation or original research, but then I realized that virtually all of it is speculation or research, or a trivial listing of synonyms. E.g. Trinity is asserted to refer to the female aspect of the Christian god (which is heavily disputed), Apoc is linked to Epoch because it sounds similar, Cypher is linked to Lucifer because it's spelled similar, and Switch is linked to a BDSM role. I'm sorry about this since I really like the film, but this article is far too devoid of actual content. R adiant _>|< 12:46, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 30 June 2005 16:13 (UTC)
A CV. delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:08, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep, no consensus to delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:06 (UTC)
Vanity -- TheParanoidOne 13:39, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete - material already existed on September 11 Wikipedia Project -- Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 16:47 (UTC)
He died in 9/11, but otherwise his main accomplishment was being an engineer who loved motorcycles. R adiant _>|< 14:02, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete - material already existed on September 11 Wikipedia Project -- Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 17:03 (UTC)
He died in 9/11, but otherwise his main accomplishment was being a computer engineer for Boeing. R adiant _>|< 14:02, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete FCYTravis 5 July 2005 07:16 (UTC)
He died in 9/11, but otherwise his main accomplishment was being employed by the Pentagon after being a refugee from Vietnam. R adiant _>|< 14:02, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete - material already existed on September 11 Wikipedia Project -- Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 17:10 (UTC)
She died in 9/11, but otherwise her main accomplishment was being an attorney. R adiant _>|< 14:02, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep by a vote of (6-3). Scimitar 16:24, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
He died in 9/11, but otherwise his main accomplishment was being assigned to a space shuttle flight that was cancelled. R adiant _>|< 14:02, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep since there is not a sufficiently strong consensus to delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:31 (UTC)
This is a list of countries that had one or more citizen die in the 9/11 attacks. I see no encyclopedic value in this trivia; this is not the memorial wiki. R adiant _>|< 14:02, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 01:12 (UTC)
Two people total are listed here, who I assume have been declared dead since this was all of four years ago. An article about current affairs gone by. R adiant _>|< 14:04, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:36 (UTC)
Vanity, plus an article about an online pseudonym. -- TheParanoidOne 14:05, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:34 (UTC)
Delete, non-notable. Only claim to fame is working in a shop. - Splash 15:13, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep since there is not a sufficiently strong consensus for deletion. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:39 (UTC)
A secondary school marching band. -- Longhair | Talk 15:25, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was No consensus so article kept. -- FCYTravis 5 July 2005 07:30 (UTC)
This is a tutorial for creating training courses, it is no way encyclopedic. Leithp 15:36, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:43 (UTC)
Fan fiction. Leithp 16:09, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:15 (UTC)
Delete unmaintable list. Every novel ever published would need to go on here.- Splash 16:24, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by
The Anome (content was: '{{delete}}{{VfD}}My Mother the Holy Spirit. Expression used by Jesus in the Gospel according to the Hebrews.') --
cesarb 17:15, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Completing nomination by anon. IP 172.209.73.95, who said:
IMHO, this is a clear speedy candidate, and I think that's what the original nominator meant.- Splash 16:38, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:21 (UTC)
Vanity page. Leithp 16:56, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 01:10 (UTC)
While I'm all for policy proposals, this just isn't proposing much - it's merely the statement that "Users who have been harassed should receive condolences and users who sexually harass other users should be banned.". No evidence, no discussion, no voting. Plus it's already redundant with WP:NPA. R adiant _>|< 16:58, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
Agree with above, maybe send it to wikipedia:village pump (proposals). Overall Delete. Howabout1 Talk to me! 17:01, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:36 (UTC)
I don't think he's notable at this point. Only 15 Googles outside of his own site. -- Xcali 17:02, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. (Should have been a speedy delete as reposted content). Rossami (talk) 5 July 2005 23:17 (UTC)
Non-notable, re-posted one day after prior deletion. Joel7687 4 July 2005 11:30 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:40 (UTC)
There is no assertion as to why this person is notable, and I was unable to find any on a google search. I did find this [3], which appears to be the source of the information. Leithp 17:10, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 01:07 (UTC)
Flagged as a proposal, but it's a two-line piece stating that using Mapquest would be a good idea. No examples, no discussion, no real proposal at all. R adiant _>|< 17:14, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:42 (UTC)
I think the guy who made it is just advertising his own website/company. 4 results in Google. Cheesycow5 17:50, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep. - Sikon 15:22, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
540 Google results when placed in quotations. Non-notable TV personality. Recnilgiarc 17:55, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:01 (UTC)
Selfpromotion by an illiterate (at least in English) contributor "The article contributes nothing to the advancement of human knowledge" is as kind as one could be about this contribution. It is a candidate for immediate deletion. Eilthireach 16:59, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:04 (UTC)
nn for own article, "Frankenstine" also misspelled. You (Talk) 18:19, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
In my langaude frankenstine. -- Nicestpersononearth 18:20, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 00:41, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Not worth its own article. You (Talk) 18:21, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge with Between the Lions, which seems to fulfill both wishes, "doesn't deserve its own article", and "would support a merge if there's a good place to merge it". Sjakkalle (Check!) 1 July 2005 10:45 (UTC)
Not worth own article. You (Talk) 18:24, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 00:40, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Ship doesn't exist in the Star Wars universe. The only site Google returned that had anything to do about this ship revealed that it was fan created. Kross 18:39, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 00:39, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This is nothing more than an advertisement for a specific MUD. Something like DikuMUD or CircleMUD is notable, these are codebases used for hundreds or even thousands of MUDs, but this is just a specific MUD running on modified Diku. Statements like GrimneMUD is set in a high fantasy society, and boasts a very active player base only confirm this as spam. CryptoDerk 17:11, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 01:05 (UTC)
This looks very much like a vanity page. What has this guy actually done? The associated Monteray Speel by the same user also looks unreliable. JBellis 17:55, 24 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep. - Sikon 15:23, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Appears to be an advertisement for some sort of luxury train cruise. — Ghakko 19:43, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 00:24, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete neologism/local vanity; the nickname of a small area in Columbus, Ohio (my hometown 1977-2002) that doesn't appear to have any currency outside of a few users on a couple of online music-related message boards (such as donewaiting.com, and just as many people on that site appear to call it "Baja Clintonville", or SoHu for South of Hudson Street). The area the article describes is in fact just referred to by the masses as "north campus" (if anything), as it's nothing more than the non-distinct northern end of the largely uniform area surrounding the Ohio State University main campus. Postdlf 20:10, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete all three. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:39 (UTC)
Delete vanity band listing, and its nonnotable albums. No AMG entry for the band or its albums, and I could find no relevant google hits for the band name (most refer to the nickname of Eowyn, the Tolkien character, or about a type of material used in jewelry). "Steel Lily" + "Tow the Line" gets 0 google hits, [4], "Argon Cola" by itself gets 0 google hits. [5] In this day and age, a band or an album that has no internet presence cannot be notable or verifiable. Postdlf 04:24, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
February 10, 2006 relisting
Claims three albums but I can't find anything about this band on google, if this gets deleted the album articles should go too. Ruby 01:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:04 (UTC)
Vanity about some kid and his egg dropping device. -- Canderson 7 20:19, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
^owch^
i did not mean to get ride of that part and i fixed it after i found i made that error and you keep earasing what i did to fix it which is here>>"let it stay<<<<repeted. It is not so bad were one should call it crap. And one does not have to be rude to get the piont across.(repeated vote by anon IP 67.80.40.235, author of article.- Splash 02:28, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)) "
sorry for bothering you guys but do you get paid for commenting on these articles
Well i can see the votes are in and not one other person here wishes for this article to stay but let me add one thing people spend time on these articles so one should at lease give the common curtsy or reading it carefully and giving constructive criticism or just maybe a small complement along with the delete vote instead of just insulting the writer.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 00:21, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable startup movie company in Austria, with no mentions on Google other than homepage and advertisements. Have yet to produce any full-length movies. Znode 20:40, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
Dear Znode Well, if you're interestet we have released a full length movie this May. it was even announced on http://www.uncut.at/graz/events/loft-beisser.php , a really famous event magazine here (since I suppose you re not from Austria, I'll believe you ve never heard of it.)
Anyway. I was trying out wikipedia for the first time today, and If you want to throw me out just go ahead. I just have to say, I'm quite disappointed of the ignorance of the wiki team. All the best, max
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 00:19, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Dictdef of a non-existant word DJ Clayworth 20:45, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect, and it appears that Darkwing Duck is where most want this redirected. Sjakkalle (Check!) 1 July 2005 12:39 (UTC)
Not notable. I'd say that this character was featured in only one episode of Darkwing Duck, but as a matter of fact he's never appeared in any; he was mentioned as being dead in one episode, and someone had a photograph of him, and that was it. Whoever started the article wrote the first paragraph mostly copying, word for word, from MultiversalOmnipediaAtlas; I wrote the second paragraph and added the stub template thinking that maybe he did play a larger role in the series, until I saw the MultiversalOmnipediaAtlas and found that that was all there was. I'm not sure how big a problem the word-for-word copying is, but this is a concern to me because in the article Taurus Bulba, I wrote most of the "Darkly Dawns the Duck" section, but someone wrote most of the next section once again copying from MultiversalOmnipediaAtlas. CanadianCaesar 21:38, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE — Gwalla | Talk 01:40, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Vanity Denni ☯ 21:47, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect to Avatar: The Last Airbender. Grue 3 July 2005 16:20 (UTC)
Information already on Avatar: The Last Airbender. Delete. -- Daniel Lawrence 21:52, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete as fork, per report of nothing to merge. -- FCYTravis 5 July 2005 07:35 (UTC)
Fork of Jesus. And no, that phrase does not imply that the messiah may not use silverware... R adiant _>|< 22:42, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. This VFD debate has been affected by a number of entirely new users, some are perhaps sockpuppets. As for keep votes I have counted Nate (the author of the article is entitled to vote keep on it), Beginning, Unfocused and FCYTravis. There are eight delete votes and this will constitute a rough consensus. If anybody wants to go ahead and briefly mention this organization in the Bates College article, go ahead. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:30 (UTC)
Another non-notable college political group. One or two sentences could bge merged into the Bates College articler, but do we need all of this trivia? Rick K 22:46, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 00:17, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Possibly nonsense. Only Google hits refer to the Wikipedia article. Transwikied to Wiktionary. -- TheParanoidOne 22:49, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 16:42, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 16:39, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Non-encyclopaedic. Little scope for expansion. -- TheParanoidOne 22:55, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 16:36, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Being a relative of someone notable does not make them notable. Delete. -- Daniel Lawrence 23:06, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedily deleted as per article creator request.
khaosworks 05:06, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
Oblitertron gets 0 Google results. "General Jesus" gets 980, but none related as far as I can tell. Recnilgiarc 23:27, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 13:42 (UTC)
Non-notable 12-year-old rocker. Rick K 23:43, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). The last unsigned vote was by User:Peter Grey and is counted. There was agreement that the article needs some cleanup though. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:45 (UTC)
Are community theater groups inherently notable? In my opinion, no. -- Xcali 23:46, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-i feel you people are being too harsh. This is just some kid who wants to feel like he did something special. You do this and delete his page then you are deleting his dream. What does it matter if this is in here. NO one is going to look at it, who cares you people shouldn't be so quick to micro-manage. And it doesn't matter if it doesn't bring any "influential" things to the table. no one is going to look at it other than the people who have no lives and just go around looking for these pages. Let it go, and continue on to another page, because this was a dieing persons last wish, they wanted this exact script put up on the web and kept there, so why are you going to kill that persons wish? jiber 20:58 19 june
whoa...the Fairfield Cmty Theatre is a not a theatre group and is thus different than the group in Fairfield that *is* a theatre group (performances, etc.). —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.44.139.246 (
talk) 00:02, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:33, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable drummer for a 12-year-old's band. Rick K 23:48, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:33, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable bassist for a 12-year-old's band. Rick K 23:50, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:33, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable vocalist for a 12-year-old's band. Rick K 23:52, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:23, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Probable vanity. Will Vernon is apparently the great-grandson of Edward Vernon, which is who this article is actually about. No notability asserted for Will, and descendants of notable people aren't inherently notable. No relevant information about Edward that isn't already in Edward Vernon is present in Will Vernon. AиDя01D TALK EMAIL 23:46, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. —
Trilobite (
Talk) 18:18, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Vanity, does not assert notability. Tagged for speedy by Xcali, and while I agree that articles like this one ought to be speediable, currently they are not. AиDя01D TALK EMAIL 23:59, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete both Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:25, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Vanity, does not assert notability. AиDя01D TALK EMAIL 00:03, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:28, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Possible vanity. Little or no content. Article fails to establish notability. Delete.
Hermione
1980 00:13, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:29, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
While dunkball is a real sport, Tyler Woods, whoever he may be, does not appear to be connected to it in any way. Safe to say the info in this article is illegitimate. Denni ☯ 00:18, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Keep. -- BD2412 talk 15:58, 2005 Jun 26 (UTC)
Violates WP:NOR - says as much in the opening paragraph. Article also doesn't seem to make much sense. Might be useful in future, but not in its current format. Delete or possibly redirect to Joseph Stalin. Hermione 1980 00:40, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete Kelly Martin 15:14, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Appears someone added a speedy tag and then User:Muijzo disagreed adding a VFD tag but never completed all the steps. Don't shoot the messanger. Evil Monkey∴ Hello 01:04, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect VH1 CDC (talk) 01:01, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming block. A programming block is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find scheduling there. Recnilgiarc 01:06, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted
Sjakkalle
(Check!) 09:30, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
No idea. Might be a candidate for speedy. What do people think?- Splash 01:11, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was redirect to VH1. -- BD2412 talk June 28, 2005 18:02 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming block. A programming block is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find scheduling there. Recnilgiarc 01:13, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 01:18, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Forumcruft. Alexa rank=463,996. nn. -- Xcali 01:15, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Redirect. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:34 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming block. A programming block is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find scheduling there. Recnilgiarc 01:17, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Redirect. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:38 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming block. A programming block is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find scheduling there. Recnilgiarc 01:19, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Redirect > VH1. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:37 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming block. A programming block is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find scheduling there. Recnilgiarc 01:21, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 08:26 (UTC)
A youth group that wants to break a world record and make a political statement in the process. While I wish them luck, I don't see how a project that garners only 50 hits is notable. -- Xcali 01:22, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was KEEP. Scimitar 16:00, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Dictdef (and non English at that). Complete article is: Gettone means "token" in Italian (whether telephone or else). Propose Transwiki and delete. RJFJR 01:23, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Redirect. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:39 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming block. A programming block is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find scheduling there. Recnilgiarc 01:24, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was KEEP (no consensus). Scimitar 16:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Neologism as far as I can tell. Gazpacho 01:24, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:12 (UTC)
Delete and merge if any appropriate to Stalin. Admits to being "unpublished MA thesis" in first sentence, so is original research, which WP:NOT.- Splash 01:27, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Redirect to VH1. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:45 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming block. A programming block is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find scheduling there. Recnilgiarc 01:31, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Transwiki to Wiktionary. Following the 22nd of June transwiki, i've changed this self-explanatorily to delete. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:43 (UTC)
Slangdef. Gazpacho 01:31, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:27 (UTC)
Delete - Not notable, not encyc. Google returns a 26 hits, none of which appear to be this person. - Splash 01:32, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was redirect to VH1. -- BD2412 talk June 28, 2005 18:08 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming block. A programming block is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find scheduling there. Recnilgiarc 01:33, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:46 (UTC)
Complement to Stalin in the Russian Civil War. Delete, per WP:NOR. Hermione 1980 01:37, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:48 (UTC)
From the IP's other articles, I'm assuming that this is a VH1 programming term. This is hardly Wiki material, especially when this is all the article has to say. At VH1 there is a link to www.vh1.com. Users can find out more there. Recnilgiarc 01:40, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 16:08, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This dab page contains two entries, one incorrect, one nonencyclopedic. The incorrect entry states that ".ai" is top-level domain for Antigua. (It's actually ai.) The nonencylopedic entry refers to a filename extension for Adobe Illustrator files. (Wikipedia is not a general-purpose database.) ---- Isaac R 01:39, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedy delete. – AB CD 30 June 2005 16:11 (UTC)
Non-notable comic about a school class. Gazpacho 02:04, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Please dont delete is a really cool comic and will post comic strips on the page. All clips posted will have jokes that can be reffered to by everyone.-Creator of Page pleese dont deeltete!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:09 (UTC)
A page about the name of a website. Vanity at best. Delete Andreww 02:20, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:18 (UTC)
Delete, non-notable, non-encyc, Google knows nothing. - Splash 02:45, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:11 (UTC)
A vanity article about the authors podcast. Delete Andreww 03:04, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:54 (UTC)
Non-notable offspring Denni ☯ 03:11, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:51 (UTC)
Real group. Real song. Delete real fast? Denni ☯ 03:20, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:49 (UTC)
Non-notable blogger, and may he forever stay that way. Denni ☯ 03:42, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:20 (UTC)
So useless a list as to defy description. Denni ☯ 03:47, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
Oh, and the Arkansas thing. What I meant was that there might be a song played at a dance that was played at no other dances. Howabout1 Talk to me! 02:21, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 09:04 (UTC)
Non-notable website. Denni ☯ 03:54, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 09:06 (UTC)
Please spare us articles on second-rate psychics. Denni ☯ 04:07, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 09:07 (UTC)
Best efforts could not find a Google hit. Denni ☯ 04:16, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 09:08 (UTC)
Vanity. Denni ☯ 04:21, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect to Independent film. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:09 (UTC)
Article seems to exist only for the sake of Banana Productions, nominated for deletion above -- Xcali 04:32, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Grue 3 July 2005 16:12 (UTC)
Dab page that points to a couple of file formats that use the .lsm extension. File name extensions are not encyclopedic. ---- Isaac R 04:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted as patent nonsense.
Sjakkalle
(Check!) 12:51, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Patent nonsense, though it might have merit according to its discussion page. 80.111.96.99 04:27, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 01:31 (UTC)
He's not a very outspoken advocate as claimed. Google only finds about 200 matches for his name and wireless together (if you leave out the middle initial), and not all of those are relevant. This seems like vanity to me. -- Xcali 04:28, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I disagree...I submitted this guy because I had do a presentation on his work this past Spring and it was difficult to find complete information on him (he is a pretty young fellow). Thus, my hope was to get others adding content. First saw him lecture at MIT in the fall...and have found numerous articles/text citations on the guy. The bulk of his work involved technology for 3G wireless networks. His research resulted in a way of allowing limited amounts of RF spectrum to be recycled at many times the rate allowed by existing technologies. This is currently a very big deal among wireless telco providers creating next-gen infrastructure. Also, he is CEO of a New York-based company called
Novatics. These are the basics of what I have on him. -B. Manohar Pseudo-signed edit by
24.190.83.190 (
talk ·
contribs)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect to VH1 Classic. Grue 3 July 2005 16:16 (UTC)
As with the other "VH1 programming block" articles, I recommend merge and delete -- Alan Au 05:25, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. BJAODN has been suggested, but only one has suggested it and the reasoning has not been based on the humor value of the article. Sorry about being mean and horrible, but I feel that I have to call this an outright delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 13:34 (UTC)
Vanity biography. Evil Monkey∴ Hello 05:33, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
Please don’t delete Nico’s article. It was his birthday present from a bunch of us (his friends). Nico is a dedicated, meticulous, and driven person who will likely run for president or be the next Karl Rove. Sure he isn’t important right now, but give him a few years, he’s one to look out for! So, please don’t delete our present to him.
Why not BJAODN?
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was ambiguous.
Since the discussion, several people have labored to make the content of this article more intelligible. With those edits, I am going to call this as a "merge" decision. The destination of the merge is, however, unclear. I am going to temporarily point the article to Economy of China but please see my comments on the Talk page. Rossami (talk) 5 July 2005 23:35 (UTC)
I see no reason for this page to exist. There is nothing even close to this title anywhere else on Wikipedia. The English is terrible. Only one article links here. Just taking up space Woohookitty 07:03, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 01:23 (UTC)
Non-notable professor, unless the patents are significant. Rick K 07:20, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 13:39 (UTC)
How is this possibly an encylopedia article? And what happens when construction is finished? Rick K 07:30, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 01:21 (UTC)
Vanity article, subject does not seem to be notable. Look at the user name of the author. Leithp 07:51, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:24 (UTC)
Are we a Genealogy database now? Leithp 08:40, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:55 (UTC)
Not notable. Fails the google test miserably (not one reference!). Leithp 08:47, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 16:17, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This article makes no sense except to the brilliantly mathmatical minded like Neil Mallender, who do maths for fun in their spare time. Either dumb it down a little, at least explain what it does, and in laymans terms PLEASE (Im too stupid to understand complicated maths like that) - Big al kicks ass 09:54, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 30 June 2005 16:13 (UTC)
Seems like a good person, but I don't think the organization is encyclopedically notable, nor is its founder. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:57, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 30 June 2005 16:13 (UTC)
Fancruft, zero google hits [1]. Leithp 10:03, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 16:19, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
An animation studio that animated three episodes of one show (not six, as the article implies), and nothing before or since. About a dozen relevant google hits, evenly split between forum posts asking who they are and mirrors of a Tiny Toons faq. Not notable. -- Cryptic (talk) 10:18, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - Merged and redirected --
Jonel |
Speak 15:50, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
What is useful in this article has been merged with Computer_keyboard Lmatt 10:56, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:20 (UTC)
Website, no Alexa rank, no inbound links. -- Cryptic (talk) 11:20, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Edit this pageGyverMagic|(talk)]] 13:05, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:45 (UTC)
It isn't an article, it's just some randominty. Perhaps if there was a description of his life, or what that game thingee is, but there isnt, so vfd. Supersaiyanplough| (talk) 11:36, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was no consensus for deletion, so the article will be kept. There are a number of users favoring moving this content to other articles, but there is no agreement of where to move it. Therefore I am left with no choice but to keep the article as it is until agreement of what to do with it, which would most likely be merge with somewhere, but not deletion, is reached. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 09:00 (UTC)
After reading this I wanted to clean out the bits that are speculation or original research, but then I realized that virtually all of it is speculation or research, or a trivial listing of synonyms. E.g. Trinity is asserted to refer to the female aspect of the Christian god (which is heavily disputed), Apoc is linked to Epoch because it sounds similar, Cypher is linked to Lucifer because it's spelled similar, and Switch is linked to a BDSM role. I'm sorry about this since I really like the film, but this article is far too devoid of actual content. R adiant _>|< 12:46, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 30 June 2005 16:13 (UTC)
A CV. delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:08, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep, no consensus to delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:06 (UTC)
Vanity -- TheParanoidOne 13:39, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete - material already existed on September 11 Wikipedia Project -- Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 16:47 (UTC)
He died in 9/11, but otherwise his main accomplishment was being an engineer who loved motorcycles. R adiant _>|< 14:02, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete - material already existed on September 11 Wikipedia Project -- Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 17:03 (UTC)
He died in 9/11, but otherwise his main accomplishment was being a computer engineer for Boeing. R adiant _>|< 14:02, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete FCYTravis 5 July 2005 07:16 (UTC)
He died in 9/11, but otherwise his main accomplishment was being employed by the Pentagon after being a refugee from Vietnam. R adiant _>|< 14:02, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete - material already existed on September 11 Wikipedia Project -- Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 17:10 (UTC)
She died in 9/11, but otherwise her main accomplishment was being an attorney. R adiant _>|< 14:02, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep by a vote of (6-3). Scimitar 16:24, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
He died in 9/11, but otherwise his main accomplishment was being assigned to a space shuttle flight that was cancelled. R adiant _>|< 14:02, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep since there is not a sufficiently strong consensus to delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:31 (UTC)
This is a list of countries that had one or more citizen die in the 9/11 attacks. I see no encyclopedic value in this trivia; this is not the memorial wiki. R adiant _>|< 14:02, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 01:12 (UTC)
Two people total are listed here, who I assume have been declared dead since this was all of four years ago. An article about current affairs gone by. R adiant _>|< 14:04, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:36 (UTC)
Vanity, plus an article about an online pseudonym. -- TheParanoidOne 14:05, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:34 (UTC)
Delete, non-notable. Only claim to fame is working in a shop. - Splash 15:13, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep since there is not a sufficiently strong consensus for deletion. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:39 (UTC)
A secondary school marching band. -- Longhair | Talk 15:25, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was No consensus so article kept. -- FCYTravis 5 July 2005 07:30 (UTC)
This is a tutorial for creating training courses, it is no way encyclopedic. Leithp 15:36, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:43 (UTC)
Fan fiction. Leithp 16:09, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:15 (UTC)
Delete unmaintable list. Every novel ever published would need to go on here.- Splash 16:24, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by
The Anome (content was: '{{delete}}{{VfD}}My Mother the Holy Spirit. Expression used by Jesus in the Gospel according to the Hebrews.') --
cesarb 17:15, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Completing nomination by anon. IP 172.209.73.95, who said:
IMHO, this is a clear speedy candidate, and I think that's what the original nominator meant.- Splash 16:38, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:21 (UTC)
Vanity page. Leithp 16:56, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 01:10 (UTC)
While I'm all for policy proposals, this just isn't proposing much - it's merely the statement that "Users who have been harassed should receive condolences and users who sexually harass other users should be banned.". No evidence, no discussion, no voting. Plus it's already redundant with WP:NPA. R adiant _>|< 16:58, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
Agree with above, maybe send it to wikipedia:village pump (proposals). Overall Delete. Howabout1 Talk to me! 17:01, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:36 (UTC)
I don't think he's notable at this point. Only 15 Googles outside of his own site. -- Xcali 17:02, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. (Should have been a speedy delete as reposted content). Rossami (talk) 5 July 2005 23:17 (UTC)
Non-notable, re-posted one day after prior deletion. Joel7687 4 July 2005 11:30 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:40 (UTC)
There is no assertion as to why this person is notable, and I was unable to find any on a google search. I did find this [3], which appears to be the source of the information. Leithp 17:10, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 01:07 (UTC)
Flagged as a proposal, but it's a two-line piece stating that using Mapquest would be a good idea. No examples, no discussion, no real proposal at all. R adiant _>|< 17:14, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:42 (UTC)
I think the guy who made it is just advertising his own website/company. 4 results in Google. Cheesycow5 17:50, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep. - Sikon 15:22, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
540 Google results when placed in quotations. Non-notable TV personality. Recnilgiarc 17:55, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:01 (UTC)
Selfpromotion by an illiterate (at least in English) contributor "The article contributes nothing to the advancement of human knowledge" is as kind as one could be about this contribution. It is a candidate for immediate deletion. Eilthireach 16:59, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 13:04 (UTC)
nn for own article, "Frankenstine" also misspelled. You (Talk) 18:19, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
In my langaude frankenstine. -- Nicestpersononearth 18:20, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 00:41, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Not worth its own article. You (Talk) 18:21, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge with Between the Lions, which seems to fulfill both wishes, "doesn't deserve its own article", and "would support a merge if there's a good place to merge it". Sjakkalle (Check!) 1 July 2005 10:45 (UTC)
Not worth own article. You (Talk) 18:24, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 00:40, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Ship doesn't exist in the Star Wars universe. The only site Google returned that had anything to do about this ship revealed that it was fan created. Kross 18:39, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 00:39, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This is nothing more than an advertisement for a specific MUD. Something like DikuMUD or CircleMUD is notable, these are codebases used for hundreds or even thousands of MUDs, but this is just a specific MUD running on modified Diku. Statements like GrimneMUD is set in a high fantasy society, and boasts a very active player base only confirm this as spam. CryptoDerk 17:11, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 01:05 (UTC)
This looks very much like a vanity page. What has this guy actually done? The associated Monteray Speel by the same user also looks unreliable. JBellis 17:55, 24 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep. - Sikon 15:23, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Appears to be an advertisement for some sort of luxury train cruise. — Ghakko 19:43, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 00:24, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete neologism/local vanity; the nickname of a small area in Columbus, Ohio (my hometown 1977-2002) that doesn't appear to have any currency outside of a few users on a couple of online music-related message boards (such as donewaiting.com, and just as many people on that site appear to call it "Baja Clintonville", or SoHu for South of Hudson Street). The area the article describes is in fact just referred to by the masses as "north campus" (if anything), as it's nothing more than the non-distinct northern end of the largely uniform area surrounding the Ohio State University main campus. Postdlf 20:10, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete all three. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:39 (UTC)
Delete vanity band listing, and its nonnotable albums. No AMG entry for the band or its albums, and I could find no relevant google hits for the band name (most refer to the nickname of Eowyn, the Tolkien character, or about a type of material used in jewelry). "Steel Lily" + "Tow the Line" gets 0 google hits, [4], "Argon Cola" by itself gets 0 google hits. [5] In this day and age, a band or an album that has no internet presence cannot be notable or verifiable. Postdlf 04:24, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
February 10, 2006 relisting
Claims three albums but I can't find anything about this band on google, if this gets deleted the album articles should go too. Ruby 01:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:04 (UTC)
Vanity about some kid and his egg dropping device. -- Canderson 7 20:19, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
^owch^
i did not mean to get ride of that part and i fixed it after i found i made that error and you keep earasing what i did to fix it which is here>>"let it stay<<<<repeted. It is not so bad were one should call it crap. And one does not have to be rude to get the piont across.(repeated vote by anon IP 67.80.40.235, author of article.- Splash 02:28, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)) "
sorry for bothering you guys but do you get paid for commenting on these articles
Well i can see the votes are in and not one other person here wishes for this article to stay but let me add one thing people spend time on these articles so one should at lease give the common curtsy or reading it carefully and giving constructive criticism or just maybe a small complement along with the delete vote instead of just insulting the writer.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 00:21, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable startup movie company in Austria, with no mentions on Google other than homepage and advertisements. Have yet to produce any full-length movies. Znode 20:40, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
Dear Znode Well, if you're interestet we have released a full length movie this May. it was even announced on http://www.uncut.at/graz/events/loft-beisser.php , a really famous event magazine here (since I suppose you re not from Austria, I'll believe you ve never heard of it.)
Anyway. I was trying out wikipedia for the first time today, and If you want to throw me out just go ahead. I just have to say, I'm quite disappointed of the ignorance of the wiki team. All the best, max
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 00:19, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Dictdef of a non-existant word DJ Clayworth 20:45, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect, and it appears that Darkwing Duck is where most want this redirected. Sjakkalle (Check!) 1 July 2005 12:39 (UTC)
Not notable. I'd say that this character was featured in only one episode of Darkwing Duck, but as a matter of fact he's never appeared in any; he was mentioned as being dead in one episode, and someone had a photograph of him, and that was it. Whoever started the article wrote the first paragraph mostly copying, word for word, from MultiversalOmnipediaAtlas; I wrote the second paragraph and added the stub template thinking that maybe he did play a larger role in the series, until I saw the MultiversalOmnipediaAtlas and found that that was all there was. I'm not sure how big a problem the word-for-word copying is, but this is a concern to me because in the article Taurus Bulba, I wrote most of the "Darkly Dawns the Duck" section, but someone wrote most of the next section once again copying from MultiversalOmnipediaAtlas. CanadianCaesar 21:38, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE — Gwalla | Talk 01:40, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Vanity Denni ☯ 21:47, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect to Avatar: The Last Airbender. Grue 3 July 2005 16:20 (UTC)
Information already on Avatar: The Last Airbender. Delete. -- Daniel Lawrence 21:52, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete as fork, per report of nothing to merge. -- FCYTravis 5 July 2005 07:35 (UTC)
Fork of Jesus. And no, that phrase does not imply that the messiah may not use silverware... R adiant _>|< 22:42, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. This VFD debate has been affected by a number of entirely new users, some are perhaps sockpuppets. As for keep votes I have counted Nate (the author of the article is entitled to vote keep on it), Beginning, Unfocused and FCYTravis. There are eight delete votes and this will constitute a rough consensus. If anybody wants to go ahead and briefly mention this organization in the Bates College article, go ahead. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:30 (UTC)
Another non-notable college political group. One or two sentences could bge merged into the Bates College articler, but do we need all of this trivia? Rick K 22:46, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 00:17, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Possibly nonsense. Only Google hits refer to the Wikipedia article. Transwikied to Wiktionary. -- TheParanoidOne 22:49, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 16:42, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 16:39, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Non-encyclopaedic. Little scope for expansion. -- TheParanoidOne 22:55, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 16:36, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Being a relative of someone notable does not make them notable. Delete. -- Daniel Lawrence 23:06, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedily deleted as per article creator request.
khaosworks 05:06, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
Oblitertron gets 0 Google results. "General Jesus" gets 980, but none related as far as I can tell. Recnilgiarc 23:27, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 13:42 (UTC)
Non-notable 12-year-old rocker. Rick K 23:43, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). The last unsigned vote was by User:Peter Grey and is counted. There was agreement that the article needs some cleanup though. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:45 (UTC)
Are community theater groups inherently notable? In my opinion, no. -- Xcali 23:46, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-i feel you people are being too harsh. This is just some kid who wants to feel like he did something special. You do this and delete his page then you are deleting his dream. What does it matter if this is in here. NO one is going to look at it, who cares you people shouldn't be so quick to micro-manage. And it doesn't matter if it doesn't bring any "influential" things to the table. no one is going to look at it other than the people who have no lives and just go around looking for these pages. Let it go, and continue on to another page, because this was a dieing persons last wish, they wanted this exact script put up on the web and kept there, so why are you going to kill that persons wish? jiber 20:58 19 june
whoa...the Fairfield Cmty Theatre is a not a theatre group and is thus different than the group in Fairfield that *is* a theatre group (performances, etc.). —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.44.139.246 (
talk) 00:02, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:33, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable drummer for a 12-year-old's band. Rick K 23:48, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:33, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable bassist for a 12-year-old's band. Rick K 23:50, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:33, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable vocalist for a 12-year-old's band. Rick K 23:52, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)