The result was delete. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 05:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply
This article was forked out of the Casio F91W article in January 2010, following discussions related to it being WP:COATRACK material and giving undue weight to this particular topic (several editors raised these concerns on the talk page between 2006 and 2009, but Geo Swan ( talk · contribs) defended starting the article and adding this material on the grounds that it illustrated problems with the US government's Guantanamo Bay-related policies - I don't know if this is still his or her view). The article is sourced almost exclusively to primary sources (two of the secondary news sources which are still 'live' refer only to a single detainee, and the others only note the watch aspect in passing when discussing individuals rather than linking the various people together), and an attempt by Fladrif ( talk · contribs) to address BLP concerns in 2011 was promptly reverted. As such, I think that this article should be deleted as it is clearly surplus to the description of the issue at Casio F91W#Claimed use in terrorism, was initially started as a WP:COATRACK, is not a notable way to group these individuals and constructing an article largely around primary sources in this way violates WP:BLPPRIMARY. Nick-D ( talk) 05:07, 1 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 05:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply
This article was forked out of the Casio F91W article in January 2010, following discussions related to it being WP:COATRACK material and giving undue weight to this particular topic (several editors raised these concerns on the talk page between 2006 and 2009, but Geo Swan ( talk · contribs) defended starting the article and adding this material on the grounds that it illustrated problems with the US government's Guantanamo Bay-related policies - I don't know if this is still his or her view). The article is sourced almost exclusively to primary sources (two of the secondary news sources which are still 'live' refer only to a single detainee, and the others only note the watch aspect in passing when discussing individuals rather than linking the various people together), and an attempt by Fladrif ( talk · contribs) to address BLP concerns in 2011 was promptly reverted. As such, I think that this article should be deleted as it is clearly surplus to the description of the issue at Casio F91W#Claimed use in terrorism, was initially started as a WP:COATRACK, is not a notable way to group these individuals and constructing an article largely around primary sources in this way violates WP:BLPPRIMARY. Nick-D ( talk) 05:07, 1 April 2013 (UTC) reply