The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep: This article, being on WP for more than seven years, was having no problems at all, until the above editor came along (Broadway biased obviously, and most likely following my edits of today). So keep it then. Best, --
Discographer (
talk)
22:27, 25 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Appologies if you think that was an attack, but at the same time, that was an attack on me, in accordance to the rest of what I stated above. Best, --
Discographer (
talk)
23:02, 25 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Hi @
Discographer. Sorry, I should be more clear. There's a route to potential notability via GNG/WP:BIO. I can't find the Billboard article, which is why I haven't cast a vote in either direction, but we have time to find it. Alternatively, I'm happy to move this to your draft space if you want to work on it. I think N:MUSIC has changed since you wrote this, I don't at all think you spent time writing about someone you didn't think was notable. StarMississippi01:15, 26 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Gotcha. Personally I think the benefits of draftifying a seven year old article are slim. It can either be improved in mainspace, or will likely just expire in six months. Based on what @
Cielquiparle has added, my opinion is that improvement in mainspace will be sufficiently productive. But that's just me as an editor, not as an admin. StarMississippi00:37, 27 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep: This article, being on WP for more than seven years, was having no problems at all, until the above editor came along (Broadway biased obviously, and most likely following my edits of today). So keep it then. Best, --
Discographer (
talk)
22:27, 25 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Appologies if you think that was an attack, but at the same time, that was an attack on me, in accordance to the rest of what I stated above. Best, --
Discographer (
talk)
23:02, 25 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Hi @
Discographer. Sorry, I should be more clear. There's a route to potential notability via GNG/WP:BIO. I can't find the Billboard article, which is why I haven't cast a vote in either direction, but we have time to find it. Alternatively, I'm happy to move this to your draft space if you want to work on it. I think N:MUSIC has changed since you wrote this, I don't at all think you spent time writing about someone you didn't think was notable. StarMississippi01:15, 26 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Gotcha. Personally I think the benefits of draftifying a seven year old article are slim. It can either be improved in mainspace, or will likely just expire in six months. Based on what @
Cielquiparle has added, my opinion is that improvement in mainspace will be sufficiently productive. But that's just me as an editor, not as an admin. StarMississippi00:37, 27 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.