The result was delete. After discounting the comments from sock puppets and giving less weight to editors with a conflict of interest, there doesn't seem to be much appetite to keep the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No sources that meet WP:GNG, there are a lot of mentions. Other sources are sponsored by some firm. Forbes 30 under 30 is marginally helpful. TLA (talk) 10:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Comment: BVWilson is likely a
WP:COI. Name and
WP:SPA-like contributions seem to suggest that. The sources mentioned by BVWilson are indeed
WP:RELIABLE, but aren't even close to
WP:SIGCOV. The Forbes, as I mentioned, is closest, but fails
WP:100WORDS. The Times piece doesn't even have a byline, as it is paid content and not written by a staff writer of The Times / Sunday Times. Sure, Josh Wilson is impressive, but does not appear to meet
WP:GNG for Wikipedia, unfortunately. If you would like, BVWilson, you can try to use
WP:THREE.
TLA
(talk)
04:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
23:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
01:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
The person's work (or works) has: ... (c) won significant critical attention. I would prefer to see some source discussion though, as that would show how to improve the page. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 08:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. After discounting the comments from sock puppets and giving less weight to editors with a conflict of interest, there doesn't seem to be much appetite to keep the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No sources that meet WP:GNG, there are a lot of mentions. Other sources are sponsored by some firm. Forbes 30 under 30 is marginally helpful. TLA (talk) 10:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Comment: BVWilson is likely a
WP:COI. Name and
WP:SPA-like contributions seem to suggest that. The sources mentioned by BVWilson are indeed
WP:RELIABLE, but aren't even close to
WP:SIGCOV. The Forbes, as I mentioned, is closest, but fails
WP:100WORDS. The Times piece doesn't even have a byline, as it is paid content and not written by a staff writer of The Times / Sunday Times. Sure, Josh Wilson is impressive, but does not appear to meet
WP:GNG for Wikipedia, unfortunately. If you would like, BVWilson, you can try to use
WP:THREE.
TLA
(talk)
04:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
23:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
01:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
The person's work (or works) has: ... (c) won significant critical attention. I would prefer to see some source discussion though, as that would show how to improve the page. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 08:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)