From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 21:57, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Jim Trick

Jim Trick (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability requirements of WP:BAND; has only been the subject of one publication by an arguably reliable source (No Depression magazine), and meets none of the other notability requirements. Inks.LWC ( talk) 03:50, 4 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC ( talk) 03:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC ( talk) 03:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC ( talk) 03:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - The pieces from Boston.com and The Boston Globe are the same "article". The piece actually isn't even an article; it is merely an ad for a program that was put on by a church, where Jim Trick was one of a dozen or so people to perform. The subject is merely mentioned in passing, and the "article" amounts to little more than a press release. The Music Times piece merely lists him as one of dozens of artists who would play at SoulFest 2013. The Significato "magazine" piece appears to be nothing more than a CD review from a blog run by a husband and wife. Thus, he has only been the subject of one non-trivial published work that appeared in a reliable source (No Depression magazine), and the subject fails the other criteria of WP:BAND (and additionally WP:GNG). It is also worth noting that in addition to being the creator of the page, Mr RD has disclosed that he was monetarily compensated to create the page. Inks.LWC ( talk) 22:21, 5 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 14:12, 11 July 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete comes no where close to meeting the notability requirements for a musician. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:43, 13 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 14:38, 18 July 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete rather promotional (subject is described as a "motivational speaker", trying to drum up an audience?, and paying for it [see above]?), fails all criteria of WP:MUSICBIO, no significant coverage in independent RS, refs are primary, blogs, trivial mentions or almost empty discographies... Kraxler ( talk) 15:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 21:57, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Jim Trick

Jim Trick (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability requirements of WP:BAND; has only been the subject of one publication by an arguably reliable source (No Depression magazine), and meets none of the other notability requirements. Inks.LWC ( talk) 03:50, 4 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC ( talk) 03:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC ( talk) 03:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC ( talk) 03:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - The pieces from Boston.com and The Boston Globe are the same "article". The piece actually isn't even an article; it is merely an ad for a program that was put on by a church, where Jim Trick was one of a dozen or so people to perform. The subject is merely mentioned in passing, and the "article" amounts to little more than a press release. The Music Times piece merely lists him as one of dozens of artists who would play at SoulFest 2013. The Significato "magazine" piece appears to be nothing more than a CD review from a blog run by a husband and wife. Thus, he has only been the subject of one non-trivial published work that appeared in a reliable source (No Depression magazine), and the subject fails the other criteria of WP:BAND (and additionally WP:GNG). It is also worth noting that in addition to being the creator of the page, Mr RD has disclosed that he was monetarily compensated to create the page. Inks.LWC ( talk) 22:21, 5 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 14:12, 11 July 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete comes no where close to meeting the notability requirements for a musician. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:43, 13 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 14:38, 18 July 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete rather promotional (subject is described as a "motivational speaker", trying to drum up an audience?, and paying for it [see above]?), fails all criteria of WP:MUSICBIO, no significant coverage in independent RS, refs are primary, blogs, trivial mentions or almost empty discographies... Kraxler ( talk) 15:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook