Per the discussion, there appear to be several problems with this article:
None of the sources mentioned in the discussion appear to deal directly and significantly with the subject of "female privilege" per se. In other words, it looks like there are no reliable sources primarily about female privilege. Thus this article will never contain a substantial amount of content that isn't original research (within the context defined by the title). Of the few reliable sources that do mention "female privilege", they seem to mostly be within the context of the men's rights movement. I believe the proper disposition of this AfD is to delete the original research and merge the remaining content into Men's rights leaving a redirect. If "female privilege" becomes an established term at some point in the future, this decision can be revisited. Kaldari ( talk) 02:48, 3 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Provides no evidence that this is a valid sociological concept. Is a product of an organized raid on wikipedia by the Reddit.com antifeminist forum Contrada10 ( talk) 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)— Contrada10 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
It really amazes me that people here can argue that an article on female privilege is unworthy, has no worthwhile content, etc. when there are reliable sources that show women are given lesser sentences than men for identical crimes (after factoring in criminal record, etc.) Meanwhile, the article on male privilege is safe and secure, when it describes such things as "full-time working men earn more than women" (because they work longer hours and choose harder, higher-paying jobs). Celdaz ( talk) 00:47, 29 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Per the discussion, there appear to be several problems with this article:
None of the sources mentioned in the discussion appear to deal directly and significantly with the subject of "female privilege" per se. In other words, it looks like there are no reliable sources primarily about female privilege. Thus this article will never contain a substantial amount of content that isn't original research (within the context defined by the title). Of the few reliable sources that do mention "female privilege", they seem to mostly be within the context of the men's rights movement. I believe the proper disposition of this AfD is to delete the original research and merge the remaining content into Men's rights leaving a redirect. If "female privilege" becomes an established term at some point in the future, this decision can be revisited. Kaldari ( talk) 02:48, 3 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Provides no evidence that this is a valid sociological concept. Is a product of an organized raid on wikipedia by the Reddit.com antifeminist forum Contrada10 ( talk) 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)— Contrada10 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
It really amazes me that people here can argue that an article on female privilege is unworthy, has no worthwhile content, etc. when there are reliable sources that show women are given lesser sentences than men for identical crimes (after factoring in criminal record, etc.) Meanwhile, the article on male privilege is safe and secure, when it describes such things as "full-time working men earn more than women" (because they work longer hours and choose harder, higher-paying jobs). Celdaz ( talk) 00:47, 29 February 2012 (UTC) reply