- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 01:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Exit Dying ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:NOTFILM. — Josh3580 talk/ hist 04:39, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 06:07, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I had to really, really look but I did find some coverage. Some of it's local, but it's over a fairly wide period of time. There is a college paper, but the college is not the same one as the one Jacobs' students attended. There's enough here to warrant a weak keep for the most part. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep There seems to be enough significant secondary coverage to meet our guidelines. Fwiw, WP:LOCAL is an essay that I don't agree with. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 23:08, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 01:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Exit Dying ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:NOTFILM. — Josh3580 talk/ hist 04:39, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 06:07, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I had to really, really look but I did find some coverage. Some of it's local, but it's over a fairly wide period of time. There is a college paper, but the college is not the same one as the one Jacobs' students attended. There's enough here to warrant a weak keep for the most part. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep There seems to be enough significant secondary coverage to meet our guidelines. Fwiw, WP:LOCAL is an essay that I don't agree with. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 23:08, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.