The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep passes WP:GNG. I've improved the article by adding Independent, reliable and secondary sources
[1] (I just added a few from the very first page page of search result). I would've added more (obviously would've shared here too), but due to exam, I'm really short of time. Thank you.
☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (
talk)
06:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)reply
CommentWP:1E does not appear to justify deletion, because there are multiple events for which she has received significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources over several years, and per
WP:1E, her significant individual role in these multiple events have been documented by multiple independent and reliable sources.
Beccaynr (
talk)
21:11, 9 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep as per
WP:GNG. The person in question has received significant media coverage (from reliable sources) for a variety of different events/reasons. The claim that the subject in question has received media coverage from a single event only is bogus. I would suggest moving the article to draft and move it back to mainspace after it is expanded based on additional sources.
RajHariya (
talk)
10:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep passes WP:GNG. I've improved the article by adding Independent, reliable and secondary sources
[1] (I just added a few from the very first page page of search result). I would've added more (obviously would've shared here too), but due to exam, I'm really short of time. Thank you.
☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (
talk)
06:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)reply
CommentWP:1E does not appear to justify deletion, because there are multiple events for which she has received significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources over several years, and per
WP:1E, her significant individual role in these multiple events have been documented by multiple independent and reliable sources.
Beccaynr (
talk)
21:11, 9 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep as per
WP:GNG. The person in question has received significant media coverage (from reliable sources) for a variety of different events/reasons. The claim that the subject in question has received media coverage from a single event only is bogus. I would suggest moving the article to draft and move it back to mainspace after it is expanded based on additional sources.
RajHariya (
talk)
10:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.