From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 23:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Eva Zu Beck

Eva Zu Beck (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Vloggers do not automatically meet the criteria of having a Wikipedia page based on their number of followers. Kinngjatt ( talk) 00:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Kinngjatt ( talk) 00:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:44, 6 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:44, 6 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Beccaynr ( talk) 16:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Comment WP:1E does not appear to justify deletion, because there are multiple events for which she has received significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources over several years, and per WP:1E, her significant individual role in these multiple events have been documented by multiple independent and reliable sources. Beccaynr ( talk) 21:11, 9 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:16, 15 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Keep as per WP:GNG. The person in question has received significant media coverage (from reliable sources) for a variety of different events/reasons. The claim that the subject in question has received media coverage from a single event only is bogus. I would suggest moving the article to draft and move it back to mainspace after it is expanded based on additional sources. RajHariya ( talk) 10:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 23:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Eva Zu Beck

Eva Zu Beck (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Vloggers do not automatically meet the criteria of having a Wikipedia page based on their number of followers. Kinngjatt ( talk) 00:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Kinngjatt ( talk) 00:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:44, 6 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:44, 6 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Beccaynr ( talk) 16:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Comment WP:1E does not appear to justify deletion, because there are multiple events for which she has received significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources over several years, and per WP:1E, her significant individual role in these multiple events have been documented by multiple independent and reliable sources. Beccaynr ( talk) 21:11, 9 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:16, 15 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Keep as per WP:GNG. The person in question has received significant media coverage (from reliable sources) for a variety of different events/reasons. The claim that the subject in question has received media coverage from a single event only is bogus. I would suggest moving the article to draft and move it back to mainspace after it is expanded based on additional sources. RajHariya ( talk) 10:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook