The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: Have you tried looking for sources in Japanese and Korean? It looks like there would be more notable sources in those languages.
lullabying (
talk)
06:05, 16 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. Ko and ja wiki articles are even more bare bones, sadly I cannot search in those languages. Polish sources give nothing. Fails NBIO but feel free to ping me if someone can read Japanese and Korean and finds better sources. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here08:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Ashleyyoursmile: A lot of these Naver domain article look like straight up PR. I've not looked at the news papers yet, but it looks like typical PR generated to promote the band at the beginning of their career. The christiantoday article is pure pufff. That is PR. I check the rest when I get back. scope_creepTalk18:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Ref 17: In 2006, the British beauty Eva Popiel, who began to gain fame for her outstanding beauty, her fluent Korean and candid and plain speaking skills in her talk show about her life in Korea of global beauties. PR. The Korean Times describes her as a reality star who is trying to convert her brief flutter of fame into an acting career. The third one mentions her career to date, appearing on The One Show, but it is all indicative of a PR assitant becoming briefly a reality star and trying to become an actor. It is a well worn path and currently believe that she is notable. Possibly
WP:TOOSOON. She is a minor D grade reality star at the moment who is non-notable. scope_creepTalk09:17, 25 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: Have you tried looking for sources in Japanese and Korean? It looks like there would be more notable sources in those languages.
lullabying (
talk)
06:05, 16 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. Ko and ja wiki articles are even more bare bones, sadly I cannot search in those languages. Polish sources give nothing. Fails NBIO but feel free to ping me if someone can read Japanese and Korean and finds better sources. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here08:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Ashleyyoursmile: A lot of these Naver domain article look like straight up PR. I've not looked at the news papers yet, but it looks like typical PR generated to promote the band at the beginning of their career. The christiantoday article is pure pufff. That is PR. I check the rest when I get back. scope_creepTalk18:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Ref 17: In 2006, the British beauty Eva Popiel, who began to gain fame for her outstanding beauty, her fluent Korean and candid and plain speaking skills in her talk show about her life in Korea of global beauties. PR. The Korean Times describes her as a reality star who is trying to convert her brief flutter of fame into an acting career. The third one mentions her career to date, appearing on The One Show, but it is all indicative of a PR assitant becoming briefly a reality star and trying to become an actor. It is a well worn path and currently believe that she is notable. Possibly
WP:TOOSOON. She is a minor D grade reality star at the moment who is non-notable. scope_creepTalk09:17, 25 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.