- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. — Bagumba ( talk) 13:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Eliot Wolf
- Eliot Wolf ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't know which ranks in NFL staff are considered high enough for notability, but this subject doesn't seem to rank very highly, and the deepest sourcing on him is of this level--a couple of sentences about him possibly getting a job, and a couple of lines here, on an NFL blog, as one of 13 possibilities for a position. Drmies ( talk) 17:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Passes GNG. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] WikiOriginal-9 ( talk) 22:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 01:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 01:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 01:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 01:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems to have proper credible references and also lot's of other news on him in Google News that are not referenced. Expertwikiguy ( talk) 22:24 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as noted above, passes GNG. Lepricavark ( talk) 21:02, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. — Bagumba ( talk) 13:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Eliot Wolf
- Eliot Wolf ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't know which ranks in NFL staff are considered high enough for notability, but this subject doesn't seem to rank very highly, and the deepest sourcing on him is of this level--a couple of sentences about him possibly getting a job, and a couple of lines here, on an NFL blog, as one of 13 possibilities for a position. Drmies ( talk) 17:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Passes GNG. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] WikiOriginal-9 ( talk) 22:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 01:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 01:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 01:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 01:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems to have proper credible references and also lot's of other news on him in Google News that are not referenced. Expertwikiguy ( talk) 22:24 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as noted above, passes GNG. Lepricavark ( talk) 21:02, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.