The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
WP:SINGLEEVENT. Became notorious 11 years ago for a while after she lied about her making photos while biking Chernobyl. After than she created zero, zilch notable. We don't need monuments to liars in wikipedia, unless they made long-lasting impact on civilization.
Staszek Lem (
talk)
23:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect'WP:SINGLEEVENT, as far as I can tell, only discusses whether to merge individuals with notable ebents. In this case, the event itself (her hoax trip) is not notable. Which takes us back to generic WP:BIO. Which is borderline - few RS, focusing primary on her trip, not her person. Which leads me to conclude that she is not notable. Her hoax trip may deserve a mention on some list of hoaxes, and/or in the
Chernobyl#In popular culture, where I recommend a one-two sentence summary with best refs is merged and redirected to. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here16:11, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Well, WP:SINGLEEVENT addresses "whether an article should be written about the individual, the event or both". In our case
Chernobyl is not the event in question. And the hoax is just as forgotten ad Elena is. I.e., I don't see valid redirect target per
WP:UNDUE.
Staszek Lem (
talk)
21:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator. No real notability. If the
WP:SINGLEEVENT she was involved in had any real impact or importance, she'd atleast have an article on ru.wiki or uk.wiki. We're giving
WP:UNDUE weight to this flash in the pan hoax and its perpetrator.
RosarioBerganza05:49, 2 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete (revised; see below) per
WP:BLP1E. I don't think
WP:SINGLEEVENT is the right guideline here - neither the person nor the event are notable. There seems to be only one source that is actually about her hoax motorcycle trip.
Ivanvector (
talk)
02:49, 3 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect There are a few reliable sources that mention her after the one event. However, it's all about the hoax, and after weighing it, it probably doesn't constitute significant coverage.
Nwlaw63 (
talk)
14:52, 3 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
WP:SINGLEEVENT. Became notorious 11 years ago for a while after she lied about her making photos while biking Chernobyl. After than she created zero, zilch notable. We don't need monuments to liars in wikipedia, unless they made long-lasting impact on civilization.
Staszek Lem (
talk)
23:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect'WP:SINGLEEVENT, as far as I can tell, only discusses whether to merge individuals with notable ebents. In this case, the event itself (her hoax trip) is not notable. Which takes us back to generic WP:BIO. Which is borderline - few RS, focusing primary on her trip, not her person. Which leads me to conclude that she is not notable. Her hoax trip may deserve a mention on some list of hoaxes, and/or in the
Chernobyl#In popular culture, where I recommend a one-two sentence summary with best refs is merged and redirected to. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here16:11, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Well, WP:SINGLEEVENT addresses "whether an article should be written about the individual, the event or both". In our case
Chernobyl is not the event in question. And the hoax is just as forgotten ad Elena is. I.e., I don't see valid redirect target per
WP:UNDUE.
Staszek Lem (
talk)
21:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator. No real notability. If the
WP:SINGLEEVENT she was involved in had any real impact or importance, she'd atleast have an article on ru.wiki or uk.wiki. We're giving
WP:UNDUE weight to this flash in the pan hoax and its perpetrator.
RosarioBerganza05:49, 2 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete (revised; see below) per
WP:BLP1E. I don't think
WP:SINGLEEVENT is the right guideline here - neither the person nor the event are notable. There seems to be only one source that is actually about her hoax motorcycle trip.
Ivanvector (
talk)
02:49, 3 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect There are a few reliable sources that mention her after the one event. However, it's all about the hoax, and after weighing it, it probably doesn't constitute significant coverage.
Nwlaw63 (
talk)
14:52, 3 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.