The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
USS Bassett. Consensus that the topic is not notable. Any useful content is preserved in the page history and may be merged into other articles as deemed appropriate.
(non-admin closure) (
t ·
c) buidhe 13:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep A warship was named after him which is a "significant award or honor and so passes
WP:ANYBIO.
Andrew🐉(
talk) 18:50, 23 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
USS Bassett. Fails
WP:SOLDIER (Ensign awarded a Navy Cross. Having a ship named after him during WWII is not a "significant award or honor") and
WP:GNG. No SIGCOV in multiple RS so not notable.
Mztourist (
talk) 03:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Merge to
USS Bassett. I concur he doesn't meet NBIO/NSOLDIER but there is some mergeable content here (sadly there are next to no inline refs in the article, but we can probably AGF the content...). The ship can have a section about its non-notable namesake.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 09:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete having a ship named after you is not a sign of notability when ships are being churned out left and right and there is an odd decision that they must be named after someone.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 16:44, 25 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect and Merge to
USS Bassett, it's more appropriate to have relevant information (specifically military career and Navy Cross action) about a ship's namesake in the ship's article than a completely separate article. Best,
GPL93 (
talk) 14:13, 28 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Merge to
USS Bassett. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
WP:GNG, and doesn't meet
WP:NSOLDIER, but there is some information which would make a nice addition on the ship article.
Onel5969TT me 18:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Northern Escapee (
talk) 05:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect as not enough coverage.
Setreis (
talk) 07:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
USS Bassett. Consensus that the topic is not notable. Any useful content is preserved in the page history and may be merged into other articles as deemed appropriate.
(non-admin closure) (
t ·
c) buidhe 13:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep A warship was named after him which is a "significant award or honor and so passes
WP:ANYBIO.
Andrew🐉(
talk) 18:50, 23 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
USS Bassett. Fails
WP:SOLDIER (Ensign awarded a Navy Cross. Having a ship named after him during WWII is not a "significant award or honor") and
WP:GNG. No SIGCOV in multiple RS so not notable.
Mztourist (
talk) 03:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Merge to
USS Bassett. I concur he doesn't meet NBIO/NSOLDIER but there is some mergeable content here (sadly there are next to no inline refs in the article, but we can probably AGF the content...). The ship can have a section about its non-notable namesake.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 09:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete having a ship named after you is not a sign of notability when ships are being churned out left and right and there is an odd decision that they must be named after someone.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 16:44, 25 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect and Merge to
USS Bassett, it's more appropriate to have relevant information (specifically military career and Navy Cross action) about a ship's namesake in the ship's article than a completely separate article. Best,
GPL93 (
talk) 14:13, 28 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Merge to
USS Bassett. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
WP:GNG, and doesn't meet
WP:NSOLDIER, but there is some information which would make a nice addition on the ship article.
Onel5969TT me 18:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Northern Escapee (
talk) 05:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect as not enough coverage.
Setreis (
talk) 07:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.