- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:31, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DVJ ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an article that just never should have existed. I read it and still don't understand what the topic is. First, it starts talking about a person who play music like a dj, but isn't because he also plays video. So like I did, you're probably thinking its a VJ (remember when they used to have them on MTV)? But no, the article insists that they are not that either. Next the article takes a left-turn and goes into an in-depth discussion about some obscure device that Pioneer put out 15 years ago. (I guess it never caught on). The article uses made-up terms such as "DVJ discs"(Google it, there's no such thing), and "DVJ player"/"DVJ mixer". (other than the Pioneer device, that doesn't exist either) This article is pure WP:OR and WP:SYNTH Rusf10 ( talk) 03:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete with prejudice. This cruft has been around here since 2007. How is that even possible? Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 11:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per accurate reasoning by nom. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 11:17, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete largely per nom; article is a vast sea of WP:OR mixed with semi-promotional details, although there does appear to be a (i.e., one) book, How to DVJ: A Digital DJ Masterclass, indicating that, at one time (2007?), there was a wave the author was hoping to ride. Wave seems to have crashed though as, even in Internet era, nothing else seems to discuss this subject, implying WP:GNG failure, too. — JohnFromPinckney ( talk) 13:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per JohnFromPinckney, article is full of WP:OR, and was possibly made by someone trying to jump on a fad. User:Kosmosnaut87 17:59, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete because it is not a thing. Kudos to the nominator for hunting this one down and for reading through the mush. Should be deleted per WP:OR and WP:SYNTH, and possibly an attempted WP:PROMOTION for a device that was new at the time but didn't catch on. Better late than never. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 23:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nom and also there aren't supporting citations. Lesliechin1 ( talk) 18:55, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - 2pou ( talk) 14:13, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:31, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DVJ ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an article that just never should have existed. I read it and still don't understand what the topic is. First, it starts talking about a person who play music like a dj, but isn't because he also plays video. So like I did, you're probably thinking its a VJ (remember when they used to have them on MTV)? But no, the article insists that they are not that either. Next the article takes a left-turn and goes into an in-depth discussion about some obscure device that Pioneer put out 15 years ago. (I guess it never caught on). The article uses made-up terms such as "DVJ discs"(Google it, there's no such thing), and "DVJ player"/"DVJ mixer". (other than the Pioneer device, that doesn't exist either) This article is pure WP:OR and WP:SYNTH Rusf10 ( talk) 03:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete with prejudice. This cruft has been around here since 2007. How is that even possible? Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 11:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per accurate reasoning by nom. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 11:17, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete largely per nom; article is a vast sea of WP:OR mixed with semi-promotional details, although there does appear to be a (i.e., one) book, How to DVJ: A Digital DJ Masterclass, indicating that, at one time (2007?), there was a wave the author was hoping to ride. Wave seems to have crashed though as, even in Internet era, nothing else seems to discuss this subject, implying WP:GNG failure, too. — JohnFromPinckney ( talk) 13:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per JohnFromPinckney, article is full of WP:OR, and was possibly made by someone trying to jump on a fad. User:Kosmosnaut87 17:59, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete because it is not a thing. Kudos to the nominator for hunting this one down and for reading through the mush. Should be deleted per WP:OR and WP:SYNTH, and possibly an attempted WP:PROMOTION for a device that was new at the time but didn't catch on. Better late than never. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 23:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nom and also there aren't supporting citations. Lesliechin1 ( talk) 18:55, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - 2pou ( talk) 14:13, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.