The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
non notable rapper - no in depth coverage and the sources in the article are blatantly fake sources run by blackhat SEO firms and otherwise unreliable.
Praxidicae (
talk)
11:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Borderline speedy delete via G11. Zero chance of passing any notability standard. And per nom, sources are wholly unreliable. I'm starting to find a high correlation between the use of exclamation marks in reference titles and unreliability.
Sulfurboy (
talk)
03:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Scoffworld, I would like you to read
WP:NEWARTICLE, which explains that you can't use this argument. Just because you are still working on the article doesn't mean it's a good excuse, especially when considering deletion based on notability.
Koridas (
Speak)
17:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - No reliable sourcing. All of them are primary or passing sources, and some of them cite the same source over and over.
Koridas (
Speak)
17:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:SIGCOV,
WP:MILL. Many thousands of musicians, professional and amateur, have "attended" SXSW. There's zero evidence of touring, reviews, deals, awards, or acclaim outside of the locality of
Rockford, Illinois. If this were 2007, a fan's advocacy could be excused, but it's 2020, and everybody knows we are not a "MusicSpaceFaceIn" for rappers. Sorry.
Bearian (
talk)
01:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
non notable rapper - no in depth coverage and the sources in the article are blatantly fake sources run by blackhat SEO firms and otherwise unreliable.
Praxidicae (
talk)
11:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Borderline speedy delete via G11. Zero chance of passing any notability standard. And per nom, sources are wholly unreliable. I'm starting to find a high correlation between the use of exclamation marks in reference titles and unreliability.
Sulfurboy (
talk)
03:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Scoffworld, I would like you to read
WP:NEWARTICLE, which explains that you can't use this argument. Just because you are still working on the article doesn't mean it's a good excuse, especially when considering deletion based on notability.
Koridas (
Speak)
17:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - No reliable sourcing. All of them are primary or passing sources, and some of them cite the same source over and over.
Koridas (
Speak)
17:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:SIGCOV,
WP:MILL. Many thousands of musicians, professional and amateur, have "attended" SXSW. There's zero evidence of touring, reviews, deals, awards, or acclaim outside of the locality of
Rockford, Illinois. If this were 2007, a fan's advocacy could be excused, but it's 2020, and everybody knows we are not a "MusicSpaceFaceIn" for rappers. Sorry.
Bearian (
talk)
01:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.