- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Corporal (band)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Corporal (band) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND -- FMSky ( talk) 04:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music. FMSky ( talk) 04:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion: previously PRODded.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:13, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails GNG, and seems to have a promotional angle besides. Also, one of the sources is the band's own website, the only other one being insufficient to establish notability. -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk) 12:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:21, 11 May 2023 (UTC)- Weak keep: fails WP:BAND, and also SIGCOV, however, (1) the prominence of one of its members, and (2) contemporaneous coverage from both BrooklynVegan, and AV Club Chicago leads me to the conclusion that this band was/is notable enough at a local level to be GNG notable Jack4576 ( talk) 09:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails GNG and ORG. Sources in article are not IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Keep vote mentions the lack of SIGCOV, the point about prominate member is covered under NOTINHERITED. I don't see properly sourced material for a merge, but no objection to a consensus redirect if one emerges. // Timothy :: talk 00:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: fails GNG and notability is not inherited. Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 16:38, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Corporal (band)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Corporal (band) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND -- FMSky ( talk) 04:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music. FMSky ( talk) 04:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion: previously PRODded.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:13, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails GNG, and seems to have a promotional angle besides. Also, one of the sources is the band's own website, the only other one being insufficient to establish notability. -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk) 12:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:21, 11 May 2023 (UTC)- Weak keep: fails WP:BAND, and also SIGCOV, however, (1) the prominence of one of its members, and (2) contemporaneous coverage from both BrooklynVegan, and AV Club Chicago leads me to the conclusion that this band was/is notable enough at a local level to be GNG notable Jack4576 ( talk) 09:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails GNG and ORG. Sources in article are not IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Keep vote mentions the lack of SIGCOV, the point about prominate member is covered under NOTINHERITED. I don't see properly sourced material for a merge, but no objection to a consensus redirect if one emerges. // Timothy :: talk 00:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: fails GNG and notability is not inherited. Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 16:38, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.