The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This really strikes me as an attack page, so I have CSD'd it. The unsuppressed version is
here.
--- Possibly (
talk)
Well, that did not work, so let's go delete on this. There is significant recent coverage of the June 2021 billion dollar plan, but very little before that. GNG fail.
--- Possibly (
talk)
18:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. The article's subject, Corey Hawtin, appears to have received
significant coverage from multiple reliable sources over an extended period of time relating to his role as the founder of Core Development Group. These include The Toronto Star, Barrie Today, The Globe and Mail, Urban Toronto, etc. If we're worried about biological details aside from public coverage, a
wedding page and
this bio of his would be a place to start for uncontroversial facts about his personal life/education. At this point, the remnants of the original page have been deleted and the violating edits appear to have been revdel'd/suppressed. As a result, I think that the page itself cannot possibly reasonably be seen to constitute an attack page at this point and the individual passes
WP:GNG and
WP:BASIC. —
Mikehawk10 (
talk)
22:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)reply
A week is not an extended period of time. The first three (the Star, Barrie Today and the Globe) are all from within one week in June 2021. Same story. The fourth is some kind of review on a webinar, from the previous year, which doesn't seem very journalistic. The two bio sources are self-published, but could be OK if RS existed to prove notability. ---
Possibly☎20:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This really strikes me as an attack page, so I have CSD'd it. The unsuppressed version is
here.
--- Possibly (
talk)
Well, that did not work, so let's go delete on this. There is significant recent coverage of the June 2021 billion dollar plan, but very little before that. GNG fail.
--- Possibly (
talk)
18:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. The article's subject, Corey Hawtin, appears to have received
significant coverage from multiple reliable sources over an extended period of time relating to his role as the founder of Core Development Group. These include The Toronto Star, Barrie Today, The Globe and Mail, Urban Toronto, etc. If we're worried about biological details aside from public coverage, a
wedding page and
this bio of his would be a place to start for uncontroversial facts about his personal life/education. At this point, the remnants of the original page have been deleted and the violating edits appear to have been revdel'd/suppressed. As a result, I think that the page itself cannot possibly reasonably be seen to constitute an attack page at this point and the individual passes
WP:GNG and
WP:BASIC. —
Mikehawk10 (
talk)
22:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)reply
A week is not an extended period of time. The first three (the Star, Barrie Today and the Globe) are all from within one week in June 2021. Same story. The fourth is some kind of review on a webinar, from the previous year, which doesn't seem very journalistic. The two bio sources are self-published, but could be OK if RS existed to prove notability. ---
Possibly☎20:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.