The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non
notable journo. Lacks coverage about Robinson instead of by him. 30 journalist under 30 is not a major award. Article was created by a banned editor returning with a bunch of socks. Sourced largely to a bunch of primary sources and misrepresented sources. Of the sources worth noting:
17, 18. Supposedly by Noonan Tom and WN.com. Actually from PRNewswire by Sirius XM Holdings Inc. with Andrew FitzPatrick as media contact. Used twice in a row for the same claim, does not mention Robinson.
2=3, 4=5, 8=9. 10=11, 12=13, 15=16. Each the same articles used back to back to make it look likes there is more sources than there is.
A mix of promotion and deception that should be deleted.
duffbeerforme (
talk) 10:17, 2 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non
notable journo. Lacks coverage about Robinson instead of by him. 30 journalist under 30 is not a major award. Article was created by a banned editor returning with a bunch of socks. Sourced largely to a bunch of primary sources and misrepresented sources. Of the sources worth noting:
17, 18. Supposedly by Noonan Tom and WN.com. Actually from PRNewswire by Sirius XM Holdings Inc. with Andrew FitzPatrick as media contact. Used twice in a row for the same claim, does not mention Robinson.
2=3, 4=5, 8=9. 10=11, 12=13, 15=16. Each the same articles used back to back to make it look likes there is more sources than there is.
A mix of promotion and deception that should be deleted.
duffbeerforme (
talk) 10:17, 2 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.